Join 60,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Info Community Demographics Summary (GTFIH)

imareasonableman

in a heartbeat
Reputable
Established
Joined
Nov 26, 2025
Messages
958
Solutions
2
Time Online
4d 9h
Reputation
2,594
tl;dr at bottom

Disclaimer: Treat this data as more of an analysis of indicative trends, not hard facts.

Less than 20% of the community responded. So I did some guesswork. If you look at the articles (which no one does tbh), it shows this:

"Primary regions: Europe (40%) and North America (34.9%), followed by Asia (17.7%)" This will serve as a foundation (of sorts) for the data predictions seen later in this thread. Anyways, according to the poll and extra information gathered in its comments, the demographics follow this trend:

Among 33 (smh) respondents, the largest self-identified group was White / European, which was a little less than 40% of the community. But this category is internally heterogeneous, and it's my fault for not realizing this earlier. Multiple ppl commented and clarified that White / European is far too broad of a category, including English, Italian, half Italian/Spanish hybrid, Mediterranean, distant mixed ancestry, etc etc. And what that information suggests is that the White / European category is over-aggregated and masks ethnic diversity. Overt neglect on my end tbh.

And I think at least partially as a result of this, both the Mixed / Multiracial and Other categories were elevated. Like I said before, the comments can mostly explain this. Central Asians didn't have a clear category to choose; Mediterranean and Hispanics were caught between ambiguous racial and ethnic labels; and at least one black respondent was socially perceived as mixed.

But what I found interesting was that Asian representation was notably high (stfu anime gooners.) The poll revealed these stats:

  • East Asian (18%)
  • South Asian (15%)
  • Southeast Asian (6%)

If you look at the numbers this is actually really interesting. If the data is scaled to the active community of 170-200+ users, Asian-identifying respondents actually rival or exceed White / European representation (when overlap is considered.)

Black (12%), Mena (12%), Indigenous (6%), and Pacific islander (6%) respondents are also present in smaller but non-trivial numbers.

Compared to general internet demographics:

  • White representation is lower than average (typically around ~60–70%, which I found really surprising)
  • Asian representation is significantly higher
  • Mixed/Other responses are dramatically higher
  • The distribution is more globally skewed and less Anglo-centric
categoryestimated # of users(# of users)
White / European7141 – 101
Black / African225 – 49
East Asian339 – 56
South Asian275 – 52
Southeast Asian112 – 36
Middle Eastern / North African225 – 49
Native American / Alaska Native112 – 36
Pacific Islander112 – 36
Mixed / Multiracial4923 – 79
Other275 – 52

1767373051986.webp

***on second thought nowhere near 95% CI but i'm too lazy to fix it***

Notes / Interpretation:

  • White / European: Still the largest single group, but could realistically be anywhere from ~40 to 100 users. Also includes Italian, Mediterranean, half Italian/half Spanish, English, etc. Very internally diverse group, should've accounted for that in original poll.
  • Asian: Combined ~71 (east + south + southeast), similar to White / European in representation. Much higher than typical internet spaces, I wonder why. Self-selection bias? Underrepresentation? In any case, the number is at least moderate, as shown in official demographics.
  • Mixed / Other: Combined ~76, bc of ambiguous identities; Central Asian, Hispanic, etc. Huge overlap possible.
  • Smaller groups (Black, MENA, Pacific, Indigenous) minor but still visible; ranges are wide due to low sample size.
tl;dr: ngl I got lazy for this part, but: less than 20% of the community responded, so numbers are rough estimates. white/european is the largest single group but internally diverse (italian, mediterranean, english, mixed ancestry). asian users are surprisingly high and combined, rival white / european. mixed / other is huge bc of ambiguous identities (central asian, hispanic, black socially perceived as mixed). smaller groups (black, MENA, pacific, indigenous) are present but barely. overall, the community skews euro/north america geographically but is ethnically diverse and far less anglo-centric than typical internet spaces.



tags better have worked 😡😡
 
Register to hide this ad
tl;dr at bottom

Disclaimer: Treat this data as more of an analysis of indicative trends, not hard facts.

Less than 20% of the community responded. So I did some guesswork. If you look at the articles (which no one does tbh), it shows this:


"Primary regions: Europe (40%) and North America (34.9%), followed by Asia (17.7%)" This will serve as a foundation (of sorts) for the data predictions seen later in this thread. Anyways, according to the poll and extra information gathered in its comments, the demographics follow this trend:

Among 33 (smh) respondents, the largest self-identified group was White / European, which was a little less than 40% of the community. But this category is internally heterogeneous, and it's my fault for not realizing this earlier. Multiple ppl commented and clarified that White / European is far too broad of a category, including English, Italian, half Italian/Spanish hybrid, Mediterranean, distant mixed ancestry, etc etc. And what that information suggests is that the White / European category is over-aggregated and masks ethnic diversity. Overt neglect on my end tbh.

And I think at least partially as a result of this, both the Mixed / Multiracial and Other categories were elevated. Like I said before, the comments can mostly explain this. Central Asians didn't have a clear category to choose; Mediterranean and Hispanics were caught between ambiguous racial and ethnic labels; and at least one black respondent was socially perceived as mixed.

But what I found interesting was that Asian representation was notably high (stfu anime gooners.) The poll revealed these stats:

  • East Asian (18%)
  • South Asian (15%)
  • Southeast Asian (6%)

If you look at the numbers this is actually really interesting. If the data is scaled to the active community of 170-200+ users, Asian-identifying respondents actually rival or exceed White / European representation (when overlap is considered.)

Black (12%), Mena (12%), Indigenous (6%), and Pacific islander (6%) respondents are also present in smaller but non-trivial numbers.

Compared to general internet demographics:

  • White representation is lower than average (typically around ~60–70%, which I found really surprising)
  • Asian representation is significantly higher
  • Mixed/Other responses are dramatically higher
  • The distribution is more globally skewed and less Anglo-centric
categoryestimated # of users(# of users)
White / European7141 – 101
Black / African225 – 49
East Asian339 – 56
South Asian275 – 52
Southeast Asian112 – 36
Middle Eastern / North African225 – 49
Native American / Alaska Native112 – 36
Pacific Islander112 – 36
Mixed / Multiracial4923 – 79
Other275 – 52

View attachment 253034
***on second thought nowhere near 95% CI but i'm too lazy to fix it***

Notes / Interpretation:

  • White / European: Still the largest single group, but could realistically be anywhere from ~40 to 100 users. Also includes Italian, Mediterranean, half Italian/half Spanish, English, etc. Very internally diverse group, should've accounted for that in original poll.
  • Asian: Combined ~71 (east + south + southeast), similar to White / European in representation. Much higher than typical internet spaces, I wonder why. Self-selection bias? Underrepresentation? In any case, the number is at least moderate, as shown in official demographics.
  • Mixed / Other: Combined ~76, bc of ambiguous identities; Central Asian, Hispanic, etc. Huge overlap possible.
  • Smaller groups (Black, MENA, Pacific, Indigenous) minor but still visible; ranges are wide due to low sample size.
tl;dr: ngl I got lazy for this part, but: less than 20% of the community responded, so numbers are rough estimates. white/european is the largest single group but internally diverse (italian, mediterranean, english, mixed ancestry). asian users are surprisingly high and combined, rival white / european. mixed / other is huge bc of ambiguous identities (central asian, hispanic, black socially perceived as mixed). smaller groups (black, MENA, pacific, indigenous) are present but barely. overall, the community skews euro/north america geographically but is ethnically diverse and far less anglo-centric than typical internet spaces.



tags better have worked 😡😡
maybe change font color and I wouldn't have to highlight everything to read
 
i wouldve thought MENA region would be way more tbh
me too, but when I was doing the math (horribly I might add), it came out to a 80%+ chance that the amount of them was 10-50. so realistically it can be anywhere between there. take that how you will.
 
tl;dr at bottom

Disclaimer: Treat this data as more of an analysis of indicative trends, not hard facts.

Less than 20% of the community responded. So I did some guesswork. If you look at the articles (which no one does tbh), it shows this:

"Primary regions: Europe (40%) and North America (34.9%), followed by Asia (17.7%)" This will serve as a foundation (of sorts) for the data predictions seen later in this thread. Anyways, according to the poll and extra information gathered in its comments, the demographics follow this trend:

Among 33 (smh) respondents, the largest self-identified group was White / European, which was a little less than 40% of the community. But this category is internally heterogeneous, and it's my fault for not realizing this earlier. Multiple ppl commented and clarified that White / European is far too broad of a category, including English, Italian, half Italian/Spanish hybrid, Mediterranean, distant mixed ancestry, etc etc. And what that information suggests is that the White / European category is over-aggregated and masks ethnic diversity. Overt neglect on my end tbh.

And I think at least partially as a result of this, both the Mixed / Multiracial and Other categories were elevated. Like I said before, the comments can mostly explain this. Central Asians didn't have a clear category to choose; Mediterranean and Hispanics were caught between ambiguous racial and ethnic labels; and at least one black respondent was socially perceived as mixed.

But what I found interesting was that Asian representation was notably high (stfu anime gooners.) The poll revealed these stats:

  • East Asian (18%)
  • South Asian (15%)
  • Southeast Asian (6%)

If you look at the numbers this is actually really interesting. If the data is scaled to the active community of 170-200+ users, Asian-identifying respondents actually rival or exceed White / European representation (when overlap is considered.)

Black (12%), Mena (12%), Indigenous (6%), and Pacific islander (6%) respondents are also present in smaller but non-trivial numbers.

Compared to general internet demographics:


  • White representation is lower than average (typically around ~60–70%, which I found really surprising)
  • Asian representation is significantly higher
  • Mixed/Other responses are dramatically higher
  • The distribution is more globally skewed and less Anglo-centric
categoryestimated # of users(# of users)
White / European7141 – 101
Black / African225 – 49
East Asian339 – 56
South Asian275 – 52
Southeast Asian112 – 36
Middle Eastern / North African225 – 49
Native American / Alaska Native112 – 36
Pacific Islander112 – 36
Mixed / Multiracial4923 – 79
Other275 – 52

View attachment 253034
***on second thought nowhere near 95% CI but i'm too lazy to fix it***

Notes / Interpretation:


  • White / European: Still the largest single group, but could realistically be anywhere from ~40 to 100 users. Also includes Italian, Mediterranean, half Italian/half Spanish, English, etc. Very internally diverse group, should've accounted for that in original poll.
  • Asian: Combined ~71 (east + south + southeast), similar to White / European in representation. Much higher than typical internet spaces, I wonder why. Self-selection bias? Underrepresentation? In any case, the number is at least moderate, as shown in official demographics.
  • Mixed / Other: Combined ~76, bc of ambiguous identities; Central Asian, Hispanic, etc. Huge overlap possible.
  • Smaller groups (Black, MENA, Pacific, Indigenous) minor but still visible; ranges are wide due to low sample size.
tl;dr: ngl I got lazy for this part, but: less than 20% of the community responded, so numbers are rough estimates. white/european is the largest single group but internally diverse (italian, mediterranean, english, mixed ancestry). asian users are surprisingly high and combined, rival white / european. mixed / other is huge bc of ambiguous identities (central asian, hispanic, black socially perceived as mixed). smaller groups (black, MENA, pacific, indigenous) are present but barely. overall, the community skews euro/north america geographically but is ethnically diverse and far less anglo-centric than typical internet spaces.



tags better have worked 😡😡
Holy effort
 
tl;dr at bottom

Disclaimer: Treat this data as more of an analysis of indicative trends, not hard facts.

Less than 20% of the community responded. So I did some guesswork. If you look at the articles (which no one does tbh), it shows this:

"Primary regions: Europe (40%) and North America (34.9%), followed by Asia (17.7%)" This will serve as a foundation (of sorts) for the data predictions seen later in this thread. Anyways, according to the poll and extra information gathered in its comments, the demographics follow this trend:

Among 33 (smh) respondents, the largest self-identified group was White / European, which was a little less than 40% of the community. But this category is internally heterogeneous, and it's my fault for not realizing this earlier. Multiple ppl commented and clarified that White / European is far too broad of a category, including English, Italian, half Italian/Spanish hybrid, Mediterranean, distant mixed ancestry, etc etc. And what that information suggests is that the White / European category is over-aggregated and masks ethnic diversity. Overt neglect on my end tbh.

And I think at least partially as a result of this, both the Mixed / Multiracial and Other categories were elevated. Like I said before, the comments can mostly explain this. Central Asians didn't have a clear category to choose; Mediterranean and Hispanics were caught between ambiguous racial and ethnic labels; and at least one black respondent was socially perceived as mixed.

But what I found interesting was that Asian representation was notably high (stfu anime gooners.) The poll revealed these stats:

  • East Asian (18%)
  • South Asian (15%)
  • Southeast Asian (6%)

If you look at the numbers this is actually really interesting. If the data is scaled to the active community of 170-200+ users, Asian-identifying respondents actually rival or exceed White / European representation (when overlap is considered.)

Black (12%), Mena (12%), Indigenous (6%), and Pacific islander (6%) respondents are also present in smaller but non-trivial numbers.

Compared to general internet demographics:


  • White representation is lower than average (typically around ~60–70%, which I found really surprising)
  • Asian representation is significantly higher
  • Mixed/Other responses are dramatically higher
  • The distribution is more globally skewed and less Anglo-centric
categoryestimated # of users(# of users)
White / European7141 – 101
Black / African225 – 49
East Asian339 – 56
South Asian275 – 52
Southeast Asian112 – 36
Middle Eastern / North African225 – 49
Native American / Alaska Native112 – 36
Pacific Islander112 – 36
Mixed / Multiracial4923 – 79
Other275 – 52

View attachment 253034
***on second thought nowhere near 95% CI but i'm too lazy to fix it***

Notes / Interpretation:


  • White / European: Still the largest single group, but could realistically be anywhere from ~40 to 100 users. Also includes Italian, Mediterranean, half Italian/half Spanish, English, etc. Very internally diverse group, should've accounted for that in original poll.
  • Asian: Combined ~71 (east + south + southeast), similar to White / European in representation. Much higher than typical internet spaces, I wonder why. Self-selection bias? Underrepresentation? In any case, the number is at least moderate, as shown in official demographics.
  • Mixed / Other: Combined ~76, bc of ambiguous identities; Central Asian, Hispanic, etc. Huge overlap possible.
  • Smaller groups (Black, MENA, Pacific, Indigenous) minor but still visible; ranges are wide due to low sample size.
tl;dr: ngl I got lazy for this part, but: less than 20% of the community responded, so numbers are rough estimates. white/european is the largest single group but internally diverse (italian, mediterranean, english, mixed ancestry). asian users are surprisingly high and combined, rival white / european. mixed / other is huge bc of ambiguous identities (central asian, hispanic, black socially perceived as mixed). smaller groups (black, MENA, pacific, indigenous) are present but barely. overall, the community skews euro/north america geographically but is ethnically diverse and far less anglo-centric than typical internet spaces.



tags better have worked 😡😡
This is wrong, we are all from Bangladesh
 
Tag more people in the thread where you ask abt their ethnicity
 
tl;dr at bottom

Disclaimer: Treat this data as more of an analysis of indicative trends, not hard facts.

Less than 20% of the community responded. So I did some guesswork. If you look at the articles (which no one does tbh), it shows this:

"Primary regions: Europe (40%) and North America (34.9%), followed by Asia (17.7%)" This will serve as a foundation (of sorts) for the data predictions seen later in this thread. Anyways, according to the poll and extra information gathered in its comments, the demographics follow this trend:

Among 33 (smh) respondents, the largest self-identified group was White / European, which was a little less than 40% of the community. But this category is internally heterogeneous, and it's my fault for not realizing this earlier. Multiple ppl commented and clarified that White / European is far too broad of a category, including English, Italian, half Italian/Spanish hybrid, Mediterranean, distant mixed ancestry, etc etc. And what that information suggests is that the White / European category is over-aggregated and masks ethnic diversity. Overt neglect on my end tbh.

And I think at least partially as a result of this, both the Mixed / Multiracial and Other categories were elevated. Like I said before, the comments can mostly explain this. Central Asians didn't have a clear category to choose; Mediterranean and Hispanics were caught between ambiguous racial and ethnic labels; and at least one black respondent was socially perceived as mixed.

But what I found interesting was that Asian representation was notably high (stfu anime gooners.) The poll revealed these stats:

  • East Asian (18%)
  • South Asian (15%)
  • Southeast Asian (6%)

If you look at the numbers this is actually really interesting. If the data is scaled to the active community of 170-200+ users, Asian-identifying respondents actually rival or exceed White / European representation (when overlap is considered.)

Black (12%), Mena (12%), Indigenous (6%), and Pacific islander (6%) respondents are also present in smaller but non-trivial numbers.

Compared to general internet demographics:


  • White representation is lower than average (typically around ~60–70%, which I found really surprising)
  • Asian representation is significantly higher
  • Mixed/Other responses are dramatically higher
  • The distribution is more globally skewed and less Anglo-centric
categoryestimated # of users(# of users)
White / European7141 – 101
Black / African225 – 49
East Asian339 – 56
South Asian275 – 52
Southeast Asian112 – 36
Middle Eastern / North African225 – 49
Native American / Alaska Native112 – 36
Pacific Islander112 – 36
Mixed / Multiracial4923 – 79
Other275 – 52

View attachment 253034
***on second thought nowhere near 95% CI but i'm too lazy to fix it***

Notes / Interpretation:


  • White / European: Still the largest single group, but could realistically be anywhere from ~40 to 100 users. Also includes Italian, Mediterranean, half Italian/half Spanish, English, etc. Very internally diverse group, should've accounted for that in original poll.
  • Asian: Combined ~71 (east + south + southeast), similar to White / European in representation. Much higher than typical internet spaces, I wonder why. Self-selection bias? Underrepresentation? In any case, the number is at least moderate, as shown in official demographics.
  • Mixed / Other: Combined ~76, bc of ambiguous identities; Central Asian, Hispanic, etc. Huge overlap possible.
  • Smaller groups (Black, MENA, Pacific, Indigenous) minor but still visible; ranges are wide due to low sample size.
tl;dr: ngl I got lazy for this part, but: less than 20% of the community responded, so numbers are rough estimates. white/european is the largest single group but internally diverse (italian, mediterranean, english, mixed ancestry). asian users are surprisingly high and combined, rival white / european. mixed / other is huge bc of ambiguous identities (central asian, hispanic, black socially perceived as mixed). smaller groups (black, MENA, pacific, indigenous) are present but barely. overall, the community skews euro/north america geographically but is ethnically diverse and far less anglo-centric than typical internet spaces.



tags better have worked 😡😡
Very good post I enjoyed reading
 
tl;dr at bottom

Disclaimer: Treat this data as more of an analysis of indicative trends, not hard facts.

Less than 20% of the community responded. So I did some guesswork. If you look at the articles (which no one does tbh), it shows this:

"Primary regions: Europe (40%) and North America (34.9%), followed by Asia (17.7%)" This will serve as a foundation (of sorts) for the data predictions seen later in this thread. Anyways, according to the poll and extra information gathered in its comments, the demographics follow this trend:

Among 33 (smh) respondents, the largest self-identified group was White / European, which was a little less than 40% of the community. But this category is internally heterogeneous, and it's my fault for not realizing this earlier. Multiple ppl commented and clarified that White / European is far too broad of a category, including English, Italian, half Italian/Spanish hybrid, Mediterranean, distant mixed ancestry, etc etc. And what that information suggests is that the White / European category is over-aggregated and masks ethnic diversity. Overt neglect on my end tbh.

And I think at least partially as a result of this, both the Mixed / Multiracial and Other categories were elevated. Like I said before, the comments can mostly explain this. Central Asians didn't have a clear category to choose; Mediterranean and Hispanics were caught between ambiguous racial and ethnic labels; and at least one black respondent was socially perceived as mixed.

But what I found interesting was that Asian representation was notably high (stfu anime gooners.) The poll revealed these stats:

  • East Asian (18%)
  • South Asian (15%)
  • Southeast Asian (6%)

If you look at the numbers this is actually really interesting. If the data is scaled to the active community of 170-200+ users, Asian-identifying respondents actually rival or exceed White / European representation (when overlap is considered.)

Black (12%), Mena (12%), Indigenous (6%), and Pacific islander (6%) respondents are also present in smaller but non-trivial numbers.

Compared to general internet demographics:


  • White representation is lower than average (typically around ~60–70%, which I found really surprising)
  • Asian representation is significantly higher
  • Mixed/Other responses are dramatically higher
  • The distribution is more globally skewed and less Anglo-centric
categoryestimated # of users(# of users)
White / European7141 – 101
Black / African225 – 49
East Asian339 – 56
South Asian275 – 52
Southeast Asian112 – 36
Middle Eastern / North African225 – 49
Native American / Alaska Native112 – 36
Pacific Islander112 – 36
Mixed / Multiracial4923 – 79
Other275 – 52

View attachment 253034
***on second thought nowhere near 95% CI but i'm too lazy to fix it***

Notes / Interpretation:


  • White / European: Still the largest single group, but could realistically be anywhere from ~40 to 100 users. Also includes Italian, Mediterranean, half Italian/half Spanish, English, etc. Very internally diverse group, should've accounted for that in original poll.
  • Asian: Combined ~71 (east + south + southeast), similar to White / European in representation. Much higher than typical internet spaces, I wonder why. Self-selection bias? Underrepresentation? In any case, the number is at least moderate, as shown in official demographics.
  • Mixed / Other: Combined ~76, bc of ambiguous identities; Central Asian, Hispanic, etc. Huge overlap possible.
  • Smaller groups (Black, MENA, Pacific, Indigenous) minor but still visible; ranges are wide due to low sample size.
tl;dr: ngl I got lazy for this part, but: less than 20% of the community responded, so numbers are rough estimates. white/european is the largest single group but internally diverse (italian, mediterranean, english, mixed ancestry). asian users are surprisingly high and combined, rival white / european. mixed / other is huge bc of ambiguous identities (central asian, hispanic, black socially perceived as mixed). smaller groups (black, MENA, pacific, indigenous) are present but barely. overall, the community skews euro/north america geographically but is ethnically diverse and far less anglo-centric than typical internet spaces.



tags better have worked 😡😡
yeye w thread skimmed and scanned through it most of its water
 
tl;dr at bottom

Disclaimer: Treat this data as more of an analysis of indicative trends, not hard facts.

Less than 20% of the community responded. So I did some guesswork. If you look at the articles (which no one does tbh), it shows this:

"Primary regions: Europe (40%) and North America (34.9%), followed by Asia (17.7%)" This will serve as a foundation (of sorts) for the data predictions seen later in this thread. Anyways, according to the poll and extra information gathered in its comments, the demographics follow this trend:

Among 33 (smh) respondents, the largest self-identified group was White / European, which was a little less than 40% of the community. But this category is internally heterogeneous, and it's my fault for not realizing this earlier. Multiple ppl commented and clarified that White / European is far too broad of a category, including English, Italian, half Italian/Spanish hybrid, Mediterranean, distant mixed ancestry, etc etc. And what that information suggests is that the White / European category is over-aggregated and masks ethnic diversity. Overt neglect on my end tbh.

And I think at least partially as a result of this, both the Mixed / Multiracial and Other categories were elevated. Like I said before, the comments can mostly explain this. Central Asians didn't have a clear category to choose; Mediterranean and Hispanics were caught between ambiguous racial and ethnic labels; and at least one black respondent was socially perceived as mixed.

But what I found interesting was that Asian representation was notably high (stfu anime gooners.) The poll revealed these stats:

  • East Asian (18%)
  • South Asian (15%)
  • Southeast Asian (6%)

If you look at the numbers this is actually really interesting. If the data is scaled to the active community of 170-200+ users, Asian-identifying respondents actually rival or exceed White / European representation (when overlap is considered.)

Black (12%), Mena (12%), Indigenous (6%), and Pacific islander (6%) respondents are also present in smaller but non-trivial numbers.

Compared to general internet demographics:


  • White representation is lower than average (typically around ~60–70%, which I found really surprising)
  • Asian representation is significantly higher
  • Mixed/Other responses are dramatically higher
  • The distribution is more globally skewed and less Anglo-centric
categoryestimated # of users(# of users)
White / European7141 – 101
Black / African225 – 49
East Asian339 – 56
South Asian275 – 52
Southeast Asian112 – 36
Middle Eastern / North African225 – 49
Native American / Alaska Native112 – 36
Pacific Islander112 – 36
Mixed / Multiracial4923 – 79
Other275 – 52

View attachment 253034
***on second thought nowhere near 95% CI but i'm too lazy to fix it***

Notes / Interpretation:


  • White / European: Still the largest single group, but could realistically be anywhere from ~40 to 100 users. Also includes Italian, Mediterranean, half Italian/half Spanish, English, etc. Very internally diverse group, should've accounted for that in original poll.
  • Asian: Combined ~71 (east + south + southeast), similar to White / European in representation. Much higher than typical internet spaces, I wonder why. Self-selection bias? Underrepresentation? In any case, the number is at least moderate, as shown in official demographics.
  • Mixed / Other: Combined ~76, bc of ambiguous identities; Central Asian, Hispanic, etc. Huge overlap possible.
  • Smaller groups (Black, MENA, Pacific, Indigenous) minor but still visible; ranges are wide due to low sample size.
tl;dr: ngl I got lazy for this part, but: less than 20% of the community responded, so numbers are rough estimates. white/european is the largest single group but internally diverse (italian, mediterranean, english, mixed ancestry). asian users are surprisingly high and combined, rival white / european. mixed / other is huge bc of ambiguous identities (central asian, hispanic, black socially perceived as mixed). smaller groups (black, MENA, pacific, indigenous) are present but barely. overall, the community skews euro/north america geographically but is ethnically diverse and far less anglo-centric than typical internet spaces.



tags better have worked 😡😡
I voted for all ethnicities
 
tl;dr at bottom

Disclaimer: Treat this data as more of an analysis of indicative trends, not hard facts.

Less than 20% of the community responded. So I did some guesswork. If you look at the articles (which no one does tbh), it shows this:

"Primary regions: Europe (40%) and North America (34.9%), followed by Asia (17.7%)" This will serve as a foundation (of sorts) for the data predictions seen later in this thread. Anyways, according to the poll and extra information gathered in its comments, the demographics follow this trend:

Among 33 (smh) respondents, the largest self-identified group was White / European, which was a little less than 40% of the community. But this category is internally heterogeneous, and it's my fault for not realizing this earlier. Multiple ppl commented and clarified that White / European is far too broad of a category, including English, Italian, half Italian/Spanish hybrid, Mediterranean, distant mixed ancestry, etc etc. And what that information suggests is that the White / European category is over-aggregated and masks ethnic diversity. Overt neglect on my end tbh.

And I think at least partially as a result of this, both the Mixed / Multiracial and Other categories were elevated. Like I said before, the comments can mostly explain this. Central Asians didn't have a clear category to choose; Mediterranean and Hispanics were caught between ambiguous racial and ethnic labels; and at least one black respondent was socially perceived as mixed.

But what I found interesting was that Asian representation was notably high (stfu anime gooners.) The poll revealed these stats:

  • East Asian (18%)
  • South Asian (15%)
  • Southeast Asian (6%)

If you look at the numbers this is actually really interesting. If the data is scaled to the active community of 170-200+ users, Asian-identifying respondents actually rival or exceed White / European representation (when overlap is considered.)

Black (12%), Mena (12%), Indigenous (6%), and Pacific islander (6%) respondents are also present in smaller but non-trivial numbers.

Compared to general internet demographics:


  • White representation is lower than average (typically around ~60–70%, which I found really surprising)
  • Asian representation is significantly higher
  • Mixed/Other responses are dramatically higher
  • The distribution is more globally skewed and less Anglo-centric
categoryestimated # of users(# of users)
White / European7141 – 101
Black / African225 – 49
East Asian339 – 56
South Asian275 – 52
Southeast Asian112 – 36
Middle Eastern / North African225 – 49
Native American / Alaska Native112 – 36
Pacific Islander112 – 36
Mixed / Multiracial4923 – 79
Other275 – 52

View attachment 253034
***on second thought nowhere near 95% CI but i'm too lazy to fix it***

Notes / Interpretation:


  • White / European: Still the largest single group, but could realistically be anywhere from ~40 to 100 users. Also includes Italian, Mediterranean, half Italian/half Spanish, English, etc. Very internally diverse group, should've accounted for that in original poll.
  • Asian: Combined ~71 (east + south + southeast), similar to White / European in representation. Much higher than typical internet spaces, I wonder why. Self-selection bias? Underrepresentation? In any case, the number is at least moderate, as shown in official demographics.
  • Mixed / Other: Combined ~76, bc of ambiguous identities; Central Asian, Hispanic, etc. Huge overlap possible.
  • Smaller groups (Black, MENA, Pacific, Indigenous) minor but still visible; ranges are wide due to low sample size.
tl;dr: ngl I got lazy for this part, but: less than 20% of the community responded, so numbers are rough estimates. white/european is the largest single group but internally diverse (italian, mediterranean, english, mixed ancestry). asian users are surprisingly high and combined, rival white / european. mixed / other is huge bc of ambiguous identities (central asian, hispanic, black socially perceived as mixed). smaller groups (black, MENA, pacific, indigenous) are present but barely. overall, the community skews euro/north america geographically but is ethnically diverse and far less anglo-centric than typical internet spaces.



tags better have worked 😡😡
Holy thread
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top