- Joined
- Aug 17, 2025
- Messages
- 6,928
- Solutions
- 1
- Time Online
- 19d 10h
- Reputation
- 20,190
- Location
- Not the United Kingdom
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
on what basismy morals are perfect
on every basison what basis
do you believe that whats moral or not is some concrete truth like 1+1=2. like is murder wrong in an absolute sense?what is that im not smarty pants
Do you believe in objective mortality?on every basis
Do you believe in objective mortality?Wetawd if u dont
i agree that morality isn't objective but what does this image meanYe ye, no such thing as "objectivism", blud
View attachment 165289
no I believe in emotional moralityDo you believe in objective mortality?
No I'm a self loathing wetawdDo you believe in objective mortality?
the only good answermy morals flip flop cause im mentally ill
its only wrong if you get caughtwould it be wrong for me to pay for my lunch with counterfeit money
I believe there's a nuance in this debate. Morality isn't fixed like maths because context differs but it's not meaningless either. I probably lean towards soft moral relativismi agree that morality isn't objective but what does this image mean
that's what I said before cheating my girlfriendits only wrong if you get caught
its not meaningless so long as we give it meaning.I believe there's a nuance in this debate. Morality isn't fixed like maths because context differs but it's not meaningless either. I probably lean towards soft moral relativism
Cheating is the only moral i hold dearly, any lapse in trust in a committed notion should be penalized with death.that's what I said before cheating my girlfriend
whyCheating is the only moral i hold dearly, any lapse in trust in a committed notion should be penalized with death.
Because in a meaningless world, broken trust makes the world impossible to bear.
I think the same, I would never dare to break trust with my partner by being unloyalCheating is the only moral i hold dearly, any lapse in trust in a committed notion should be penalized with death.
i agree with this.Because in a meaningless world, broken trust makes the world impossible to bear.
75 to 80 more likelyThis is com's attempt to move the range from 90 iq to 95 iq
i mean yea morals, even tho they’re man-made, still sound fair. idk what to say. lets kill all joos? my answer is yea, it’s water. murder is tricky tbh because muh depends what if that was a threat to someone’s life and some killer got shot? then it’s not as bad. but we can’t know why people kill. maybe their family got kidnapped. then every person thinks what’s right: to kill? you don’t know. or your own family either. either way, people die, right? but not really, because if you don’t kill, you’re not guilty, only to your family. but tbh some, not all, could even say “save people, just know we loved you,” and yea, try to be a hero. so, well, how can we decide is murder absolute wrongdoing or no? hm hm. well, some water stuff like math and other stuff, not related to exact moral questions like life and etc. so subjective morality is 50/50 then, right?do you believe that whats moral or not is some concrete truth like 1+1=2. like is murder wrong in an absolute sense?
well at least thats an attempt right?This is com's attempt to move the range from 90 iq to 95 iq
you mean like part objective part subjective?i mean yea morals, even tho they’re man-made, still sound fair. idk what to say. lets kill all joos? my answer is yea, it’s water. murder is tricky tbh because muh depends what if that was a threat to someone’s life and some killer got shot? then it’s not as bad. but we can’t know why people kill. maybe their family got kidnapped. then every person thinks what’s right: to kill? you don’t know. or your own family either. either way, people die, right? but not really, because if you don’t kill, you’re not guilty, only to your family. but tbh some, not all, could even say “save people, just know we loved you,” and yea, try to be a hero. so, well, how can we decide is murder absolute wrongdoing or no? hm hm. well, some water stuff like math and other stuff, not related to exact moral questions like life and etc. so subjective morality is 50/50 then, right?
Fairwell at least thats an attempt right?
something like that yeayou mean like part objective part subjective?
from a utilitarian standpoint you can say harm is wrong and work backwards from there. within that framework something could objectively cause harm. but than that begs the question why causing harm is wrong in the first placesomething like that yea
i i jack off to your images does that make me immoral?heres a simple no need moral situation. "If I jack off to my partners images, does that make me immoral"
Not in my booki i jack off to your images does that make me immoral?
because life is not tale and world is not perfect to have only goodfrom a utilitarian standpoint you can say harm is wrong and work backwards from there. within that framework something could objectively cause harm. but than that begs the question why causing harm is wrong in the first place
depends on the personi i jack off to your images does that make me immoral?
is sex with animals wrongWhatever I believe is right and wrong is the truest
brois sex with animals wrong
everyone hates a dictatorship until you got a good dictatorWe just need a dictatorship