Join 60,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Do you believe in objective morality?

Register to hide this ad
Ye ye, no such thing as "objectivism", blud
IMG_20250823_222721.jpg
 
Wetawd if u dont
 
i agree that morality isn't objective but what does this image mean
I believe there's a nuance in this debate. Morality isn't fixed like maths because context differs but it's not meaningless either. I probably lean towards soft moral relativism
 
I believe there's a nuance in this debate. Morality isn't fixed like maths because context differs but it's not meaningless either. I probably lean towards soft moral relativism
its not meaningless so long as we give it meaning.
 
do you believe that whats moral or not is some concrete truth like 1+1=2. like is murder wrong in an absolute sense?
i mean yea morals, even tho they’re man-made, still sound fair. idk what to say. lets kill all joos? my answer is yea, it’s water. murder is tricky tbh because muh depends what if that was a threat to someone’s life and some killer got shot? then it’s not as bad. but we can’t know why people kill. maybe their family got kidnapped. then every person thinks what’s right: to kill? you don’t know. or your own family either. either way, people die, right? but not really, because if you don’t kill, you’re not guilty, only to your family. but tbh some, not all, could even say “save people, just know we loved you,” and yea, try to be a hero. so, well, how can we decide is murder absolute wrongdoing or no? hm hm. well, some water stuff like math and other stuff, not related to exact moral questions like life and etc. so subjective morality is 50/50 then, right?
 
i mean yea morals, even tho they’re man-made, still sound fair. idk what to say. lets kill all joos? my answer is yea, it’s water. murder is tricky tbh because muh depends what if that was a threat to someone’s life and some killer got shot? then it’s not as bad. but we can’t know why people kill. maybe their family got kidnapped. then every person thinks what’s right: to kill? you don’t know. or your own family either. either way, people die, right? but not really, because if you don’t kill, you’re not guilty, only to your family. but tbh some, not all, could even say “save people, just know we loved you,” and yea, try to be a hero. so, well, how can we decide is murder absolute wrongdoing or no? hm hm. well, some water stuff like math and other stuff, not related to exact moral questions like life and etc. so subjective morality is 50/50 then, right?
you mean like part objective part subjective?
 
heres a simple no need moral situation. "If I jack off to my partners images, does that make me immoral"
 
something like that yea
from a utilitarian standpoint you can say harm is wrong and work backwards from there. within that framework something could objectively cause harm. but than that begs the question why causing harm is wrong in the first place
 
from a utilitarian standpoint you can say harm is wrong and work backwards from there. within that framework something could objectively cause harm. but than that begs the question why causing harm is wrong in the first place
because life is not tale and world is not perfect to have only good
 
Whatever I believe is right and wrong is the truest
 
We just need a dictatorship
 
  • Gold
Reactions: RRM

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top