Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

don’t r**e me but I just don’t see why Chico lachowski is considered to be so good looking tbh

Register to hide this ad
Theres hundreds of analysis of him G, he has a 76-78% overall harmony, around 7.5 misc, around 7.5 dimo and around 7 angularity, literally textbook chadlite
textbook
 
7.5 dimo and 7 ang? No shot
Best unedited media for angularity, you could argue 7 dimo, but you cant say this isnt a 7 angularity
1782860808417.webp
 
I can say it's not 7 angularity because it's not, and it's not even 7 dimo. 6 ang and 6 dimo
I couldnt disagree more with you, but even if youre scores were true, making harmony 35%, misc 25%, ang 20% and dimo 20%, he still gets a 7, which is fairly on the hhtn-lcl range, calling him an htn is a massive underrate imo
 
I couldnt disagree more with you, but even if youre scores were true, making harmony 35%, misc 25%, ang 20% and dimo 20%, he still gets a 7, which is fairly on the hhtn-lcl range, calling him an htn is a massive underrate imo
What does this even mean g
Anyway 7 ang example
93c5972abaad3e521952c42f1a4e4217.webp.webp
174d120a3668de6cc1f32238965e7228.webp.webp
6c9a8dbcfb6bd3e58d65f80a6e7a20b8.webp

Chico isn't 7 ang
 
I have vergvall on a 7.5 ang but ok ill take it, what i was saying, is that even if your scores were true, a 6 dimo and 6 angularity, he would still get a 7, meaning not htn, rather at least hhtn
Hhtn is fine but he's not cl
 
i wouldnt say hes 6 as @Penalizer69 is saying but you can argue he doesnt have 7 angularity, at the end of the day this area is subjective not like harmony
I realise what you meant now, not sure I agree with that formula as dimo would be higher on the scale of importance
 
Hhtn is fine but he's not cl
I would argue hes at least lcl but ok
I realise what you meant now, not sure I agree with that formula as dimo would be higher on the scale of importance
Yeah, im still developing my formula, but i have misc higher than dimo and angularity from the simple reason that ywhen you see that someone lacks or has 2 bad pilars of all 4, most good looking would be the ones that lack more dimo and ang than rather those who lack harmony and misc, idk if that made sense
 
Dont get me wrong he is good looking but to me he has no striking features tbh his side profiles kinda ass idk, again don’t r**e me
To be a CL you don’t need to be striking. Chico is quite literally the most prime example of great everything bad nothing he doesn’t have any major flaws imo and his side isn’t even bad actually it’s somewhat good.
 
To be a CL you don’t need to be striking. Chico is quite literally the most prime example of great everything bad nothing he doesn’t have any major flaws imo and his side isn’t even bad actually it’s somewhat good.
Hows about you strike these nuts
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top