Join 54,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Discussion "Don't get rich in your 50s, don't get rich ever."

Deleted Member 55516

El Moggero-Migas Cartel Interrogator
Reputable ★
Established ★
Joined
Dec 29, 2024
Messages
2,993
Solutions
1
Time Online
8d 6h
Reputation
14,101
A conversation I encountered on org:
Guy1: I don’t want to get rich only when I'm 50. You're a scammer. (Changed it a bit to make it “.com-friendly”)
Guy2: I didn't scam anyone. Who do you think you are talking to? Fine by me, don't get rich in your 50s, don't get rich ever.

This conversation made me reflect on how we perceive wealth. As for me, I want to be rich when I’m young because being wealthy in old age might not be as fulfilling as it is in youth. We might be too weak and without that youthful desire to travel, party and experience all the best things that money can buy. I essentially don’t want to be an old man living with the regret of never having experienced many things (which he can no longer replicate), during what was supposed to be his prime.

I think that most of us would agree that to become rich, we have to take some sort of risk rather than saving money and making relatively safe investments. However, this seems more and more like a survivorship bias to me (might be quite water for some). The ones who failed to succeed rarely get interviewed, if ever. You only hear about the people who succeeded by taking big risks because that’s what the people love to hear, that’s what really sells for the broadcasting media.

The conclusion from this is how most of us will never become rich. This is quite a sad realisation in all honesty: to know that we’ll probably never achieve the American dream.
Therefore, knowing that most people will never achieve extreme wealth, it’s worth considering alternative approaches such as safe investments and consistent saving to secure financial stability in the long run, which, in addition, could pay off very well and may result in significant wealth.

This is in no way meant to discourage risk-taking. In fact, I still do not want to wait decades for wealth to reach me. Rather, it is just a caution about how being slow and steady might be better for most people rather than trying to get rich quick. While wealth in youth might be ideal, securing financial stability or becoming rich in old age is still a worthwhile goal and far better than never attaining it at all.

No statement made here is set in stone. There are many paths towards success, so let this be a discussion instead.
 
Register to hide this ad
Contemplated adding images and stuff, but that made the thread appear even longer which would prob cause even more people to dnr.
 
I think these stories about people taking ‘big risks’ are really damaging and cause more people to make bad financial decisions that we don’t hear about. Definitely better to be less risky and more reliable even if it may take longer.
 
This take is super real. Survivorship bias makes us think taking huge risks is the only way to get rich but we rarely hear about the ones who failed. Yeah being rich while you’re young sounds way better than in old age but most people won’t hit that level no matter how much risk they take.
Imo a balance does it…taking smart risks while also securing long term financial stability
 
what a looser mentality
Screenshot_53.jpg
 
bro wants fast money but just wrote a novel on why slow and steady is better🥶💅
You miss the point. Read the damn thing mane. The point is that this is supposed to be a discussion for and against either fast money or slow and steady.
Although I would like to get rich quickly, that might not be viable.
 
You miss the point. Read the damn thing mane. The point is that this is supposed to be a discussion for and against either fast money or slow and steady.
Although I would like to get rich quickly, that might not be viable.
tbh I haven't read it, and cant bring myself to do it
 
Make a tldr I ain't reading allat
Give ChatGPT a break mane
Anyways, here's your tl;dr:
A conversation I encountered on org:
Guy1: I don’t want to get rich only when I'm 50. You're a scammer. (Changed it a bit to make it “.com-friendly”)
Guy2: I didn't scam anyone. Who do you think you are talking to? Fine by me, don't get rich in your 50s, don't get rich ever.

This conversation made me reflect on how we perceive wealth. I prefer wealth in youth since old age may lack the energy to fully enjoy it. However, getting rich often requires risk, and success stories are influenced by survivorship bias—failures are rarely highlighted.

Most people won’t achieve extreme wealth, so safe investments and consistent saving might be a smarter path to financial stability. While getting rich young is ideal, building wealth later is still worthwhile and is far better than never achieving it at all. There’s no single right path—this is just food for thought and open for discussion.
 
Last edited:
Give ChatGPT a break mane
Anyways, here's your tl;dr:


This conversation made me reflect no how we perceive wealth. I prefer wealth in youth since old age may lack the energy to fully enjoy it. However, getting rich often requires risk, and success stories are influenced by survivorship bias—failures are rarely highlighted.

Most people won’t achieve extreme wealth, so safe investments and consistent saving might be a smarter path to financial stability. While getting rich young is ideal, building wealth later is still worthwhile. There’s no single right path—this is just food for thought and open for discussion.
Ye agreed but I'd take the risk to be rich young even if it's a 0,1% succes rate while having investments/money saved.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top