Join 82,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Equality is unnatural and counterproductive

Deleted Member 49073

Still dreaming 'bout you
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★★
Joined
Nov 5, 2024
Messages
12,260
Solutions
2
Online time
22d 22h
Reputation
46,457
Nature civilisation is built on hierarchies. Law of the jungle, strength bias, social Darwinism, etc.
A food chain, represented by bigger eats big.

Historic human civilisations were built on a metaphorical food chain, through strength.
The Romans cut out the weak, and the Macedonians crushed the disunited.

The problem with contemporary society is the extreme focus on inclusivity and equality.
We cannot disavow the great to accept the weak.

We need order, strength through difference. Our society should be stratified by intelligence.
Weed out the inferior, leave them for the menial work.

I'm not bothered writing big, longer paragraphs.
TL;DR Societal hierarchies are natural, accept the brutal truth.

1749950143877.png
 
Register to hide this ad
Nature civilisation is built on hierarchies. Law of the jungle, strength bias, social Darwinism, etc.
A food chain, represented by bigger eats big.

Historic human civilisations were built on a metaphorical food chain, through strength.
The Romans cut out the weak, and the Macedonians crushed the disunited.

The problem with contemporary society is the extreme focus on inclusivity and equality.
We cannot disavow the great to accept the weak.

We need order, strength through difference. Our society should be stratified by intelligence.
Weed out the inferior, leave them for the menial work.

I'm not bothered by writing big, longer paragraphs.
TL;DR Societal hierarchies are natural, accept the brutal truth.

View attachment 114699
And I'm held back because we aren't living in those times anymore
 
what would be an example of how this is a disadvantage to our society? to not have hierarchy? it just leads to revolt
Living naturally is the truest and easiest way of living life.
It gives us order to the regime for life.

If everyone were to be coequal, we'd lose all order.
We'd have no innovation, no creativity. We'd be pale copies of each other.

Difference and superiority may seem unfair, but it is the truest way of living.
It's the reason why the Roman Empire is generally regarded as the greatest empire.

Slaves did slaves' work, generals did generals' work, and aristocrats did aristocratic work.
 
Nature civilisation is built on hierarchies. Law of the jungle, strength bias, social Darwinism, etc.
A food chain, represented by bigger eats big.

Historic human civilisations were built on a metaphorical food chain, through strength.
The Romans cut out the weak, and the Macedonians crushed the disunited.

The problem with contemporary society is the extreme focus on inclusivity and equality.
We cannot disavow the great to accept the weak.

We need order, strength through difference. Our society should be stratified by intelligence.
Weed out the inferior, leave them for the menial work.

I'm not bothered writing big, longer paragraphs.
TL;DR Societal hierarchies are natural, accept the brutal truth.

View attachment 114699
You wanted social Darwinism? Well you already have it, go on Tinder or apply for a job. People promote equality because they want everybody to be happy, this lost on so many people.

Also explain to me how rich kids getting everything handed to them promotes Darwinism? A lot of differences in outcome are due to forces that are not Darwinistic at all.
 
You wanted social Darwinism? Well you already have it, go on Tinder or apply for a j*b. People promote equality because they want everybody to be happy, this lost on so many people.

Also explain to me how rich kids getting everything handed to them promotes Darwinism?
I was more referring to a society of intellectuals, where it is structured by intelligence.
If the smart are given time to theorise, experiment and innovate, society will improve drastically.
It will also allow them to have more children, increasing the chances of smarter offspring, hence social Darwinism (in a way).
 
This is a very interesting discussion… just an example.

If you are in a room and you are the smartest person or one of the smartest people in that room, these things happen:
- some will accept your intelligence
- others will question your intelligence, in two main ways: emotionally (who hurt you? why do you want to brag?) or logically (what you say doesn't make sense, do you have proof?)


One room
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top