- Joined
- Jan 29, 2024
- Messages
- 3,078
- Time Online
- 4h 24m
- Reputation
- 6,461
Link
This is from a feminist group from 1911:
"Eugenic feminists argued that if women were provided with more rights and equality, the deteriorating characteristics of a given race could be averted."
Basically, this feminist group advocated for eugenics and believed that if women had more sexual and social freedom, they would naturally reproduce and nurture the better men and disfavor the weak ones (positive and negative eugenics).
And that's exactly what is happening.
There are texts showcasing how old technology such as the telephone and new locomotives forms such as bicycles disrupted the social and sexual atmosphere of old cities, making people betray more and be picky.
The augmentation of technology aligned with feminism had simply accelerated the natural eugenics of sexual selection AND guts instinct.
Right now, feminism is - to the social public - aligned with the left. And that translates to the feminist movement having limitations of being consciously defending left ideals and combating right ones.
Considering that the promotion of technological eugenics (edit genes) to create new people who are better then them will sound like a future disadvantage ("prettier and smarter women then me will exist? Noooo") and be related to alt right.
However, what if the discourse pro eugenics focused on editing only men? "Men will be tall, blue eyes..."
This prey on their selective sexual mindset while not posing a clear threat at their own future sexual worth.
Pluss, the laws on eugenics could be made in such a way that more advantages are socially given to women while men are not. Appearing, therefore, to be "pro feminism".
The longer the time to hardcore eugenics be used, bigger are the amount of people who will suffer.
Once eugenic is made to all, less would be subjected to it for they would not have "negative genes".
That's not what Nick Land believes. To him, constant possible improvement will always exist and the slightest difference between individuals will still be subjective to social hierarchy positioning, thus the future of eugenics is a hyper eugenics, the future of racism is super racism.
IT is 100% certain, via either the creation of more locomotive and internet technology (and that's absolutely certain) or political changes in favor of consciousness or unconscious eugenics that we are and will keep growing more eugenic as time passes.
And who are we? Me and you? Those stuck in the middle of history. We can see time, the past, present and future: how to make that an advantage?
This is from a feminist group from 1911:
"Eugenic feminists argued that if women were provided with more rights and equality, the deteriorating characteristics of a given race could be averted."
Basically, this feminist group advocated for eugenics and believed that if women had more sexual and social freedom, they would naturally reproduce and nurture the better men and disfavor the weak ones (positive and negative eugenics).
And that's exactly what is happening.
There are texts showcasing how old technology such as the telephone and new locomotives forms such as bicycles disrupted the social and sexual atmosphere of old cities, making people betray more and be picky.
The augmentation of technology aligned with feminism had simply accelerated the natural eugenics of sexual selection AND guts instinct.
Right now, feminism is - to the social public - aligned with the left. And that translates to the feminist movement having limitations of being consciously defending left ideals and combating right ones.
Considering that the promotion of technological eugenics (edit genes) to create new people who are better then them will sound like a future disadvantage ("prettier and smarter women then me will exist? Noooo") and be related to alt right.
However, what if the discourse pro eugenics focused on editing only men? "Men will be tall, blue eyes..."
This prey on their selective sexual mindset while not posing a clear threat at their own future sexual worth.
Pluss, the laws on eugenics could be made in such a way that more advantages are socially given to women while men are not. Appearing, therefore, to be "pro feminism".
The longer the time to hardcore eugenics be used, bigger are the amount of people who will suffer.
Once eugenic is made to all, less would be subjected to it for they would not have "negative genes".
That's not what Nick Land believes. To him, constant possible improvement will always exist and the slightest difference between individuals will still be subjective to social hierarchy positioning, thus the future of eugenics is a hyper eugenics, the future of racism is super racism.
IT is 100% certain, via either the creation of more locomotive and internet technology (and that's absolutely certain) or political changes in favor of consciousness or unconscious eugenics that we are and will keep growing more eugenic as time passes.
And who are we? Me and you? Those stuck in the middle of history. We can see time, the past, present and future: how to make that an advantage?
