everyone in org is getting banned for gayposting today

[signaturefaggot]

actually no, birth rate is dropping, especially in modern countries

Where are u getting ur facts from?? And as I said before on a GLOBAL (this means every country) the population is increasing jfl

 

[arniedagoats]

Yes you’re right that many women chose not to have children, but as I’ve said before we aren’t facing issues of declining birth rates, in most western countries there actually aren’t enough jobs for most people, which means less money in the economy, less food production etc and the cycle goes on, so a decline (or a rather a pause) on birth and death rates isn’t a bad thing

less ppl is a bad thing. also bc of trump, in the usa for example unemployment is on an alltime low. and its getting lower every year. the money isnt the main problem, the main problem is feminism and abortion

 

[arniedagoats]

Where are u getting ur facts from?? And as I said before on a GLOBAL (this means every country) the population is increasing jfl

im comparison to the decades before yes, bc we are more ppl than back then, but in comparison to recent years, brith rates are steadily declining

 

[zaycism]

less ppl is a bad thing. also bc of trump, in the usa for example unemployment is on an alltime low. and its getting lower every year. the money isnt the main problem, the main problem is feminism and abortion

i cant bother to read what u said before but i agree abortion is decreasing population

 

[TFC]

ion know technically a social construct to show love, but if u cant even have real sex, then how can u have real lovee? doesnt it jsut equal lust at some point?

If it’s to show love then I have 3 things for you

1. In order for love to exist does it NEED the promise to have a baby together? (This idea would exclude old people, infernal people, and people who don’t want kids- also this would include all people who want to adopt)

2. If love doesn’t NEED sex (and in this situation love comes from a feeling beyond biology) a kiss is to show love would mean sex is to show love

3. If a straight couple doesn’t want to have kids and there is a gay couple who want to adopt. Would this make the straight couple not normal and they should break up?

 

[TFC]

actually no, birth rate is dropping, especially in modern countries

Not globally, the bigger countries are multiplying like crazy

 

[arniedagoats]

If it’s to show love then I have 3 things for you

1. In order for love to exist does it NEED the promise to have a baby together? (This idea would exclude old people, infernal people, and people who don’t want kids- also this would include all people who want to adopt)

2. If love doesn’t NEED sex (and in this situation love comes from a feeling beyond biology) a kiss is to show love would mean sex is to show love

3. If a straight couple doesn’t want to have kids and there is a gay couple who want to adopt. Would this make the straight couple not normal and they should break up?

1. i never said anything about children, i said our sexual organs were only designed for straight intercourse, i didnt say the end goal was having children
2. sex is one of the ultimate demotions or however u call it to show love to a person
3. if u adopt a kid, its not your kid, ur just the one raising it. also i never said anything abt kids which i explained in 1

 

[yourfavLTB]

im glad .com doesnt have that rule, all the cool people would be banned by now

Yea you can post ab femboys dw

 

[arniedagoats]

Not globally, the bigger countries are multiplying like crazy

overall the birth rate is still declining

 

[signaturefaggot]

less ppl is a bad thing. also bc of trump, in the usa for example unemployment is on an alltime low. and its getting lower every year. the money isnt the main problem, the main problem is feminism and abortion

Countries can still grow economically with a flat or decreasing birth rate, more doesn’t mean better, what matters is productivity rate and age (immigration) Japan has a declining population rate but high productivity means a healthy large economy. Although feminism does relate to a decline in birth rates it isn’t the main reasoning, woman having choices over their body is not the cause of harm in this situation. Idefk what ur waffling abt w abortions but I am deciding to leave this here cos ur 100% not on the same intellectual level as me and ur facts aren’t right

 

[zaycism]

Countries can still grow economically with a flat or decreasing birth rate, more doesn’t mean better, what matters is productivity rate and age (immigration) Japan has a declining population rate but high productivity means a healthy large economy. Although feminism does relate to a decline in birth rates it isn’t the main reasoning, woman having choices over their body is not the cause of harm in this situation. Idefk what ur waffling abt w abortions but I am deciding to leave this here cos ur 100% not on the same intellectual level as me and ur facts aren’t right

guys.. stop arguing just kiss it out

 

[icnone]

world, rejoice! we are going to find an answer to the LGBTQ debate on forum.looksmaxxing.com!

 

[TFC]

im comparison to the decades before yes, bc we are more ppl than back then, but in comparison to recent years, brith rates are steadily declining

I’m not arguing with you on this… you’re just stating a wrong scientific fact

 

[icnone]

guys.. stop arguing just kiss it out

most stereotypical foid thing to say in this situation tbh

 

[arniedagoats]

Countries can still grow economically with a flat or decreasing birth rate, more doesn’t mean better, what matters is productivity rate and age (immigration) Japan has a declining population rate but high productivity means a healthy large economy. Although feminism does relate to a decline in birth rates it isn’t the main reasoning, woman having choices over their body is not the cause of harm in this situation. Idefk what ur waffling abt w abortions but I am deciding to leave this here cos ur 100% not on the same intellectual level as me and ur facts aren’t right

1. we need to see into the future, at some point there arent going the enough ppl, also considering the speed were advancing in technology, there will be a lot more we need to manage, and at some point there are not enough ppl for it,
2. its not the womens bosy, its the babys body, and therefore it shoudlnt be her choice, nothing justifies the killing of a baby
3. im defo not on the same intellecutal level than u, im far above it, and myfacts are indeed right and make sense, urs are right too, but dont matter for the future nearly as much as mine

 

[TFC]

1. i never said anything about children, i said our sexual organs were only designed for straight intercourse, i didnt say the end goal was having children
2. sex is one of the ultimate demotions or however u call it to show love to a person
3. if u adopt a kid, its not your kid, ur just the one raising it. also i never said anything abt kids which i explained in 1

If it’s not about kids then what is the difference between gay and straight sex?

 

[signaturefaggot]

1. we need to see into the future, at some point there arent going the enough ppl, also considering the speed were advancing in technology, there will be a lot more we need to manage, and at some point there are not enough ppl for it,
2. its not the womens bosy, its the babys body, and therefore it shoudlnt be her choice, nothing justifies the killing of a baby
3. im defo not on the same intellecutal level than u, im far above it, and myfacts are indeed right and make sense, urs are right too, but dont matter for the future nearly as much as mine

Dnr f****t

 

[icnone]

View attachment 343825
I’m not arguing with you on this… you’re just stating a wrong scientific fact

9.66 billion people... imagine if we kept only the top 100 million people and let the population grow back to 9.66 billion again

 

[arniedagoats]

View attachment 343825
I’m not arguing with you on this… you’re just stating a wrong scientific fact

 

[zaycism]

most stereotypical foid thing to say in this situation tbh

what else could i say

 

[arniedagoats]

Dnr f****t

looks like ur outta arguments r****d

 

[arniedagoats]

If it’s not about kids then what is the difference between gay and straight sex?

gay sex isnt real sex. sexual organs were designed for straight sex, even if u dont make children

 

[icnone]

what else could i say

settle this over a game of counter strike

 

[signaturefaggot]

looks like ur outta arguments r****d

ur wrong about the increase of birth rates there’s nothing else for me to argue look at the statistics broski

 

[zaycism]

settle this over a game of counter strike

Okay wait

 

[zaycism]

ur wrong about the increase of birth rates there’s nothing else for me to argue look at the statistics broski

guys stop it settle this over a game of marvel rivals

 

[TFC]

1. we need to see into the future, at some point there arent going the enough ppl, also considering the speed were advancing in technology, there will be a lot more we need to manage, and at some point there are not enough ppl for it,
2. its not the womens bosy, its the babys body, and therefore it shoudlnt be her choice, nothing justifies the killing of a baby
3. im defo not on the same intellecutal level than u, im far above it, and myfacts are indeed right and make sense, urs are right too, but dont matter for the future nearly as much as mine

To be clear this is you’re stance:
No one should never have an abortive EVER. Even in the following cases

1. Moms death
2. Baby’s death
3. r**e
4. Incest
5. Child mother

And it doesn’t matter the stage/ trimester or anything

 

[Gio.]

Is IPHONE human NATURE?

No cuz iphone is not something you do?

 

[TFC]

View attachment 343827

You’re mixing % with population size
If something was growing by 50% and now it’s growing by 20% then 2 things are true
1. The population is growing
2. The growth is shrinking

 

[zaycism]

To be clear this is you’re stance:
No one should never have an abortive EVER. Even in the following cases

1. Moms death
2. Baby’s death
3. r**e
4. Incest
5. Child mother

And it doesn’t matter the stage/ trimester or anything

if thats what hes saying then i take my words back i DONT agree with him

 

[TFC]

if thats what hes saying then i take my words back i DONT agree with him

I don’t know what he’s saying he is talking around several points, while also arguing abortion shouldn’t be a thing

 

[arniedagoats]

To be clear this is you’re stance:
No one should never have an abortive EVER. Even in the following cases

1. Moms death
2. Baby’s death
3. r**e
4. Incest
5. Child mother

And it doesn’t matter the stage/ trimester or anything

1. c section is safer and quicker than an abortion, an abortion is dangerous for the mom too
2. that the removal of a carcass, not an abortion
3. the fact that its baby, and thats its still murder doesnt change, punish the rapist and not the innocent baby
4. same point i made at 3
5. its still a baby, and if u tell a child, that its gonna have child, and ur gonna kill it, it will always be sad, even if it was conceveided in incest/r**e bc children dont correlate these things like we do. also abortion is way mor edangerous for them than for grown women, whereas the risks of a c section dont really change depending on age or size

 

[icnone]

To be clear this is you’re stance:
No one should never have an abortive EVER. Even in the following cases

1. Moms death
2. Baby’s death
3. r**e
4. Incest
5. Child mother

And it doesn’t matter the stage/ trimester or anything

prevention >>> correction
imagine a world where we didn't have to deal with ts to begin with, both sides of the debate could be happy

 

[arniedagoats]

look at the statistics broski

ur wrong about the increase of birth rates there’s nothing else for me to argue look at the statistics broski

 

[arniedagoats]

prevention >>> correction
imagine a world where we didn't have to deal with ts to begin with, both sides of the debate could be happy

i dont undertsand the first part, but a world without incest and grape would be peak

 

[TFC]

You’re mixing % with population size
If something was growing by 50% and now it’s growing by 20% then 2 things are true
1. The population is growing
2. The growth is shrinking

look at the statistics broski

View attachment 343830

No

 

[arniedagoats]

You’re mixing % with population size
If something was growing by 50% and now it’s growing by 20% then 2 things are true
1. The population is growing
2. The growth is shrinking

your statistic waestimating that we would continue growing, as we did the last decades, however we will not grow like that. but ur 1 and 2 are right, even tho its only for the next few years , in like two or maybe even faster the population will shrink, with world war three starting and also more other bad things happening rn

 

[icnone]

wait I'm confused
who supports what
what is this debate even about

 

[signaturefaggot]

look at the statistics broski

View attachment 343830

Population is rising, while population growth is slowing. End of convo f****t

 

[arniedagoats]

No

yes. i never denied that the population is growing compared to the recent decades, however, the birht rate is indeed declining

 

[TFC]

1. c section is safer and quicker than an abortion, an abortion is dangerous for the mom too
2. that the removal of a carcass, not an abortion
3. the fact that its baby, and thats its still murder doesnt change, punish the rapist and not the innocent baby
4. same point i made at 3
5. its still a baby, and if u tell a child, that its gonna have child, and ur gonna kill it, it will always be sad, even if it was conceveided in incest/r**e bc children dont correlate these things like we do. also abortion is way mor edangerous for them than for grown women, whereas the risks of a c section dont really change depending on age or size

You are wrong. Your moral code pretends to be righteous, but it’s not.

 

[arniedagoats]

Population is rising, while population growth is slowing. End of convo f****t

which means in the next years at some point he population will shrink, also yeah, i never denied that, iwas talking about the future

 

[zaycism]

I don’t know what he’s saying he is talking around several points, while also arguing abortion shouldn’t be a thing

it shouldn’t be a thing to those who cant keep their legs closed, but it should be available for r**e cases and medical issues etc

 

[arniedagoats]

You are wrong. Your moral code pretends to be righteous, but it’s not.

how is it not? its always a baby, and the way it was conceived doesnt matter, as it is a baby, support the pregnant mothers, give them good and free healthcare, punish the bad guys, and life would be peak

 

[TFC]

it shouldn’t be a thing to those who cant keep their legs closed, but it should be available for r**e cases and medical issues etc

Look at his explanation… he laid it all out

 

[arniedagoats]

it shouldn’t be a thing to those who cant keep their legs closed, but it should be available for r**e cases and medical issues etc

why r**e cases? punish the rapist not the innocent child. also u dont fight evil with evil, imagine u get r***d AND then kill ur child.

 

[arniedagoats]

Look at his explanation… he laid it all out

nah gng its not morally rightous or whatevr

 

[arniedagoats]

it is

You are wrong. Your moral code pretends to be righteous, but it’s not.

 

[Blackpillirony]

im glad .com doesnt have that rule, all the cool people would be banned by now

I slayed GD

 

[zaycism]

why r**e cases? punish the rapist not the innocent child. also u dont fight evil with evil, imagine u get r***d AND then kill ur child.

if a child gets r***d they shouldn’t keep their child