Everyone is MTB/MTN apparently

[catlady]

I see this rating given to way too many people . Is it cause it’s a safe one ? Not that offending ? Anyways don’t rate if you don’t know how to .

 

[Gothed]

I see this rating given to way too many people . Is it cause it’s a safe one ? Not that offending ? Anyways don’t rate if you don’t know how to .

LMTN/LMTB is actually above average with hmtn/b being significantly above average. I'd say its given out too often actually.

 

[inversions]

Nearly nobody can give objective ratings.

And ratings are a bunch of bullshit anyways, your true rating should be based on IRL experiences.

 

[benny]

I see this rating given to way too many people . Is it cause it’s a safe one ? Not that offending ? Anyways don’t rate if you don’t know how to .

honestly u should get as many ratings as possible and average them out to get as close as possible to true rating

 

[Unkown tea maker]

honestly u should get as many ratings as possible and average them out to get as close as possible to true rating

Yh I agree

 

[Unkown tea maker]

I think there should be sum sort of scale like what rank is who

 

[Nenestar]

it's the same as "normies" saying you're a 7/10. people here think because you used a "fancy term" it becomes objective and they're definitely not wanting to pander for the other person (while obviously complaining about normies overrating others), jfl at how ironic people in these spaces are

 

[kitti]

I see this rating given to way too many people . Is it cause it’s a safe one ? Not that offending ? Anyways don’t rate if you don’t know how to .

mtb/n is a prison

 

[icnone]

Nearly nobody can give objective ratings.

And ratings are a bunch of bullshit anyways, your true rating should be based on IRL experiences.

Delusional take. Too much affected by personal bias

 

[inversions]

Delusional take. Too much affected by personal bias

Explain to me how this is delusional.

Nearly nobody can consistently rate. I've never gotten a personal rating before, but a person will always have bias.

And a simple comparison of ratios using maths won't work either.

 

[icnone]

Nearly nobody can consistently rate. I've never gotten a personal rating before, but a person will always have bias.

Then you use average rating

 

[inversions]

Then you use average rating

Develop on your point instead of calling me out and then providing no clear argument.

 

[icnone]

Develop on your point instead of calling me out and then providing no clear argument.

n***a I’m on mobile it takes more effort to type

Your rating based on experiences will have a bias and will be based on a very small sample size. I’ve seen too many foids on here who looked decently attractive but thought they were ugly from their experiences

When I mean average rating I mean aggregate what multiple people say about you to get your true rating free from an individual person’s bias. Then you can include thing like variance for extra info about your appearance

 

[Alexander Wolfgang]

honestly u should get as many ratings as possible and average them out to get as close as possible to true rating

htn

 

[benny]

htn

what bro

 

[inversions]

When I mean average rating I mean aggregate what multiple people say about you to get your true rating free from an individual person’s bias. Then you can include thing like variance for extra info about your appearance

If you look at this forum.

The ratings are just completely wrong. You can't average incorrect data to make it correct.

Most people, as the original thread, just give "mtn" or "hltn"

It's like how normies would give a 7/10

If you average out in the range of 6-8, you will still get around 7. But this rating of 7 is incorrect anyways.

And by personal experience I am not talking about women because they have practically infinite SMV.

As a man, your personal experiences should be your social life, dates, relationships, body count ect. This factors in things that can't be represented by a simple facial analysis.

 

[Alexander Wolfgang]

what bro

you said "get as many ratings as possible and average them out to get as close as possible to true rating"

Then my average rating will be htn based on all the ratings ive received

 

[benny]

you said "get as many ratings as possible and average them out to get as close as possible to true rating"

Then my average rating will be htn based on all the ratings ive received

oh yeah then go with that esp if you feel like you’re treated as such by normies

 

[icnone]

If you look at this forum.

The ratings are just completely wrong. You can't average incorrect data to make it correct.

Most people, as the original thread, just give "mtn" or "hltn"

It's like how normies would give a 7/10

If you average out in the range of 6-8, you will still get around 7. But this rating of 7 is incorrect anyways.

And by personal experience I am not talking about women because they have practically infinite SMV.

As a man, your personal experiences should be your social life, dates, relationships, body count ect. This factors in things that can't be represented by a simple facial analysis.

“rating of 7 is incorrect” wdym?

 

[benny]

If you look at this forum.

The ratings are just completely wrong. You can't average incorrect data to make it correct.

Most people, as the original thread, just give "mtn" or "hltn"

It's like how normies would give a 7/10

If you average out in the range of 6-8, you will still get around 7. But this rating of 7 is incorrect anyways.

And by personal experience I am not talking about women because they have practically infinite SMV.

As a man, your personal experiences should be your social life, dates, relationships, body count ect. This factors in things that can't be represented by a simple facial analysis.

i agree, however it’s hard to gauge based off just one’s experience without hearing several others experiences as well

 

[Alexander Wolfgang]

oh yeah then go with that esp if you feel like you’re treated as such by normies

idrc about ratings

I'm just someone like you and everyone else

 

[benny]

idrc about ratings

I'm just someone like you and everyone else

agreed at a certain point ratings don’t even matter ur either good looking or not

 

[catlady]

“rating of 7 is incorrect” wdym?

It’s a rating that is given to most people by normies irl ( if they’re not incredibly good looking or unbelievably ugly ) to not hurt their feelings, just a safe rating yk?

 

[Alexander Wolfgang]

agreed at a certain point ratings don’t even matter ur either good looking or not

Yea, its black and white

not black, white, and gray

 

[inversions]

“rating of 7 is incorrect” wdym?

If we got a set of data from normies involving ratings.

They would give inaccurate data. Averaging this dataset does not then give an accurate rating.

It's known that people often give a rating of 7. Lets say person A was rated 7,7,7,4,8,6.

If his true rating was that 4, but due to a massive amount of incorrect ratings from RETARDS, the average would be nowhere near 4, and therefore the rating would be incorrect.

 

[icnone]

It’s a rating that is given to most people by normies irl ( if they’re not incredibly good looking or unbelievably ugly ) to not hurt their feelings, just a safe rating yk?

so it is a data collection problem
you can very easily solve this by giving normies two random faces and asking them to rate which one is attractive
math is very similar to how chatgpt asks you to rank two responses instead of rating a single one out of 10

 

[Byro]

I see this rating given to way too many people . Is it cause it’s a safe one ? Not that offending ? Anyways don’t rate if you don’t know how to .

im always rated around hmtn-lhtn

 

[inversions]

i agree, however it’s hard to gauge based off just one’s experience without hearing several others experiences as well

You should simply know that if you have a shit social life with no women you are ugly and vice versa.

 

[benny]

You should simply know that if you have a shit social life with no women you are ugly and vice versa.

yeah that’s true, but i still had a social life and a gf when i was sub 5

i don’t know if it’s always this black and white tbh but i see ur point

 

[Byro]

i always rate pretty honestly

 

[inversions]

yeah that’s true, but i still had a social life and a gf when i was sub 5

i don’t know if it’s always this black and white tbh but i see ur point

And that factored in things that a rating couldn't.

It's like how you see fat subhumans with hot girlfriends.

A rating would say it's impossible for him to get a girlfriend.

But yeah it's not black and white.

 

[Gio.]

I see this rating given to way too many people . Is it cause it’s a safe one ? Not that offending ? Anyways don’t rate if you don’t know how to .

Only on .com

 

[catlady]

Only on .com

.org does pretty much the same icl

 

[benny]

Only on .com

not even true i was getting lhtn-mhtn like way too much on org

 

[Gio.]

.org does pretty much the same icl

not even true i was getting lhtn-mhtn like way too much on org

Nah if you look at the average rating with someone over 1k post on org its not even close to like on .com

 

[1894]

Nearly nobody can give objective ratings.

And ratings are a bunch of bullshit anyways, your true rating should be based on IRL experiences.

this is cope btw even the lowest ltb does well irl

 

[inversions]

this is cope btw even the lowest ltb does well irl

And by personal experience I am not talking about women because they have practically infinite SMV.

^

 

[1894]

And by personal experience I am not talking about women because they have practically infinite SMV.

As a man, your personal experiences should be your social life, dates, relationships, body count ect. This factors in things that can't be represented by a simple facial analysis.

Yah true to that

 

[benny]

Nah if you look at the average rating with someone over 1k post on org its not even close to like on .com

yea i suppose if you don’t count greys that makes more sense

 

[Byro]

lurking on org and seeing their ratings. its worse then here by miles. years even