Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Discussion explain this to me ( moids)

catlady

𝔐𝔞𝔨𝔢 𝔠𝔬𝔪 𝔤𝔯𝔢𝔞𝔱 𝔞𝔤𝔞𝔦𝔫
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★★
Joined
Mar 21, 2026
Messages
11,058
Solutions
5
Online time
1mo 5d
Reputation
24,546
Location
wonderland
How come most of you think women are the ones going for tiers well above their looksmatch when men are the visual ones ; when, from a scientific standpoint, male mate choice is more strongly driven by immediate visual cues like facial symmetry, waist-to-hip ratio, skin quality , which are processed rapidly in reward circuits like the ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex, leading to a skewed attention distribution toward the highest-attractiveness individuals.
In parallel, female mate choice while still sensitive to physical attractiveness is more multidimensional, integrating cues of status, resources, competence, and behavioral traits linked to broader cortical evaluation and social cognition networks.
This is not opinions based just some biological facts . Like what happened for you to start having this mindset ?
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
How come most of you think women are the ones going for tiers well above their looksmatch when men are the visual ones ; when, from a scientific standpoint, male mate choice is more strongly driven by immediate visual cues like facial symmetry, waist-to-hip ratio, skin quality , which are processed rapidly in reward circuits like the ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex, leading to a skewed attention distribution toward the highest-attractiveness individuals.
In parallel, female mate choice while still sensitive to physical attractiveness is more multidimensional, integrating cues of status, resources, competence, and behavioral traits linked to broader cortical evaluation and social cognition networks.
This is not opinions based just some biological facts . Like what happened for you to start having this mindset ?
the stereotype that men will genuinely crack anything is still quiet true, compared to women who would not do such a thing
 
the stereotype that men will genuinely crack anything is still quiet true, compared to women who would not do such a thing
I mean cracking is not the end goal . This is just about men getting praised for a higher body count and shamed for being a virgin .
 
the stereotype that men will genuinely crack anything is still quiet true, compared to women who would not do such a thing
For women sex is a bigger deal. In pregnancy we put way more things on the line than a man. Even outside of pregnancy, we are more emotional people and therefore more careful and less wasteful when it comes to getting close to someone.
You wouldnt crack anything simply because you find anything attractive, cracking just isnt as significant to you and can easily be distributed even to people you dont like that much.
 
How come most of you think women are the ones going for tiers well above their looksmatch when men are the visual ones ; when, from a scientific standpoint, male mate choice is more strongly driven by immediate visual cues like facial symmetry, waist-to-hip ratio, skin quality , which are processed rapidly in reward circuits like the ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex, leading to a skewed attention distribution toward the highest-attractiveness individuals.
In parallel, female mate choice while still sensitive to physical attractiveness is more multidimensional, integrating cues of status, resources, competence, and behavioral traits linked to broader cortical evaluation and social cognition networks.
This is not opinions based just some biological facts . Like what happened for you to start having this mindset ?
Idk im hypergameous as fuckkkkkkk
 
How come most of you think women are the ones going for tiers well above their looksmatch when men are the visual ones ; when, from a scientific standpoint, male mate choice is more strongly driven by immediate visual cues like facial symmetry, waist-to-hip ratio, skin quality , which are processed rapidly in reward circuits like the ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex, leading to a skewed attention distribution toward the highest-attractiveness individuals.
In parallel, female mate choice while still sensitive to physical attractiveness is more multidimensional, integrating cues of status, resources, competence, and behavioral traits linked to broader cortical evaluation and social cognition networks.
This is not opinions based just some biological facts . Like what happened for you to start having this mindset ?
20.webp
 
For women sex is a bigger deal. In pregnancy we put way more things on the line than a man. Even outside of pregnancy, we are more emotional people and therefore more careful and less wasteful when it comes to getting close to someone.
You wouldnt crack anything simply because you find anything attractive, cracking just isnt as significant to you and can easily be distributed even to people you dont like that much.
also there is way higher risk of getting cancer in your genitals if you have too many different parteners and higher stakes when you actually get and std . For example HPV is and std that is passed even with protection and has no effect on men but could cause cancer to women
 
In parallel, female mate choice while still sensitive to physical attractiveness is more multidimensional, integrating cues of status, resources, competence, and behavioral traits linked to broader cortical evaluation and social cognition networks.
This is not opinions based just some biological facts . Like what happened for you to start having this mindset ?
It was prob true 30 years ago but nowadays women are spending time on dating apps, choosing only gl men from the pics they saw, and also try to hook-up with attractive men, without caring if they're competent, skilled, intelligent, or have ressources.

Also women are working and are more financially independent, meaning they are less likely to not care as much about stability, long-term and personality than their female ancestors, and are more likely okay to have short-term relationships, even if they got dumped after being pumped.
 
makes sense makes sense
 
i’d add: sometimes a woman “rejects” an attractive man to prove she’s different from the rest
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top