Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Discussion faceiq yay or nay

thehammer

Jack is my hopefuel, I'm a kafir btw
Requested Ban
Reputable ★
Established ★
Joined
Mar 21, 2026
Messages
2,460
Online time
8d 2h
Reputation
3,996
what you think about that blud?
 
Register to hide this ad
He's smart
 
what you think about that blud?
1774212213672.webp


see how most intelligent has the most downgrown jew face....
 
Honestly most paid face rating tools are overpriced for what they give you. A single number doesn't tell you anything useful. What you want is a breakdown by individual metric — jawline angle, canthal tilt, FWHR, facial thirds, symmetry etc. That way you know exactly what to work on. There are free tools now that measure 15-17 metrics individually. Way more useful than paying for a number.
 
Following up on my own comment — the free one I've been running my pics through is realsmile.online/looksmaxxing-test. Measures the 17 geometric metrics individually (canthal tilt, FWHR, gonial angle, facial thirds, symmetry etc) and drops a percentile per metric. No signup, runs in browser.

Way more useful than FaceIQ-style "you are 4.7/10" stuff because you can actually see WHICH metric is dragging the score and target that one. The composite "attractiveness percentile" it tacks on at the end is noisy imo so I ignore it — but the individual geometry numbers match what the megathreads here say.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top