Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Female losers are hilarious

Mogden

Bodiedysmorphia
Reputable ★
Established ★
Joined
Aug 19, 2025
Messages
3,355
Solutions
1
Time Online
3d 21h
Reputation
7,055
Unless you’re subhuman how the fuck do you become a loser. You gotta be a special kind of neurodivergent or just not want to succeed.


Like n***a society is built to support you and give you success on the backs of male labor.

You have hypergamy and inherent value

You can larp with makeup, and the beauty standards are becoming less strict with every year

All you have to fucking do it be mtb and not be fat to date htn men.

And the highest value you can have is not to have lots of sex. Let that sink in. You don’t need to be a millionaire or Stacy, you don’t need to take roids, all you have to have is self control and choose not to have sex.

And even now, that is becoming less important. You could literally start an onlyfans or sell pics if you didn’t give a fuck about morals and people would still want you and care about you


SOCIETY EVEN TELLS YOU TO BE ENTITLED AND EXPECT OTHER PEOPLE TO DO SHIT FOR YOU. YOU CAN JUDGE THE CHARACTER OF MEN WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES AND SOCIETY WILL SAY YOU’RE IN THE RIGHT
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Unless you’re subhuman how the fuck do you become a loser. You gotta be a special kind of neurodivergent or just not want to succeed.


Like n***a society is built to support you and give you success on the backs of male labor.

You have hypergamy and inherent value

You can larp with makeup, and the beauty standards are becoming less strict with every year

All you have to fucking do it be mtb and not be fat to date htn men.

And the highest value you can have is not to have lots of sex. Let that sink in. You don’t need to be a millionaire or Stacy, you don’t need to take roids, all you have to have is self control and choose not to have sex.
Females act like life is more difficult for them
 
Your threads are filler
 
Unless you’re subhuman how the fuck do you become a loser. You gotta be a special kind of neurodivergent or just not want to succeed.


Like n***a society is built to support you and give you success on the backs of male labor.

You have hypergamy and inherent value

You can larp with makeup, and the beauty standards are becoming less strict with every year

All you have to fucking do it be mtb and not be fat to date htn men.

And the highest value you can have is not to have lots of sex. Let that sink in. You don’t need to be a millionaire or Stacy, you don’t need to take roids, all you have to have is self control and choose not to have sex.

And even now, that is becoming less important. You could literally start an onlyfans or sell pics if you didn’t give a fuck about morals and people would still want you and care about you
All of the so called female losers just self sabotage
 
Unless you’re subhuman how the fuck do you become a loser. You gotta be a special kind of neurodivergent or just not want to succeed.


Like n***a society is built to support you and give you success on the backs of male labor.

You have hypergamy and inherent value

You can larp with makeup, and the beauty standards are becoming less strict with every year

All you have to fucking do it be mtb and not be fat to date htn men.

And the highest value you can have is not to have lots of sex. Let that sink in. You don’t need to be a millionaire or Stacy, you don’t need to take roids, all you have to have is self control and choose not to have sex.

And even now, that is becoming less important. You could literally start an onlyfans or sell pics if you didn’t give a fuck about morals and people would still want you and care about you


SOCIETY EVEN TELLS YOU TO BE ENTITLED AND EXPECT OTHER PEOPLE TO DO SHIT FOR YOU. YOU CAN JUDGE THE CHARACTER OF MEN WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES AND SOCIETY WILL SAY YOU’RE IN THE RIGHT
"b-b-ut im a femcel" 🥺
 
android_emoji_laughing_by_soldierkolski_dic2w2l-fullview.jpg
 
Unless you’re subhuman how the fuck do you become a loser. You gotta be a special kind of neurodivergent or just not want to succeed.


Like n***a society is built to support you and give you success on the backs of male labor.

You have hypergamy and inherent value

You can larp with makeup, and the beauty standards are becoming less strict with every year

All you have to fucking do it be mtb and not be fat to date htn men.

And the highest value you can have is not to have lots of sex. Let that sink in. You don’t need to be a millionaire or Stacy, you don’t need to take roids, all you have to have is self control and choose not to have sex.

And even now, that is becoming less important. You could literally start an onlyfans or sell pics if you didn’t give a fuck about morals and people would still want you and care about you


SOCIETY EVEN TELLS YOU TO BE ENTITLED AND EXPECT OTHER PEOPLE TO DO SHIT FOR YOU. YOU CAN JUDGE THE CHARACTER OF MEN WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES AND SOCIETY WILL SAY YOU’RE IN THE RIGHT
Most likely mentalcels with self-sabotage tendencies, inherited from genetics
 
what would you consider being a female loser? like having no friends? single?
Unless you’re subhuman how the fuck do you become a loser. You gotta be a special kind of neurodivergent or just not want to succeed.


Like n***a society is built to support you and give you success on the backs of male labor.

You have hypergamy and inherent value

You can larp with makeup, and the beauty standards are becoming less strict with every year

All you have to fucking do it be mtb and not be fat to date htn men.

And the highest value you can have is not to have lots of sex. Let that sink in. You don’t need to be a millionaire or Stacy, you don’t need to take roids, all you have to have is self control and choose not to have sex.

And even now, that is becoming less important. You could literally start an onlyfans or sell pics if you didn’t give a fuck about morals and people would still want you and care about you


SOCIETY EVEN TELLS YOU TO BE ENTITLED AND EXPECT OTHER PEOPLE TO DO SHIT FOR YOU. YOU CAN JUDGE THE CHARACTER OF MEN WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES AND SOCIETY WILL SAY YOU’RE IN THE RIGHT
 
what would you consider being a female loser? like having no friends? single?
Anyone who calls themselves a femcel while being hltb+ and whining about how they have no friends and need surgery or compare to models
 
Unless you’re subhuman how the fuck do you become a loser. You gotta be a special kind of neurodivergent or just not want to succeed.


Like n***a society is built to support you and give you success on the backs of male labor.

You have hypergamy and inherent value

You can larp with makeup, and the beauty standards are becoming less strict with every year

All you have to fucking do it be mtb and not be fat to date htn men.

And the highest value you can have is not to have lots of sex. Let that sink in. You don’t need to be a millionaire or Stacy, you don’t need to take roids, all you have to have is self control and choose not to have sex.

And even now, that is becoming less important. You could literally start an onlyfans or sell pics if you didn’t give a fuck about morals and people would still want you and care about you


SOCIETY EVEN TELLS YOU TO BE ENTITLED AND EXPECT OTHER PEOPLE TO DO SHIT FOR YOU. YOU CAN JUDGE THE CHARACTER OF MEN WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES AND SOCIETY WILL SAY YOU’RE IN THE RIGHT
Water, but still a @godtier post.
 
Foids



























Dnr
 
Unless you’re subhuman how the fuck do you become a loser. You gotta be a special kind of neurodivergent or just not want to succeed.


Like n***a society is built to support you and give you success on the backs of male labor.

You have hypergamy and inherent value

You can larp with makeup, and the beauty standards are becoming less strict with every year

All you have to fucking do it be mtb and not be fat to date htn men.

And the highest value you can have is not to have lots of sex. Let that sink in. You don’t need to be a millionaire or Stacy, you don’t need to take roids, all you have to have is self control and choose not to have sex.

And even now, that is becoming less important. You could literally start an onlyfans or sell pics if you didn’t give a fuck about morals and people would still want you and care about you


SOCIETY EVEN TELLS YOU TO BE ENTITLED AND EXPECT OTHER PEOPLE TO DO SHIT FOR YOU. YOU CAN JUDGE THE CHARACTER OF MEN WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES AND SOCIETY WILL SAY YOU’RE IN THE RIGHT
Not true
 
Like n***a society is built to support you and give you success on the backs of male labor.
im not exactly sure what this means. youre right that society gives women some advantages, but those advantages are given to them by other men, like being able to attract attention more easily online or in dating, but those are surface-level things.

i think life is just hard in different ways for both men and women in western society. it gives no reason for anybody to hate the other for it due to shallow perspective.
 
im not exactly sure what this means. youre right that society gives women some advantages, but those advantages are given to them by other men, like being able to attract attention more easily online or in dating, but those are surface-level things.

i think life is just hard in different ways for both men and women in western society. it gives no reason for anybody to hate the other for it due to shallow perspective.
Why are the women and children evacuated first
 
im not exactly sure what this means. youre right that society gives women some advantages, but those advantages are given to them by other men, like being able to attract attention more easily online or in dating, but those are surface-level things.

i think life is just hard in different ways for both men and women in western society. it gives no reason for anybody to hate the other for it due to shallow perspective.
I second this
 
Why are the women and children evacuated first
i think this mixes up a grand gesture of protection with inequality in everyday life. but i can understand if you are using this as a way to say "look, this shows one gender's life is seen as more valuable than the other".

that phrase actually originated as a moral code for emergencies. for most of history, women couldn’t vote, own property, have their own money, or make many choices for themselves. they were dependents of the men, so they had to be protected, not seen as powerful. it was the assumption that women were weaker and less capable in dangerous situations.

even when you isolate gender roles: men are strong, brave protectors and women are fragile or nurturing. some men throughout history even viewed women as childlike or should be treated like children. i even hear it today and on the forum, which is exactly why they were “saved first” along with the children. also, the phrase “women and children” specifically was used because women were seen as the primary caretakers of children. the logic was that if one parent had to survive to raise a child, it should be the mother.

a lesser example of extreme gender roles would be during home invasions, the man is usually the one to stand against the criminal because the the criminal was usually another man.

another point i always considered is that this phrase is used a lot in war, and it was seen as morally deplorable to not do so. i always thought it was because men were mostly in political power, began the wars, and were the ones fighting. women and children were not apart of these decisions or able to even go fight if they wanted, so it would be unfair to harm them during a war. that is just my logic though, and isnt backed up in history like the rest of what i said. im simply just explaining the phrase though, and not trying to say anybody has it harder. its just the way you look at it using reasoning
 
i think this mixes up a grand gesture of protection with inequality in everyday life. but i can understand if you are using this as a way to say "look, this shows one gender's life is seen as more valuable than the other".

that phrase actually originated as a moral code for emergencies. for most of history, women couldn’t vote, own property, have their own money, or make many choices for themselves. they were dependents of the men, so they had to be protected, not seen as powerful. it was the assumption that women were weaker and less capable in dangerous situations.

even when you isolate gender roles: men are strong, brave protectors and women are fragile or nurturing. some men throughout history even viewed women as childlike or should be treated like children. i even hear it today and on the forum, which is exactly why they were “saved first” along with the children. also, the phrase “women and children” specifically was used because women were seen as the primary caretakers of children. the logic was that if one parent had to survive to raise a child, it should be the mother.

a lesser example of extreme gender roles would be during home invasions, the man is usually the one to stand against the criminal because the the criminal was usually another man.

another point i always considered is that this phrase is used a lot in war, and it was seen as morally deplorable to not do so. i always thought it was because men were mostly in political power, began the wars, and were the ones fighting. women and children were not apart of these decisions or able to even go fight if they wanted, so it would be unfair to harm them during a war. that is just my logic though, and isnt backed up in history like the rest of what i said. im simply just explaining the phrase though, and not trying to say anybody has it harder. its just the way you look at it using reasoning
Solid read. I’d agree but I need to do research
 
i think this mixes up a grand gesture of protection with inequality in everyday life. but i can understand if you are using this as a way to say "look, this shows one gender's life is seen as more valuable than the other".

that phrase actually originated as a moral code for emergencies. for most of history, women couldn’t vote, own property, have their own money, or make many choices for themselves. they were dependents of the men, so they had to be protected, not seen as powerful. it was the assumption that women were weaker and less capable in dangerous situations.

even when you isolate gender roles: men are strong, brave protectors and women are fragile or nurturing. some men throughout history even viewed women as childlike or should be treated like children. i even hear it today and on the forum, which is exactly why they were “saved first” along with the children. also, the phrase “women and children” specifically was used because women were seen as the primary caretakers of children. the logic was that if one parent had to survive to raise a child, it should be the mother.

a lesser example of extreme gender roles would be during home invasions, the man is usually the one to stand against the criminal because the the criminal was usually another man.

another point i always considered is that this phrase is used a lot in war, and it was seen as morally deplorable to not do so. i always thought it was because men were mostly in political power, began the wars, and were the ones fighting. women and children were not apart of these decisions or able to even go fight if they wanted, so it would be unfair to harm them during a war. that is just my logic though, and isnt backed up in history like the rest of what i said. im simply just explaining the phrase though, and not trying to say anybody has it harder. its just the way you look at it using reasoning
Correction: 0.0001% of men who had power initiated wars that the other 99% had to participate in.
 
  • Gold
Reactions: RRM
Correction: 0.0001% of men who had power initiated wars that the other 99% had to participate in.
well yes, the point was that it was only men who participated in wars because they were recruited by those other men, even if they didnt want to, which is sad. but the reason i mentioned it still stands true. the fact is that it was still all men and i can see how killing women and children who arent even participating in the war can seem more wrong, and it becoming a moral code. not saying their lives are more valuable, but they are seen as having nothing to do with it.
 
Unless you’re subhuman how the fuck do you become a loser. You gotta be a special kind of neurodivergent or just not want to succeed.


Like n***a society is built to support you and give you success on the backs of male labor.

You have hypergamy and inherent value

You can larp with makeup, and the beauty standards are becoming less strict with every year

All you have to fucking do it be mtb and not be fat to date htn men.

And the highest value you can have is not to have lots of sex. Let that sink in. You don’t need to be a millionaire or Stacy, you don’t need to take roids, all you have to have is self control and choose not to have sex.

And even now, that is becoming less important. You could literally start an onlyfans or sell pics if you didn’t give a fuck about morals and people would still want you and care about you


SOCIETY EVEN TELLS YOU TO BE ENTITLED AND EXPECT OTHER PEOPLE TO DO SHIT FOR YOU. YOU CAN JUDGE THE CHARACTER OF MEN WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES AND SOCIETY WILL SAY YOU’RE IN THE RIGHT
Not everything is about sex and fucking, there are more beautiful things in life
 
well yes, the point was that it was only men who participated in wars because they were recruited by those other men, even if they didnt want to, which is sad. but the reason i mentioned it still stands true. the fact is that it was still all men and i can see how killing women and children who arent even participating in the war can seem more wrong, and it becoming a moral code. not saying their lives are more valuable, but they are seen as having nothing to do with it.
You’re not completely wrong. But OP’s point still stands. Every statistic shows that women have it better than men, in general, primarily in the US and western society.
 
You’re not completely wrong. But OP’s point still stands. Every statistic shows that women have it better than men, in general, primarily in the US and western society.
it depends on which statistics youre looking at, which im actually curious about since thats pretty broad. i would say in general in western society, men and women have equal struggles in different things, but in opposite ways, so you have to look at the whole picture.

an example of a topic could be healthcare. there are different struggles between both genders:

women were virtually excluded from clinical trials until the 1990s. male bodies are still used as the "default" in the majority of medical studies. women are 50–75% more likely to have the negative side effects in drugs because dosage and effects are mostly studied on men. up to 50% of heart attacks in women are misdiagnosed because their symptoms don't match the "male standard." studies reveal that doctors prescribe less pain medication to women who report the same level of pain as males, indicating that women's pain is not given the same priority as men's. the history of "hysteria" or the definition of a "WW" is worth researching to further prove that.

on the other side, due of the shame associated with being perceived as "weak," males are less likely to seek medical attention or mental health care, and their average lifespan is shortened by ~5 years. men are 3 to 4 times as likely than women to commit suicide, and more than 90% of workplace deaths are men. its truly sad

with this, both genders can be seen as being failed by the healthcare system. its easy to just look at something like workplace deaths, see who has more of them, and say that men are treated worse in total by the healthcare system.
--------------

there are many more statistics on other things that both men and women experience, such as narrow emotional standards, abuse and prejudice, constraint by gender roles, constant pressured about looks, and feeling isolated. all of this is equally supported by research, and looking at one statistic for who feels what "more" isnt correct.

and since its mentioned, i would say that women may have it objectively worse than men in areas other than the west. its much more equal here. with all of this, i would say its more than just my opinion due to the facts i gave you, but this is my perception. i can respect and look into your perception as well
 
it depends on which statistics youre looking at, which im actually curious about since thats pretty broad. i would say in general in western society, men and women have equal struggles in different things, but in opposite ways, so you have to look at the whole picture.

an example of a topic could be healthcare. there are different struggles between both genders:

women were virtually excluded from clinical trials until the 1990s. male bodies are still used as the "default" in the majority of medical studies. women are 50–75% more likely to have the negative side effects in drugs because dosage and effects are mostly studied on men. up to 50% of heart attacks in women are misdiagnosed because their symptoms don't match the "male standard." studies reveal that doctors prescribe less pain medication to women who report the same level of pain as males, indicating that women's pain is not given the same priority as men's. the history of "hysteria" or the definition of a "WW" is worth researching to further prove that.

on the other side, due of the shame associated with being perceived as "weak," males are less likely to seek medical attention or mental health care, and their average lifespan is shortened by ~5 years. men are 3 to 4 times as likely than women to commit suicide, and more than 90% of workplace deaths are men. its truly sad

with this, both genders can be seen as being failed by the healthcare system. its easy to just look at something like workplace deaths, see who has more of them, and say that men are treated worse in total by the healthcare system.
--------------

there are many more statistics on other things that both men and women experience, such as narrow emotional standards, abuse and prejudice, constraint by gender roles, constant pressured about looks, and feeling isolated. all of this is equally supported by research, and looking at one statistic for who feels what "more" isnt correct.

and since its mentioned, i would say that women may have it objectively worse than men in areas other than the west. its much more equal here. with all of this, i would say its more than just my opinion due to the facts i gave you, but this is my perception. i can respect and look into your perception as well
ChatGPT summarize this in 4 words
 
and since its mentioned, i would say that women may have it objectively worse than men in areas other than the west
#1 India. Nuff said. #2 that’s exactly why women here should stop complaining.
 
#1 India. Nuff said. #2 that’s exactly why women here should stop complaining.
i think both have the right to complain honestly, just with awareness. like i complain about school sometimes while knowing women in some places arent even allowed to go to school. i am fortunate
 
i think both have the right to complain honestly, just with awareness. like i complain about school sometimes while knowing women in some places arent even allowed to go to school. i am fortunate
Yeah I agree, never waste your studies when there are people who can’t go
 
i think both have the right to complain honestly, just with awareness. like i complain about school sometimes while knowing women in some places arent even allowed to go to school. i am fortunate
we are all luckier in some places where we don't notice it
 
i think both have the right to complain honestly, just with awareness. like i complain about school sometimes while knowing women in some places arent even allowed to go to school. i am fortunate
Okay but just don’t yap about how oppressed yall are here in the land of opportunity.
 
we are all luckier in some places where we don't notice it
If I went to Japan I’d be “luckier” doesn’t change how I’m treated in America tho
 
If I went to Japan I’d be “luckier” doesn’t change how I’m treated in America tho
Not necessarily, different culture
 
exactly, somebody will always have it better and worse than you. just live
That’s why I’m telling females to stop whining about shit like the gender pay gap when they don’t experience it themselves. An that’s just an example
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top