Join 33,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Story Femcels and normie foids argue over LTRing Chad. Who lifemogs?

Who lifemogs?


  • Total voters
    7

Jova

It's so jova
Reputable
Established
Joined
Apr 18, 2024
Messages
1,319
Reputation
2,934
Location
Southwest coast of Mexico
NameTyping StyleType2024 Thoughts2028 OutcomePartnerBody Count (including partner)Comments
Helene💀 CrassFemcel"Won't settle for marshmallow men"Married to ideal same-age Chad husbandIsaac (Chad, fit)1Roasts others for settling; extreme standards, 4chan-esque.
JovađŸ”„ DefiantFemcel"Not here for Beta Bobs or safety nets"Married to young, professional ChadliteXavier (Chadlite)1Maintains high standards; rejects “safe” options.
IdaliađŸ’Ș ConfidentFemcel"Society wants us to aim low"With self-made, same-age local ChadMarcus (Chad, local)1Believes in aiming high; finds a rare, desirable partner.
Aletta🛑 RealistNormie"Hot guys are players, better to settle"Happily with dependable LTNDouglas (LTN, steady)15Advocates for stability over looks; realistic and grounded.
FernandađŸ’Œ PracticalNormie"Looks fade; stability is key"With mature, reliable MTNSimon (MTN, stable)12Seeks reliability; avoids Chads due to commitment concerns.
Pilar🎹 Free-SpiritedNormie"Attractive men come with too much risk"Settled with caring, artsy MTNIrwin (MTN, creative)22Finds happiness with alternative partner; values balance.
Debora🔒 SecureNormie"Better off with a mature, stable man"With ambitious, older MTNLowell (MTN, serious)8Prefers stability; focuses on long-term potential.


Dialogue


2024:


The chat heats up as experienced women try to school the femcels about “realistic” dating expectations, claiming that the types of men they want are “unrealistic.” The femcels, unbothered, push back with biting critiques and refuse to settle, fully embracing their 4chan-influenced language.





Aletta: Listen, ladies, we’ve all been there. The truth is, these “Chads” you’re obsessing over? They’re not committing. They know their worth, and they have every woman chasing them. It’s just not practical to expect these guys to settle down with one person.


Helene: 💀💀 Cope harder, Aletta. Just because you bagged yourself some marshmallow with a 9-5 doesn’t mean we’re all lining up for Dad Bod Doug. Maybe your “Chads” were out here pump-and-dumping, but most Chads and Chadlites aren’t even models or influencers. They’re out there in any decently wealthy city—unseen by women who’ve already given up. Reality check: not all hot men are fame-hungry Instagram addicts.


Fernanda: I’m telling you, Helene, I dated my share of these “hot guys.” They’re all the same. The moment they get bored, they’re gone. It’s like clockwork. You’re setting yourself up for disappointment.


Jova: That’s your projection, Fernanda. Maybe they ghosted you because they sensed desperation. Not our problem if you were aiming for high-inhib, beta-tier men in disguise as “hot.” I’m not lowering my standards to lock down some Eugene-type just to play it “safe.” We’re not allergic to risk.


Pilar: Jova, no offense, but it sounds like you’re setting yourself up for heartbreak. Do you really think these guys who look like models are going to settle down with one woman? Be real. They’re getting DMs 24/7.


Idalia: No, that’s just visibility bias, Pilar. These guys exist in regular settings, too. You all just think they’re untouchable because they’re not lurking on dating apps, where you’re competing with every desperate woman in town. Newsflash: they’re not unicorns—they just don’t have to chase you.


Debora: This is about experience, ladies. We’ve actually been through this and learned the hard way. I’m trying to save you the heartbreak. Most guys that look like the men you want know they can do better. The sooner you get that, the better.


Helene: Experience. Right, that’s just code for “I lowered my standards.” And now you’re salty because some of us aren’t doing the same. I’ll pass on your low-tier oofy doofy, thank you. 💀💀


Aletta: Be careful what you wish for, Helene. These guys might look good on paper, but they’ll break your heart just as fast as they slid into your DMs. They’re players, plain and simple.


Idalia: That’s only true if you believe it. This whole “hot men can’t commit” nonsense is societal brainrot. Y’all got hurt and let it warp your standards, so now you’re pushing that fear on us. We’ll pass.


Pilar: Suit yourself. Just remember, when these guys treat you like options, don’t say we didn’t warn you.


Helene: I’ll take my chances with a Chadlite over some mayonnaise-eating Normie Nate who is only handsome in Mumbai. Real cope is settling for someone you don’t actually want just to feel “safe.” Good luck with that Netflix dad-bod retirement plan. 💀


2028:


Four years later, the group reconnects, and the relationship landscape has shifted. Some of the experienced women have settled into “stable” relationships with dependable partners, while Helene, Jova, and Idalia smugly flaunt their ideal Chads and Chadlites, fully committed to rubbing it in.





Aletta: So here we are
 married, stable, happy. Guess some of us realized that not every guy has to be a runway model to be a good partner. A lot of those “Chads” you talked about? Still single. And I bet you are too, Helene.


  • Aletta is with Douglas, a soft-spoken and stable LTN, and they’re content.

Helene: Happy? 😂 More like “content in complacency.” You found your little marshmallow man and now think you’ve cracked the code. Meanwhile, some of us actually held out and ended up with men—not marshmallows. Enjoy your dad-bod retirement plan. 💀


  • Helene is proudly married to Isaac, a laid-back but chiseled Chad who isn’t on social media.

Fernanda: Look, Helene, I’m glad you’re happy, but let’s be real. Most of these guys don’t exist outside Instagram, and you know it. I settled because I saw through the fantasy. I’d rather have stability than constantly feel like I have to compete for attention.


  • Fernanda is married to Simon, an MTN who’s kind and reliable.

Jova: 💀 Simon? You mean Mr. Safe Choice? Just because you chose stability doesn’t mean we’re delusional for wanting a man who doesn’t look like he eats processed cheese for lunch. Most Chads are living normal lives, but you wouldn’t see them because you’ve convinced yourself they don’t exist outside your little safe bubble.


  • Jova is with Xavier, a younger Chadlite who works in finance but keeps a low profile.

Pilar: Look, just because you two found your unicorns doesn’t mean everyone else’s choices are “settling.” At some point, it’s not about looks; it’s about who’ll actually be there for you.


  • Pilar has settled with Irwin, a slightly alternative but caring MTN.

Idalia: That’s a nice cope, Pilar. Keep telling yourself that if it helps you sleep. Meanwhile, we’re waking up to men who actually look good and don’t have the personality of a damp sponge.


  • Idalia is happily with Marcus, a Chad who owns a local business.

Debora: This is why people warned you. Relationships are more than just appearances. You’re banking on the hope these men will stick around forever, but looks fade. Stability doesn’t.


  • Debora is with Lowell, an older, serious-minded MTN.

Helene: Looks fade, but at least we had standards. Y’all settled for men who look like they peak at weekend barbecues, while we held out for men with a presence. Marshmallows vs. Men. 💀💀
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #2
out of the 3 with normal body-counts, her 2024 thoughts are the niceliest put. She simply states that she wont settle for anyone she doesnt love dearly whilst the other 2 use dogmatic terms such as "marshmallow men" and seem generally nasty. I too believe that you shouldnt settle for less than what you feel you deserve. As i am christian and believe in the Bible, the Bible states that not everyone will or should marry. If you can not find your standards, unrealistic or not, you simply dont marry.
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #12
out of the 3 with normal body-counts
Thought the normies had normal body counts for foids these days
, her 2024 thoughts are the niceliest put. She simply states that she wont settle for anyone she doesnt love dearly whilst the other 2 use dogmatic terms such as "marshmallow men" and seem generally nasty.
Why do the other two seem nasty or dogmatic?
I too believe that you shouldnt settle for less than what you feel you deserve. As i am christian and believe in the Bible, the Bible states that not everyone will or should marry. If you can not find your standards, unrealistic or not, you simply dont marry.
Are you a Christian fr?
 
Thought the normies had normal body counts for foids these days
they do, however i think it absurd that such a thing is normalised. Its normal by todays standard to say "my body count is only 2-3" and be seen as modest. Thats 3 people youve slept with. The only modest body count is 0-1. And for he/she who is not married, 0.

Why do the other two seem nasty or dogmatic?
"Won't settle for marshmallow men", "Not here for Beta Bobs or safety nets". such modern statements. The 3 women said nearly the same thing, but idalias statement was less of an insult and more of an opinion than the other 2. If i were a man, i would be put off by their unromantic way of looking at meeting the love of their lives.
Are you a Christian fr?
yes
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #14
they do, however i think it absurd that such a thing is normalised. Its normal by todays standard to say "my body count is only 2-3" and be seen as modest. Thats 3 people youve slept with. The only modest body count is 0-1. And for he/she who is not married, 0.
Where do you live?
"Won't settle for marshmallow men", "Not here for Beta Bobs or safety nets". such modern statements. The 3 women said nearly the same thing, but idalias statement was less of an insult and more of an opinion than the other 2. If i were a man, i would be put off by their unromantic way of looking at meeting the love of their lives.
Be honest do you think the other two femcels suffer from severe brainrot?
Nice!
 
Where do you live?
sweden
Be honest do you think the other two femcels suffer from severe brainrot?
nah. Their attitude to partner selecting is just slightly above average on the nasty scale for me. I am traditional enough to say that a simple "she/he must be this or that" puts me off. Atleast 6 ft, or atleast D ups. Its such an unromantic way of looking at it. Sure you may not be attracted to women below D cups or men below 6 ft and there is little u can do to change that. But plainly saying that makes the dating scene look more like grocery shopping than falling in love.
are u Christian ?
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #16
sweden

nah. Their attitude to partner selecting is just slightly above average on the nasty scale for me. I am traditional enough to say that a simple "she/he must be this or that" puts me off. Atleast 6 ft, or atleast D ups. Its such an unromantic way of looking at it. Sure you may not be attracted to women below D cups or men below 6 ft and there is little u can do to change that. But plainly saying that makes the dating scene look more like grocery shopping than falling in love.
Could they possibly be aspie?
are u Christian ?
Muslim
 
NameTyping StyleType2024 Thoughts2028 OutcomePartnerBody Count (including partner)Comments
Helene💀 CrassFemcel"Won't settle for marshmallow men"Married to ideal same-age Chad husbandIsaac (Chad, fit)1Roasts others for settling; extreme standards, 4chan-esque.
JovađŸ”„ DefiantFemcel"Not here for Beta Bobs or safety nets"Married to young, professional ChadliteXavier (Chadlite)1Maintains high standards; rejects “safe” options.
IdaliađŸ’Ș ConfidentFemcel"Society wants us to aim low"With self-made, same-age local ChadMarcus (Chad, local)1Believes in aiming high; finds a rare, desirable partner.
Aletta🛑 RealistNormie"Hot guys are players, better to settle"Happily with dependable LTNDouglas (LTN, steady)15Advocates for stability over looks; realistic and grounded.
FernandađŸ’Œ PracticalNormie"Looks fade; stability is key"With mature, reliable MTNSimon (MTN, stable)12Seeks reliability; avoids Chads due to commitment concerns.
Pilar🎹 Free-SpiritedNormie"Attractive men come with too much risk"Settled with caring, artsy MTNIrwin (MTN, creative)22Finds happiness with alternative partner; values balance.
Debora🔒 SecureNormie"Better off with a mature, stable man"With ambitious, older MTNLowell (MTN, serious)8Prefers stability; focuses on long-term potential.


Dialogue


2024:


The chat heats up as experienced women try to school the femcels about “realistic” dating expectations, claiming that the types of men they want are “unrealistic.” The femcels, unbothered, push back with biting critiques and refuse to settle, fully embracing their 4chan-influenced language.





Aletta: Listen, ladies, we’ve all been there. The truth is, these “Chads” you’re obsessing over? They’re not committing. They know their worth, and they have every woman chasing them. It’s just not practical to expect these guys to settle down with one person.


Helene: 💀💀 Cope harder, Aletta. Just because you bagged yourself some marshmallow with a 9-5 doesn’t mean we’re all lining up for Dad Bod Doug. Maybe your “Chads” were out here pump-and-dumping, but most Chads and Chadlites aren’t even models or influencers. They’re out there in any decently wealthy city—unseen by women who’ve already given up. Reality check: not all hot men are fame-hungry Instagram addicts.


Fernanda: I’m telling you, Helene, I dated my share of these “hot guys.” They’re all the same. The moment they get bored, they’re gone. It’s like clockwork. You’re setting yourself up for disappointment.


Jova: That’s your projection, Fernanda. Maybe they ghosted you because they sensed desperation. Not our problem if you were aiming for high-inhib, beta-tier men in disguise as “hot.” I’m not lowering my standards to lock down some Eugene-type just to play it “safe.” We’re not allergic to risk.


Pilar: Jova, no offense, but it sounds like you’re setting yourself up for heartbreak. Do you really think these guys who look like models are going to settle down with one woman? Be real. They’re getting DMs 24/7.


Idalia: No, that’s just visibility bias, Pilar. These guys exist in regular settings, too. You all just think they’re untouchable because they’re not lurking on dating apps, where you’re competing with every desperate woman in town. Newsflash: they’re not unicorns—they just don’t have to chase you.


Debora: This is about experience, ladies. We’ve actually been through this and learned the hard way. I’m trying to save you the heartbreak. Most guys that look like the men you want know they can do better. The sooner you get that, the better.


Helene: Experience. Right, that’s just code for “I lowered my standards.” And now you’re salty because some of us aren’t doing the same. I’ll pass on your low-tier oofy doofy, thank you. 💀💀


Aletta: Be careful what you wish for, Helene. These guys might look good on paper, but they’ll break your heart just as fast as they slid into your DMs. They’re players, plain and simple.


Idalia: That’s only true if you believe it. This whole “hot men can’t commit” nonsense is societal brainrot. Y’all got hurt and let it warp your standards, so now you’re pushing that fear on us. We’ll pass.


Pilar: Suit yourself. Just remember, when these guys treat you like options, don’t say we didn’t warn you.


Helene: I’ll take my chances with a Chadlite over some mayonnaise-eating Normie Nate who is only handsome in Mumbai. Real cope is settling for someone you don’t actually want just to feel “safe.” Good luck with that Netflix dad-bod retirement plan. 💀


2028:


Four years later, the group reconnects, and the relationship landscape has shifted. Some of the experienced women have settled into “stable” relationships with dependable partners, while Helene, Jova, and Idalia smugly flaunt their ideal Chads and Chadlites, fully committed to rubbing it in.





Aletta: So here we are
 married, stable, happy. Guess some of us realized that not every guy has to be a runway model to be a good partner. A lot of those “Chads” you talked about? Still single. And I bet you are too, Helene.


  • Aletta is with Douglas, a soft-spoken and stable LTN, and they’re content.

Helene: Happy? 😂 More like “content in complacency.” You found your little marshmallow man and now think you’ve cracked the code. Meanwhile, some of us actually held out and ended up with men—not marshmallows. Enjoy your dad-bod retirement plan. 💀


  • Helene is proudly married to Isaac, a laid-back but chiseled Chad who isn’t on social media.

Fernanda: Look, Helene, I’m glad you’re happy, but let’s be real. Most of these guys don’t exist outside Instagram, and you know it. I settled because I saw through the fantasy. I’d rather have stability than constantly feel like I have to compete for attention.


  • Fernanda is married to Simon, an MTN who’s kind and reliable.

Jova: 💀 Simon? You mean Mr. Safe Choice? Just because you chose stability doesn’t mean we’re delusional for wanting a man who doesn’t look like he eats processed cheese for lunch. Most Chads are living normal lives, but you wouldn’t see them because you’ve convinced yourself they don’t exist outside your little safe bubble.


  • Jova is with Xavier, a younger Chadlite who works in finance but keeps a low profile.

Pilar: Look, just because you two found your unicorns doesn’t mean everyone else’s choices are “settling.” At some point, it’s not about looks; it’s about who’ll actually be there for you.


  • Pilar has settled with Irwin, a slightly alternative but caring MTN.

Idalia: That’s a nice cope, Pilar. Keep telling yourself that if it helps you sleep. Meanwhile, we’re waking up to men who actually look good and don’t have the personality of a damp sponge.


  • Idalia is happily with Marcus, a Chad who owns a local business.

Debora: This is why people warned you. Relationships are more than just appearances. You’re banking on the hope these men will stick around forever, but looks fade. Stability doesn’t.


  • Debora is with Lowell, an older, serious-minded MTN.

Helene: Looks fade, but at least we had standards. Y’all settled for men who look like they peak at weekend barbecues, while we held out for men with a presence. Marshmallows vs. Men. 💀💀

Femcels and normie foids argue over LTRing Chad. Who lifemogs?​

 
Wdym please Elab and how it related to the story

Why?
An economist categorized action in relation to win or losts outcomes in relation to personal and community values, while also trying to come with a mathematical model for stupidity. So he elaborated that.
Relation to the storie? Jo mama
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #49
wtf the femcels got cl and chads??
Yes.
  • Helene is a white high MTB with Daria Morgendorffer pheno and is skinny
  • Jova and Idalia are mulatta HTBs on the curvy side but “quirky”
Are you surprised at this, and who Lifemogs? Femcels or normies?
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #50
An economist categorized action in relation to win or losts outcomes in relation to personal and community values, while also trying to come with a mathematical model for stupidity. So he elaborated that.
Relation to the storie? Jo mama
Hello Isaac Cock
 

Similar threads


Back
Top