Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

First trillionaire

Register to hide this ad
Letxs forget that he canxt use this money, as it is worth of his comapny
yea i understand how liquidity works, i don't care for political debates but no man should be worth that much while others don't know where there next meal is coming from.
 
yea i understand how liquidity works, i don't care for political debates but no man should be worth that much while others don't know where there next meal is coming from.
Not being able to buy a meal doesnxt mean everyone shouldnxt be able to buy a meal
 
Not being able to buy a meal doesnxt mean everyone shouldnxt be able to buy a meal
Falasy: false equivalence

If there is enough for everyone to eat then everyone should be able to eat

If there isn’t enough for everyone to eat that does not mean everyone shouldn’t eat (it does mean that nobody should be dying of obesity
 
Falasy: false equivalence

If there is enough for everyone to eat then everyone should be able to eat

If there isn’t enough for everyone to eat that does not mean everyone shouldn’t eat (it does mean that nobody should be dying of obesity
If there is enough it means that people should work for it, not because "otherwise they will starve"
 
If there is enough it means that people should work for it, not because "otherwise they will starve"

If living isn’t a right, how much work do they have to do to deserve to live
 
Falasy: false equivalence

If there is enough for everyone to eat then everyone should be able to eat

If there isn’t enough for everyone to eat that does not mean everyone shouldn’t eat (it does mean that nobody should be dying of obesity
I agree
 
If there is enough it means that people should work for it, not because "otherwise they will starve"
you really think that there aren't single moms out there who can barely afford to keep their kids alive working 60 hour weeks? It's not always a work harder issue bro
 
If living isn’t a right, how much work do they have to do to deserve to live
n***a is telling that my statement is logical fallacy while doing the same

They need to work enough/find a way to get food. Itxs their problem how they get it. Itxs like saying that water is human right, though it isnxt.
 
but saar he worked harder than everyone else saar. it doesn't matter he could solve world hunger for 18 years with that money saar he deserves all of it
His parents being billionaires has nothing to do with his money!
 
do you not have any empathy? are we not civilized enough to where people should no longer have to "find a way" to survive?
It was always like that, survives the most adapted. Your empathy, your morals are your doctrines, whole Ixm freed from them. Thatxs why I donxt care
 
It was always like that, survives the most adapted. Your empathy, your morals are your doctrines, whole Ixm freed from them. Thatxs why I donxt care
well i do suppose we need extremists on both ends to work towards solutions, i just don't think i resonate with your perspective. I hope you have a great day!
 
n***a is telling that my statement is logical fallacy while doing the same

They need to work enough/find a way to get food. Itxs their problem how they get it. Itxs like saying that water is human right, though it isnxt.
You said they need to work for food

So how much should someone work to be able to live? It’s a real question… if someone works 10 hours a week? 40? 60?

If you can’t answer that question then you don’t believe in your own point.
 
You said they need to work for food

So how much should someone work to be able to live? It’s a real question… if someone works 10 hours a week? 40? 60?

If you can’t answer that question then you don’t believe in your own point.
They need to work enough to get food. If they canxt, they need to find a way.
"If you can’t answer that question then you don’t believe in your own point." It does NOT work like that. If You can believe in God without proof, doesnxt mean you donxt believe in him because of not enough evidence
 
They need to work enough to get food. If they canxt, they need to find a way.
"If you can’t answer that question then you don’t believe in your own point." It does NOT work like that. If You can believe in God without proof, doesnxt mean you donxt believe in him because of not enough evidence
If I ask someone why the believe in god and they say I don’t know… then they don’t believe in him

If you don’t count eating as a human right and tell people if your work doesn’t pay you enough to “figure it out” then you are have no awareness of the difference between financial classes.

You can’t put a number on these things because you know some people with a lot more work a lot less then people in poverty.
 
If I ask someone why the believe in god and they say I don’t know… then they don’t believe in him

If you don’t count eating as a human right and tell people if your work doesn’t pay you enough to “figure it out” then you are have no awareness of the difference between financial classes.

You can’t put a number on these things because you know some people with a lot more work a lot less then people in poverty.
1. I love my family, but I canxt say why. Do you think I donxt love them?
2. Food is not a human right because the only thing guaranteed from birth is death.
3. I donxt understand what you want to say
 
My dad said he deserves it for all the things he created
He alone hasn’t contributed 1 trillion dollars of value
Either way I don’t care about rich people existing, he owns stock that over the years has for better or worse increased massively in value

I’m just making fun of trickle down economics
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top