Foid are just inferior

[gimp]

Throughout history, they have never been the ones to initiate change or reshape the course of events

they just react and submit to whatever came their way

 

[Carcinogenic]

is this genderbait ?

 

[Br4va]

I don’t really think it matters who is superior when comparing the two genders

 

[gimp]

is this genderbait ?

It’s a fact

 

[Carcinogenic]

It’s a fact

ah so it is

 

[ghoulmania]

diddler

 

[leea]

Throughout history, they have never been the ones to initiate change or reshape the course of events

they just react and submit to whatever came their way

Theres nothing such as natural submission its called socially conditioning feminity as "fragile, weak" since a very young age and i blame the moids for it.

Because they used to burn women genius and stripped them off their rights to be able to control them but im not here to teach you history

 

[ghoulmania]

Theres nothing such as natural submission its called socially conditioning feminity as "fragile, weak" since a very young age and i blame the moids for it.

Because they used to burn women genius and stripped them off their rights to be able to control them but im not here to teach you history

stfu

 

[Nenestar]

 

[leea]

It’s a fact

"Its a fact cause i said so"

 

[gimp]

It’s raging, poor thing

 

[ghoulmania]

View attachment 411960

master eating good huh

 

[leea]

It’s raging, poor thing

 

[TonyDr]

Throughout history, they have never been the ones to initiate change or reshape the course of events

they just react and submit to whatever came their way

And then all the queens walk in

 

[gimp]

View attachment 411962

huh, what r u trying to say unknown ragingfoid

 

[Carcinogenic]

Throughout history, they have never been the ones to initiate change or reshape the course of events

they just react and submit to whatever came their way

historically yes but there was also some female leaders that brought great change

 

[Venus]

“200 replies i got this”

 

[verbal]

Theres nothing such as natural submission its called socially conditioning feminity as "fragile, weak" since a very young age and i blame the moids for it.

that just stems from women's physical weakness , that hierarchy naturally created itself , the stronger dominates the weaker it's animalistic but inevitable

 

[leea]

that just stems from women's physical weakness , that hierarchy naturally created itself , the stronger dominates the weaker it's animalistic but inevitable

If that was true they wouldnt of felt the need to take women's rights away to control them, they wouldve been naturally submissive.
ITs all societal.
In order for the hierarchical structures of society and civilisation to work, just a few people need to be dominant, the majority need to be the submissive followers. Otherwise, too many people wanting to be in charge causes anarchy and conflict. Soo the majority condition is submissive and just a few are truly dominant. Culture asks men to be dominant, but most are really bad at being leaders (just look at your average politician lol)

 

[verbal]

If that was true they wouldnt of felt the need to take women's rights away to control them, they wouldve been naturally submissive.
ITs all societal.
In order for the hierarchical structures of society and civilisation to work, just a few people need to be dominant, the majority need to be the submissive followers. Otherwise, too many people wanting to be in charge causes anarchy and conflict. Soo the majority condition is submissive and just a few are truly dominant. Culture asks men to be dominant, but most are really bad at being leaders (just look at your average politician lol)

that societal submission was possible because of men's physical strength being greater than women's which stopped women from a possible revolt against that forced submission , otherwise you would be implying women are just so easily manipulated that their societal group as a whole got submitted through mental control? that would be you calling women stupid , once again , that systemic submission stems from a biological reality

Culture asks men to be dominant

lol and once again that stems from biology , because men would be the hunters / gatherers because of their superior physical aptitudes , that hierarchy created itself

but most are really bad at being leaders (just look at your average politician lol)

agreed

In order for the hierarchical structures of society and civilisation to work, just a few people need to be dominant

agreed , intra group we see those same dynamics with men but through resources and status In modern times

 

[leea]

that societal submission was possible because of men's physical strength being greater than women's which stopped women from a possible revolt against that forced submission ,

exactly so dont confuse natural submission with forced submission becquse of the physical difference.

otherwise you would be implying women are just so easily manipulated that their societal group as a whole got submitted through mental control? that would be you calling women stupid , once again , that systemic submission stems from a biological reality

lol and once again that stems from biology , because men would be the hunters /

In hunter/gatherer societies, nobody specialized. Nobody was just a hunter or a gatherer or even a tool maker exclusively. Rather, everybody did a bit of everything,
This means that in many societies women as well as men did engage in hunting and trapping game, just as men did engage in gathering plant resources..etc rather than having assigned gender roles. There was no patriarchy in nature

 

[verbal]

This means that in many societies women as well as men did engage in hunting and trapping game, just as men did engage in gathering plant resources..etc rather than having assigned gender roles. There was no patriarchy in nature

I would love to see a source for this , in every cave painting men were depicted as hunters and women with children

 

[Overthrown]

I would love to see a source for this , in every cave painting men were depicted as hunters and women with children

Challenging prehistoric gender roles: Research finds that women were hunters, too

It's a familiar story to many of us: In prehistoric times, men were hunters and women were gatherers. Women were not physically capable of hunting because their anatomy was different from men. And because men were hunters, they drove human evolution.

phys.org

Anthropologists hate your perspective

 

[leea]

I would love to see a source for this , in every cave painting men were depicted as hunters and women with children

Just look it up, theres many sources online