Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Foid hypergamy isn't real


~β€”β€’ @TrueFakeCell β€’β€”~​




Could you post your evidence? I'm interested.
Evidence for Looks-Based Hypergamy
Women rate men’s attractiveness far more harshly than men rate women. OKCupid’s behavioral data, not a survey but real ratings, found that women rated roughly 80% of men as below average in physical appeal, while men rated women on a normal bell curve.
The Tinder economy reveals extreme female selectivity. Analysis of nearly half a million users found women swipe right far less frequently than men, starving most men of matches. One quantitative breakdown estimated the bottom 80% of men compete for only the bottom 22% of women, giving Tinder a Gini inequality score of 0.58, more unequal than 95% of the world’s national economies.
Looks dominate actual behavior, not just stated preferences. A 2025 study in Computers in Human Behavior Reports analyzed 5,000+ real swiping decisions and found physical attractiveness outweighed every other factor including intelligence, height, and job by 7 to 20 times.
The more attractive a woman is, the more selective she becomes. Research by Buss and Shackelford found higher mate-value women set significantly stricter standards, filtering heavily for men at or above their own level.
Men’s attractiveness is also judged more inconsistently. Studies show women agree easily on which men are very attractive or very unattractive, but disagree heavily on men in the middle, making it harder for average men to clear the bar.
Sources: Wikipedia/Hypergamy Β· Arxiv (Tinder, 2016) Β· Medium/@worstonlinedater Β· PsyPost/Computers in Human Behavior Reports (2025) Β· PMC/Buss and Shackelford Β· ResearchGate/Rules of Attraction
 
Evidence for Looks-Based Hypergamy
Women rate men’s attractiveness far more harshly than men rate women. OKCupid’s behavioral data, not a survey but real ratings, found that women rated roughly 80% of men as below average in physical appeal, while men rated women on a normal bell curve.
The Tinder economy reveals extreme female selectivity. Analysis of nearly half a million users found women swipe right far less frequently than men, starving most men of matches. One quantitative breakdown estimated the bottom 80% of men compete for only the bottom 22% of women, giving Tinder a Gini inequality score of 0.58, more unequal than 95% of the world’s national economies.
Looks dominate actual behavior, not just stated preferences. A 2025 study in Computers in Human Behavior Reports analyzed 5,000+ real swiping decisions and found physical attractiveness outweighed every other factor including intelligence, height, and job by 7 to 20 times.
The more attractive a woman is, the more selective she becomes. Research by Buss and Shackelford found higher mate-value women set significantly stricter standards, filtering heavily for men at or above their own level.
Men’s attractiveness is also judged more inconsistently. Studies show women agree easily on which men are very attractive or very unattractive, but disagree heavily on men in the middle, making it harder for average men to clear the bar.
Sources: Wikipedia/Hypergamy Β· Arxiv (Tinder, 2016) Β· Medium/@worstonlinedater Β· PsyPost/Computers in Human Behavior Reports (2025) Β· PMC/Buss and Shackelford Β· ResearchGate/Rules of Attraction
Holy essay
 

~β€”β€’ @TrueFakeCell β€’β€”~​



Is this from incelwiki bro?

Evidence for Looks-Based Hypergamy
Women rate men’s attractiveness far more harshly than men rate women. OKCupid’s behavioral data, not a survey but real ratings, found that women rated roughly 80% of men as below average in physical appeal, while men rated women on a normal bell curve.

Dating apps have a ratio of 3 men for every 1 woman. And tinder is a form of speed dating. In speed dating, data shows that humans value physical attractiveness. However, in more natural scenarios, personality traits such as being risk taking, confident, and extraversion equate to more sexual partners and/or giving a person an easier time to find a long term mate. Using dating apps as evidence for how all of human mating functions is not viable.

The Tinder economy reveals extreme female selectivity. Analysis of nearly half a million users found women swipe right far less frequently than men, starving most men of matches. One quantitative breakdown estimated the bottom 80% of men compete for only the bottom 22% of women, giving Tinder a Gini inequality score of 0.58, more unequal than 95% of the world’s national economies.

Again, the ratio of men to women is 3:1

Looks dominate actual behavior, not just stated preferences. A 2025 study in Computers in Human Behavior Reports analyzed 5,000+ real swiping decisions and found physical attractiveness outweighed every other factor including intelligence, height, and job by 7 to 20 times.

Speed dating = valuing physical attractivness over other traits.

The more attractive a woman is, the more selective she becomes. Research by Buss and Shackelford found higher mate-value women set significantly stricter standards, filtering heavily for men at or above their own level.

This makes sense. If a woman is of "high mate value" then they will want to find a "high value" mate. That is simply just assortative mating and is fair. Also David Buss studies actually favors my argument.
 
Again, the ratio of men to women is 3:1
If this is true and hypergomh didn’t exist then 1/3rd of men should be getting all the girls (and this is if all the girls were still super selective) but it’s not 1|3 it’s closer to 1/5th the fractions don’t add up
 

~β€”β€’ @TrueFakeCell β€’β€”~​


If this is true and hypergomh didn’t exist then 1/3rd of men should be getting all the girls (and this is if all the girls were still super selective) but it’s not 1|3 it’s closer to 1/5th the fractions don’t add up

How does the skewed men to women ratio on dating apps lead to that correlation of 1/3 of men getting all the girls? I'm confused. Hypergamy is heavily exaggerated, assortative mating is what plays out in real life.
 

~β€”β€’ @TrueFakeCell β€’β€”~​




How does the skewed men to women ratio on dating apps lead to that correlation of 1/3 of men getting all the girls? I'm confused. Hypergamy is heavily exaggerated, assortative mating is what plays out in real life.
If the group of women is 1/3 to to every 1 guy then out of every 3 guys that swipe on a girl one of those guys statistically would have been swiped back on but that’s not the case even at the top 20% that get the matches the disparity is exponential, the top 5% get multiple times more the the top 20% and a magnitude again for the top 1 to the top 5, this is not a bell curve it’s a highly skewed exponential curve
 
Loser nerds on top and forever in my heart
The loser nerd in question :
1775955764345.gif

@Yani @TonyDr @foidslayer
 

~β€”β€’ @TrueFakeCell β€’β€”~​


If the group of women is 1/3 to to every 1 guy then out of every 3 guys that swipe on a girl one of those guys statistically would have been swiped back on but that’s not the case even at the top 20% that get the matches the disparity is exponential, the top 5% get multiple times more the the top 20% and a magnitude again for the top 1 to the top 5, this is not a bell curve it’s a highly skewed exponential curve

Isn't that 5% swipe rate only based off one study, and it doesn't reflect the actual dating landscape? Here check pm's.
 
There’s days where I feel like I’m the shit and other days where I feel like shit
rony remember your 3 evisceration threads under your belt can you make that 4
 
rony remember your 3 evisceration threads under your belt can you make that 4
Brutal Blackpillirony EVISCERATION THREAD :

He used to bald but he’s recovering from it but lets still bring it for no reason.
He’s ethnic.
He larps French (even tho he’s born in France)
 
Brutal Blackpillirony EVISCERATION THREAD :

He used to bald but he’s recovering from it but lets still bring it for no reason.
He’s ethnic.
He larps French (even tho he’s born in France)
n***a how are you balding at 18
 
nΓ―gga hes your man atleast compliment him.
oh my golly @Blackpillirony is like a cute little catboy hes SOOOOOO sexy and awesome i would crack all day all night guys like oh my god the most beautiful man on the planet ever finer than a chad like he has ascended past chad a chad is a measly subhuman compared to him hes so sexy
 

~β€”β€’ @Blackpillirony β€’β€”~​




Hold on, has Catlady shown you her face before?
I don’t think she’s very private about it, I saw it on both her TikTok and IG and I think she posted it on the forum
 
Brutal Blackpillirony EVISCERATION THREAD :

He used to bald but he’s recovering from it but lets still bring it for no reason.
He’s ethnic.
He larps French (even tho he’s born in France)
no nigha eviscerate someone 😑😑
 
oh my golly @Blackpillirony is like a cute little catboy hes SOOOOOO sexy and awesome i would crack all day all night guys like oh my god the most beautiful man on the planet ever finer than a chad like he has ascended past chad a chad is a measly subhuman compared to him hes so sexy
im not reading this ngl bro
 
UR THE ONE WHO ASKED ME TO U FAT CHUD
on wallahi the compliment isnt to me why ru acting like im the one getting complimented
 
on wallahi the compliment isnt to me why ru acting like im the one getting complimented
Lcls do not need compliments , just look in the mirror or sum
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top