Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Serious forum ratings

Can also be, i saw only 2 Black people like 90% of my life it was so strange when i moved to the Netherlands i saw seeing black people everywhere it felt so weird (still not in a racist way there are like only a handful of black people in Turkey) So it is a strange phenotype for me
yeah i think your js biased against blacks due to little exposure
 
yeah the bottom left guy and 3rd bottom guy are def mtns even by the rating system foidslayers talking bout
? it's the botb of .org threads first pic i sent was cls by the standard and second pic was htns
 
i did watch it the guy used bad pics for both the front and side profile 🫩
bad pics how?? eye leveled picture of ronaldo in his 30s like u said he was rated cl, and yeah u could argue that the sp pic isnt that good but his sp is not that good either
 
then the creators either js wrong or biased due to social attraction changing
the first guy in the bottom and the third are in no world 1/92
It's not just him I sent another thread talking about it too. Theres also incel wiki backing my claim up too
 
It's not just him I sent another thread talking about it too. Theres also incel wiki backing my claim up too
what other thread
this is the one im reffering to
op clarified htn is 1/92 which is js untrue for the two on the bottom
 
bad pics how?? eye leveled picture of ronaldo in his 30s like u said he was rated cl, and yeah u could argue that the sp pic isnt that good but his sp is not that good either
1316d546326e772bef012e16ca612915.webp

ed627738ce97681ab58d5c1b5637fa4c.webp


yea bro my favourite lhtn fucking cage
 
what other thread
this is the one im reffering to
op clarified htn is 1/92 which is js untrue for the two on the bottom
it is true. You don't realize you see hundreds of faces everyday

This is the actual average

can-the-average-american-man-be-considered-attractive-the-v0-oekyozz1odfe1.webp
 
alr i can back behind mtn being average but the face in this is obviously not going for accuracy lol
this is a shitty 3d render
this is a 3d render based on multiple studies and collectively the average of males in the US
 
It's true that the average person is LTN, but that doesn't change the fact that even most attractive people are MTN-HTN.
You're simply wrong, I gave you posts of .org back before the greyflood of what was considered for each ranking by trusted and known users

Anything but admitting you guys are underrating
 
Wait till you find out they're considered cl by old .org (that actually had good ratings before the greycel flood)

Your perceptions of looks are flawed
I vividly remember searching up Andrew Garfield on org back in like 2022/3 and seeing the consensus was that he was HTN-CL.

Nowadays, he’s rated MTN. Crazy to see
 
I vividly remember searching up Andrew Garfield on org back in like 2022/3 and seeing the consensus was that he was HTN-CL.

Nowadays, he’s rated MTN. Crazy to see
these people pmo so bad genuinely anything but admitting they're underrating
 
a good amount of them are mtn


literally how is this underrate

 
You guys underrate like your lives depend on it

it's sad to see
i genuinely think some people spend so much time online in this community looking at incredibly handsome people they forget how incredibly chopped the average person is
 
You're simply wrong, I gave you posts of .org back before the greyflood of what was considered for each ranking by trusted and known users

Anything but admitting you guys are underrating
Could go both ways and I'm not knocking you, if you remember I kinda refuse to rate anyone an actual chad or stacy cause that would imply ideal ratios for everything, and I don't believe that even exists without frauding. However to me, a CL or SL should be a unanimous mogger, there should be no debates on whether or not they're the top tier genetic end of humans with little to no frauding as everyone can see it clearly. Very little people fall into that category.
 
I didnt use it in that context idiot yet ur still not admitting its edited
yeye cause when you use a dlss upscaler in your games it means what you see on your screen isnt really there

your logic is flawed if you didnt use it in that context then whyd you type it out reyard
 
Could go both ways and I'm not knocking you, if you remember I kinda refuse to rate anyone an actual chad or stacy cause that would imply ideal ratios for everything, and I don't believe that even exists without frauding. However to me, a CL or SL should be a unanimous mogger, there should be no debates on whether or not they're the top tier genetic end of humans with little to no frauding as everyone can see it clearly. Very little people fall into that category.
your understanding of cl is what's actually chad.
 
The issue is that for whatever reason, MTN is no longer seen as average. Mid - Strong LTN is.

So, if we go based off that, then MTN is accurate because that would be considefed an HTN on old org.

It simply is based off what you consider average
 
i genuinely think some people spend so much time online in this community looking at incredibly handsome people they forget how incredibly chopped the average person is
true


most of the people that get rated mtn here would be significantly haloed in real life
 
The issue is that for whatever reason, MTN is no longer seen as average. Mid - Strong LTN is.

So, if we go based off that, then MTN is accurate because that would be considefed an HTN on old org.

It simply is based off what you consider average
the thing is mtn is not the average
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top