Serious forum ratings

[foidslayer]

The issue is that for whatever reason, MTN is no longer seen as average. Mid - Strong LTN is.

So, if we go based off that, then MTN is accurate because that would be considefed an HTN on old org.

It simply is based off what you consider average

i dont get why people started shifting the scale to whatever they deemed right

it's legit in the name

"Mid" Tier Normie

 

[Suguru]

your understanding of cl is what's actually chad.

A good amount of people would see it that way, if we bumped everything up one then yeah prime Ronaldo could possibly fall into low CL territory by your scale.

 

[knightmaxxer]

The issue is that for whatever reason, MTN is no longer seen as average. Mid - Strong LTN is.

So, if we go based off that, then MTN is accurate because that would be considefed an HTN on old org.

It simply is based off what you consider average

ig it makes sense, most (male) normies are low tier in the smv, but still its all so fucking confusing now

 

[foidslayer]

the thing is mtn is not the average

You don't have a mind of your own and you cant think for your own you're a dalit sheep fagcuck

 

[Dandelions]

true


most of the people that get rated mtn here would be significantly haloed in real life

Very true. And from my experience being in the BP community, this new rating system is absolutely correct based off my IRL experiences.

Again, we just have to add nuance that MTN is a GOOD rating. People think it’s an insult because for like a decade, it was the pinnacle peak of “average”.

The issue is, the scale has changed, but people’s minds haven’t.

Again, an MTN nowadays would be an HTN on old org. It’s accurate

 

[foidslayer]

A good amount of people would see it that way, if we bumped everything up one then yeah prime Ronaldo could possibly fall into low CL territory by your scale.

no i meant even in your scale a chad can still have flaws.

Reminder flaws ≠ falios

 

[knightmaxxer]

A good amount of people would see it that way, if we bumped everything up one then yeah prime Ronaldo could possibly fall into low CL territory by your scale.

prime ronaldo is a chad i dont fucking care what any of you n*****s say

 

[viasco]

prime ronaldo is a chad i dont fucking care what any of you n*****s say

ty bro cause why is this being questioned?

 

[foidslayer]

Very true. And from my experience being in the BP community, this new rating system is absolutely correct based off my IRL experiences.

Again, we just have to add nuance that MTN is a GOOD rating. People think it’s an insult because for like a decade, it was the pinnacle peak of “average”.

The issue is, the scale has changed, but people’s minds haven’t.

Again, an MTN nowadays would be an HTN on old org. It’s accurate

slowly restoring the iq to this forum

 

[knightmaxxer]

the fucked up rating system is why i usually dont trust it to judge if im actually getting better in looks, but instead i just use the way people treat me irl, you can TELL when your getting more handsome

 

[Suguru]

no i meant even in your scale a chad can still have flaws.

I don't believe that, through artificial visual mediums we know it's possible to create at least the digital image of an ideal face with no real flaws for either gender. So if we can't find something flawless like that in real life, then I really do think it's fair to say there are no real chads or stacies among real life humans.

 

[foidslayer]

I don't believe that, through artificial visual mediums we know it's possible to create at least the digital image of an ideal face with no real flaws for either gender. So if we can't find something flawless like that in real life, then I think it's fair to say there are no real chads or stacies among real life humans.

there is a tier for flawless called adam which is unattainable

 

[Dandelions]

slowly restoring the iq to this forum

It’s never gonna be fully standardized simply due to the fact that everyone’s definition of MTN is different now. People still think MTN is an insult and it’s baffling to me

 

[foidslayer]

the fucked up rating system is why i usually dont trust it to judge if im actually getting better in looks, but instead i just use the way people treat me irl, you can TELL when your getting more handsome

cause why are nigs tryna convince us a man that dates supermodels and ONLY supermodels like they're random ltbs is a lhtn

 

[viasco]

I don't believe that, through artificial visual mediums we know it's possible to create at least the digital image of an ideal face with no real flaws for either gender. So if we can't find something flawless like that in real life, then I really do think it's fair to say there are no real chads or stacies among real life humans.

youre forgetting that its our flaws that make us unique tho bro. its those use embrace the power of their flaws that stand out most in the eyes of the hoes

 

[giga.mia]

I feel like I see the opposite ngl

 

[knightmaxxer]

cause why are nigs tryna convince us a man that dates supermodels and ONLY supermodels like they're random ltbs is a lhtn

if ronaldo is an lhtn im a fucking sub2

 

[foidslayer]

It’s never gonna be fully standardized simply due to the fact that everyone’s definition of MTN is different now. People still think MTN is an insult and it’s baffling to me

im still holding onto the fact that I got rated lcl here like my life depends on it

 

[Dandelions]

there is a tier for flawless called adam which is unattainable

Ts wasn’t even a thing on old org jfl. TikTok has done irreversible damage to this community. Yikes

the fucked up rating system is why i usually dont trust it to judge if im actually getting better in looks, but instead i just use the way people treat me irl, you can TELL when your getting more handsome

Trvth nvke. It’s really easy to tell where you stand facially based off irl treatment

 

[foidslayer]

Ts wasn’t even a thing on old org jfl. TikTok has done irreversible damage to this community. Yikes

Trvth nvke. It’s really easy to tell where you stand facially based off irl treatment

it's called terachad by old .org but newgens call it adam

 

[Dandelions]

im still holding onto the fact that I got rated lcl here like my life depends on it

Your face is clearly attractive and you would stand out in any room, so I can’t see why you wouldn’t be a CL.

Realistically though, most newgens would rate you HTN which I don’t get, because your face isn’t anywhere near a “normie” range rating

 

[viasco]

this is so beautiful

 

[foidslayer]

Your face is clearly attractive and you would stand out in any room, so I can’t see why you wouldn’t be a CL.

Realistically though, most newgens would rate you HTN which I don’t get, because your face isn’t anywhere near a “normie” range rating

you genuinely should've seen the thread ratings ranged from hmtn-lcl it was retarded

 

[Dandelions]

Every single one of these guys would unironically get rated MTN

 

[Dandelions]

you genuinely should've seen the thread ratings ranged from hmtn-lcl it was retarded

I know for a fact my friend is HTN based off his face and how people treat him, and I can comfortably say you mog him

 

[viasco]

View attachment 354074
Every single one of these guys would unironically get rated MTN

every single one those guys arent even ltn id bully these n*****s ts crazy

 

[Dandelions]

every single one those guys arent even ltn id bully these n*****s ts crazy

Yet, they were the standard for CL back in the day. Crazy how times change

 

[Suguru]

youre forgetting that its our flaws that make us unique tho bro. its those use embrace the power of their flaws that stand out most in the eyes of the hoes

That does have some truth to it, also miring avi change.

 

[foidslayer]

Yet, they were the standard for CL back in the day. Crazy how times change

i remember when orb was considered a chad now people are calling him an overrated mtn

 

[viasco]

Yet, they were the standard for CL back in the day. Crazy how times change

this is why i constantly preach anti scale propaganda them mfks boneless

 

[viasco]

That does have some truth to it, also miring avi change.

bless

 

[knightmaxxer]

View attachment 354074
Every single one of these guys would unironically get rated MTN

first guy is htn imo but the rest are probably high mtn in my opinion

 

[Dandelions]

this is why i constantly preach anti scale propaganda them mfks boneless

Trvth nvke

i remember when orb was considered a chad now people are calling him an overrated mtn

I remember that as well. I think the best way to gauge someones rating is simply comparing them because HTN and CLs get super halo’d in stand alone pictures.

Orb might look like a Chad in a selfie, but if he took a picture next to an actual Chad like O’Pry, it’d be clear why Orb is not Chad.

But, I don’t think that’s an issue with the rating, I think it’s an issue with people being low IQ and thinking you need to be rated super high to be attractive.

The truth is, MTN+ are considered attractive in day to day life. HTNs are considered giga attractive at that. People just don’t realize it because we’re online and see the best of the best

 

[Suguru]

every single one those guys arent even ltn id bully these n*****s ts crazy

Yet, they were the standard for CL back in the day. Crazy how times change

Yeah those are all way too low for even old CL tier, I wonder how long ago this was made.

 

[foidslayer]

Trvth nvke

I remember that as well. I think the best way to gauge someones rating is simply comparing them because HTN and CLs get super halo’d in stand alone pictures.

Orb might look like a Chad in a selfie, but if he took a picture next to an actual Chad like O’Pry, it’d be clear why Orb is not Chad.

But, I don’t think that’s an issue with the rating, I think it’s an issue with people being low IQ and thinking you need to be rated super high to be attractive.

The truth is, MTN+ are considered attractive in day to day life. HTNs are considered giga attractive at that. People just don’t realize it because we’re online and see the best of the best

 

[Dandelions]

Yeah those are all way too low for even old CL tier, I wonder how long ago this was made.

It was a long time ago. The date said July 2023, But I could’ve sworn I saw it in like 2022. Probably around 2020 if I has to guess

 

[foidslayer]

It was a long time ago. The date said July 2023, But I could’ve sworn I saw it in like 2022. Probably around 2020 if I has to guess

yea i saw it back then too when I first started lm i think 2023 refers to the last edit

 

[Dandelions]

yea i saw it back then too when I first started lm i think 2023 refers to the last edit

Ahhh that makes sense, I think you’re right

 

[Suguru]

It was a long time ago. The date said July 2023, But I could’ve sworn I saw it in like 2022. Probably around 2020 if I has to guess

That's crazy, I assumed like early 2000s cause social media standards were well underway by even the late 2010s.

 

[foidslayer]

That's crazy, I assumed like early 2000s cause social media standards were well underway by even the late 2010s.

hypergamy was always a thing tho

 

[viasco]

That's crazy, I assumed like early 2000s cause social media standards were well underway by even the late 2010s.

ts was prolly neil straus propaganda tbh

 

[foidslayer]

View attachment 354074
Every single one of these guys would unironically get rated MTN

i js hopped on incel wiki and it said an ltn is a 4 on the normie scale which is this

this makes it inconsistent tbh

 

[viasco]

i js hopped on incel wiki and it said an ltn is a 4 on the normie scale which is this

View attachment 354081

this makes it inconsistent tbh

ngl this looks realistic aside from the obsession with hunter eyes & being square

 

[nomi]

You guys underrate like your lives depend on it

it's sad to see

some days I get rated mtb-mmtb and some days I get rated a ltb someone even said MY SIDE could be considered htb (personally htb is crazy)
idfk what to believe anymore

 

[glamora]

Wait till you find out they're considered cl by old .org (that actually had good ratings before the greycel flood)

Your perceptions of looks are flawed

with the epidemic of new people joining and more proven methods theres bound to be an uplift in looks.

not to mention old org didnt have an adequate system of rating people and most of the rates done on there were purely done based off of first glance. the abundance of specifically analyzing each ratio on said face to establish a tier was foreign in the sense that most people weren't doing that and the forum was still relatively niche.

while i do agree that the vast majority of people specifically newgens tend to over or underrate this doesnt mean that looks-inflation didnt happen. for example; in a sense where the economy was lower, 100$ would be perceived as more valuable than it is now. this is adamant when you take into account that people like Tom welling used to be rated low chad, and now he is most often rated mid cl. people also used to rate drew starkey as mhtn when now hes barely making the htn mark. same way how mtn used to be considered the global average while now its 4.5 or hltn

to conclude this doesnt mean that "everyone" is rating lower, it just means the stance of what a "chad" is has changed.

 

[Dandelions]

with the epidemic of new people joining and more proven methods theres bound to be an uplift in looks.

not to mention old org didnt have an adequate system of rating people and most of the rates done on there were purely done based off of first glance. the abundance of specifically analyzing each ratio on said face to establish a tier was foreign in the sense that most people weren't doing that and the forum was still relatively niche.

while i do agree that the vast majority of people specifically newgens tend to over or underrate this doesnt mean that looks-inflation didnt happen. for example; in a sense where the economy was lower, 100$ would be perceived as more valuable than it is now. this is adamant when you take into account that people like Tom welling used to be rated low chad, and now he is most often rated mid cl. people also used to rate drew starkey as mhtn when now hes barely making the htn mark. same way how mtn used to be considered the global average while now its 4.5 or hltn

to conclude this doesnt mean that "everyone" is rating lower, it just means the stance of what a "chad" is has changed.

You said it perfectly