General Theory of Law of Self-Undermining Devaluation (or The Dialectical Boomerang)

[StarWalker]

In an age of lies, acquiring truth constitutes one of the highest forms of self-defense.​

1. The Universal Maxim Of Perceived Value And Influence.
After careful synthesis of evolutionary psychology, psychoanalytic theory, empirical observations, and philosophical reflection, the manifold patterns of female relational behavior converge upon one universal maxim — a singular governing principle that functions like a fundamental law in a complex dynamical system:

"A woman’s psyche is fundamentally oriented toward maximizing her superego value through the strategic management of external perception of her projected relation with male desire and female political alliances."

This Maxim of Perceived Value and Influence serves as the central attractor around which all other behaviors orbit.





2. The Dialectical Model.
Internal tensions drive the system forward producing changes.
Thesis: affirmative impulse toward value maximization and security.
antithesis: emerges as the inherent contradiction within the thesis itself. Full realization of value is impossible to sustain.

Spoiler: (...)

Familiarity breeds contempt (the boredom clock in long-term relationships); male emotional availability or “ordinariness” fails to match the projected animus; external validation is fleeting and competitive. This produces frustration, envy, and aggression. The same drive that seeks elevation now turns destructive or manipulative: covert aggression, coercive control, gaslighting, jealousy induction, and relational sabotage. Craving for strong men while pathologizing masculinity, and in the use of helplessness as a weapon. It is the “dark” pole — the pain of devaluation, the fear of invisibility, and the discharge of tension onto others (especially men, who serve as emotional regulators). Jungian projection and Freudian repetition compulsion fuel this: the psyche attacks the very object it needs to complete itself.

Synthesis: Not a static resolution but a higher-order dynamic equilibrium achieved through continuous influence and adaptation. Women "resolve" the thesis-antithesis contradiction through ongoing influence, control, and perception management rather than genuine resolution. Coercive control, gaslighting, intermittent reinforcement, and plausible deniability are tools of this synthesis.

The synthesis (dynamic influence and relational power) appears functional in the short term but contains a fatal flaw: every successful act of taming reduces the man’s perceived power and autonomy. The once-exciting projection of strength is replaced by a regulated, frustrated, or submissive partner. This destroys the superego ideal she relies upon for her own sense of worth and completion.
From this internal contradiction we can formalize a new structural law:

​

3. The Law of Self-Undermining Devaluation (or The Dialectical Boomerang)​

By successfully deploying strategies of coercive control and taming to resolve the antithesis, women inevitably erode the very source of value (the strong, autonomous masculine figure) that their thesis demands, thereby devaluing their own projected superego ideal and generating chronic, self-reinforcing dissatisfaction.

Market Instability of the dialectical process leads to only 2 options of relationships:
a) relationship with devaluation;
b) breakup.

Spoiler: (extra, something to help me build the rest of the theory)

4. Aggregation Into Market Cycles​

When millions of women pursue the same strategy, individual acts aggregate without central planning.
The relational market follows classic hype cycles and innovation diffusion.
a) Innovation Trigger: a new high-value man or social trend appears.
b) Peak of Inflated Expectations: idealization and social proof create hype (preselection, mimetic desire – Girard).
c) Trough of Disillusionment: taming, familiarity (the law of self-undermining devaluation) and inflation (as more men or women achieve theprevious expectations) lead to boredom and devaluation (“wear and tear”) to the previous innovation.
d) ...

5. Superego of Men​

a) Mothers value a boy’s worth to his ability to please society standarts and, therefore, female standards of value. The boy internalizes that he must earn his value through female validation. This plants a harsh superego that teaches female approval. The natural ego (autonomous, exploratory self) is subordinated to the superego (“you must earn love by being useful”). This creates an internal split: the boy feels he must perform to survive inside. The boy enters adulthood with a superego already wired to female judgment, making him vulnerable to later manipulation.

b) In further social interactions, the superego is weaponized and the ego further suppressed. The man’s sense of identity is attacked through splitting (idealized then demonized) and projection (her animus needs placed on him). He becomes a transitional object — useful for her regulation but denied his own needs. Authenticity (healthy boundaries, mission focus) is penalized as “not male,” while compliance is rewarded temporarily before devaluation. The system frames non-compliance as identity death. Men learn to prioritize relational survival over authentic self, leading to quiet self-erasure.

 

[loserfoid]

apologies, but what are you talking about?

i dnr tbh but like i skimmed it n i can barely tell what ur talking abt

 

[StarWalker]

@Auggy