- Joined
- Jul 8, 2025
- Messages
- 475
- Time Online
- 16h 25m
- Reputation
- 745
yeah i did its a valid point lmfao ur a dumb fuckdid you deadass just ask me this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yeah i did its a valid point lmfao ur a dumb fuckdid you deadass just ask me this?
eyebrow fullness would fall into misceyebrow density? you dont need a measurment to tell if someones eyebrows are thin/lack density but theres eyebrow setness brow ridge projection etc to measure ur brows objectively
not valid at allyeah i did its a valid point lmfao ur a dumb fuck
dude ur so fucking stupid i promise u more people know what mtn means vs the ideal ratios of a face and how to measure themnot valid at all
one is just shitty forum lingo and the other one is literally mainstream study
dude ur so fucking stupid i promise u more people know what mtn means vs the ideal ratios of a face and how to measure them
Yes — everything I’ve told you is mainstream understanding in the fields of:
- Facial aesthetics
- Plastic surgery
- Oculoplastic (eye-focused) surgery
- Anthropometry (the scientific study of human proportions)
- Beauty analysis and modeling
These fields do not rely solely on ratios or strict measurements when evaluating facial beauty
--
Looksmaxxing is niche.
It’s not mainstream science — it comes from internet subcultures, mainly:
- Reddit (e.g., r/looksmaxxing, r/truerateme)
- Incelosphere-adjacent forums (like Lookism.net)
- TikTok/YouTube creators focused on "male aesthetics"
- Online self-improvement communities
and those other factors u mentioned either 1. fall into harmony 2. fall into a different catagory that can be measured. and lets pretend ur right and beauty cant be measured, the scale still exists even if its wrong and on said scale that you yourself use i am objectively not mtn because this scale uses these measruments, if u think beauty truly isnt measurable then u should stop using the ltn-htn scale and should honestly stop rating overallit agreed that its ONE of the factors, his point is that its everything which is objectively wrong
@over0Yes — everything I’ve told you is mainstream understanding in the fields of:
- Facial aesthetics
- Plastic surgery
- Oculoplastic (eye-focused) surgery
- Anthropometry (the scientific study of human proportions)
- Beauty analysis and modeling
These fields do not rely solely on ratios or strict measurements when evaluating facial beauty
--
Looksmaxxing is niche.
It’s not mainstream science — it comes from internet subcultures, mainly:
- Reddit (e.g., r/looksmaxxing, r/truerateme)
- Incelosphere-adjacent forums (like Lookism.net)
- TikTok/YouTube creators focused on "male aesthetics"
- Online self-improvement communities
someone else just called you mtn in the server btwand those other factors u mentioned either 1. fall into harmony 2. fall into a different catagory that can be measured. and lets pretend ur right and beauty cant be measured, the scale still exists even if its wrong and on said scale that you yourself use i am objectively not mtn because this scale uses these measruments, if u think beauty truly isnt measurable then u should stop using the ltn-htn scale and should honestly stop rating overall
dont care im objectively notsomeone else just called you mtn in the server btw
I'm just leaving it atp if he wants to believe this he can@over0back on chatgpt im literally just arguing with ai atp
you objectively aredont care im objectively not
@over0 wasnt he just saying beauty isnt measurable?you objectively are
ok explain how i objectively am without using ratios or harmony or angularity or dimorphism or anything like that because u said it isnt measurable, ill waityou objectively are
Just prove you can't analyse faces theoryyou objectively are
@gullible wasnt he just saying beauty isnt measurable?@over0 wasnt he just saying beauty isnt measurable?its hilarious how retarded he is bro everything he says is a direct contradiction to something else he said
i think hes baiting cuz he realised he lost the argument no way hes genuinely this stupid and thinks more people know the ideal ratios of a face vs what mtn meansI'm just leaving it atp if he wants to believe this he can
troll when u lose the argument oldest trick in the book its basically the equivilent of wearing a dunce cap and doing a monkey dance@gullible wasnt he just saying beauty isnt measurable?its hilarious how retarded he is bro everything he says is a direct contradiction to something else he said
youre so easy to troll
dimorphism and harmonyok explain how i objectively am without using ratios or harmony or angularity or dimorphism or anything like that because u said it isnt measurable, ill wait
lemme guess ur gonna take back every stupid statement u made in this thread and say it was all "rage bait"troll when u lose the argument oldest trick in the book its basically the equivilent of wearing a dunce cap and doing a monkey dance
i hope you realize im not reading all this junk you're sending me puptroll when u lose the argument oldest trick in the book its basically the equivilent of wearing a dunce cap and doing a monkey dance
i wasnt trolling about the shit i told you, im talking about making fun of your facelemme guess ur gonna take back every stupid statement u made in this thread and say it was all "rage bait"
dimorphism and harmony
keeps @over0 like they give a shitView attachment 130893
am i tweaking? @over0 remember what i said in ur thread abt people who throw around buzzwords they dont know how to measure![]()
but the shit u told me contradicts u being able to make fun of my face or even rate me because u said its not measurablei wasnt trolling about the shit i told you, im talking about making fun of your face
almost everybody rating eachother using THIS scale arent measuring shit, it doesnt matterbut the shit u told me contradicts u being able to make fun of my face or even rate me because u said its not measurable
Most people also can't rate including you clearly. If you don't measure shit or care to know how to why are you talking about analysing faces? If a mass amount of people disagree with you the chances are you're wrongkeeps @over0 like they give a shit
i promise you most people rating arent measuring shit you're just a nerd straight up
they r doing an eye test of everything lolll ur rating low cuz ur seething i iq mog face mog and life mog u so ur trolling to cope. true jesterkeeps @over0 like they give a shit
i promise you most people rating arent measuring shit you're just a nerd straight up
you can literally just look at someones face and judgeMost people also can't rate including you clearly. If you don't measure shit or care to know how to why are you talking about analysing faces? If a mass amount of people disagree with you the chances are you're wrong
also ppl literally do they point out flaws all the time if they see one or at least i doMost people also can't rate including you clearly. If you don't measure shit or care to know how to why are you talking about analysing faces? If a mass amount of people disagree with you the chances are you're wrong
judge what? their ratios....you can literally just look at someones face and judge
you're both simply nerds
you've been writing me love paragraphs on every reply for the past hour, talking about some life mogging, seems like you dont have anything to dothey r doing an eye test of everything lolll ur rating low cuz ur seething i iq mog face mog and life mog u so ur trolling to cope. true jester
do you have to sit there and measure the face of everyone you look at in order to tell what category they fall into?judge what? their ratios....
send an ugly person ill tell u what ratios/measurments r off rn just by doing it with an eyetest. im still basing the rate off those measurments i just dont have to go and measure them its like when a construction worker can eyeball something thats 8ft long without a measuring tapeyou can literally just look at someones face and judge
you're both simply nerds
vice versa bro im 12 am on a saturdayyou've been writing me love paragraphs on every reply for the past hour, talking about some life mogging, seems like you dont have anything to do
do you have to sit there and measure the face of everyone you look at in order to tell what category they fall into?
like this guy i can INSTANTLY tell his nose to lip width ratio is unideal i dont have to go measure it but im still basing it off the ideal measurment, its not that hard of a concept to understand if ur iq is in the triple digitsdo you have to sit there and measure the face of everyone you look at in order to tell what category they fall into?
send an ugly person ill tell u what ratios/measurments r off rn just by doing it with an eyetest
mtn glaring fwhr flaw and if i go measure it ill be right
go measure itmtn glaring fwhr flaw and if i go measure it ill be right
alr didgo measure it
blackgymmax is a extreme example though, his shi was visibly TOO biglike this guy i can INSTANTLY tell his nose to lip width ratio is unideal i dont have to go measure it but im still basing it off the ideal measurment, its not that hard of a concept to understand if ur iq is in the triple digits
yeah and so was that kids fwhr and his lip proportions and his nose to lip width and his eye spacing, i can spot these flaws on anyone if they r there i dont need to go measure themblackgymmax is a extreme example though, his shi was visibly TOO big
yeah and so was that kids fwhr and his lip proportions and his nose to lip width and his eye spacing, i can spot these flaws on anyone if they r there i dont need to go measure them
super good looking guy, has bad eyebrow spacing
give a ratingsuper good looking guy, has bad eyebrow spacing
high htn would need to see side for full ratinggive a rating