Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Girlies, this is very important to remember

eyebrow density? you dont need a measurment to tell if someones eyebrows are thin/lack density but theres eyebrow setness brow ridge projection etc to measure ur brows objectively
eyebrow fullness would fall into misc
 
It's definitely underated, I use my mom's makeup pen or whatever it is to make my brow symmetrical
 
Redpillers demonize it way to much
 
not valid at all

one is just shitty forum lingo and the other one is literally mainstream study
dude ur so fucking stupid i promise u more people know what mtn means vs the ideal ratios of a face and how to measure them
 
Yes — everything I’ve told you is mainstream understanding in the fields of:


  • Facial aesthetics
  • Plastic surgery
  • Oculoplastic (eye-focused) surgery
  • Anthropometry (the scientific study of human proportions)
  • Beauty analysis and modeling

These fields do not rely solely on ratios or strict measurements when evaluating facial beauty
--
Looksmaxxing is niche.
It’s not mainstream science — it comes from internet subcultures, mainly:


  • Reddit (e.g., r/looksmaxxing, r/truerateme)
  • Incelosphere-adjacent forums (like Lookism.net)
  • TikTok/YouTube creators focused on "male aesthetics"
  • Online self-improvement communities
 
dude ur so fucking stupid i promise u more people know what mtn means vs the ideal ratios of a face and how to measure them
Yes — everything I’ve told you is mainstream understanding in the fields of:


  • Facial aesthetics
  • Plastic surgery
  • Oculoplastic (eye-focused) surgery
  • Anthropometry (the scientific study of human proportions)
  • Beauty analysis and modeling

These fields do not rely solely on ratios or strict measurements when evaluating facial beauty
--
Looksmaxxing is niche.
It’s not mainstream science — it comes from internet subcultures, mainly:


  • Reddit (e.g., r/looksmaxxing, r/truerateme)
  • Incelosphere-adjacent forums (like Lookism.net)
  • TikTok/YouTube creators focused on "male aesthetics"
  • Online self-improvement communities
 
it agreed that its ONE of the factors, his point is that its everything which is objectively wrong
and those other factors u mentioned either 1. fall into harmony 2. fall into a different catagory that can be measured. and lets pretend ur right and beauty cant be measured, the scale still exists even if its wrong and on said scale that you yourself use i am objectively not mtn because this scale uses these measruments, if u think beauty truly isnt measurable then u should stop using the ltn-htn scale and should honestly stop rating overall
 
Yes — everything I’ve told you is mainstream understanding in the fields of:


  • Facial aesthetics
  • Plastic surgery
  • Oculoplastic (eye-focused) surgery
  • Anthropometry (the scientific study of human proportions)
  • Beauty analysis and modeling

These fields do not rely solely on ratios or strict measurements when evaluating facial beauty
--
Looksmaxxing is niche.
It’s not mainstream science — it comes from internet subcultures, mainly:


  • Reddit (e.g., r/looksmaxxing, r/truerateme)
  • Incelosphere-adjacent forums (like Lookism.net)
  • TikTok/YouTube creators focused on "male aesthetics"
  • Online self-improvement communities
@over0 🥷 back on chatgpt im literally just arguing with ai atp
 
and those other factors u mentioned either 1. fall into harmony 2. fall into a different catagory that can be measured. and lets pretend ur right and beauty cant be measured, the scale still exists even if its wrong and on said scale that you yourself use i am objectively not mtn because this scale uses these measruments, if u think beauty truly isnt measurable then u should stop using the ltn-htn scale and should honestly stop rating overall
someone else just called you mtn in the server btw
 
@over0 wasnt he just saying beauty isnt measurable? :ROFLMAO: its hilarious how retarded he is bro everything he says is a direct contradiction to something else he said
@gullible wasnt he just saying beauty isnt measurable? :ROFLMAO: its hilarious how retarded he is bro everything he says is a direct contradiction to something else he said

youre so easy to troll
 
I'm just leaving it atp if he wants to believe this he can
i think hes baiting cuz he realised he lost the argument no way hes genuinely this stupid and thinks more people know the ideal ratios of a face vs what mtn means
 
@gullible wasnt he just saying beauty isnt measurable? :ROFLMAO: its hilarious how retarded he is bro everything he says is a direct contradiction to something else he said

youre so easy to troll
troll when u lose the argument oldest trick in the book its basically the equivilent of wearing a dunce cap and doing a monkey dance
 
ok explain how i objectively am without using ratios or harmony or angularity or dimorphism or anything like that because u said it isnt measurable, ill wait
dimorphism and harmony
 
troll when u lose the argument oldest trick in the book its basically the equivilent of wearing a dunce cap and doing a monkey dance
lemme guess ur gonna take back every stupid statement u made in this thread and say it was all "rage bait"
 
troll when u lose the argument oldest trick in the book its basically the equivilent of wearing a dunce cap and doing a monkey dance
i hope you realize im not reading all this junk you're sending me pup

nonetheless, low mtn
 
lemme guess ur gonna take back every stupid statement u made in this thread and say it was all "rage bait"
i wasnt trolling about the shit i told you, im talking about making fun of your face
 
dimorphism and harmony
1752305564795.png

am i tweaking? @over0 remember what i said in ur thread abt people who throw around buzzwords they dont know how to measure 😱
 
i wasnt trolling about the shit i told you, im talking about making fun of your face
but the shit u told me contradicts u being able to make fun of my face or even rate me because u said its not measurable
 
but the shit u told me contradicts u being able to make fun of my face or even rate me because u said its not measurable
almost everybody rating eachother using THIS scale arent measuring shit, it doesnt matter

low mtn
 
keeps @over0 like they give a shit


i promise you most people rating arent measuring shit you're just a nerd straight up
Most people also can't rate including you clearly. If you don't measure shit or care to know how to why are you talking about analysing faces? If a mass amount of people disagree with you the chances are you're wrong
 
keeps @over0 like they give a shit


i promise you most people rating arent measuring shit you're just a nerd straight up
they r doing an eye test of everything lolll ur rating low cuz ur seething i iq mog face mog and life mog u so ur trolling to cope. true jester
 
Most people also can't rate including you clearly. If you don't measure shit or care to know how to why are you talking about analysing faces? If a mass amount of people disagree with you the chances are you're wrong
you can literally just look at someones face and judge

you're both simply nerds
 
Most people also can't rate including you clearly. If you don't measure shit or care to know how to why are you talking about analysing faces? If a mass amount of people disagree with you the chances are you're wrong
also ppl literally do they point out flaws all the time if they see one or at least i do
 
they r doing an eye test of everything lolll ur rating low cuz ur seething i iq mog face mog and life mog u so ur trolling to cope. true jester
you've been writing me love paragraphs on every reply for the past hour, talking about some life mogging, seems like you dont have anything to do
 
you can literally just look at someones face and judge

you're both simply nerds
send an ugly person ill tell u what ratios/measurments r off rn just by doing it with an eyetest. im still basing the rate off those measurments i just dont have to go and measure them its like when a construction worker can eyeball something thats 8ft long without a measuring tape
 
you've been writing me love paragraphs on every reply for the past hour, talking about some life mogging, seems like you dont have anything to do
vice versa bro im 12 am on a saturday
 
do you have to sit there and measure the face of everyone you look at in order to tell what category they fall into?
like this guy i can INSTANTLY tell his nose to lip width ratio is unideal i dont have to go measure it but im still basing it off the ideal measurment, its not that hard of a concept to understand if ur iq is in the triple digits
 

Attachments

  • 1752306111254.png
    1752306111254.png
    291.9 KB · Views: 5
like this guy i can INSTANTLY tell his nose to lip width ratio is unideal i dont have to go measure it but im still basing it off the ideal measurment, its not that hard of a concept to understand if ur iq is in the triple digits
blackgymmax is a extreme example though, his shi was visibly TOO big
 
blackgymmax is a extreme example though, his shi was visibly TOO big
yeah and so was that kids fwhr and his lip proportions and his nose to lip width and his eye spacing, i can spot these flaws on anyone if they r there i dont need to go measure them
 
yeah and so was that kids fwhr and his lip proportions and his nose to lip width and his eye spacing, i can spot these flaws on anyone if they r there i dont need to go measure them
cll.jpeg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top