Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Give solution on bad infras supras

Register to hide this ad
Sort by date Sort by votes
fat grafting dont do undereye filler
pre orbital implants + fat grafting would be ideal
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Blackpillirony said:
Volufiline before trying any implants, fillers or fat grafting
Click to expand...
@Orka shouldnt this be taken down because it’s misinformation? the only study backing this up which reported an avg breast vol increase of 2.2% after using volufiline for 56 days. its cope and misleading
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
zaycism said:
@Orka shouldnt this be taken down because it’s misinformation? the only study backing this up which reported an avg breast vol increase of 2.2% after using volufiline for 56 days. its cope and misleading
Click to expand...
Stay mad son, volufiline does work and should be considered before anything intrusive
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
zaycism said:
What do you get from spreading misinformation on volufiline, it doesn’t work. At least back your claim up
Click to expand...
A lot of studies confirm in fact that volufiline does bring fat in the area where it's applied, you love to scream "muh cope" without bringing anything of a proof.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Blackpillirony said:
A lot of studies confirm in fact that volufiline does bring fat in the area where it's applied, you love to scream "muh cope" without bringing anything of a proof.
Click to expand...
and its just one study showing the increase in breast volume which is 2.2% after 2 months
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
zaycism said:
and its just one study showing the increase in breast volume which is 2.2% after 2 months
Click to expand...
Yeah, and guess what ? Volufiline affects both breast fat pads and facial fat pads. OP was looking for non-invasive methods and I gave him one, he can also try an alternative like rosiglitazone.
Dragon said:
send said studies here
Click to expand...
Sure, lemme find the studies linked on the guides I've read on volufiline
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Blackpillirony said:
Yeah, and guess what ? Volufiline affects both breast fat pads and facial fat pads. OP was looking for non-invasive methods and I gave him one, he can also try an alternative like rosiglitazone.
Click to expand...
volufiline wouldn’t work, rosiglitazone is still a non cope method
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Blackpillirony said:
Where does your claims come from ? Explain please
Click to expand...
like i said there was only one study which was by the marketers themselves, conducted on the breasts of some girls. which barely means anything because results were seen after two months and breasts change a lot bc of weight gain, menstrual cycle etc
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
zaycism said:
like i said there was only one study which was by the marketers themselves, conducted on the breasts of some girls. which barely means anything because results were seen after two months and breasts change a lot bc of weight gain, menstrual cycle etc
Click to expand...
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, we'll see the orka verdict so you stop whining
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
zaycism said:
@Orka shouldnt this be taken down because it’s misinformation? the only study backing this up which reported an avg breast vol increase of 2.2% after using volufiline for 56 days. its cope and misleading
Click to expand...
Blackpillirony said:
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, we'll see the orka verdict so you stop whining
Click to expand...
Volufiline isn't backed by anything substantial, and recommending it for infras/supras is misleading and wastes time, especially when you tell people to do it before cosmetic procedures that are verified to work

Battle of the solution over here, I've deleted the post
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Orka said:
Volufiline isn't backed by anything substantial, and recommending it for infras/supras is misleading and wastes time, especially when you tell people to do it before cosmetic procedures that are verified to work

Battle of the solution over here, I've deleted the post
Click to expand...
Pretty sure volufiline has been proven to act on fat where it's applied, OP has manifested he was looking for non-invasive methods so I have him one, he can look for alternatives too.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Blackpillirony said:
Pretty sure volufiline has been proven to act on fat where it's applied, OP has manifested he was looking for non-invasive methods so I have him one, he can look for alternatives too.
Click to expand...
It acts, but not significantly enough for it to be worth it

As long as I'm here /looksmaxxing will start getting stricter
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Blackpillirony said:
Pretty sure volufiline has been proven to act on fat where it's applied, OP has manifested he was looking for non-invasive methods so I have him one, he can look for alternatives too.
Click to expand...
even if someone starts w very little under eye fat and vol increases fat the amount would be too small to see the evidence youre talking about are studies conducted by people selling volufiline they can say anything
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Topical rosiglitazone is the best non-invasive method i just dfk how to make that shit
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 3)
Back
Top