Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

got a haircut

Register to hide this ad
psl doesn’t really give an accurate rating of irl smv. even when not including body.
thats why psl and smv are two different things, a brokie 6'3 6.5 on the scale will teramog the lltn betabux cuck 5'6 mexican jfl
 
  • Like
Reactions: </3
thats why psl and smv are two different things, a brokie 6'3 6.5 on the scale will teramog the lltn betabux cuck 5'6 mexican jfl
that made no sense. the first one would have more smv regardless of psl.
 
  • Like
Reactions: </3
thats why ratings are objective and is dumb to rely on a schizoid foid like you jfl
to make a proper argument for your side. you should say “jordan barrett would slay more than michele morrone because of higher psl”. however that is not true irl.
 
  • Like
Reactions: </3
to make a proper argument for your side. you should say “jordan barrett would slay more than michele morrone because of higher psl”. however that is not true irl.
two different archetypes, one is a model slayer the other one is the love of brown mtb. yea im going with jordan on this one
 
two different archetypes, one is a model slayer the other one is the love of brown mtb. yea im going with jordan on this one
that awkward moment when morrone is a famous actor beloved by women and much more famous than barrett
 
to make a proper argument for your side. you should say “jordan barrett would slay more than michele morrone because of higher psl”. however that is not true irl.
those who psl vs appeal chico jordan :200iq::200iq::200iq:
 
that awkward moment when morrone is a famous actor beloved by women and much more famous than barrett
so what? still getting mogged
 
Walking morph vs overhyped htn with subhuman infras
morrone is a chad. what creates a chad is the right mix of smv dom and appeal. i can respect psl as a "science" but it fails to capture too many factors that would make someone a chad to the majority of women.
 
morrone is a chad. what creates a chad is the right mix of smv dom and appeal. i can respect psl as a "science" but it fails to capture too many factors that would make someone a chad to the majority of women.
Didn't read past the first sentence. You are retarded
 
Your argument is just your foid opinion
you are just avoiding my argument because you don't have an answer. how can a man be a chad if the majority of women don't see him that way. what really determines a chad is the right mix of smv dom and appeal. not psl.
 
you are just avoiding my argument because you don't have an answer. how can a man be a chad if the majority of women don't see him that way. what really determines a chad is the right mix of smv dom and appeal. not psl.
so youre changing the objective rating of looks because some people subjectively look better to you?
 
so youre changing the objective rating of looks because some people subjectively look better to you?
no i am not changing the psl scale. which is objective due to being based on mathematical ratios. i am arguing that the psl scale and the ltn chad scale are not the same. which is true.
 
you are just avoiding my argument because you don't have an answer. how can a man be a chad if the majority of women don't see him that way. what really determines a chad is the right mix of smv dom and appeal. not psl.
Appeal and smv are subjectives, the soul purpose of rating is to objectively assert beauty and failos.
 
no i am not changing the psl scale. which is objective due to being based on mathematical ratios. i am arguing that the psl scale and the ltn chad scale are not the same. which is true.
IMG_7986.webp
 
no argument

Appeal and smv are subjectives, the soul purpose of rating is to objectively assert beauty and failos.
if the mass majority of women would agree that a certain man has high smv dom and appeal. then he objectively has high smv dom and appeal to most women. if you objectively have high smv dom and appeal to most women. you are a chad.
 
no argument


if the mass majority of women would agree that a certain man has high smv dom and appeal. then he objectively has high smv dom and appeal to women. if you objectively have high smv dom and appeal to women. you are a chad.
The majority of women would bail out criminal just for the fact they are handsome, and kill innocent kids just because they are whores. Women's opinions are retarded, mathematically accurate measurements are not. Kys I will not engage with you low iq bodycel make up fraud whore
 
The majority of women would bail out criminal just for the fact they are handsome, and kill innocent kids just because they are whores. Women's opinions are retarded, mathematically accurate measurements are not. Kys I will not engage with you low iq bodycel make up fraud whore
you failed to outreason me so now you just say all women are wrong. classic midwit.
 
you failed to outreason me so now you are just saying all women are wrong. classic midwit.
My reasons are valid just look at rira, Luigi mangione and that retarded that became a model. Your 'reasons' are just your opinions
 
My reasons are valid just look at rira, Luigi mangione and that retarded that became a model. Your 'reasons' are just your opinions
if the majority of men are against criminals then why do the majority of men listen to music made by criminals glorifying criminals. but of course this whole criminal direction is your straw man. my argument was as simple as this. yes psl is an objective mathematical scale that cannot be changed. but the psl scale fails to capture too many aspects such as smv dom and appeal that determine whether a man is a chad to most women. so therefore the psl scale and the ltn chad scale are not the same.
 
if the majority of men are against criminals then why do the majority of men look up to and listen to music made by criminals. but of course this whole criminal direction is your straw man. my argument was as simple as this. yes psl is an objective mathematical scale that cannot be changed. but the psl scale fails to capture too many aspects such as smv dom and appeal that determine whether a man is a chad to most women. so therefore the psl scale and the ltn chad scale are not the same.
Listening to music and bailing out serial killers are different things ig

n***a there is not 'chad' to some women jfl just because a brown foid think a statusmaxxed htn is chad doesn't make him one stfu. A chad is chad due to high psl, if you can't comprehend that I'm sorry for you low iq
 
Listening to music and bailing out serial killers are different things ig
the vast majority of criminals are men in the first place. and when was the last time women actually bailed out serial killers.

A chad is chad due to high psl, if you can't comprehend that I'm sorry for you low iq
that is simply not what happens irl. smv dom and appeal are what make men a chad to most women. the psl scale and the ltn chad scale are not the same because the psl scale cannot accurately capture these factors.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top