Harmony is not flawed.

[Syniq]

The idea of ratios being flawed is stupid. They clearly correlate with attractiveness.

Useless ratios do not though, fair enough.

This idea that harmony is flawed is stupid. Please, if you have any arguments on why it is flawed, explain it to me.

 

[Penalizer69]

It's flawed because there's many different systems and noone can agree on which is correct

 

[Syniq]

It's flawed because there's many different systems and noone can agree on which is correct

So because something has many systems it's flawed?

That's retarded.

If you see any good raters with a good formula, you can see that the harmony doesn't go off by %5+- between different rates.
Just because something has different systems doesn't mean it's flawed. What a horrible argument, made me laugh

 

[emeraldpill]

So because something has many systems it's flawed?

That's retarded.

If you see any good raters with a good formula, you can see that the harmony doesn't go off by %5+- between different rates.
Just because something has different systems doesn't mean it's flawed. What a horrible argument, made me laugh

10% is pretty big

 

[Penalizer69]

So because something has many systems it's flawed?

That's retarded.

If you see any good raters with a good formula, you can see that the harmony doesn't go off by %5+- between different rates.

What does that even mean? If I analyse a mtn and a chad obviously there's gonna be a huge % difference. Maybe you mean the same person but that still makes no sense?

 

[Syniq]

10% is pretty big

I didn't say 10%, did I do?

 

[Syniq]

What does that even mean? If I analyse a mtn and a chad obviously there's gonna be a huge % difference. Maybe you mean the same person but that still makes no sense?

I did mean the same person.

And how does it make no sense? If 2 people who rate faces and use a different formula, get the harmony between 5%+- close to each other. How is that flawed? Because the same thing can be said about misc, angularity, and dimo.

This is a laughable argument.

 

[Penalizer69]

I did mean the same person.

And how does it make no sense? If 2 people who rate faces and use a different formula, get the harmony between 5%+- close to each other. How is that flawed? Because the same thing can be said about misc, angularity, and dimo.

This is a laughable argument.

That's a huge difference for top 0.0001% faces.

I didn't say 10%, did I do?

You cant even do maths g maybe stop the iq larp

 

[Syniq]

That's a huge difference for top 0.0001% faces.

You cant even do maths g maybe stop the iq larp

Same thing can be said about any other system in rating. Misc, ang, dimo. Harmony is no different, and a 5% difference, if that isn't big,

You fucking moron. %5± means a difference of %5 to the minus 5 or the addition of 5. You don't add these together because then it becomes 0

Here's an example: 65% ---> 70%. That isn't 10%.
And 5% on the higher end, I usually get 2-3%± with surgerymaxx, nuv, and morphological.

 

[Syniq]

Same thing can be said about any other system in rating. Misc, ang, dimo. Harmony is no different, and a 5% difference, if that isn't big,

You fucking moron. %5± means a difference of %5 to the minus 5 or the addition of 5. You don't add these together because then it becomes 0

Here's an example: 65% ---> 70%. That isn't 10%.
And 5% on the higher end, I usually get 2-3%± with surgerymaxx, nuv, and morphological.

Maybe if you mean total difference across the full range, then yes.

 

[Syniq]

That's a huge difference for top 0.0001% faces.

You cant even do maths g maybe stop the iq larp

Huge difference? You have never rated faces have you? You're laughable to me.

You have no idea of ratings. Because this can be said about any rating system

 

[emeraldpill]

I didn't say 10%, did I do?

You quite literally did

Same thing can be said about any other system in rating. Misc, ang, dimo. Harmony is no different, and a 5% difference, if that isn't big,

You fucking moron. %5± means a difference of %5 to the minus 5 or the addition of 5. You don't add these together because then it becomes 0

Here's an example: 65% ---> 70%. That isn't 10%.
And 5% on the higher end, I usually get 2-3%± with surgerymaxx, nuv, and morphological.

You’re retarded

For starters it’s +-5% not the other way round but whatever it gets the point across I suppose

Anyway, a deviation of 5% on each side of a value leads to a total difference of 10% between the lowest and highest calculated values

Even if you want to take it as relative % it’s still bigger than you claim most of the time

 

[Syniq]

You quite literally did

You’re retarded

For starters it’s +-5% not the other way round but whatever it gets the point across I suppose

Anyway, a deviation of 5% on each side of a value leads to a total difference of 10% between the lowest and highest calculated values

Even if you want to take it as relative % it’s still bigger than you claim most of the time

It's the same thing, means the same thing anyway.

"Anyway, a deviation of 5% on each side of a value leads to a total difference of 10% between the lowest and highest calculated values"

Please look at my other comment.

Prove it. Don't give me shit raters like FaceIQ. Give me good raters: Surgerymax, Morphological, ImChadLmfao, Nuv, etc.
Please, embarrass yourself to me. Go quiet on me, so I can laugh at your mediocracy.
The same picture must be used because one can be distorted or a bad angle.

You're a moron and below me. Know your place

 

[emeraldpill]

It's the same thing, means the same thing anyway.

"Anyway, a deviation of 5% on each side of a value leads to a total difference of 10% between the lowest and highest calculated values"

Please look at my other comment.

Prove it. Don't give me shit raters like FaceIQ. Give me good raters: Surgerymax, Morphological, ImChadLmfao, Nuv, etc.
Please, embarrass yourself to me. Go quiet on me, so I can laugh at your mediocracy.
The same picture must be used because one can be distorted or a bad angle.

You're a moron and below me. Know your place

What the fuck are you talking about you stupid n****r

There is nothing to prove, it’s just how maths works

 

[Syniq]

What the fuck are you talking about you stupid n****r

There is nothing to prove, it’s just how maths works

Moron, you said: "Even if you want to take it as relative % it’s still bigger than you claim most of the time"

So prove it. Prove it's higher. I'm guessing the difference between harmony in people and raters. So prove it for me. Let me laugh in your face at your idiocy

 

[Deleted Member 121099]

I used to get my harmony measured knowing it was going to be high so I could cope with the fact I’m treacherous to look at

 

[rope_maxxer]

What the fuck are you talking about you stupid n****r

There is nothing to prove, it’s just how maths works

dnr this retarded n***a is ragebaiting

 

[emeraldpill]

Moron, you said: "Even if you want to take it as relative % it’s still bigger than you claim most of the time"

So prove it. Prove it's higher. I'm guessing the difference between harmony in people and raters. So prove it for me. Let me laugh in your face at your idiocy

Jesus Christ dude you’re a fucking idiot relative % is still just maths

Everything I said was based on YOUR claim of +-5%

 

[emeraldpill]

I used to get my harmony measured knowing it was going to be high so I could cope with the fact I’m treacherous to look at

Me too

 

[Deleted Member 121099]

Me too

let’s share our %’s and then kiss

 

[emeraldpill]

let’s share our %’s and then kiss

1%, high right?

 

[Deleted Member 121099]

1%, high right?

the lower the better it’s like golf

 

[Syniq]

Jesus Christ dude you’re a fucking idiot relative % is still just maths

Everything I said was based on YOUR claim of +-5%

I was in thought that you have said the difference is higher than -+5% between rates, so as in it's -+7%
Also, the difference is by 0.5% which negligible. A 0.5% doesn't make any difference, so I just rounded it down to 10% instead 10.5%.

 

[Syniq]

dnr this retarded n***a is ragebaiting

Laughable that you think you're on my level. Quiet down dog

 

[Syniq]

I was in thought that you have said the difference is higher than -+5% between rates, so as in it's -+7%
Also, the difference is by 0.5% which negligible. A 0.5% doesn't make any difference, so I just rounded it down to 10% instead 10.5%.

We're also changing the topic. We should focus on harmony, please someone provide me with any evidence that harmony is flawed.

 

[rope_maxxer]

Laughable that you think you're on my level. Quiet down dog

who is this guy

 

[Syniq]

who is this guy

Keep barking for my attention my little unwanted dog. Soon you'll get it