Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

high cheekbones = good under eye support

Register to hide this ad
Do you guys actually have high cheekbones I'm talking cheekbones the end about a centimetre before the nasal base.
I have 82% cheekbone setness.... that is tier 1
 
Do you guys actually have high cheekbones I'm talking cheekbones the end about a centimetre before the nasal base.
idk whats my cheekbone setnets but caucasoid skulls usually have high cheekbones so i said that through deduction
 
doesnt the maxilla affect under eye support? i have decent cheekbones and a shit maxilla, and my under eye support is subpar
 
I have 82% cheekbone setness.... that is tier 1
And you have hollow under eyes?? I don't think that's possible at that point your cheekbones and your orbital rim are basically indistinguishable unless you've got very prominent cheekbones
 
doesnt the maxilla affect under eye support? i have decent cheekbones and a shit maxilla, and my under eye support is subpar
The maxilla does play a big part, but having very high cheekbones causes the cheekbones to give you under eye support like your orbital wood and in even higher cases it is directly connected and indistinguishable from the orbital rim
 
Do you guys actually have high cheekbones I'm talking cheekbones the end about a centimetre before the nasal base.
yes its 91% one of my few ideal ratios even faceiqlabs said that but they arent prominent
 
Then it would be impossible for you to have no under eye support since the cheekbone
1767618264076.webp
 
That doesn't help me I would need your full midface and if you don't have the support thing, you don't have very high cheekbones
the cause of undereyebags are recessed infras wich is part of the maxila not zygomatic bone
 
the cause of undereyebags are recessed infras wich is part of the maxila not zygomatic bone
I know but having very high cheekbones causes the cheekbones to act as under eye support if you do have very high cheekbones, but you still have no under support, it's probably from lack of sleep or missing fat
 
I know but having very high cheekbones causes the cheekbones to act as under eye support if you do have very high cheekbones, but you still have no under support, it's probably from lack of sleep or missing fat
i think its most probably because of missing fat but i can remeasure again i forgot how to measure it myself
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top