Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Serious Hot take i think

glamora

Well-known member
Reputable ★
Established
Joined
Jun 26, 2025
Messages
1,603
Solutions
2
Online time
6d 16h
Reputation
4,523
Location
United States
Unironically Charlie Kirk was a great guy and a good debater. He had good arguments and I agreed with him on most takes. Idk why his death was such a big thing bc he wasnt really that popular to gain that much attention. His theology takes were alright however he was a good guy and fairly nice. I do think he marketed himself in a bad way and he didn't really use TPUSA as a good leverage. He wouldve done wonders had he marketed himself as "changing the youth" when he went to college campuses. He was fun to watch esp his jubilee debates and I was actually saddened by his death as someone who watched him for so long.
 
Register to hide this ad
Unironically Charlie Kirk was a great guy and a good debater. He had good arguments and I agreed with him on most takes. Idk why his death was such a big thing bc he wasnt really that popular to gain that much attention. His theology takes were alright however he was a good guy and fairly nice. I do think he marketed himself in a bad way and he didn't really use TPUSA as a good leverage. He wouldve done wonders had he marketed himself as "changing the youth" when he went to college campuses. He was fun to watch esp his jubilee debates and I was actually saddened by his death as someone who watched him for so long.
he was a r****d
 
how so? what takes did you not agree with
Border control, theology, abortion rights, opinions on racism.

the only good take he ever had was about Israel and keeping America's money in america
 
Border control, theology, abortion rights, opinions on racism.

the only good take he ever had was about Israel and keeping America's money in america
His old takes about israel were horrible. It wasnt until leading up to his death when he actually woke up to the propaganda.
his takes on Abortion rights were good too, he was a good prolife debater and I respect that. Border control and ICE takes were also good however i do agree with you that his theology wasnt the best. He wasnt racist at all I dont know why thats a common misconception, all he did was link crimes to races which isnt morally right but people kinda needed a wake-up call.
 
maybe the fact he was against abortions for women who were victims of r**e and incest
He wasnt actually "against" it, he simply didnt believe it was morally right in MOST circumstances. If you watched some of his newish debates on it, youd know he changed his view on that and believed legality of abortion for r**e and incest.
 
Unironically Charlie Kirk was a great guy and a good debater. He had good arguments and I agreed with him on most takes. Idk why his death was such a big thing bc he wasnt really that popular to gain that much attention. His theology takes were alright however he was a good guy and fairly nice. I do think he marketed himself in a bad way and he didn't really use TPUSA as a good leverage. He wouldve done wonders had he marketed himself as "changing the youth" when he went to college campuses. He was fun to watch esp his jubilee debates and I was actually saddened by his death as someone who watched him for so long.
Well that’s definitely a take
 
His old takes about israel were horrible. It wasnt until leading up to his death when he actually woke up to the propaganda.
his takes on Abortion rights were good too, he was a good prolife debater and I respect that
he was genuinely the most average pro life debater ever
All he said was that the baby's were humans so they don't deserve to die, I never heard a philosophical statement from him on the value of lives that haven't started(which is the only good argument for or against abortion)
. Border control and ICE takes were also good
If anyone genuinely believes all illegal immigrants should be kicked out of the country im going to assume their stupid or racist
Instead of wasting our money making innocent people's lives worse we could have spent it on improving the legal process
He wasnt racist at all I dont know why thats a common misconception, all he did was link crimes to races which isnt morally right but people kinda needed a wake-up call.
he stated he would be scared if he saw a black person as his airplane driver(ik this was linked to affirmative action but if he understood how the process worked he wouldn't be saying this so either he's stupid or racist.) he stated kamala harris and michel Obama didn't deserve to be where they were and that they only got their because they are a minority and treated better, and he said smth bout Martin Luther King but I forgot and don't rlly wanna search it up
 
he was genuinely the most average pro life debater ever
All he said was that the baby's were humans so they don't deserve to die, I never heard a philosophical statement from him on the value of lives that haven't started(which is the only good argument for or against abortion)
He's made multiple objective arguments on abortion not regarding Christianity which were good. Also, "the value of lives that haven't started" is exactly where the disagreement is. Charlies position is that those lives have started already, so debating the value of a life that hasn't begun isn't really relevant from his perspective. you can disagree with that premise, but it's still a philosophical argument.
If anyone genuinely believes all illegal immigrants should be kicked out of the country im going to assume their stupid or racist
Instead of wasting our money making innocent people's lives worse we could have spent it on improving the legal process
I don't think someone has to be racist or stupid to support deporting undocumented immigrants. There are legal ways to immigrate here, so any illegal should leave. crossing the border is a misdemeanor here but a felony everywhere else, why is it that every other country can enforce border control but we cant? Not everyone deserves to live here if we thought about the morality of each and every illegal coming here the country would fall. Instead we need to think about the future of americans not the illegals that are coming here. housing prices, gas, etc; are already so high for actual american citizens, if we import a bunch of immigrants that number will skyrocket even more. This is just disregarding all the crime they commit too.
he stated he would be scared if he saw a black person as his airplane driver(ik this was linked to affirmative action but if he understood how the process worked he wouldn't be saying this so either he's stupid or racist.) he stated kamala harris and michel Obama didn't deserve to be where they were and that they only got their because they are a minority and treated better, and he said smth bout Martin Luther King but I forgot and don't rlly wanna search it up
you're dismissing the whole point of that claim. Hes saying he would be scared because of DEI and how theyre letting under-qualified POC take skilled jobs from whites and whatnot. Personally idc what race they are but Id like to be sure that theyre qualified for the position and DEI combats that. He said that about Kamala because she was a shitty prosecutor and district attorney in cali that let a bunch of criminals get away. Biden also stated that he was gonna choose a "black female" for his running mate which is why Charlie considered her a DEI candidate.
 
He's made multiple objective arguments on abortion not regarding Christianity which were good. Also, "the value of lives that haven't started" is exactly where the disagreement is. Charlies position is that those lives have started already, so debating the value of a life that hasn't begun isn't really relevant from his perspective. you can disagree with that premise, but it's still a philosophical argument.

I don't think someone has to be racist or stupid to support deporting undocumented immigrants. There are legal ways to immigrate here, so any illegal should leave. crossing the border is a misdemeanor here but a felony everywhere else, why is it that every other country can enforce border control but we cant? Not everyone deserves to live here if we thought about the morality of each and every illegal coming here the country would fall. Instead we need to think about the future of americans not the illegals that are coming here. housing prices, gas, etc; are already so high for actual american citizens, if we import a bunch of immigrants that number will skyrocket even more. This is just disregarding all the crime they commit too.

you're disregarding the whole point of that claim. Hes saying he would be scared because of DEI and how theyre letting under-qualified POC take skilled jobs from whites and whatnot. Personally idc what race they are but Id like to be sure that theyre qualified for the position and DEI combats that. He said that about Kamala because she was a shitty prosecutor and district attorney in cali that let a bunch of criminals get away. Biden also stated that he was gonna choose a "black female" for his running mate which is why Charlie considered her a DEI candidate.
I'm not reading this sorry
dei doesn't let under qualified people work tho
which showcases his stupidity and bias against ethnics
 
I'm not reading this sorry
dei doesn't let under qualified people work tho
which showcases his stupidity and bias against ethnics
n***a its 3 paragraphs yours was about the same length
it doesnt let under qualified people work however it chooses a mediocre poc over a skilled white and thats the truth
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top