How’s my face harmony?

[Bonelessandconfused]

is it good or bad

 

[over0]

cl even

Mogs marlon

 

[vespertine]

im so sorry man. just in general

 

[JesusandGodarethebest]

im so sorry man. just in general

fuck you sorry for

 

[Bonelessandconfused]

Bad id say avrage wich is not rlly good also measuring ur face every ratio would take a long time but i say in the most important ones ur ether avrage or below

So what do i do to improve?

 

[JesusandGodarethebest]

get a longer haircut that covers ear and forehead my opinio

 

[Bonelessandconfused]

Bad id say avrage wich is not rlly good also measuring ur face every ratio would take a long time but i say in the most important ones ur ether avrage or below

So what do i do to improve?

 

[idkwhatodo]

So what do i do to improve?

A lot just look at yourself and then look in the guides on the org

 

[snow]

Do u post rate me’s every day? What typa mental illness is this

 

[Bonelessandconfused]

just jfl nigha, I am doing you a great service to make you stop coping and actually improve your looks instead of comforting you

Do u post rate me’s every day? What typa mental illness is this

Validation seeking idk

 

[Deleted Member 90088]

how does our looks effect objective facts? if a subhuman called another person subhuman it doesn't make their point anymore invalid

bro downvoted your comment lmfao

 

[collagen]

is it good or bad

YO

 

[collagen]

is it good or bad

"Advanced Blackpill Ratio Analysis

Core Facial Proportions (1-10)​

1. Facial Width to Height Ratio (FWHR): Bizygomatic width / distance from brow to upper lip. Ideal: 1.8-2.0 (high dimorphism, wide face). His: ~1.6 (narrow, feminine). Impact: Massive failo—looks weak, low T, no intimidation factor.
2. Midface Ratio: Interpupillary distance / distance from pupils to upper lip. Ideal: 1.0-1.1 (compact). His: ~0.9 (elongated midface). Impact: Horseface vibe, ages him, kills harmony.
3. Eye Separation Ratio (ESR): Interocular distance / bizygomatic width. Ideal: 0.45-0.47. His: ~0.48 (slightly wide-set). Impact: Minor failo—looks less focused, less trustworthy.
4. Chin to Philtrum Ratio: Chin height / philtrum length. Ideal: 2.0-2.5. His: ~1.7 (short chin). Impact: Recessed lower third, beta look.
5. Lower to Upper Facial Height Ratio: Distance from subnasale to menton / glabella to subnasale. Ideal: ~1.618 (golden ratio). His: ~1.4 (top-heavy). Impact: Imbalanced, cartoonish proportions.
6. Facial Thirds Ratio (Upper:Middle:Lower): Ideal: 1:1:1. His: 1:1.1:0.9 (elongated mid, short lower). Impact: Disharmony, no aesthetic flow.
7. Bigonial to Bizygomatic Ratio: Jaw width / cheekbone width. Ideal: 0.85-0.9 (flared gonions). His: ~0.75 (narrow jaw). Impact: Egghead shape, zero angularity.
8. Nasal Index: Nose width / height. Ideal: 0.6-0.7 (refined). His: ~0.8 (wide). Impact: Ethnic failo, broadens face unappealingly.
9. Mouth Width to Nose Width Ratio: Ideal: 1.5-1.6. His: ~1.4 (narrow mouth). Impact: Pinched look, reduces expressiveness.
10. Total Facial Height to Width Ratio: Ideal: 1.3-1.4 (oval). His: ~1.2 (round). Impact: Bloated, low appeal.

Eye Area Ratios (11-25) – 40% of Attractiveness, His is Mid-Sub​

1. Palpebral Fissure Length (PFL) to Height Ratio: Ideal: 3:1 (hunter eyes). His: ~2.5:1 (short PFL). Impact: Squinty, unremarkable.
2. Canthal Tilt Angle: Medial to lateral canthus. Ideal: +4-6°. His: ~0° (neutral). Impact: No prey eyes halo, looks tired.
3. Intercanthal Distance to PFL Ratio: Ideal: 1:1. His: ~1.1:1 (wide). Impact: Slight hypertelorism vibe.
4. Upper Eyelid Exposure Ratio: Visible lid / eye height. Ideal: 0-10% (hooded). His: ~15% (slight exposure). Impact: Less masculine.
5. Lower Eyelid to Iris Ratio: Sclera show. Ideal: 0 (tight). His: ~5% (minor show). Impact: Aged, sad look.
6. Eyebrow to Eye Ratio (Density/Position): Ideal: Low-set, thick (1:1 arch). His: ~1.2:1 (high, thin). Impact: Feminine brows.
7. Orbital Vector Angle: Ideal: Positive (projecting). His: Neutral. Impact: Flat orbitals, no depth.
8. PFL to Bizygomatic Ratio: Ideal: 0.25. His: ~0.22. Impact: Small eyes relative to face.
9. Iris Diameter to PFL Ratio: Ideal: 0.4. His: ~0.45 (large iris). Impact: Doll-like, not striking.
10. Medial Canthus Sharpness Ratio: Ideal: Acute angle. His: Rounded. Impact: Soft, low dimorphism.
11. Eye Asymmetry Ratio: Left vs right difference. Ideal: <2%. His: ~3% (slight asymmetry). Impact: Minor harmony failo.
12. Supraorbital Ridge Projection Ratio: Ideal: 1.1 (prominent). His: ~0.9 (flat). Impact: Low T indicator.
13. Infraorbital Rim Ratio: Ideal: Forward. His: Recessed (~0.8). Impact: Dark circles potential.
14. Lateral Canthus to Temple Ratio: Ideal: Tight. His: Loose. Impact: Aged appearance.
15. Eye Color Contrast Ratio: Iris to sclera. Ideal: High. His: Low (brown eyes). Impact: No pop, generic.

Nose and Mouth Ratios (26-40)​

1. Nose Length to Midface Ratio: Ideal: 0.5. His: ~0.55 (long). Impact: Protruding, disrupts flow.
2. Alae Width to Interpupillary Ratio: Ideal: 0.6. His: ~0.7 (flared nostrils). Impact: Ethnic broadening.
3. Nasal Tip Projection Ratio (Goode's): Columella to tip. Ideal: 0.55-0.6. His: ~0.5. Impact: Underprojected, weak.
4. Nasolabial Angle: Ideal: 90-100°. His: ~105° (upturned). Impact: Feminine.
5. Philtrum Length to Nose Base Ratio: Ideal: 1:2. His: ~1:1.8 (long philtrum). Impact: Ape-like upper lip.
6. Lip Thickness Ratio (Upper:Lower): Ideal: 1:1.5. His: 1:1.2 (thin upper). Impact: Unkissable, low sensuality.
7. Mouth Width to Jaw Width Ratio: Ideal: 0.5. His: ~0.55 (wide). Impact: Goofy smile potential.
8. Cupid's Bow Definition Ratio: Ideal: Sharp (1:1). His: Flat (~0.8). Impact: Bland lips.
9. Vermilion Border Ratio: Ideal: Defined. His: Blurry. Impact: Ages mouth area.
10. Oral Commissure to Canthus Ratio: Ideal: Aligned. His: Low. Impact: Downturned, sad.
11. Nose Bridge Width Ratio: Ideal: Narrow (0.3 of midface). His: ~0.35. Impact: Bulky.
12. Columella Width Ratio: Ideal: Thin. His: Average. Impact: No refinement.
13. Lip to Chin Ratio: Ideal: 1:2. His: ~1:1.5. Impact: Short lower.
14. Nasofacial Angle: Ideal: 30-40°. His: ~45°. Impact: Flat profile.
15. Mouth to Eye Ratio (Vertical Alignment): Ideal: Balanced. His: Low mouth. Impact: Elongated feel.

Jaw, Chin, and Lower Third Ratios (41-55)​

1. Mandibular Angle: Ideal: 120-130° (sharp). His: ~140° (obtuse). Impact: No jawline, gonial eversion failo.
2. Chin Width to Jaw Width Ratio: Ideal: 0.7. His: ~0.6 (pointy). Impact: Weak chin.
3. Ramus Length to Mandible Ratio: Ideal: Long (0.4). His: ~0.3 (short). Impact: Recessed.
4. Gonial Angle to FWHR Correlation: Ideal: Low angle high FWHR. His: High angle low FWHR. Impact: Double failo.
5. Mental Protuberance Projection: Ideal: Forward. His: Recessed. Impact: No dimple halo.
6. Jaw to Neck Ratio: Ideal: Defined (1:0.8). His: ~1:1 (blends). Impact: Turkey neck potential.
7. Bigonial Width to Height Ratio: Ideal: Wide. His: Narrow. Impact: Frail.
8. Chin Recession Ratio (SNB Angle): Ideal: 78-82°. His: ~75°. Impact: Birdface profile.
9. Lower Facial Convexity: Ideal: Straight. His: Convex. Impact: Bloated.
10. Masseter Volume Ratio: Ideal: Prominent. His: Flat. Impact: No chewermaxx halo.
11. Antegonial Notch Depth: Ideal: Minimal. His: Noticeable. Impact: Jowls incoming.
12. Jaw Asymmetry Ratio: Ideal: <1%. His: ~2%. Impact: Minor but noticeable.
13. Chin to Neck Angle: Ideal: 90°. His: ~100°. Impact: Double chin risk.
14. Mandible to Cranium Ratio: Ideal: Balanced. His: Small mandible. Impact: Craniofacial dissonance.
15. Lower Third to Total Height Ratio: Ideal: 33%. His: ~30%. Impact: Stunted lower.

Additional/Composite Ratios (56-75) – Harmony and Misc​

1. Golden Ratio Mask Fit: Ideal: 90%+. His: ~60%. Impact: Far from divine proportions.
2. Symmetry Index (Left:Right Halves): Ideal: 95%+. His: ~90%. Impact: Subtle off-putting asymmetry.
3. Craniofacial Width Ratio: Ideal: Broad skull. His: Average. Impact: No robust halo.
4. Forehead Height to Total Ratio: Ideal: 25%. His: ~28% (high). Impact: Fivehead failo.
5. Hairline to Brow Ratio: Ideal: Low. His: High (receding). Impact: Balding indicator.
6. Neck Width to Shoulder Ratio: Visible part ideal: Thick (0.5). His: ~0.4 (thin). Impact: Frail frame.
7. Clavicle to Neck Ratio: Ideal: Visible. His: Hidden. Impact: No definition.
8. Skin Luminance Uniformity: Ideal: Even. His: Patchy shine. Impact: Poor texture.
9. Color Contrast (Skin:Hair:Eyes): Ideal: High. His: Low (all medium). Impact: Blends in, no striking.
10. Aging Vector (Wrinkle Potential): Ideal: Low. His: Medium (hairline). Impact: Will descend fast.
11. Dimorphism Index (Composite Masculinity): Ideal: 80%+. His: ~50%. Impact: Androgynous subhuman.
12. Neoteny Ratio (Youthful Features): Ideal: Balanced. His: Low (mature failos). Impact: Looks older than age.
13. Profile Convexity Ratio: Ideal: Straight. His: Dish. Impact: Weak side view.
14. Frontal Bossing Ratio: Ideal: Minimal. His: Present. Impact: Neanderthal vibe.
15. Zygomatic Arch Projection: Ideal: High. His: Low. Impact: Flat cheeks.
16. Maxilla Forward Growth Ratio: Ideal: 1.0. His: ~0.9. Impact: Slight recession.
17. Palate Width Ratio: Inferred ideal: Wide. His: Narrow (from nose). Impact: Breathing issues possible.
18. Ear Height to Nose Ratio: Ideal: Equal. His: Small ears. Impact: Minor disproportion.
19. Neck Length to Torso Ratio: Ideal: Proportional. His: Short. Impact: Squat appearance.
20. Overall Harmony Score (Averaged Ratios): Ideal: 90%+. His: ~65%. Impact: Forgettable mess.

Body/Frame Ratios (76-85) – From Visible Upper Body​

1. Neck Circumference to Head Ratio: Ideal: 0.6. His: ~0.5 (thin). Impact: Pencil neck.
2. Shoulder Width to Head Width Ratio: Ideal: 3:1. His: ~2.5:1. Impact: Narrow frame.
3. Chest Hair Density Ratio: Ideal: Minimal or groomed. His: Patchy. Impact: Unkempt.
4. Deltoid to Trap Ratio: Ideal: Defined. His: Flat. Impact: No V-taper.
5. Clavicle Length Ratio: Ideal: Long. His: Average. Impact: No broadness.
6. Adam's Apple Prominence: Ideal: Visible. His: Subtle. Impact: Low T signal.
7. Sternal Notch Depth: Ideal: Defined. His: Shallow. Impact: No chest halo.
8. Upper Body Asymmetry: Ideal: None. His: Minor lean. Impact: Posture failo.
9. Skin Tone Uniformity (Chest): Ideal: Even. His: Mottled. Impact: Poor health vibe.
10. Frame Robustness Index: Ideal: High. His: Low. Impact: Frailmogged.

Exotic/Composite Metrics (86-100) – To Hit 100​

1. Ethnic Adjustment Ratio: Ideal: 1.0 (NT white). His: 0.8 (mixed). Impact: Hypergamy penalty.
2. Lighting Compensation Ratio: Image lighting flatters slightly; real: -0.2. Impact: Looks worse IRL.
3. Expression Bias Ratio: Neutral; smiling would: -0.5 (exposes flaws). Impact: NT failo.
4. Age Acceleration Ratio: Looks +5 years. Ideal: 0. Impact: Premature subhuman.
5. Mogging Potential Ratio: Vs average: 1.0. His: 0.9. Impact: Gets mogged.
6. Surgery Viability Ratio: Fixable: 50%. Impact: Could hit 5.5 with $50k.
7. Testosterone Inference Ratio (From Features): Ideal: High. His: Low (~300 ng/dl est). Impact: Manlet energy.
8. Height Inference Ratio (From Proportions): Ideal: 6'+. His: ~5'8" est. Impact: Manlet failo.
9. Voice Pitch Ratio (Inferred): Ideal: Deep. His: Average. Impact: No halo.
10. Body Fat % Ratio (Upper Body): Ideal: 10-12%. His: ~18%. Impact: Soft.
11. Genetic Ceiling Ratio: Ideal: Unlimited. His: Capped at MTN-. Impact: It's over.
12. PSL Decimal Adjustment: Base 4.0, ratios deduct to 3.7. Impact: High subhuman confirmed.
13. Hypergamy Survival Ratio: Matches: 5%. Impact: Incel stats.
14. Blackpill Composite Score: Averaged failos: 62/100. Impact: Subhuman.
15. True Adam Distance: Ideal: 0. His: 6.3/10 gap. Impact: Lightyears from god-tier.

Summary: With these ratios, he's solidly high subhuman—3.8/10. Ratios expose the genetic fraud: poor growth, no dimorphism, ethnic deductions. No single halo saves him. If this is you kill yourself"

 

[Blackpillirony]

"Advanced Blackpill Ratio Analysis

Core Facial Proportions (1-10)​

1. Facial Width to Height Ratio (FWHR): Bizygomatic width / distance from brow to upper lip. Ideal: 1.8-2.0 (high dimorphism, wide face). His: ~1.6 (narrow, feminine). Impact: Massive failo—looks weak, low T, no intimidation factor.
2. Midface Ratio: Interpupillary distance / distance from pupils to upper lip. Ideal: 1.0-1.1 (compact). His: ~0.9 (elongated midface). Impact: Horseface vibe, ages him, kills harmony.
3. Eye Separation Ratio (ESR): Interocular distance / bizygomatic width. Ideal: 0.45-0.47. His: ~0.48 (slightly wide-set). Impact: Minor failo—looks less focused, less trustworthy.
4. Chin to Philtrum Ratio: Chin height / philtrum length. Ideal: 2.0-2.5. His: ~1.7 (short chin). Impact: Recessed lower third, beta look.
5. Lower to Upper Facial Height Ratio: Distance from subnasale to menton / glabella to subnasale. Ideal: ~1.618 (golden ratio). His: ~1.4 (top-heavy). Impact: Imbalanced, cartoonish proportions.
6. Facial Thirds Ratio (Upper:Middle:Lower): Ideal: 1:1:1. His: 1:1.1:0.9 (elongated mid, short lower). Impact: Disharmony, no aesthetic flow.
7. Bigonial to Bizygomatic Ratio: Jaw width / cheekbone width. Ideal: 0.85-0.9 (flared gonions). His: ~0.75 (narrow jaw). Impact: Egghead shape, zero angularity.
8. Nasal Index: Nose width / height. Ideal: 0.6-0.7 (refined). His: ~0.8 (wide). Impact: Ethnic failo, broadens face unappealingly.
9. Mouth Width to Nose Width Ratio: Ideal: 1.5-1.6. His: ~1.4 (narrow mouth). Impact: Pinched look, reduces expressiveness.
10. Total Facial Height to Width Ratio: Ideal: 1.3-1.4 (oval). His: ~1.2 (round). Impact: Bloated, low appeal.

Eye Area Ratios (11-25) – 40% of Attractiveness, His is Mid-Sub​

1. Palpebral Fissure Length (PFL) to Height Ratio: Ideal: 3:1 (hunter eyes). His: ~2.5:1 (short PFL). Impact: Squinty, unremarkable.
2. Canthal Tilt Angle: Medial to lateral canthus. Ideal: +4-6°. His: ~0° (neutral). Impact: No prey eyes halo, looks tired.
3. Intercanthal Distance to PFL Ratio: Ideal: 1:1. His: ~1.1:1 (wide). Impact: Slight hypertelorism vibe.
4. Upper Eyelid Exposure Ratio: Visible lid / eye height. Ideal: 0-10% (hooded). His: ~15% (slight exposure). Impact: Less masculine.
5. Lower Eyelid to Iris Ratio: Sclera show. Ideal: 0 (tight). His: ~5% (minor show). Impact: Aged, sad look.
6. Eyebrow to Eye Ratio (Density/Position): Ideal: Low-set, thick (1:1 arch). His: ~1.2:1 (high, thin). Impact: Feminine brows.
7. Orbital Vector Angle: Ideal: Positive (projecting). His: Neutral. Impact: Flat orbitals, no depth.
8. PFL to Bizygomatic Ratio: Ideal: 0.25. His: ~0.22. Impact: Small eyes relative to face.
9. Iris Diameter to PFL Ratio: Ideal: 0.4. His: ~0.45 (large iris). Impact: Doll-like, not striking.
10. Medial Canthus Sharpness Ratio: Ideal: Acute angle. His: Rounded. Impact: Soft, low dimorphism.
11. Eye Asymmetry Ratio: Left vs right difference. Ideal: <2%. His: ~3% (slight asymmetry). Impact: Minor harmony failo.
12. Supraorbital Ridge Projection Ratio: Ideal: 1.1 (prominent). His: ~0.9 (flat). Impact: Low T indicator.
13. Infraorbital Rim Ratio: Ideal: Forward. His: Recessed (~0.8). Impact: Dark circles potential.
14. Lateral Canthus to Temple Ratio: Ideal: Tight. His: Loose. Impact: Aged appearance.
15. Eye Color Contrast Ratio: Iris to sclera. Ideal: High. His: Low (brown eyes). Impact: No pop, generic.

Nose and Mouth Ratios (26-40)​

1. Nose Length to Midface Ratio: Ideal: 0.5. His: ~0.55 (long). Impact: Protruding, disrupts flow.
2. Alae Width to Interpupillary Ratio: Ideal: 0.6. His: ~0.7 (flared nostrils). Impact: Ethnic broadening.
3. Nasal Tip Projection Ratio (Goode's): Columella to tip. Ideal: 0.55-0.6. His: ~0.5. Impact: Underprojected, weak.
4. Nasolabial Angle: Ideal: 90-100°. His: ~105° (upturned). Impact: Feminine.
5. Philtrum Length to Nose Base Ratio: Ideal: 1:2. His: ~1:1.8 (long philtrum). Impact: Ape-like upper lip.
6. Lip Thickness Ratio (Upper:Lower): Ideal: 1:1.5. His: 1:1.2 (thin upper). Impact: Unkissable, low sensuality.
7. Mouth Width to Jaw Width Ratio: Ideal: 0.5. His: ~0.55 (wide). Impact: Goofy smile potential.
8. Cupid's Bow Definition Ratio: Ideal: Sharp (1:1). His: Flat (~0.8). Impact: Bland lips.
9. Vermilion Border Ratio: Ideal: Defined. His: Blurry. Impact: Ages mouth area.
10. Oral Commissure to Canthus Ratio: Ideal: Aligned. His: Low. Impact: Downturned, sad.
11. Nose Bridge Width Ratio: Ideal: Narrow (0.3 of midface). His: ~0.35. Impact: Bulky.
12. Columella Width Ratio: Ideal: Thin. His: Average. Impact: No refinement.
13. Lip to Chin Ratio: Ideal: 1:2. His: ~1:1.5. Impact: Short lower.
14. Nasofacial Angle: Ideal: 30-40°. His: ~45°. Impact: Flat profile.
15. Mouth to Eye Ratio (Vertical Alignment): Ideal: Balanced. His: Low mouth. Impact: Elongated feel.

Jaw, Chin, and Lower Third Ratios (41-55)​

1. Mandibular Angle: Ideal: 120-130° (sharp). His: ~140° (obtuse). Impact: No jawline, gonial eversion failo.
2. Chin Width to Jaw Width Ratio: Ideal: 0.7. His: ~0.6 (pointy). Impact: Weak chin.
3. Ramus Length to Mandible Ratio: Ideal: Long (0.4). His: ~0.3 (short). Impact: Recessed.
4. Gonial Angle to FWHR Correlation: Ideal: Low angle high FWHR. His: High angle low FWHR. Impact: Double failo.
5. Mental Protuberance Projection: Ideal: Forward. His: Recessed. Impact: No dimple halo.
6. Jaw to Neck Ratio: Ideal: Defined (1:0.8). His: ~1:1 (blends). Impact: Turkey neck potential.
7. Bigonial Width to Height Ratio: Ideal: Wide. His: Narrow. Impact: Frail.
8. Chin Recession Ratio (SNB Angle): Ideal: 78-82°. His: ~75°. Impact: Birdface profile.
9. Lower Facial Convexity: Ideal: Straight. His: Convex. Impact: Bloated.
10. Masseter Volume Ratio: Ideal: Prominent. His: Flat. Impact: No chewermaxx halo.
11. Antegonial Notch Depth: Ideal: Minimal. His: Noticeable. Impact: Jowls incoming.
12. Jaw Asymmetry Ratio: Ideal: <1%. His: ~2%. Impact: Minor but noticeable.
13. Chin to Neck Angle: Ideal: 90°. His: ~100°. Impact: Double chin risk.
14. Mandible to Cranium Ratio: Ideal: Balanced. His: Small mandible. Impact: Craniofacial dissonance.
15. Lower Third to Total Height Ratio: Ideal: 33%. His: ~30%. Impact: Stunted lower.

Additional/Composite Ratios (56-75) – Harmony and Misc​

1. Golden Ratio Mask Fit: Ideal: 90%+. His: ~60%. Impact: Far from divine proportions.
2. Symmetry Index (Left:Right Halves): Ideal: 95%+. His: ~90%. Impact: Subtle off-putting asymmetry.
3. Craniofacial Width Ratio: Ideal: Broad skull. His: Average. Impact: No robust halo.
4. Forehead Height to Total Ratio: Ideal: 25%. His: ~28% (high). Impact: Fivehead failo.
5. Hairline to Brow Ratio: Ideal: Low. His: High (receding). Impact: Balding indicator.
6. Neck Width to Shoulder Ratio: Visible part ideal: Thick (0.5). His: ~0.4 (thin). Impact: Frail frame.
7. Clavicle to Neck Ratio: Ideal: Visible. His: Hidden. Impact: No definition.
8. Skin Luminance Uniformity: Ideal: Even. His: Patchy shine. Impact: Poor texture.
9. Color Contrast (Skin:Hair:Eyes): Ideal: High. His: Low (all medium). Impact: Blends in, no striking.
10. Aging Vector (Wrinkle Potential): Ideal: Low. His: Medium (hairline). Impact: Will descend fast.
11. Dimorphism Index (Composite Masculinity): Ideal: 80%+. His: ~50%. Impact: Androgynous subhuman.
12. Neoteny Ratio (Youthful Features): Ideal: Balanced. His: Low (mature failos). Impact: Looks older than age.
13. Profile Convexity Ratio: Ideal: Straight. His: Dish. Impact: Weak side view.
14. Frontal Bossing Ratio: Ideal: Minimal. His: Present. Impact: Neanderthal vibe.
15. Zygomatic Arch Projection: Ideal: High. His: Low. Impact: Flat cheeks.
16. Maxilla Forward Growth Ratio: Ideal: 1.0. His: ~0.9. Impact: Slight recession.
17. Palate Width Ratio: Inferred ideal: Wide. His: Narrow (from nose). Impact: Breathing issues possible.
18. Ear Height to Nose Ratio: Ideal: Equal. His: Small ears. Impact: Minor disproportion.
19. Neck Length to Torso Ratio: Ideal: Proportional. His: Short. Impact: Squat appearance.
20. Overall Harmony Score (Averaged Ratios): Ideal: 90%+. His: ~65%. Impact: Forgettable mess.

Body/Frame Ratios (76-85) – From Visible Upper Body​

1. Neck Circumference to Head Ratio: Ideal: 0.6. His: ~0.5 (thin). Impact: Pencil neck.
2. Shoulder Width to Head Width Ratio: Ideal: 3:1. His: ~2.5:1. Impact: Narrow frame.
3. Chest Hair Density Ratio: Ideal: Minimal or groomed. His: Patchy. Impact: Unkempt.
4. Deltoid to Trap Ratio: Ideal: Defined. His: Flat. Impact: No V-taper.
5. Clavicle Length Ratio: Ideal: Long. His: Average. Impact: No broadness.
6. Adam's Apple Prominence: Ideal: Visible. His: Subtle. Impact: Low T signal.
7. Sternal Notch Depth: Ideal: Defined. His: Shallow. Impact: No chest halo.
8. Upper Body Asymmetry: Ideal: None. His: Minor lean. Impact: Posture failo.
9. Skin Tone Uniformity (Chest): Ideal: Even. His: Mottled. Impact: Poor health vibe.
10. Frame Robustness Index: Ideal: High. His: Low. Impact: Frailmogged.

Exotic/Composite Metrics (86-100) – To Hit 100​

1. Ethnic Adjustment Ratio: Ideal: 1.0 (NT white). His: 0.8 (mixed). Impact: Hypergamy penalty.
2. Lighting Compensation Ratio: Image lighting flatters slightly; real: -0.2. Impact: Looks worse IRL.
3. Expression Bias Ratio: Neutral; smiling would: -0.5 (exposes flaws). Impact: NT failo.
4. Age Acceleration Ratio: Looks +5 years. Ideal: 0. Impact: Premature subhuman.
5. Mogging Potential Ratio: Vs average: 1.0. His: 0.9. Impact: Gets mogged.
6. Surgery Viability Ratio: Fixable: 50%. Impact: Could hit 5.5 with $50k.
7. Testosterone Inference Ratio (From Features): Ideal: High. His: Low (~300 ng/dl est). Impact: Manlet energy.
8. Height Inference Ratio (From Proportions): Ideal: 6'+. His: ~5'8" est. Impact: Manlet failo.
9. Voice Pitch Ratio (Inferred): Ideal: Deep. His: Average. Impact: No halo.
10. Body Fat % Ratio (Upper Body): Ideal: 10-12%. His: ~18%. Impact: Soft.
11. Genetic Ceiling Ratio: Ideal: Unlimited. His: Capped at MTN-. Impact: It's over.
12. PSL Decimal Adjustment: Base 4.0, ratios deduct to 3.7. Impact: High subhuman confirmed.
13. Hypergamy Survival Ratio: Matches: 5%. Impact: Incel stats.
14. Blackpill Composite Score: Averaged failos: 62/100. Impact: Subhuman.
15. True Adam Distance: Ideal: 0. His: 6.3/10 gap. Impact: Lightyears from god-tier.

Summary: With these ratios, he's solidly high subhuman—3.8/10. Ratios expose the genetic fraud: poor growth, no dimorphism, ethnic deductions. No single halo saves him. If this is you kill yourself"

Thats more accurate than my initial mltn rating

 

[collagen]

Thats more accurate than my initial mltn rating

i mog him to death

 

[collagen]

@ALWAYS FOREVER first mog of the month?

 

[Blackpillirony]

i mog him to death

Not a flex, I can’t believe he tried to pull the « I mog you irl » card against me

 

[Deleted Member 90088]

@ALWAYS FOREVER first mog of the month?

Yes bro, you’re building your harem of mogs

 

[mus.]

reminds me of mrbeast chandler

 

[Blackpillirony]

reminds me of mrbeast chandler

Chandler mogs that n***a to hyperborean hell

 

[Bonelessandconfused]

Chandler mogs that n***a to hyperborean hell

dang what have i done to yall why are you guys hating on me

 

[Syniq]

"Advanced Blackpill Ratio Analysis

Core Facial Proportions (1-10)​

1. Facial Width to Height Ratio (FWHR): Bizygomatic width / distance from brow to upper lip. Ideal: 1.8-2.0 (high dimorphism, wide face). His: ~1.6 (narrow, feminine). Impact: Massive failo—looks weak, low T, no intimidation factor.
2. Midface Ratio: Interpupillary distance / distance from pupils to upper lip. Ideal: 1.0-1.1 (compact). His: ~0.9 (elongated midface). Impact: Horseface vibe, ages him, kills harmony.
3. Eye Separation Ratio (ESR): Interocular distance / bizygomatic width. Ideal: 0.45-0.47. His: ~0.48 (slightly wide-set). Impact: Minor failo—looks less focused, less trustworthy.
4. Chin to Philtrum Ratio: Chin height / philtrum length. Ideal: 2.0-2.5. His: ~1.7 (short chin). Impact: Recessed lower third, beta look.
5. Lower to Upper Facial Height Ratio: Distance from subnasale to menton / glabella to subnasale. Ideal: ~1.618 (golden ratio). His: ~1.4 (top-heavy). Impact: Imbalanced, cartoonish proportions.
6. Facial Thirds Ratio (Upper:Middle:Lower): Ideal: 1:1:1. His: 1:1.1:0.9 (elongated mid, short lower). Impact: Disharmony, no aesthetic flow.
7. Bigonial to Bizygomatic Ratio: Jaw width / cheekbone width. Ideal: 0.85-0.9 (flared gonions). His: ~0.75 (narrow jaw). Impact: Egghead shape, zero angularity.
8. Nasal Index: Nose width / height. Ideal: 0.6-0.7 (refined). His: ~0.8 (wide). Impact: Ethnic failo, broadens face unappealingly.
9. Mouth Width to Nose Width Ratio: Ideal: 1.5-1.6. His: ~1.4 (narrow mouth). Impact: Pinched look, reduces expressiveness.
10. Total Facial Height to Width Ratio: Ideal: 1.3-1.4 (oval). His: ~1.2 (round). Impact: Bloated, low appeal.

Eye Area Ratios (11-25) – 40% of Attractiveness, His is Mid-Sub​

1. Palpebral Fissure Length (PFL) to Height Ratio: Ideal: 3:1 (hunter eyes). His: ~2.5:1 (short PFL). Impact: Squinty, unremarkable.
2. Canthal Tilt Angle: Medial to lateral canthus. Ideal: +4-6°. His: ~0° (neutral). Impact: No prey eyes halo, looks tired.
3. Intercanthal Distance to PFL Ratio: Ideal: 1:1. His: ~1.1:1 (wide). Impact: Slight hypertelorism vibe.
4. Upper Eyelid Exposure Ratio: Visible lid / eye height. Ideal: 0-10% (hooded). His: ~15% (slight exposure). Impact: Less masculine.
5. Lower Eyelid to Iris Ratio: Sclera show. Ideal: 0 (tight). His: ~5% (minor show). Impact: Aged, sad look.
6. Eyebrow to Eye Ratio (Density/Position): Ideal: Low-set, thick (1:1 arch). His: ~1.2:1 (high, thin). Impact: Feminine brows.
7. Orbital Vector Angle: Ideal: Positive (projecting). His: Neutral. Impact: Flat orbitals, no depth.
8. PFL to Bizygomatic Ratio: Ideal: 0.25. His: ~0.22. Impact: Small eyes relative to face.
9. Iris Diameter to PFL Ratio: Ideal: 0.4. His: ~0.45 (large iris). Impact: Doll-like, not striking.
10. Medial Canthus Sharpness Ratio: Ideal: Acute angle. His: Rounded. Impact: Soft, low dimorphism.
11. Eye Asymmetry Ratio: Left vs right difference. Ideal: <2%. His: ~3% (slight asymmetry). Impact: Minor harmony failo.
12. Supraorbital Ridge Projection Ratio: Ideal: 1.1 (prominent). His: ~0.9 (flat). Impact: Low T indicator.
13. Infraorbital Rim Ratio: Ideal: Forward. His: Recessed (~0.8). Impact: Dark circles potential.
14. Lateral Canthus to Temple Ratio: Ideal: Tight. His: Loose. Impact: Aged appearance.
15. Eye Color Contrast Ratio: Iris to sclera. Ideal: High. His: Low (brown eyes). Impact: No pop, generic.

Nose and Mouth Ratios (26-40)​

1. Nose Length to Midface Ratio: Ideal: 0.5. His: ~0.55 (long). Impact: Protruding, disrupts flow.
2. Alae Width to Interpupillary Ratio: Ideal: 0.6. His: ~0.7 (flared nostrils). Impact: Ethnic broadening.
3. Nasal Tip Projection Ratio (Goode's): Columella to tip. Ideal: 0.55-0.6. His: ~0.5. Impact: Underprojected, weak.
4. Nasolabial Angle: Ideal: 90-100°. His: ~105° (upturned). Impact: Feminine.
5. Philtrum Length to Nose Base Ratio: Ideal: 1:2. His: ~1:1.8 (long philtrum). Impact: Ape-like upper lip.
6. Lip Thickness Ratio (Upper:Lower): Ideal: 1:1.5. His: 1:1.2 (thin upper). Impact: Unkissable, low sensuality.
7. Mouth Width to Jaw Width Ratio: Ideal: 0.5. His: ~0.55 (wide). Impact: Goofy smile potential.
8. Cupid's Bow Definition Ratio: Ideal: Sharp (1:1). His: Flat (~0.8). Impact: Bland lips.
9. Vermilion Border Ratio: Ideal: Defined. His: Blurry. Impact: Ages mouth area.
10. Oral Commissure to Canthus Ratio: Ideal: Aligned. His: Low. Impact: Downturned, sad.
11. Nose Bridge Width Ratio: Ideal: Narrow (0.3 of midface). His: ~0.35. Impact: Bulky.
12. Columella Width Ratio: Ideal: Thin. His: Average. Impact: No refinement.
13. Lip to Chin Ratio: Ideal: 1:2. His: ~1:1.5. Impact: Short lower.
14. Nasofacial Angle: Ideal: 30-40°. His: ~45°. Impact: Flat profile.
15. Mouth to Eye Ratio (Vertical Alignment): Ideal: Balanced. His: Low mouth. Impact: Elongated feel.

Jaw, Chin, and Lower Third Ratios (41-55)​

1. Mandibular Angle: Ideal: 120-130° (sharp). His: ~140° (obtuse). Impact: No jawline, gonial eversion failo.
2. Chin Width to Jaw Width Ratio: Ideal: 0.7. His: ~0.6 (pointy). Impact: Weak chin.
3. Ramus Length to Mandible Ratio: Ideal: Long (0.4). His: ~0.3 (short). Impact: Recessed.
4. Gonial Angle to FWHR Correlation: Ideal: Low angle high FWHR. His: High angle low FWHR. Impact: Double failo.
5. Mental Protuberance Projection: Ideal: Forward. His: Recessed. Impact: No dimple halo.
6. Jaw to Neck Ratio: Ideal: Defined (1:0.8). His: ~1:1 (blends). Impact: Turkey neck potential.
7. Bigonial Width to Height Ratio: Ideal: Wide. His: Narrow. Impact: Frail.
8. Chin Recession Ratio (SNB Angle): Ideal: 78-82°. His: ~75°. Impact: Birdface profile.
9. Lower Facial Convexity: Ideal: Straight. His: Convex. Impact: Bloated.
10. Masseter Volume Ratio: Ideal: Prominent. His: Flat. Impact: No chewermaxx halo.
11. Antegonial Notch Depth: Ideal: Minimal. His: Noticeable. Impact: Jowls incoming.
12. Jaw Asymmetry Ratio: Ideal: <1%. His: ~2%. Impact: Minor but noticeable.
13. Chin to Neck Angle: Ideal: 90°. His: ~100°. Impact: Double chin risk.
14. Mandible to Cranium Ratio: Ideal: Balanced. His: Small mandible. Impact: Craniofacial dissonance.
15. Lower Third to Total Height Ratio: Ideal: 33%. His: ~30%. Impact: Stunted lower.

Additional/Composite Ratios (56-75) – Harmony and Misc​

1. Golden Ratio Mask Fit: Ideal: 90%+. His: ~60%. Impact: Far from divine proportions.
2. Symmetry Index (Left:Right Halves): Ideal: 95%+. His: ~90%. Impact: Subtle off-putting asymmetry.
3. Craniofacial Width Ratio: Ideal: Broad skull. His: Average. Impact: No robust halo.
4. Forehead Height to Total Ratio: Ideal: 25%. His: ~28% (high). Impact: Fivehead failo.
5. Hairline to Brow Ratio: Ideal: Low. His: High (receding). Impact: Balding indicator.
6. Neck Width to Shoulder Ratio: Visible part ideal: Thick (0.5). His: ~0.4 (thin). Impact: Frail frame.
7. Clavicle to Neck Ratio: Ideal: Visible. His: Hidden. Impact: No definition.
8. Skin Luminance Uniformity: Ideal: Even. His: Patchy shine. Impact: Poor texture.
9. Color Contrast (Skin:Hair:Eyes): Ideal: High. His: Low (all medium). Impact: Blends in, no striking.
10. Aging Vector (Wrinkle Potential): Ideal: Low. His: Medium (hairline). Impact: Will descend fast.
11. Dimorphism Index (Composite Masculinity): Ideal: 80%+. His: ~50%. Impact: Androgynous subhuman.
12. Neoteny Ratio (Youthful Features): Ideal: Balanced. His: Low (mature failos). Impact: Looks older than age.
13. Profile Convexity Ratio: Ideal: Straight. His: Dish. Impact: Weak side view.
14. Frontal Bossing Ratio: Ideal: Minimal. His: Present. Impact: Neanderthal vibe.
15. Zygomatic Arch Projection: Ideal: High. His: Low. Impact: Flat cheeks.
16. Maxilla Forward Growth Ratio: Ideal: 1.0. His: ~0.9. Impact: Slight recession.
17. Palate Width Ratio: Inferred ideal: Wide. His: Narrow (from nose). Impact: Breathing issues possible.
18. Ear Height to Nose Ratio: Ideal: Equal. His: Small ears. Impact: Minor disproportion.
19. Neck Length to Torso Ratio: Ideal: Proportional. His: Short. Impact: Squat appearance.
20. Overall Harmony Score (Averaged Ratios): Ideal: 90%+. His: ~65%. Impact: Forgettable mess.

Body/Frame Ratios (76-85) – From Visible Upper Body​

1. Neck Circumference to Head Ratio: Ideal: 0.6. His: ~0.5 (thin). Impact: Pencil neck.
2. Shoulder Width to Head Width Ratio: Ideal: 3:1. His: ~2.5:1. Impact: Narrow frame.
3. Chest Hair Density Ratio: Ideal: Minimal or groomed. His: Patchy. Impact: Unkempt.
4. Deltoid to Trap Ratio: Ideal: Defined. His: Flat. Impact: No V-taper.
5. Clavicle Length Ratio: Ideal: Long. His: Average. Impact: No broadness.
6. Adam's Apple Prominence: Ideal: Visible. His: Subtle. Impact: Low T signal.
7. Sternal Notch Depth: Ideal: Defined. His: Shallow. Impact: No chest halo.
8. Upper Body Asymmetry: Ideal: None. His: Minor lean. Impact: Posture failo.
9. Skin Tone Uniformity (Chest): Ideal: Even. His: Mottled. Impact: Poor health vibe.
10. Frame Robustness Index: Ideal: High. His: Low. Impact: Frailmogged.

Exotic/Composite Metrics (86-100) – To Hit 100​

1. Ethnic Adjustment Ratio: Ideal: 1.0 (NT white). His: 0.8 (mixed). Impact: Hypergamy penalty.
2. Lighting Compensation Ratio: Image lighting flatters slightly; real: -0.2. Impact: Looks worse IRL.
3. Expression Bias Ratio: Neutral; smiling would: -0.5 (exposes flaws). Impact: NT failo.
4. Age Acceleration Ratio: Looks +5 years. Ideal: 0. Impact: Premature subhuman.
5. Mogging Potential Ratio: Vs average: 1.0. His: 0.9. Impact: Gets mogged.
6. Surgery Viability Ratio: Fixable: 50%. Impact: Could hit 5.5 with $50k.
7. Testosterone Inference Ratio (From Features): Ideal: High. His: Low (~300 ng/dl est). Impact: Manlet energy.
8. Height Inference Ratio (From Proportions): Ideal: 6'+. His: ~5'8" est. Impact: Manlet failo.
9. Voice Pitch Ratio (Inferred): Ideal: Deep. His: Average. Impact: No halo.
10. Body Fat % Ratio (Upper Body): Ideal: 10-12%. His: ~18%. Impact: Soft.
11. Genetic Ceiling Ratio: Ideal: Unlimited. His: Capped at MTN-. Impact: It's over.
12. PSL Decimal Adjustment: Base 4.0, ratios deduct to 3.7. Impact: High subhuman confirmed.
13. Hypergamy Survival Ratio: Matches: 5%. Impact: Incel stats.
14. Blackpill Composite Score: Averaged failos: 62/100. Impact: Subhuman.
15. True Adam Distance: Ideal: 0. His: 6.3/10 gap. Impact: Lightyears from god-tier.

Summary: With these ratios, he's solidly high subhuman—3.8/10. Ratios expose the genetic fraud: poor growth, no dimorphism, ethnic deductions. No single halo saves him. If this is you kill yourself"

Shit ratios. I'm not even kidding more than 30 of these are wrong

 

[Hyaluronic]

Pretty damn bad, give solution

Why so brutal

 

[Blackpillirony]

Why so brutal

I forgot about this, fucking cage

 

[homiespidy]

You look like marlon
i would say Htn

hmm

 

[Hyaluronic]

You look like marlon
i would say Htn

Marlon from target

 

[collagen]

Shit ratios. I'm not even kidding more than 30 of these are wrong

Ok

 

[Bonelessandconfused]

Shit ratios. I'm not even kidding more than 30 of these are wrong

So is that supposed to be good or bad?

 

[Syniq]

So is that supposed to be good or bad?

The formula is bad

 

[Bonelessandconfused]

The formula is bad

Can you tell me if they’re better or worse?

 

[Love]

is it good or bad

sub3