How bad is hypergamy really?

[Syniq]

Well, not that bad.

We have been fed this idea that women date only 6.5+ and they date top 10% of males only.

I do agree that for a most comfortable relationship a top 10% SMV is needed; however, that is not hard to get.

A 6.5 is top 2% of people

I rated 1300+ faces on the street, jubilee videos, and videos of people walking down the street. I got the average to be 4.84. Keep in mind this over Europe and not other countries. I live in London, in a good area. I go to university. I go outside a lot, and I'm good rater. Well, better than most.

From that, I got that a MTN, 5.5 is 23% of people. If you are a 5.5 on my scale you mog 77% of the whole population ages range from 16-26. A 6 is 7.9% of the population.

"Okay, so what does this have to do with hypergamy?" Well, hypergamy is not only face. It's SMV, excluding money and status. If you are a 5.5, 5'11, and you have a good body (6.5). You can be in the top 7.9% of people.

Body you can change, height you can fraud, and face you can improve.

True abundance comes 6.77+ SMV that's top 1% of people. But, you can still get 50+ matches, per month/week as a 6+ SMV.

Face is not all of it. Height is not all of it. Body is not all of it. It's a mixture of all them. This idea "Face matter only" or "Height matters only" is bullshit. If you believe humans are so 1 dimensional kys.


Most people can have a good dating life as long as they improve things they can.

 

[Syniq]

Interestingly enough, when I rated couples the man was usually on par or a bit worse looking than the women, but taller usually by 1+ inch. Have I seen the opposite, where the man is ugly and the women is beautiful? Yes. Have I seen vice versa? Yes.

Point being, most people will go to their looks match.

 

[mjölk]

just do a voice message

 

[Syniq]

just do a voice message

I can type my thoughts easier than speaking them.

 

[Pinksunglasses]

Well, not that bad.

We have been fed this idea that women date only 6.5+ and they date top 10% of males only.

I do agree that for a most comfortable relationship a top 10% SMV is needed; however, that is not hard to get.

A 6.5 is top 2% of people

I rated 1300+ faces on the street, jubilee videos, and videos of people walking down the street. I got the average to be 4.84. Keep in mind this over Europe and not other countries. I live in London, in a good area. I go to university. I go outside a lot, and I'm good rater. Well, better than most.

From that, I got that a MTN, 5.5 is 23% of people. If you are a 5.5 on my scale you mog 77% of the whole population ages range from 16-26. A 6 is 7.9% of the population.

"Okay, so what does this have to do with hypergamy?" Well, hypergamy is not only face. It's SMV, excluding money and status. If you are a 5.5, 5'11, and you have a good body (6.5). You can be in the top 7.9% of people.

Body you can change, height you can fraud, and face you can improve.

True abundance comes 6.77+ SMV that's top 1% of people. But, you can still get 50+ matches, per month/week as a 6+ SMV.

Face is not all of it. Height is not all of it. Body is not all of it. It's a mixture of all them. This idea "Face matter only" or "Height matters only" is bullshit. If you believe humans are so 1 dimensional kys.


Most people can have a good dating life as long as they improve things they can.

If beta zeta said it bad then it bad

 

[Syniq]

If beta zeta said it bad then it bad

Oui

 

[Syniq]

Well, not that bad.

We have been fed this idea that women date only 6.5+ and they date top 10% of males only.

I do agree that for a most comfortable relationship a top 10% SMV is needed; however, that is not hard to get.

A 6.5 is top 2% of people

I rated 1300+ faces on the street, jubilee videos, and videos of people walking down the street. I got the average to be 4.84. Keep in mind this over Europe and not other countries. I live in London, in a good area. I go to university. I go outside a lot, and I'm good rater. Well, better than most.

From that, I got that a MTN, 5.5 is 23% of people. If you are a 5.5 on my scale you mog 77% of the whole population ages range from 16-26. A 6 is 7.9% of the population.

"Okay, so what does this have to do with hypergamy?" Well, hypergamy is not only face. It's SMV, excluding money and status. If you are a 5.5, 5'11, and you have a good body (6.5). You can be in the top 7.9% of people.

Body you can change, height you can fraud, and face you can improve.

True abundance comes 6.77+ SMV that's top 1% of people. But, you can still get 50+ matches, per month/week as a 6+ SMV.

Face is not all of it. Height is not all of it. Body is not all of it. It's a mixture of all them. This idea "Face matter only" or "Height matters only" is bullshit. If you believe humans are so 1 dimensional kys.


Most people can have a good dating life as long as they improve things they can.

I have found that on this forum, If I don't write about brain rot or rage bait people, my post do like shit.

 

[draftLexy]

I have been saying this

I think people think its a lot drastic due to social media snd what is pushed to us on the internet
Even if we say oh i differentiate it and dont take social media into account subconsciously we still do
I have seen a massive difference in what i thought about dating looks, people ect after deleting all social media.
Kinda of a side tangent

But most people will go for their looksmatch
Even if they arent matched in looks they will match in other ways
Like for example an extremely good looking woman with a ugly rich man (not in a gold digger type of way)

 

[rand anon]

Hypergamy made me inkwell