- Joined
- Feb 19, 2026
- Messages
- 3,066
- Online time
- 7d 19h
- Reputation
- 3,579
When there’s plenty of women dealing with men who piss in bottles and can barely hold a job
Like
Like
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t knowWhen there’s plenty of of women dealing with men who piss in bottles and can barely hold a job
Like
I don’t knowI only ever see women date down I swear
When there’s plenty of women dealing with men who piss in bottles and can barely hold a job
Like
where is the peer reviewed study that shows this![]()
hypergamy is actually necessary i’ve spoken abt this before
women’s risk in sexual relationships (motherhood, pregnancy, single mother hood, etc.) is much higher then men’s
it’s always existed u can either bitch abt it or change your life for the better
These risks in sexual relationships do not exist anymore, as the vast majority of sexual encounters do not result in children. In fact, most women and men do not want to have them. The vast majority of single mother preganancies are aborted, which removes another riskhypergamy is actually necessary i’ve spoken abt this before
women’s risk in sexual relationships (motherhood, pregnancy, single mother hood, etc.) is much higher then men’s
it’s always existed u can either bitch abt it or change your life for the better
I’m a hypergamous moid truely Stacy sexualWhen there’s plenty of women dealing with men who piss in bottles and can barely hold a job
Like
I mean but I feel like women don’t often date men more attractive than them idk why everyone acts like it’s a common thinghypergamy is actually necessary i’ve spoken abt this before
women’s risk in sexual relationships (motherhood, pregnancy, single mother hood, etc.) is much higher then men’s
it’s always existed u can either bitch abt it or change your life for the better
I mean both genders are hypergamous to one extentThese risks in sexual relationships do not exist anymore, as the vast majority of sexual encounters do not result in children. In fact, most women and men do not want to have them. The vast majority of single mother preganancies are aborted, which removes another risk
(possibility of single motherhood)
I do agree that it's just biological, and women have always been hypergamous
Whether it's fair, anyone can argue about, but it is reality
Hypergamy is normal, no guy wants to date an ugly girl, if anything guys have higher standards compared to their own looks level and most girls end up dating guys uglier than them...
Just be bottle pissing Chad brahhh
Maybe on the surface, it's much more socially accepted for women to fraud.There’s because the amount of attractive women is much larger than the amount of attractive men
Literally why they all choppedThere’s because the amount of attractive women is much larger than the amount of attractive men
yeah but what you feel like and what actually happens are two different things, i’m sure some incel will drop a study proving hypergamy statisticallyI mean but I feel like women don’t often date men more attractive than them idk why everyone acts like it’s a common thing
Is the half attractive guy a midget like Peter DinklageLiterally why they all choppedI see at least 30 beautiful women a day and like 2.5 attractive guys
No
They are not Chads in the slightest I promise you
Just be bottle pissing, NT, low inhib, possibly drug dealing, braddddNo
They are not Chads in the slightest I promise you
I would love to see it. I can’t imagine that’s something you can study due to how subjective the entire concept isyeah but what you feel like and what actually happens are two different things, i’m sure some incel will drop a study proving hypergamy statistically![]()
No he’s just like cute uglyIs the half attractive guy a midget like Peter Dinklage
Maybe on the surface, it's much more socially accepted for women to fraud.
You don’t have to talk abt me behind my backWhen there’s plenty of women dealing with men who piss in bottles and can barely hold a job
Like
Maybe on the surface, it's much more socially accepted for women to fraud.
That’s diff though, Hispanics dont hve do deal with much hypergamy within their communitiesThe only example I've observed that fits what you're saying is the average mexican couple
like bruh these ugly ass mexican dudes pull htbs and stacies
if you dont see the reality of hypergamy leave the forum. dumb foidWhen there’s plenty of women dealing with men who piss in bottles and can barely hold a job
Like
ya cus they have a bunch of kids and they are traditional and have family values. this leads to NON hypergamyThat’s diff though, Hispanics dont hve do deal with much hypergamy within their communities
if you dont see the reality of hypergamy leave the forum. dumb foid
I would love to see it. I can’t imagine that’s something you can study due to how subjective the entire concept is
That’s diff though, Hispanics dont hve do deal with much hypergamy within their communities
That’s diff though, Hispanics dont hve do deal with much hypergamy within their communities
The only example I've observed that fits what you're saying is the average mexican couple
like bruh these ugly ass mexican dudes pull htbs and stacies
If you mean the typical Edgar and Latina couple, I think you're overrating the women. But I've seen some chopped Edgars pull hot white girls, whites need to get it together...The only example I've observed that fits what you're saying is the average mexican couple
like bruh these ugly ass mexican dudes pull htbs and stacies
A literal cheerleader htb popular girl i thinks is talking or trying to get into a talking stage with me rnWhen there’s plenty of women dealing with men who piss in bottles and can barely hold a job
Like
Don’t use ai for this bs
here u go
chatgpt summary for easier digestion:
Here’s a clear, digestible breakdown of the study “Evolution of Human Mate Choice” by Geary, Vigil, & Byrd-Craven:
Core Idea (in plain English)
The paper argues that human dating preferences aren’t random—they’re shaped by evolution.
At the highest level:
- People choose partners based on reproductive value
- Meaning: Who gives me the best chance of having healthy, successful offspring?
The Big Framework
1.
Sexual selection drives behavior
There are two main forces:
- Competition (usually male vs male)
- Choice (usually female choosing males)
Why?
- Women invest more biologically (pregnancy, childbirth)
- So they’re more selective
- Men can reproduce more easily → more competition
This pattern shows up across most animal species, not just humans
Why Men & Women Differ
Key concept:
Parental Investment
- Women: high cost (pregnancy, risk, time)
- Men: lower cost (can reproduce more often)
Result:
- Women = choosier
- Men = more willing to pursue multiple partners
Women’s Mate Preferences (simplified)
Women generally prioritize:
1.
Resources & Status
- Money, success, ambition
- Why? → Helps raise children
This is one of the most consistent findings across cultures
2.
Willingness to invest
- Kindness, stability, family orientation
- Not just “has resources,” but will he use them for me and kids?
3.
Good genes (physical traits)
- Symmetry
- Masculine features (jaw, cheekbones)
- Health cues
These signal:
- Strong immune system
- Better offspring survival
4.
Protection ability
- Physical strength or dominance
- Ability to defend
Tradeoff women face:
- “Good dad” vs “good genes”
This leads to mixed strategies, like:
- Long-term partner for stability
- Occasional attraction to genetically “high-quality” men
Men’s Mate Preferences (simplified)
Men generally prioritize:
1.
Fertility cues
- Youth
- Physical attractiveness
- Body ratios (e.g., waist-to-hip)
These correlate with:
- Higher reproductive potential
2.
Short-term vs long-term shift
- Short-term: low standards, focus on attractiveness
- Long-term: higher standards (personality, loyalty)
3.
Sexual fidelity
- Extremely important to men (to avoid raising another man’s child)
Biggest Behavioral Difference
Men:
- More interested in casual sex
- More partners on average
- Lower selectiveness short-term
Women:
- More cautious
- Prefer long-term stability
This difference is one of the most robust findings in psychology
Interesting Findings
Attraction shifts across menstrual cycle
- During ovulation:
- Women prefer more masculine / “genetically strong” men
- Other times:
- Prefer stable, nurturing men
Social context matters
Preferences aren’t fixed:
- If men are scarce → women get pickier, men commit more
- If women are abundant → men pursue more casual strategies
Divorce patterns
- One of the most common causes:
- Lack of resources (from men)
- Infidelity
Big Picture Summary
The study argues:
- Human dating behavior is shaped by evolutionary pressures
- Men and women differ because they face different reproductive costs
- Preferences are about:
- Genes (health, attractiveness)
- Resources (money, status)
- Investment (parenting, loyalty)
Important Caveat (the authors mention this)
This is not the whole story:
- Culture
- Personal values
- Social norms
…all modify these tendencies.
One-line takeaway
Humans don’t just date for attraction—we’re subconsciously optimizing for reproduction, survival, and long-term success.
If you want, I can:
- Break this down into modern dating implications
- Or translate it into practical advice / “what actually matters for attractiveness” today
hypergamy isn’t always about better looking thoughDon’t use ai for this bswaste of water View attachment 331269
If you mean the typical Edgar and Latina couple, I think you're overrating the women. But I've seen some chopped Edgars pull hot white girls, whites need to get it together...
Searching something on google, sending messages, and using a online service at all uses water as wellDon’t use ai for this bswaste of water View attachment 331269
look there are real hard evidence stats to prove hypergamy, every guy here has hid direct personal evidence of this. saying it doesn't exist is a slap in the face and retarded, pointing out exceptions does not weaken the fact of hypergamy and it certainly doesn't disprove it.It’s present in white and black people too
It’s probably for money or status rarely for looks which is what I see men complain abt the mosthypergamy isn’t always about better looking though
it’s dating up in all ways (status, money, etc)![]()
It uses significantly less wateryh tbh you might be right
I d
Searching something on google, sending messages, and using a online service at all uses water as well
Not saying ai doesn't use a lot of water, but it isnt some grand cause
that’s just cuz too many people attribute their problems to that nglIt’s probably for money or status rarely for looks which is what I see men complain abt the most
look there are real hard evidence stats to prove hypergamy, every guy here has hid direct personal evidence of this. saying it doesn't exist is a slap in the face and retarded, pointing out exceptions does not weaken the fact of hypergamy and it certainly doesn't disprove it.
if your a foid try and get a looks match and statistically it will be outrageously easy for you to do.
for a guy it will be extremely hard and if he is average it will be statistically improbable for him to get a average girl
waste of water
Ya that’s what I’m basically sayingthat’s just cuz too many people attribute their problems to that ngl![]()
hypergamy is the natural orderWhen there’s plenty of women dealing with men who piss in bottles and can barely hold a job
Like
Unnecessary search = small amount of water waste