- Joined
- May 2, 2025
- Messages
- 4,410
- Solutions
- 1
- Time Online
- 9d 15h
- Reputation
- 18,314
- Location
- Albuquerque
- Guild
- Candy
Meth not crackyou need to smoke crack to understand some of this stuff they're saying
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Meth not crackyou need to smoke crack to understand some of this stuff they're saying
i mean we can trust them because theres so many people saying the same things and we dont see motives to lie, however they should be taken with a grain of salt and not taken as the ultimate truth because there can always be more context lost to timeIt’s the past and only a memory to some (oldcels),how can we trust history books when maybe the opposite happened for example. What if our grandparents were all tortured to not speak about what happened. It’s the same concept as “Don’t believe what your eyes don’t see”. You could show me a picture of space “taken” by NASA and I wouldn’t entirely believe it but we’ve grown up with the concept. Not a conspiracy theorist but how should I believe something I didn’t see for myself?
You don’t see motives to lie,they do. The same people saying the same things are US not THEMi mean we can trust them because theres so many people saying the same things and we dont see motives to lie, however they should be taken with a grain of salt and not taken as the ultimate truth because there can always be more context lost to time
U need to take the pills broYou don’t see motives to lie,they do. The same people saying the same things are US not THEM
Yeah correct, the problem arises from the said sources, are they contemporary? Were they written after ? How much credibility do these contemporary sources have ? Might they be a mere fabrication?
NoU need to take the pills bro
father never disappointsYeah correct, the problem arises from the said sources, are they contemporary? Were they written after ? How much credibility do these contemporary sources have ? Might they be a mere fabrication?
For example, you'd see that most roman accounts about Carthage after the Punic wars are those of belittling and contempt , while other sources ( Greek , Egyptian ) confirm that the Carthaginians were indeed a great empire
On the other hand , you'd see how the Spanish records say how the central American native civilization were barbaric and demonic ( and this is the widespread view ) while the monuments prove otherwise ( it was actually great for a civilization that was isolated since it's conception)
I agree. That’s why we should not put blind faith on a single source (religion moment)Yeah correct, the problem arises from the said sources, are they contemporary? Were they written after ? How much credibility do these contemporary sources have ? Might they be a mere fabrication?
For example, you'd see that most roman accounts about Carthage after the Punic wars are those of belittling and contempt , while other sources ( Greek , Egyptian ) confirm that the Carthaginians were indeed a great empire
On the other hand , you'd see how the Spanish records say how the central American native civilization were barbaric and demonic ( and this is the widespread view ) while the monuments prove otherwise ( it was actually great for a civilization that was isolated since it's conception)
What do you think about world war 2 btw , do you think the death toll was that much ? And do you think the Germans were actually cartoonishly evil while the allies were the defenders and liberators ?I agree. That’s why we should not put blind faith on a single source (religion moment)
?You don’t see motives to lie,they do. The same people saying the same things are US
we tryna get this guy to say sum incriminating so he can be banned?What do you think about world war 2 btw , do you think the death toll was that much ? And do you think the Germans were actually cartoonishly evil while the allies were the defenders and liberators ?
Cartoonishly evil is actually not an exaggeration for once in history.What do you think about world war 2 btw , do you think the death toll was that much ? And do you think the Germans were actually cartoonishly evil while the allies were the defenders and liberators ?
No I am genuinely curiouswe tryna get this guy to say sum incriminating so he can be banned?
I believe they were "evil" but not for the sake of evil , they had a goal and the ends justify the means igCartoonishly evil is actually not an exaggeration for once in history.
id say columbos was cartoonishly evil, as well as like the king of england the one from hamilton and the boston tea party and allah thatCartoonishly evil is actually not an exaggeration for once in history.
ElaborateI believe they were "evil" but not for the sake of evil , they had a goal and the ends justify the means ig
Esoteric visions go with this , I certainly believe that the nazis had a deep occult background