LOOKSMAXXING

Join 82,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

How to spot smoke sellers (pseudo intellectuals or something)

Deleted Member 60441

Deleted Member 60441

Blurred
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★★
Joined
Feb 10, 2025
Messages
18,481
Online time
25d 12h
Reputation
56,981
most people can’t tell the difference between pompous words and intersecting but not necessarily pompous writings, although the two may coincide

As for AI-generated constructs, it’s very simple: eye test, but if that’s not enough, it will suffice to remember that an AI-generated text often lacks synthesis
AI-generated texts are summarizing (often), that is, they are limited to addition in the form of “reduction”

The similarity between AI-generated and pseudo-whatever is the inability to provide (a word I like) a kind of conceptual juxtaposition. Result: empty meaning


Imagine this scene: the teacher asks a question, you don't know how to answer and you try to get around it by repeating what was said before, hoping he/she doesn't notice.

I would like to add an indicative conceptual scheme, but I won’t
 
screenshot-2022-05-13-09.53.45.webp
 
Darkeningstar said:
most people can’t tell the difference between pompous words and intersecting but not necessarily pompous writings, although the two may coincide

As for AI-generated constructs, it’s very simple: eye test, but if that’s not enough, it will suffice to remember that an AI-generated text often lacks synthesis
AI-generated texts are summarizing (often), that is, they are limited to addition in the form of “reduction”

The similarity between AI-generated and pseudo-whatever is the inability to provide (a word I like) a kind of conceptual juxtaposition, that results in a empty meaning


Imagine this scene: the teacher asks a question, you don't know how to answer and you try to get around it by repeating what was said before, hoping he/she doesn't notice.

I would like to add an indicative conceptual scheme, but I won’t
Click to expand...
This actually makes a bit of sense. You’re basically saying AI branches off too often right? And it lacks… idk the word. Connectedness?

I know what you’re trying to say but I can’t put it into words. You’re right tho. I see it a lot with @Logicmaxxer’s threads
 
AuggyDauggy said:
This actually makes a bit of sense. You’re basically saying AI branches off too often right? And it lacks… idk the word. Connectedness?

I know what you’re trying to say but I can’t put it into words. You’re right tho. I see it a lot with @Logicmaxxer’s threads
Click to expand...
gpt calls me n***a
 
AuggyDauggy said:
This actually makes a bit of sense. You’re basically saying AI branches off too often right? And it lacks… idk the word. Connectedness?

I know what you’re trying to say but I can’t put it into words. You’re right tho. I see it a lot with @Logicmaxxer’s threads
Click to expand...
Yeah more or less
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top