Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

How women feel aborting their 9th baby this week

bro is getting shit on by foids :/

then said some bs
I love how you just show up at the very end and start begging for com foids attention
 
are u genuinely going to argue against facts and statistics with an argument u pulled out of ur ass
Nope
The median iq for both men and woman is the same
Men just have more geniuses
 
bro is getting shit on by foids :/

then said some bs
Plus you saying this just shows that you think women are inferior to men
 
there isnt any study showing that a gender is more influenced than the other because its a wrong claim
There are studies showing that women are more emotional then men are which kind of proves my point
 
There are studies showing that women are more emotional then men are which kind of proves my point
you need evidence measuring susceptibility to influence, not evidence about emotionality those are unrelated
 
you need evidence measuring susceptibility to influence, not evidence about emotionality those are unrelated
They are related
I have to go now but you can do the research if you want or I’ll show after I’m back
 
They are related
I have to go now but you can do the research if you want or I’ll show after I’m back
Even your argument relies on a fallacy. Women being more emotional is itself an oversimplification both men and women experience emotions AS intensly, but they may express them differently sadness to anger for example. And even hypothetically assuming emotionality and susceptibility were related your argument would be wrong.
 
I've had this debate so many times on here so I'm not going to get into it too much. Most people who want to force women to go through pregnancy just are ignorant in my opinion.

None of this has to do with another life, it has to do with consent, which is why men are normally the ones who are anti-abortion because they don't understand this perspective outside of their own. It was something I learned about over time too, it is what it is.

Eh...

You wouldn't say it should be illegal for someone to refuse to give a body part to another person to save their life, right? You have to AGREE to give up a body part. You have to AGREE to donate blood. They can't just siphon your blood. They're not allowed to do it without your consent. It doesn't matter if it would save a life, it doesn't matter if you're the only person who could save that person. You have a choice.

An unborn child cannot be taken out of your body and survive. If it can, then it's obvious it shouldn't be aborted. Being pregnant is a selfless act, and requires you to give up your own body to birth a child. Your body is never going to go back to how it was previously. You're giving up your own body for life; it's beautiful and it's wonderful. Making that mandatory is horrible, and lacks empathy towards women who have ever gone through pregnancy or birth.

I don't understand how you can be anti-abortion but be in support of eugenics, though. If you view it as murder, then murdering the people you think "suffer beyond a reasonable point" is... well... I guess I don't want to get into it now. It just seems unusual is all.

Either way, people who talk about the life of the child AFTER it's already been born is missing the point. I don't have an interest in talking about whether or not a hypothetical child is going to live as a poor child or is going to become the smartest man on the planet. It has nothing to do with a made up child in a world full of billions of people; it's about the choice as someone who already exists and has a life, and whether or not that person is entitled to picking this specific medical procedure.

In my opinion, people should be allowed to seek medical treatment in general, for their own reasons, and I don't think they should need to justify it if it's not being billed through insurance. What would we ever gain by controlling someone else's body like that? Again, if the child is developed enough where it could survive outside of the body, then that's a different discussion in my opinion. Then it becomes about "when are they allowed to have an abortion?" rather than "should it be allowed at all?".

People who say women should just stop having sex just want to control women and what they do is all. No point on debating people like this because it's never actually about abortion, it's about controlling what people do in their free time. Nobody is going to tell a man he should stop having sex because he can get someone pregnant, nor should we be making laws to control what kind of sex adults have privately lmfao.
 
Go to class bro,bout time you learn something 😭😭
ugh i am. sadly I am taking one of those useless classes like AP calculus right now and not one of the imporotant ones like gender studies or african american studies
 
lol there have been like 100 msgs since i went to class lol
dnr all of them


just dont kill babies bro
2.5 billion deaths in the past 50 years.

Lets try and not get to 3
 
I've had this debate so many times on here so I'm not going to get into it too much. Most people who want to force women to go through pregnancy just are ignorant in my opinion.

None of this has to do with another life, it has to do with consent, which is why men are normally the ones who are anti-abortion because they don't understand this perspective outside of their own. It was something I learned about over time too, it is what it is.



People who say women should just stop having sex just want to control women and what they do is all. No point on debating people like this because it's never actually about abortion, it's about controlling what people do in their free time. Nobody is going to tell a man he should stop having sex because he can get someone pregnant, nor should we be making laws to control what kind of sex adults have privately lmfao.
birth control, condoms, implants.
 
You cant do shit about this btw, youre opinion doesnt even matter

1788189740793.webp
 
I've had this debate so many times on here so I'm not going to get into it too much. Most people who want to force women to go through pregnancy just are ignorant in my opinion.

None of this has to do with another life, it has to do with consent, which is why men are normally the ones who are anti-abortion because they don't understand this perspective outside of their own. It was something I learned about over time too, it is what it is.



People who say women should just stop having sex just want to control women and what they do is all. No point on debating people like this because it's never actually about abortion, it's about controlling what people do in their free time. Nobody is going to tell a man he should stop having sex because he can get someone pregnant, nor should we be making laws to control what kind of sex adults have privately lmfao.
I’m not gonna argue since it’ll just be a waste of time but your logic doesn’t really follow
Using your I could say me not being able to own a slave is also controlling since I would love to own one
or me not being able to murder someone is also controlling since it’s in my interest to do so
Both scenarios ( abortion and slavery ) are harming humans you can’t just let someone hurt another because you don’t wanna be controlling
 
I’m not gonna argue since it’ll just be a waste of time but your logic doesn’t really follow
Using your I could say me not being able to own a slave is also controlling since I would love to own one
or me not being able to murder someone is also controlling since it’s in my interest to do so
Both scenarios ( abortion and slavery ) are harming humans you can’t just let someone hurt another because you don’t wanna be controlling
No, the law requiring you use your body to medically maintain the life of someone else, without your consent, is not the equivalent of not wanting to tell people they can't own slaves or murder others.
 
No, the law requiring you use your body to medically maintain the life of someone else, without your consent, is not the equivalent of not wanting to tell people they can't own slaves or murder others.
If you don’t wanna get pregnant maybe get a surgery to stop you from getting pregnant?
 
If you don’t wanna get pregnant maybe get a surgery to stop you from getting pregnant?
So if a man gets an STD, should we refuse him medical treatment? Because he could've worn a condom? Should he just accept the consequences of having sex?
 
So if a man gets an STD, should we refuse him medical treatment? Because he could've worn a condom? Should he just accept the consequences of having sex?
I mean if you take a risk there’s always a consequence
But that’s not really the same thing either way
Murdering another human being just so you can have pleasure isnt something that should be normalized
 
I mean if you take a risk there’s always a consequence
But that’s not really the same thing either way
Murdering another human being just so you can have pleasure isnt something that should be normalized
That's the difference between our arguments, it's about how you feel.

Women should be punished for having sex in a way you don't agree with (pleasure), and any discussion otherwise is just murder because you say it is. My argument supports the pro-life argument, that the fetus is still a life, and yet you don't actually have an argument against it besides its murder, because that's an emotional argument and nobody agrees with murder on a surface level.

It's why I'm saying debating people about it is from ignorance because even in an argument where I'm agreeing with you that it's a life, you simply can't understand a world where women don't sacrifice their bodies for others.

My argument is consistent, can be applied to every demographic for every reason, for anyone who believes anything. Your argument only applies to very specific people for specific reasons, because it's about how you feel and not logical.
 
That's the difference between our arguments, it's about how you feel.

Women should be punished for having sex in a way you don't agree with (pleasure), and any discussion otherwise is just murder because you say it is. My argument supports the pro-life argument, that the fetus is still a life, and yet you don't actually have an argument against it besides its murder, because that's an emotional argument and nobody agrees with murder on a surface level.

It's why I'm saying debating people about it is from ignorance because even in an argument where I'm agreeing with you that it's a life, you simply can't understand a world where women don't sacrifice their bodies for others.

My argument is consistent, can be applied to every demographic for every reason, for anyone who believes anything. Your argument only applies to very specific people for specific reasons, because it's about how you feel and not logical.
How is the woman sacrificing her body exactly?
simply not wanting a baby isn’t really sacrificing your body
 
It’s really not
imo sacrificing your body is having sex with hundreds of people not giving birth
Yuh, in your opinion. Lmao.

Anyways no point on having a discussion about certain vibes and emotions. Like I said previously it's an argument I've had many times before and it always boils down to the same thing, genuinely every time. :sadge: And I'm the idiot who falls for the bait genuinely every time.
 
Yuh, in your opinion. Lmao.

Anyways no point on having a discussion about certain vibes and emotions. Like I said previously it's an argument I've had many times before and it always boils down to the same thing, genuinely every time. :sadge: And I'm the idiot who falls for the bait genuinely every time.
I mean our morals are based off of our emotions so idk how this argument should go? But you’re right we’re just going in circles
 
genuinely how is this a debate among humans. no one sane should support this yet most of the world does. catastrophic extinction event would be awesome.
I doubt that’s a real statistic
They just estimate based off of American statistics globally many people disagree with abortion
If half of the religious people on earth disagreed with it it would be like 50% let alone 30 that’s just false
 
I doubt that’s a real statistic
They just estimate based off of American statistics globally many people disagree with abortion
If half of the religious people on earth disagreed with it it would be like 50% let alone 30 that’s just false
still too much.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top