I’ve made tons of guides

[Mandy?]

And not even one is in must reads even tho they’re the highest quality and most effective guides in my opinion besides @Archelaus , how will people ascend if they can’t find my guides properly?

 

[cryaotic]

List them

 

[Deleted Member 80294]

Do they meet ts criteria tho?

D

Info Critical Analysis and Destruction of the Must-Read Subsection

Feb 17, 2025

Reviewing the current requirements:
In this thread I covered how many of these threads had pseudoscientific reasonings mixed in with some water, common facts. The titles are also extremely misleading. https://shorturl.at/EcOj9
I just now realized that those are just 4 threads, and that the criteria must be incredibly low for them to get here. But I was shocked to see the criteria was actually not that steep but reasonable but most of the threads probably shouldn't be in there. Here's my analysis
Here are the requirements, and here's how I searched for...​

• Deleted Member 60933
• Replies: 60
• Forum: Off-Topic

• 
• 
• 

 

[Deleted Member 76607]

Make a guide and name it my best guides for example or anything else and link your guides in it . It will defo go into must read I think

 

[Gynomaster]

And not even one is in must reads even tho they’re the highest quality and most effective guides in my opinion besides @Archelaus , how will people ascend if they can’t find my guides properly?

Thanks. I'll check you out

 

[Mandy?]

List them

https://forum.looksmaxxing.com/threads/the-best-mandy-threads.80422/

These ones specifically but all of them are good

 

[Mandy?]

Make a guide and name it my best guides for example or anything else and link your guides in it . It will defo go into must read I think

https://forum.looksmaxxing.com/threads/the-best-mandy-threads.80422/

These ones specifically but all of them are good

 

[Mandy?]

Do they meet ts criteria tho?

D

Info Critical Analysis and Destruction of the Must-Read Subsection

Feb 17, 2025

Reviewing the current requirements:
In this thread I covered how many of these threads had pseudoscientific reasonings mixed in with some water, common facts. The titles are also extremely misleading. https://shorturl.at/EcOj9
I just now realized that those are just 4 threads, and that the criteria must be incredibly low for them to get here. But I was shocked to see the criteria was actually not that steep but reasonable but most of the threads probably shouldn't be in there. Here's my analysis
Here are the requirements, and here's how I searched for...​

• Deleted Member 60933
• Replies: 60
• Forum: Off-Topic

• 
• 
• 

I don’t always add links or studies to obvious things that every person on here should know clearly but in terms of theories and highly discussable topics I do.

 

[Deleted Member 70402]

Do they meet ts criteria tho?

D

Info Critical Analysis and Destruction of the Must-Read Subsection

Feb 17, 2025

Reviewing the current requirements:
In this thread I covered how many of these threads had pseudoscientific reasonings mixed in with some water, common facts. The titles are also extremely misleading. https://shorturl.at/EcOj9
I just now realized that those are just 4 threads, and that the criteria must be incredibly low for them to get here. But I was shocked to see the criteria was actually not that steep but reasonable but most of the threads probably shouldn't be in there. Here's my analysis
Here are the requirements, and here's how I searched for...​

• Deleted Member 60933
• Replies: 60
• Forum: Off-Topic

• 
• 
• 

Let it go bro

 

[Deleted Member 81037]

https://forum.looksmaxxing.com/threads/the-best-mandy-threads.80422/

These ones specifically but all of them are good

making a thread about your best threads is some next level OG shit

 

[Archelaus]

And not even one is in must reads even tho they’re the highest quality and most effective guides in my opinion besides @Archelaus , how will people ascend if they can’t find my guides properly?

Our guides alone probably provide more value than 90% of BOTB , not even being egotistical

 

[Mandy?]

Our guides alone probably provide more value than 90% of BOTB , not even being egotistical

Exactly. @Randomized Shame and @Dean need to realize more than half of these threads are total water information. Genuine guides that could seriously ascend many people come from people such as such meanwhile half pf the threads are generated by ChatGPT.