Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Hypothesis I don't understand people wanting women off of .com specifically

junebug
junebug

junebug

18, 175cm | 1 Samuel 16:7 KJV
VIP
Moderator
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★★
Joined
Jan 19, 2026
Messages
14,408
Solutions
8
Reputation
46,333
Location
whatever makes the sky blue
I understand that looksmaxxing is more of a male-centered practice, but some women will inevitably want to join in on something even if it's "for men". .com is a gender inclusive forum, it's a place for women to experience looksmaxxing culture without needing to "invade" male-only spaces. If you force women out of every forum, they won't leave, they'll just go undercover. If you truly want a male-only experience you'll have better luck on org, .is, or .net. .com is a place where women are allowed, which is why you see a higher volume of women.

Is this a bad take?
 
Register to hide this ad
bambie said:
legit, If u have an issue with girls here just go rot on org or some other incel forum
Click to expand...
Exactly. I do not condone women joining org as it's specified male-only but this forum is not and therefore I see no problem with women being here.
 
Not a bad take (didn’t even read your post I’m gonna be honest), this forum was created by Dean. His forum, his rules. We guys have .org anyway.
 
There's no problem with women looksmaxxing. The only logical problem I could see there being is women claiming femcel status, but that's not something I see on here really and fakecels exist in these spaces much more prominently.

Crying that women can't looksmaxx because of smv is stupid, all of the best looking "looksmaxxers" were destined to be good looking regardless
 
junebug said:
I understand that looksmaxxing is more of a male-centered practice, but some women will inevitably want to join in on something even if it's "for men". .com is a gender inclusive forum, it's a place for women to experience looksmaxxing culture without needing to "invade" male-only spaces. If you force women out of every forum, they won't leave, they'll just go undercover. If you truly want a male-only experience you'll have better luck on org, .is, or .net. .com is a place where women are allowed, which is why you see a higher volume of women.

Is this a bad take?
Click to expand...
Looksmaxxing is actually a gender-neutral practice. Women do it even earlier than men do. Just go to any high school, I teach 7th graders and they’re already doing makeup and whatnot (looksmaxxing). Not to mention it’s not unique to today’s society, even in ancient Egypt they were looksmaxxing (they performed rhinoplasty thousands of years ago). The thing is that most guys here come from .org where there is gender-exclusion involved so they somehow think looksmaxxing is a male-only practice, that’s not true at all. As a concept it’s gender-neutral, but the methods that men employ are very different. You won’t see women using all sorts of chemicals to look better, or getting implants and stuff.
 
junebug said:
I understand that looksmaxxing is more of a male-centered practice, but some women will inevitably want to join in on something even if it's "for men". .com is a gender inclusive forum, it's a place for women to experience looksmaxxing culture without needing to "invade" male-only spaces. If you force women out of every forum, they won't leave, they'll just go undercover. If you truly want a male-only experience you'll have better luck on org, .is, or .net. .com is a place where women are allowed, which is why you see a higher volume of women.

Is this a bad take?
Click to expand...
I think the reason is because most are compliment fishing or low iq. Also it's because women don't struggle in the sexual dating market so much. But I agree if there are already many sites which are male centered, there should be an available option such as .com
 
Penalizer69 said:
There's no problem with women looksmaxxing. The only logical problem I could see there being is women claiming femcel status, but that's not something I see on here really and fakecels exist in these spaces much more prominently.

Crying that women can't looksmaxx because of smv is stupid, all of the best looking "looksmaxxers" were destined to be good looking regardless
Click to expand...
Women claiming femcel status is mostly ragebait tbh. There are many more incels than femcels, but I wouldn't say NO femcels exist. I have yet to see one here though.
 
junebug said:
I understand that looksmaxxing is more of a male-centered practice, but some women will inevitably want to join in on something even if it's "for men". .com is a gender inclusive forum, it's a place for women to experience looksmaxxing culture without needing to "invade" male-only spaces. If you force women out of every forum, they won't leave, they'll just go undercover. If you truly want a male-only experience you'll have better luck on org, .is, or .net. .com is a place where women are allowed, which is why you see a higher volume of women.

Is this a bad take?
Click to expand...

 
junebug said:
I understand that looksmaxxing is more of a male-centered practice, but some women will inevitably want to join in on something even if it's "for men". .com is a gender inclusive forum, it's a place for women to experience looksmaxxing culture without needing to "invade" male-only spaces. If you force women out of every forum, they won't leave, they'll just go undercover. If you truly want a male-only experience you'll have better luck on org, .is, or .net. .com is a place where women are allowed, which is why you see a higher volume of women.

Is this a bad take?
Click to expand...
I can kind of agree with the plight of finding it very annoying when women invade male centred spaces, but it gets to a point where you just have to accept it or find a different space to be in
 
Xx_Sh4tteredHe4rt_xX said:
I can kind of agree with the plight of finding it very annoying when women invade male centred spaces, but it gets to a point where you just have to accept it or find a different space to be in
Click to expand...
and then said new space is invaded by women
once again

like a cancer
 
junebug said:
I understand that looksmaxxing is more of a male-centered practice, but some women will inevitably want to join in on something even if it's "for men". .com is a gender inclusive forum, it's a place for women to experience looksmaxxing culture without needing to "invade" male-only spaces. If you force women out of every forum, they won't leave, they'll just go undercover. If you truly want a male-only experience you'll have better luck on org, .is, or .net. .com is a place where women are allowed, which is why you see a higher volume of women.

Is this a bad take?
Click to expand...
its actually good for org since less women would try to join
 
Penalizer69 said:
There's no problem with women looksmaxxing. The only logical problem I could see there being is women claiming femcel status, but that's not something I see on here really and fakecels exist in these spaces much more prominently.

Crying that women can't looksmaxx because of smv is stupid, all of the best looking "looksmaxxers" were destined to be good looking regardless
Click to expand...
junebug said:
Women claiming femcel status is mostly ragebait tbh. There are many more incels than femcels, but I wouldn't say NO femcels exist. I have yet to see one here though.
Click to expand...
Yeah there’s no such thing as femcels, men are just too downbad
 
junebug said:
I don't speak french
Click to expand...
reddit-mod.webp
 
Xx_Sh4tteredHe4rt_xX said:
I can kind of agree with the plight of finding it very annoying when women invade male centred spaces, but it gets to a point where you just have to accept it or find a different space to be in
Click to expand...
Exactly. True male-only spaces just don't exist, but you can find a lower volume of women where it's specifically stated they're not welcome. Whining about women in a forum where women are allowed is complete bullshit though.
 
BlackFag said:
and then said new space is invaded by women
once again

like a cancer
Click to expand...
Once again I can kind of agree with this and it makes me insanely mad when women invite themselves into men's spaces then get mad when they are mistreated or rejected, which is think is happening pretty regularly in the community, but .com is not the right place to go to avoid this
 
junebug said:
I understand that looksmaxxing is more of a male-centered practice, but some women will inevitably want to join in on something even if it's "for men". .com is a gender inclusive forum, it's a place for women to experience looksmaxxing culture without needing to "invade" male-only spaces. If you force women out of every forum, they won't leave, they'll just go undercover. If you truly want a male-only experience you'll have better luck on org, .is, or .net. .com is a place where women are allowed, which is why you see a higher volume of women.

Is this a bad take?
Click to expand...
Technically women were the first looksmaxxers
 
junebug said:
I understand that looksmaxxing is more of a male-centered practice, but some women will inevitably want to join in on something even if it's "for men". .com is a gender inclusive forum, it's a place for women to experience looksmaxxing culture without needing to "invade" male-only spaces. If you force women out of every forum, they won't leave, they'll just go undercover. If you truly want a male-only experience you'll have better luck on org, .is, or .net. .com is a place where women are allowed, which is why you see a higher volume of women.

Is this a bad take?
Click to expand...
w take only interact on com because its so much less incel coded
 
unknown mtn said:
everywhere else is a bunch of kids trying to be overly edgy

i will go to .org for more hardmaxxing stuff but thats really the only benefit imo
Click to expand...
yeah .org for info and here for fun and the community
 
Luxe said:
Technically women were the first looksmaxxers
Click to expand...
The first looksmaxxers were in ancient Egypt. We don’t know their gender but would make sense both genders were involved. Today? Yeah females are doing it much earlier, when they start wearing makeup.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top