Join 84,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

I got raw milk !!!!

okay well a primal is someone who eats raw meat and organs regularly, I like to cook my food, I always want raw milk apart of my diet and lost of fats and fruit
bro heart broken it then dislike
dnr doe
 
People like that show you whatever shit stained “study” they find online and swear it to be true. In the end knowledge is something you discover within not something you are spoon fed by demons (jews)
None of you can prove any of these studies are biased or manipulated

also JFL at your spiritual goyim cope, muh within, glorified plant fertilizer

Just lol dude people like you belong to the world and you use the word “goyim” as if it doesn’t refer exactly to you
The hyper goyish are mindless mega retards such as yourself who'll never contribute anything to the world apart from tiktok conspiracy slop.
All you subhumans are capable of is reposting edits exposing the "secret system", you can't achieve anything else.

You people are destined for the permanent underclass, it's so pathetic

its fear mongering, weve been pasturizing milk for less than 100 years, big corporations created laws regulating it
I addressed this & you couldn't refute it past a goatis gif, don't think you're anything more than a hivemind moron
 
None of you can prove any of these studies are biased or manipulated
you cant prove our studies differ
also JFL at your spiritual goyim cope, muh within, glorified plant fertilizer
another assumption again
All you subhumans are capable of is reposting edits exposing the "secret system", you can't achieve anything else.

You people are destined for the permanent underclass, it's so pathetic
I'm more attractive than you an I guarantee I make more money than you.
I addressed this & you couldn't refute it past a goatis gif, don't think you're anything more than a hivemind moron
you haven't questioned your narrative once, your appealing to public opinion like the real "goy" because you have never questioned anything in your life, and that's why everyone knows your wrong, so you can keep acting intellectual but all your really doing is articulating yourself better.
 
Last edited:
None of you can prove any of these studies are biased or manipulated

also JFL at your spiritual goyim cope, muh within, glorified plant fertilizer


The hyper goyish are mindless mega retards such as yourself who'll never contribute anything to the world apart from tiktok conspiracy slop.
All you subhumans are capable of is reposting edits exposing the "secret system", you can't achieve anything else.

You people are destined for the permanent underclass, it's so pathetic


I addressed this & you couldn't refute it past a goatis gif, don't think you're anything more than a hivemind moron

you cant prove your studies differ

another assumption again

I'm more attractive than you an I guarantee I make more money than you.

you haven't questioned your narrative once, your appealing to public opinion like the real "goy" because you have never questioned anything in your life, and that's why everyone knows your wrong, so you can keep acting intellectual but all your really doing is articulating yourself better.
Image result for lobotamy glitch meme



@BrazilianKen @Evilthinker21 @gatetoheaven @jestr @JRB69 @mod @ownerofwasia @percghøst* @Project chad @Slayer.inTraining @sweLmaxer @XWJ @yourfavlltb
 
btw fatty milk is good too if you cant afford or dont have balls to drink raw milk
 
if he's big and shredded he's probably a carb guy, lean is law imo so Id choose a low carb high fat high protein diet, if hes just obese then blud stored the fat lol
25%of fat is on bros face
 
None of you can prove any of these studies are biased or manipulated

also JFL at your spiritual goyim cope, muh within, glorified plant fertilizer


The hyper goyish are mindless mega retards such as yourself who'll never contribute anything to the world apart from tiktok conspiracy slop.
All you subhumans are capable of is reposting edits exposing the "secret system", you can't achieve anything else.

You people are destined for the permanent underclass, it's so pathetic


I addressed this & you couldn't refute it past a goatis gif, don't think you're anything more than a hivemind moron
Tell yourself these things and pat yourself on the back. Award yourself the most beautiful metal you surely deserve it.

Tell yourself you are better because we disagree and tell those around you too. We all need to give you a prize.

People like you just give me a headache
 
you cant prove our studies differ
??? One's a study done on cats from the 30s, another is a tooth-decay study done in the 40s; a case-study from this era is 10x more accurate than slop from back then. You're retarded if you think studies from that era are at-all accurate.

>Peer-reviewed RCT meta-analysis vs unverified trash. Also, what logic is this? Pathetic cop out saying "Muh can't prove our studies differ" when you're the one suggesting the ones i cite are bias & manipulated - where's the evidence? Oh wait, a social-media comment section. JFL making a claim and then refusing to elaborate past conspiratorial hivemind opinions



you haven't questioned your narrative once, your appealing to public opinion like the real "goy" because you have never questioned anything in your life, and that's why everyone knows your wrong, so you can keep acting intellectual but all your really doing is articulating yourself better.
You're just coping at this point. Questioned what exactly? That there's a global conspiracy to smear raw milk's reputation? It's like i said before: that's impossible. If you have any evidence apart from "The jews bro!", go ahead and attach it.

You people can't prove your claims whatsoever it's hilarious

Tell yourself these things and pat yourself on the back. Award yourself the most beautiful metal you surely deserve it.
Tell yourself you are better because we disagree and tell those around you too. We all need to give you a prize.
My prize is the future where you're flagged by ELITE for being a glue sniffing moron & appropriately slaughtered
 
You're just coping at this point. Questioned what exactly? That there's a global conspiracy to smear raw milk's reputation? It's like i said before: that's impossible. If you have any evidence apart from "The jews bro!", go ahead and attach it.
and again, your attempting to exarate my statements to remove credibility, its futile, your the one coping. and raw milks laws came into place after world war two, your strait up denying all the facts, your pathetic
 
and again, your attempting to exarate my statements to remove credibility, its futile, your the one coping.
and raw milks laws came into place after world war two, your strait up denying all the facts, your pathetic
You just hinted towards it being a Jewish conspiracy so there's no exaggeration, you quite literally just contradicted yourself. (assuming you mean exaggerate? Get your spelling in check)

And what does this prove? This is just a vague shit-post, not a refute. Nuclear weapons came into existence after WW2 - does that mean they've also dictated the regulation regarding raw milk? Obviously not

Like i said before: you have no evidence
 
You just hinted towards it being a Jewish conspiracy so there's no exaggeration, you quite literally just contradicted yourself. (assuming you mean exaggerate? Get your spelling in check)

And what does this prove? This is just a vague shit-post, not a refute. Nuclear weapons came into existence after WW2 - does that mean they've also dictated the regulation regarding raw milk? Obviously not

Like i said before: you have no evidence
your a broken record, thats why Im running out of shit to say, ive made my point and im right
 
You just hinted towards it being a Jewish conspiracy so there's no exaggeration, you quite literally just contradicted yourself. (assuming you mean exaggerate? Get your spelling in check)

And what does this prove? This is just a vague shit-post, not a refute. Nuclear weapons came into existence after WW2 - does that mean they've also dictated the regulation regarding raw milk? Obviously not

Like i said before: you have no evidence
you keep repeating the same bullshit, you dont make any sense whatsoever and you keep trying to put words in my mouth,
 
Just talking nonsense atp

you've got nothing to back up your claims 😭
if you want to refresh our entire conversation then do that but I have no tangible proof to give you, I sent you the videos, you sent me biased government articles. neither are tangible evidence and I can instantly discredit the medical narrative because of the harmful diets they promote, its clear the western nations will profit through medicine and cheap refined products sold by big corporations that fund the same fucking studies you listed, and we were much healthier 100 years ago, I seriously cant with you anymore @v3daddy @quijada @bomborders @Jack Frost @junebug @TonyDr @jestr @percghøst*
 
Last edited:
I sent you the videos
Outdated slop that's not even 1:1000 with all the papers against. 2 studies, literally just 2, from the 30s/40s respectively, to refute a claim regarding one of the most documented instances of inherently dangrous foods. The only logic you've got to support why 2 outdated, poor-control studies would ever invalidate thousands-upon-thousands of extensive modern studies is "Bro it's just uh, yk the gov and jews lie and stuff" with no other elaboration

you sent me biased government articles
You've got nothing to support these claims. You're just making shit up to avoid addressing valid evidence; i even went out of my way to spoon-feed you my logic as to why immoral governments would protect citizen health when it comes to raw-milk but allow the sale of goods like alcohol & you just ignored it

neither are tangible evidence and I can instantly discredit the medical narrative because of the harmful diets they promote, its clear the western nations will profit through medicine and cheap refined products sold by big corporations that fund the same fucking studies you listed,
Raw-milk epidemics aren't profitable i explained this before my god. You're repeating the same "Muh narrative" cope without taking a second to think about it
I never stated the government's some moral good, nor that they've restricted & advised against the sale of raw milk for "The good of the citizens" - the reason they've been so heavy on regulating raw-milk is because there's no real beneficial outcome; the socioeconomics of raw-milk consuming demographics aren't attractive to major healthcare corporations: they're largely poorer, more rural, and distrusting people - rather than the type who'd pay for a full treatment plan if they were to fall ill from drinking unpasteurized milk.

Also, subsequent of their working-class nature, it's not an ideal outcome their numbers should dwindle. And raw-milk epidemics are a royal pain in the ass for the government to handle because they rapidly spiral out of control & cost large amounts of money to contain:


Obesity, alcoholism, and addictive-foods on the other hand are the exact opposite: they're self-contained from person-to-person, warrant profit for the manufacturers, have a strong social acceptance, and directly profit healthcare corporations due to the long-set nature of adverse effects & the consequential treatments provided; obesity/liver-failure > E.coli for profit.

And seed oils aren't all bad, I'm skeptical of some data regarding them because they directly profit corporations like McDonald's, but there's no genuine evidence of any sort of short-term consumption being inherently harmful; because most seed-oil related studies focus on typical junk food, it's hard to conclude it's the seed oils alone that are responsible for some of the reported side-effects.

TLDR; raw milk's not profitable since the dangers (not the benefits) don't aid the economy or government, that's why it's heavily restricted


and we were much healthier 100 years ago
No....
1794367408780.webp


Why do you always feel the need to tag people? It's like you're just seeking people to virtue-signal your retarded logic to save your dwindling ego
 
Outdated slop that's not even 1:1000 with all the papers against. 2 studies, literally just 2, from the 30s/40s respectively, to refute a claim regarding one of the most documented instances of inherently dangrous foods. The only logic you've got to support why 2 outdated, poor-control studies would ever invalidate thousands-upon-thousands of extensive modern studies is "Bro it's just uh, yk the gov and jews lie and stuff" with no other elaboration


You've got nothing to support these claims. You're just making shit up to avoid addressing valid evidence; i even went out of my way to spoon-feed you my logic as to why immoral governments would protect citizen health when it comes to raw-milk but allow the sale of goods like alcohol & you just ignored it


Raw-milk epidemics aren't profitable i explained this before my god. You're repeating the same "Muh narrative" cope without taking a second to think about it




No....
View attachment 443977


Why do you always feel the need to tag people? It's like you're just seeking people to virtue-signal your retarded logic to save your dwindling ego
okay I read some of it and its small cases of 30 people that got there supply from the same unregulated sources, also alot of what I read aswell as your chart is fabricated
 
okay I read some of it and it small cases of 30 people that got there supply from the same unregulated sources
That was for an example of epidemic nature & then USDA's was for cost reference

https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/php/publications/research-anthology-raw-milk.html pretty much lists all major studies that show raw milk's dangerous. And no; just because muh .gov doesn't mean all these studies are bias, departments like the CDC issue these studies for the results regardless of outcome, they really don't care if it's against or for raw milk; as for why the NZ meta analysis documents raw-milk's limited data on positive allergy effects rather than just excluding it.

That's how studies at this scale operate, it's easy to understand how bias is hard to come by if you've ever spent even just an hour looking into how it works. Have you even done that? Do you even have any references of data manipulation?

There's a reason big health corporations get shit on 24/7 for falsifying or paying-off researchers for literally A-Z bullshit except raw-milk; because there's no corporate interest in it....

It'd make more sense for them to sell raw-milk and then treat for the diseases (direct cause) than your supposed vague "Unhealthy so they can sell drugs" point regarding raw milk's "benefits". If you're going to use profit-driven logic you should of already considered this. Using your logic it's far more profitable to lobby for & sell "Low-quality" raw-milk to then treat the diseases people would get from them than smear "High-quality" raw-milk's reputation with false data so, what? People get a nutritional deficiency? You can't even make sense of what you're saying
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top