Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 65,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

I love being white

Register to hide this ad
RRM said:
Just being white doesn’t help
Click to expand...
Yet it brings more power than any other kind. Not everything boils down to how attractive you are. This applies to your psyche, place of birth, linage and racial IQ. One is rare and the other is replaceable.
 
Inanimate Pragmatist said:
Yet it brings more power than any other kind. Not everything boils down to how attractive you are. This applies to your psyche, place of birth, linage and racial IQ. One is rare and the other is replaceable.
Click to expand...
I didn’t say it didn’t it’s just not enough on its own
 
Inanimate Pragmatist said:
What race and nationality. There is heavy nuance to this.
Click to expand...
Seems like you are obssessed with certain white nationalities. I can only say that I'm north european according to binary classification (south-north).
 
ogrecel said:
Seems like you are obssessed with certain white nationalities. I can only say that I'm north european according to binary classification (south-north).
Click to expand...
No, I tend to have a strong radar for people who say they are a race which they do not belong too.
 
Inanimate Pragmatist said:
No, I tend to have a strong radar for people who say they are a race which they do not belong too.
Click to expand...
Then it's alright if not everyone considers north euros to be white. When you're just learning, mistakes only help.
 
ogrecel said:
Then it's alright if not everyone considers north euros to be white. When you're just learning, mistakes only help.
Click to expand...
No, I tend to consider the majority of Europe white. What nationality are you.
 
True_Fakecell said:
Well being white definitely ain't a good thing 🤣
Click to expand...
I feel like I am watching the opposites of two ethnics clash. One that hates his race and another that does not, whilst the former pretends to be another.
 
ogrecel said:
ragebait.

It's just north slavic if you are that curious.
Click to expand...
Why cannot you just say what you are? No one will arrest you.
 
True_Fakecell said:
Icl ethnics who hate their race are just big fat faggoted cucks.
Click to expand...
I barely pity them. No amount of jestering to my kind will have them accepted. It is like a goyim and a Jew, it will never happen.
 
Inanimate Pragmatist said:
Yet it brings more power than any other kind. Not everything boils down to how attractive you are. This applies to your psyche, place of birth, linage and racial IQ. One is rare and the other is replaceable.
Click to expand...

Race and intelligence - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

"Discussions of race and intelligence—specifically regarding claims of differences in intelligence along racial lines—have appeared in both popular science and academic research since the modern concept of race was first introduced. With the inception of IQ testing in the early 20th century, differences in average test performance between racial groups have been observed, though these differences have fluctuated and in many cases steadily decreased over time. Complicating the issue, modern science has concluded that race is a *socially constructed phenomenon* rather than a *biological reality*, and there exist various conflicting definitions of intelligence. In particular, the validity of IQ testing as a metric for human intelligence is disputed. Today, the *scientific consensus* is that *genetics does not explain differences in IQ test performance between groups, and that observed differences are environmental in origin*.

*Pseudoscientific* claims of inherent differences in intelligence between races have played a central role in the history of scientific racism. The first tests showing differences in IQ scores between different population groups in the United States were those of United States Army recruits in World War I. In the 1920s, groups of eugenics lobbyists argued that these results demonstrated that African Americans and certain immigrant groups were of inferior intellect to Anglo-Saxon white people, and that this was due to innate biological differences. In turn, they used such beliefs to justify policies of racial segregation. However, *other studies* soon appeared, contesting these conclusions and arguing that the Army tests had not adequately controlled for environmental factors, such as socioeconomic and educational inequality between the groups."

Some emphasis added from me.
 
www.city-journal.org

Don’t Even Go There

The agency now restricts access to an important database if it thinks a scientist’s research may enter “forbidden” territory.
www.city-journal.org www.city-journal.org
AngryBuu96 said:

Race and intelligence - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

"Discussions of race and intelligence—specifically regarding claims of differences in intelligence along racial lines—have appeared in both popular science and academic research since the modern concept of race was first introduced. With the inception of IQ testing in the early 20th century, differences in average test performance between racial groups have been observed, though these differences have fluctuated and in many cases steadily decreased over time. Complicating the issue, modern science has concluded that race is a *socially constructed phenomenon* rather than a *biological reality*, and there exist various conflicting definitions of intelligence. In particular, the validity of IQ testing as a metric for human intelligence is disputed. Today, the *scientific consensus* is that *genetics does not explain differences in IQ test performance between groups, and that observed differences are environmental in origin*.

*Pseudoscientific* claims of inherent differences in intelligence between races have played a central role in the history of scientific racism. The first tests showing differences in IQ scores between different population groups in the United States were those of United States Army recruits in World War I. In the 1920s, groups of eugenics lobbyists argued that these results demonstrated that African Americans and certain immigrant groups were of inferior intellect to Anglo-Saxon white people, and that this was due to innate biological differences. In turn, they used such beliefs to justify policies of racial segregation. However, *other studies* soon appeared, contesting these conclusions and arguing that the Army tests had not adequately controlled for environmental factors, such as socioeconomic and educational inequality between the groups."

Some emphasis added from me.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top