I think more girls should be strippers

[neymar]

We dont need beauticians, lash technician, influencers we should have more strippers and strip clubs

 

[Sigma Girl]

We dont need beauticians, lash technician, influencers we should have more strippers and strip clubs​

And I think that moids' opinions don't matter; girls aren't here for men.

 

[Deleted Member 60441]

And I think that moids' opinions don't matter; girls aren't here for men.

Reminder: this girl is 11

 

[neymar]

And I think that moids' opinions don't matter; girls aren't here for men.

And i think theyd rather listen to chad then a truecel 60 yo who larps as a 13 yo little girl

 

[Sigma Girl]

Reminder: this girl is 11​

I am 13 yo

And i think theyd rather listen to chad then a truecel 60 yo who larps as a 13 yo little girl

ummmm yes im 60yo men , Thank you for telling me new information about myself

 

[Drownedwithluv]

Reminder: this girl is 11

Says a lot considering considering she's more sentient than most cucksmax users

And I think that moids' opinions don't matter;

Correct

 

[neymar]

Says a lot considering considering she's more sentient than most cucksmax users


Correct

She already got exposed for catfishing stop tryna bang her

 

[Drownedwithluv]

She already got exposed for catfishing stop tryna bang her

I'm a girl?

 

[neymar]

I'm a girl?

Stop tryna scissor

 

[Drownedwithluv]

Stop tryna scissor

I am gulf Arab rich Chad only

 

[Sigma Girl]

I'm a girl?

u are a girl? omg girllll i love u more noww

 

[Sigma Girl]

I am gulf Arab rich Chad only

oh shit

 

[James Othy]

And I think that moids' opinions don't matter; girls aren't here for men.

Actually they are. That's literally what they are for. To make a man's household, give him children, and compliment his life in general. Men are meant to blaze trails and women are meant to assist them, making it worth something more than just vain glory in the end. That's what God made women for. To be a help meet for men. God made woman for man. He didn't make man for woman, or woman for herself.

 

[g4rl1c]

Strippers shouldn't exist. But with how things work out if you are a low iq even mid looking woman it might be an OK career option

 

[neymar]

Actually they are. That's literally what they are for. To make a man's household, give him children, and compliment his life in general. Men are meant to blaze trails and women are meant to assist them, making it worth something more than just vain glory in the end. That's what God made women for. To be a help meet for men. God made woman for man. He didn't make man for woman, or woman for herself.

Half the female looksmax section is asking males for their opinion

 

[Sigma Girl]

Actually they are. That's literally what they are for. To make a man's household, give him children, and compliment his life in general. Men are meant to blaze trails and women are meant to assist them, making it worth something more than just vain glory in the end. That's what God made women for. To be a help meet for men. God made woman for man. He didn't make man for woman, or woman for herself.

"It's a men's world, but it would be nothing without women" – James Brown

btw I think it's time to catch up with the 21st century – women are no longer here to be 'helpers.' They’re here to lead, create, and make the world a better place.

 

[g4rl1c]

"It's a men's world, but it would be nothing without women" – James Brown

btw I think it's time to catch up with the 21st century – women are no longer here to be 'helpers.' They’re here to lead, create, and make the world a better place.

James brown was high on cocaine and one of the biggest rogs to exist

 

[neymar]

"It's a men's world, but it would be nothing without women" – James Brown

btw I think it's time to catch up with the 21st century – women are no longer here to be 'helpers.' They’re here to lead, create, and make the world a better place.

Theyre in the world to become strippers

 

[Sigma Girl]

James brown was high on cocaine and one of the biggest rogs to exist​

And that was the smartest thing that ever came out of his mouth.

 

[volny]

No strip clubs in India

 

[g4rl1c]

And that was the smartest thing that ever came out of his mouth.

James brown would say that to lure you in his basement

 

[neymar]

No strip clubs in India

There is i saw on insta

 

[Drownedwithhim]

If more girls are strippers that's less possible girlfriends for most men

 

[n4evis]

Actually they are. That's literally what they are for. To make a man's household, give him children, and compliment his life in general. Men are meant to blaze trails and women are meant to assist them, making it worth something more than just vain glory in the end. That's what God made women for. To be a help meet for men. God made woman for man. He didn't make man for woman, or woman for herself.

Not everyone believes in man-made religions that were created to control people and promote misogynistic beliefs, hope this helps!!

 

[Sigma Girl]

Not everyone believes in man-made religions that were created to control people and promote misogynistic beliefs, hope this helps!!​

girl I really liked you....

 

[James Othy]

"It's a men's world, but it would be nothing without women" – James Brown

btw I think it's time to catch up with the 21st century – women are no longer here to be 'helpers.' They’re here to lead, create, and make the world a better place.

That's not true. Doesn't matter what the times are, biology will never change and neither will God or His purpose. Allowing women to "lead" and create is nothing more than grossly misplaced charity, to the large scale detriment of society. Women being in the workplace has done nothing to contribute to society. They've only dramatically increased liability and expenditures while stifling progress. When women went to work in droves the price of everything went through the roof as a result. The average price of a two story three bedroom house on the outskirts of a city in 1920 would have come out to around $23,000 in today's money. Households began earning two incomes and we've gotten NOTHING to show for it except a need to pay to have our kids raised by someone else for a good part of the day at some facility.

Women chasing their careers are like cats chasing lazer beams across a carpet floor. And the satan's the one holding the lazer pointer.

The original purpose of any of God's creations have never and will never change.

 

[Sigma Girl]

That's not true. Doesn't matter what the times are, biology will never change and neither will God or His purpose. Allowing women to "lead" and create is nothing more than grossly misplaced charity, to the large scale detriment of society. Women being in the workplace has done nothing to contribute to society. They've only dramatically increased liability and expenditures while stifling progress. When women went to work in droves the price of everything went through the roof as a result. The average price of a two story three bedroom house on the outskirts of a city in 1920 would have come out to around $23,000 in today's money. Households began earning two incomes and we've gotten NOTHING to show for it except a need to pay to have our kids raised by someone else for a good part of the day at some facility.

Women chasing their careers are like cats chasing lazer beams across a carpet floor. And the satan's the one holding the lazer pointer.

The original purpose of any of God's creations have never and will never change.

---

I think this is a one-dimensional perspective that overlooks societal and cultural changes over time. Women didn’t enter the workforce ‘to disrupt society’ or ‘raise prices,’ but to gain equal opportunities and contribute in diverse ways.
Research shows that gender equality boosts economic growth and innovation. The world has changed, and technological and economic advancements mean we need everyone’s participation – especially women, who can bring diverse talents to the table.
More women in the workforce isn’t just an economic necessity; it’s a reflection of evolving family dynamics. Households today often require two incomes to maintain a good standard of living, which isn’t a negative outcome.
The world doesn’t progress by staying stuck in outdated models. Women are essential in every field – science, technology, art, and politics – and their presence is crucial for progress.

 

[volny]

There is i saw on insta

Extremely rare

 

[volny]

---

I think this is a one-dimensional perspective that overlooks societal and cultural changes over time. Women didn’t enter the workforce ‘to disrupt society’ or ‘raise prices,’ but to gain equal opportunities and contribute in diverse ways.
Research shows that gender equality boosts economic growth and innovation. The world has changed, and technological and economic advancements mean we need everyone’s participation – especially women, who can bring diverse talents to the table.
More women in the workforce isn’t just an economic necessity; it’s a reflection of evolving family dynamics. Households today often require two incomes to maintain a good standard of living, which isn’t a negative outcome.
The world doesn’t progress by staying stuck in outdated models. Women are essential in every field – science, technology, art, and politics – and their presence is crucial for progress.

Foidlet coping

 

[Sigma Girl]

That's not true. Doesn't matter what the times are, biology will never change and neither will God or His purpose. Allowing women to "lead" and create is nothing more than grossly misplaced charity, to the large scale detriment of society. Women being in the workplace has done nothing to contribute to society. They've only dramatically increased liability and expenditures while stifling progress. When women went to work in droves the price of everything went through the roof as a result. The average price of a two story three bedroom house on the outskirts of a city in 1920 would have come out to around $23,000 in today's money. Households began earning two incomes and we've gotten NOTHING to show for it except a need to pay to have our kids raised by someone else for a good part of the day at some facility.

Women chasing their careers are like cats chasing lazer beams across a carpet floor. And the satan's the one holding the lazer pointer.

The original purpose of any of God's creations have never and will never change.

You have to understand that we don't live in the Byzantine period, things have changed

 

[volny]

Not everyone believes in man-made religions that were created to control people and promote misogynistic beliefs, hope this helps!!

Evolution is enough proof for this, religion is irrelevant

 

[Sigma Girl]

Foidlet coping

Yes? What am I wrong about, come and tell me.

 

[Sigma Girl]

Evolution is enough proof for this, religion is irrelevant​

Not all of us believe in evolution

 

[volny]

Not all of us believe in evolution

Feminism > evolution
Got it

 

[James Othy]

Not everyone believes in man-made religions that were created to control people and promote misogynistic beliefs, hope this helps!!

Doesn't matter. With or without religion women are completely at the mercy of men. Go to China where atheism and agnosticism are the common belief and tell me if religion is needed one bit for misogyny to exist.

 

[Sigma Girl]

Doesn't matter. With or without religion women are completely at the mercy of men. Go to China where atheism and agnosticism are the common belief and tell me if religion is needed one bit for misogyny to exist.

True, misogyny exists in every society, regardless of whether there is religion or not, and that's exactly why we need to focus on breaking social patterns that lead to the oppression of women. While misogyny can exist in atheist countries as well, that doesn’t mean it’s natural or inevitable. It’s not about whether people believe in God or not, but how we construct society, how we view women, and what values we instill.

 

[Whitepill]

And I think that moids' opinions don't matter; girls aren't here for men.

That's like saying men aren't here for women. Both genders are necessary, if you don't care about the opposite gender's preferences it's likely you are infertile or deranged

 

[n4evis]

Doesn't matter. With or without religion women are completely at the mercy of men. Go to China where atheism and agnosticism are the common belief and tell me if religion is needed one bit for misogyny to exist.

Men traditionally hold a monopoly on physical force within society, which gives them significant power in enforcing rights, religions and social norms but that doesn't mean that they're superior LOL

 

[n4evis]

Evolution is enough proof for this, religion is irrelevant

Explain

 

[James Othy]

---

I think this is a one-dimensional perspective that overlooks societal and cultural changes over time. Women didn’t enter the workforce ‘to disrupt society’ or ‘raise prices,’ but to gain equal opportunities and contribute in diverse ways.
Research shows that gender equality boosts economic growth and innovation. The world has changed, and technological and economic advancements mean we need everyone’s participation – especially women, who can bring diverse talents to the table.
More women in the workforce isn’t just an economic necessity; it’s a reflection of evolving family dynamics. Households today often require two incomes to maintain a good standard of living, which isn’t a negative outcome.
The world doesn’t progress by staying stuck in outdated models. Women are essential in every field – science, technology, art, and politics – and their presence is crucial for progress.

This is all false, and those studies are extremely flawed. Do you know how they were carried out? You know you can make a study say anything you want right? It's all all about numbers to controlled variables and omissions.

Would you let a mentally retarded person participate in an engineering project just for the sake of inclusiveness? Women are not essential in science, technology, politics or even art. What you're saying is absolute nonsense.

Of course women didn't go to work to disrupt society or raise prices, but that's what inadvertently happened as a result nevertheless. Women didn't go to work because households needed two incomes. Households began needing to have two incomes because women started going to work.

Just look at Saudi Arabia. Up to 2017 only 21.2% of women in Saudi Arabia worked. Look how technologically advanced they are. Look at how rich their average citizen is are compared to in the West, and how much more buying power their currency within their country holds.

 

[volny]

Explain

Women are not evolved to work equally, look at history and prehistory and literally how men and women evolved, r****d there's a reason sexes are different and not the same

 

[James Othy]

True, misogyny exists in every society, regardless of whether there is religion or not, and that's exactly why we need to focus on breaking social patterns that lead to the oppression of women. While misogyny can exist in atheist countries as well, that doesn’t mean it’s natural or inevitable. It’s not about whether people believe in God or not, but how we construct society, how we view women, and what values we instill.

That's just luxurious and naive thinking. Women will always be at the mercy of men. That's nature. And nature was always there long before we began to construct any sort of society, and it will always be there waiting if that society ever collapses. You can't escape it. Even in a society where women are ALLOWED to function in an equal capacity as men they will still need men at the end of the day to enforce that status quo. The truth is women are not equal to men.

Don't get me wrong. Men should be benevolent to women. It's not "oppression" for the majority of woman to spend their lives working in the home and raising children. For most of human history the reason a woman couldn't go out and work wasn't because of some misogynistic conspiracy with a goal to oppress. It was because there simply wasn't any practical need for it. And there isn't a need for it today, except to feed corporate greed and materialism. The only ones who benefited from women going to work are corporations. Society itself certainly didn't.

 

[n4evis]

This is all false, and those studies are extremely flawed. Do you know how they were carried out? You know you can make a study say anything you want right? It's all all about numbers to controlled variables and omissions.

Would you let a mentally retarded person participate in an engineering project just for the sake of inclusiveness? Women are not essential in science, technology, politics or even art. What you're saying is absolute nonsense.

There are so many examples of women who have made groundbreaking contributions to these fields. JFL at "Mentally retarded". Women have more volume in the prefrontal cortex than men and their brains are more active in this area, which is involved in focus and impulse control. They also have more gray matter volume in the medial and lateral prefrontal. These differences can give women strength in multiple areas like multitasking, emotional intelligence etc. However, both men and women are capable of excelling in leadership postions and other fields, your 'arguments' make no sense.

 

[n4evis]

Women are not evolved to work equally, look at history and prehistory and literally how men and women evolved, r****d there's a reason sexes are different and not the same

Physical differences between the sexes may have influenced historical labor division but leadership abilities and emotional intelligence are not confined to one gender, you're the one that's retarded

 

[James Othy]

Men traditionally hold a monopoly on physical force within society, which gives them significant power in enforcing rights, religions and social norms but that doesn't mean that they're superior LOL

It's not just physical strength. If that were the case we'd all be spending our lives hiding from beasts of the field. Woman are less variant than men. It's way more rare for a woman to be above or below average in any field, including intelligence. Men on the other hand are more likely to be found at every range of the spectrum in the realm of ability. Therefore you're going to have way more men that are above average than women. More stupid ones to but, the men with high ability will naturally rule the world.

It's also about how men and women structure themselves in terms of ability. Women aren't wired to organize themselves like men are. Get a group of women together and ask them to complete a task. It's not gonna happen because women cannot get anything done without a lot of discourse. They tear each to pieces and lose sight of the goal. Men will naturally figure out who's good at what and organize themselves accordingly without much discourse. They'll put aside personal feelings for the bigger picture. I'm talking about building something from the ground up without a format or standard protocol.

 

[James Othy]

Physical differences between the sexes may have influenced historical labor division but leadership abilities and emotional intelligence are not confined to one gender, you're the one that's retarded

There's no such thing as "emotional intelligence". That's just intelligence. If I don't respond to you the way that you think I should it doesn't me I don't recognize how you feel or understand it. I just might have different values than you.

And, yes, leadership abilities aren't confined to one gender. But way more men are going to be adept in that area than women. Generally speaking, men are better leaders than women.

 

[n4evis]

It's not just physical strength. If that were the case we'd all be spending our lives hiding from beasts of the field. Woman are less variant than men. It's way more rare for a woman to be above or below average in any field, including intelligence. Men on the other hand are more likely to be found at every range of the spectrum in the realm of ability. Therefore you're going to have way more men that are above average than women. More stupid ones to but, the men with high ability will naturally rule the world.

It's also about how men and women structure themselves in terms of ability. Women aren't wired to organize themselves like men are. Get a group of women together and ask them to complete a task. It's not gonna happen because women cannot get anything done without a lot of discourse. They tear each to pieces and lose sight of the goal. Men will naturally figure out who's good at what and organize themselves accordingly without much discourse. They'll put aside personal feelings for the bigger picture. I'm talking about building something from the ground up without a format or standard protocol.

Women today outpace men in college enrollment and outperform in various categories, which is why we see some men telling women to stop pursuing education and focus on motherhood(take Harrison Butker’s speech as an example) and they even advocate for restricting women's right to education. Skills aren't determined by gender. People of any gender can be diverse in their skills, intelligence and problem solving approaches

 

[n4evis]

There's no such thing as "emotional intelligence". That's just intelligence. If I don't respond to you the way that you think I should it doesn't me I don't recognize how you feel or understand it. I just might have different values than you.

And, yes, leadership abilities aren't confined to one gender. But way more men are going to be adept in that area than women. Generally speaking, men are better leaders than women.

Speaking from a biological perspective, women are wired to lead and i already explained why

 

[volny]

Speaking from a biological perspective, women are wired to lead and i already explained why

No historical or prehistorical example just all cope

 

[volny]

Too much wordcelling in this thread wtf are you guys on?