Info Ideal looks

[theRetard]

it's obvious that elites>peasants and therefore you need to look like an elite rather than robust masc peasant.
the elite was distinguished by pale skin as their lifestyle did not involve working outdoors. darker shitty skin on the other hand indicates belonging to the working class. pale skin is a symbol of refinement. a high forehead is a sign of intelligence. if you have such a forehead you look aristocratic. a long and thin face is another sign of aristocracy. if your face is more rounded or square or just wide - then you look like a peasant. a straight long nose is a sign of nobility.. the necks of aristocrats are long and refined. (it looks grace). aristocrats are slender because they aren't engaged in heavy manual physical labor.
thin and long fingers are signs of intelligence an refinement

 

[theRetard]

@Enrique ꗞ @giga.mia

 

[Spuffy]

these were the beauty standards of the past though. nobody is going to think youre a peasant for having a wide face.

if thats what you desire then fine, but a lot of those standards arent real anymore

 

[Enrique ꗞ]

these were the beauty standards of the past though. nobody is going to think youre a peasant for having a wide face.

if thats what you desire then fine, but a lot of those standards arent real anymore

Everyone let’s take a break

Time to congratulate me for my high iq

 

[theRetard]

these were the beauty standards of the past though. nobody is going to think youre a peasant for having a wide face.

if thats what you desire then fine, but a lot of those standards arent real anymore

no, i said "ideal" looks, not something that it a "standard" right now.
so that thing i described is eternal. nobody is going to think you are a peasant for having wide face because it's capitalism rn but it still looks peasant even tho peasantry doesn't exist anymore

 

[theRetard]

Everyone let’s take a break

Time to congratulate me for my high iq

View attachment 261804

congrats

 

[Duchess]

it's obvious that elites>peasants and therefore you need to look like an elite rather than robust masc peasant.
the elite was distinguished by pale skin as their lifestyle did not involve working outdoors. darker shitty skin on the other hand indicates belonging to the working class. pale skin is a symbol of refinement. a high forehead is a sign of intelligence. if you have such a forehead you look aristocratic. a long and thin face is another sign of aristocracy. if your face is more rounded or square or just wide - then you look like a peasant. a straight long nose is a sign of nobility.. the necks of aristocrats are long and refined. (it looks grace). aristocrats are slender because they aren't engaged in heavy manual physical labor.
thin and long fingers are signs of intelligence an refinement

As someone who’s been in a European ‘elite’ environment, it legit doesn’t matter that much. These ‘elite’ kids go to school with the richest Indian families, the richest South Americans, etc. There is no elite look in itself. They don’t judge your fucking tan, I was always the poorest there and I am pale with most attributes you describe, and a lot of the richer ones I’ve seen were actually tan due to travelling a lot to places like Monaco that are always sunny.

The only thing I noticed is they tend to be tall, both women and men and dress a certain way and are always well groomed.

 

[theRetard]

As someone who’s been in a European ‘elite’ environment, it legit doesn’t matter that much. These ‘elite’ kids go to school with the richest Indian families, the richest South Americans, etc. There is no elite look in itself. They don’t judge your fucking tan, I was always the poorest there and I am pale with most attributes you describe, and a lot of the richer ones I’ve seen were actually tan due to travelling a lot to places like Monaco that are always sunny.

The only thing I noticed is they tend to be tall, both women and men and dress a certain way and are always well groomed.

modern elites are bourgeois/merchants, they aren't aristocrats at all
and yeah i described aristocratic look. ofc some particular elite guy can look peasant

 

[trueceljester]

modern elites are bourgeois/merchants, they aren't aristocrats at all

So the ideal look is a pale kid with a shitty fwhr?

 

[theRetard]

So the ideal look is a pale kid with a shitty fwhr?

wdym by shitty fwhr?

 

[trueceljester]

wdym by shitty fwhr?

"long and thin face is another sign of aristocracy. if your face is more rounded or square or just wide - then you look like a peasant" you're saying you'd rather have a long face than a wide?

 

[Duchess]

"long and thin face is another sign of aristocracy. if your face is more rounded or square or just wide - then you look like a peasant" you're saying you'd rather have a long face than a wide?

For real that sounds like long face syndrome. Was characteristic of royalty back then because they only ate soft things and got recessed compared to peasants. but it’s factually ugly.

 

[theRetard]

"long and thin face is another sign of aristocracy. if your face is more rounded or square or just wide - then you look like a peasant" you're saying you'd rather have a long face than a wide?

ofc, long face is better

For real that sounds like long face syndrome. Was characteristic of royalty back then because they only ate soft things and got recessed compared to peasants. but it’s factually ugly.

long face syndrome is just being downgrown, barely related to thing i meant lol

 

[trueceljester]

For real that sounds like long face syndrome. Was characteristic of royalty back then because they only ate soft things and got recessed compared to peasants. but it’s factually ugly.

That reminds me of when sugar was only available to rich people so shitty teeth was the ideal like ages ago

 

[theRetard]

That reminds me of when sugar was only available to rich people so shitty teeth was the ideal like ages ago

shitty teeth weren't the ideal even tho it's a popular myth

 

[trueceljester]

ofc, long face is better

long face syndrome is just being downgrown, barely related to thing i meant lol

not true
If you measure fwhr like this

The ideal measurement is for the horizontal line to be 2x longer than the vertical line, long faces wouldn't be close to 2x, long faces also usually happen because of a recessed face, recessed face never means you look good so idk where ur comin from

 

[theRetard]

not true
If you measure fwhr like this
View attachment 261820
The ideal measurement is for the horizontal line to be 2x longer than the vertical line, long faces wouldn't be close to 2x, long faces also usually happen because of a recessed face, recessed face never means you look good so idk where ur comin from

2.0 fwhr is ugly and please delete his disgusting face.

 

[trueceljester]

2.0 fwhr is ugly and please delete his disgusting face.

Who mogs in ur opinion then

 

[homiespidyhatesjuice]

Everyone let’s take a break

Time to congratulate me for my high iq

View attachment 261804

is that real

 

[theRetard]

Who mogs in ur opinion then
View attachment 261827View attachment 261828

i don't like both but i have a sympathy for 1st for being a queen and i have sympathy for 2nd for being a male

 

[idkwhatodo]

it's obvious that elites>peasants and therefore you need to look like an elite rather than robust masc peasant.
the elite was distinguished by pale skin as their lifestyle did not involve working outdoors. darker shitty skin on the other hand indicates belonging to the working class. pale skin is a symbol of refinement. a high forehead is a sign of intelligence. if you have such a forehead you look aristocratic. a long and thin face is another sign of aristocracy. if your face is more rounded or square or just wide - then you look like a peasant. a straight long nose is a sign of nobility.. the necks of aristocrats are long and refined. (it looks grace). aristocrats are slender because they aren't engaged in heavy manual physical labor.
thin and long fingers are signs of intelligence an refinement

jew detected opinion rejected info objected

 

[trueceljester]

i don't like both but i have a sympathy for 1st for being a queen and i have sympathy for 2nd for being a male

Okay show me someone with your ideal perception of looks

 

[theRetard]

jew detected opinion rejected info objected

get out you plebeian

 

[theRetard]

Okay show me someone with your ideal perception of looks

 

[idkwhatodo]

it's obvious that elites>peasants and therefore you need to look like an elite rather than robust masc peasant.
the elite was distinguished by pale skin as their lifestyle did not involve working outdoors. darker shitty skin on the other hand indicates belonging to the working class. pale skin is a symbol of refinement. a high forehead is a sign of intelligence. if you have such a forehead you look aristocratic. a long and thin face is another sign of aristocracy. if your face is more rounded or square or just wide - then you look like a peasant. a straight long nose is a sign of nobility.. the necks of aristocrats are long and refined. (it looks grace). aristocrats are slender because they aren't engaged in heavy manual physical labor.
thin and long fingers are signs of intelligence an refinement

are u stuck in the past or smh also the description kinda fits me a bit

get out you plebeian

will do with pleasure

 

[homiespidyhatesjuice]

View attachment 261829View attachment 261832

these n*****s dont even have big foreheads

 

[idkwhatodo]

View attachment 261829View attachment 261832

wait what the second looks like me with longer hair and skinnier istg im not making ts up

 

[theRetard]

wait what the second looks like me with longer hair and skinnier istg im not making ts up

well when i had 50cm hair i looked 100% like second but now i got a haircut which is similar to first picture so i look like him

 

[theRetard]

these n*****s dont even have big foreheads

tall forehead=/=big

 

[idkwhatodo]

well when i had 50cm hair i looked 100% like second but now i got a haircut which is similar to first picture so i look like him

well calling that ideal doesnt make your opinion biased since its based on yourself

 

[theRetard]

well calling that ideal doesnt make your opinion biased since its based on yourself

it's objectively ideal

 

[idkwhatodo]

no, it's objectively ideal

is there any proof or argument behind your statment other than ppl in acient times using them as muses

 

[theRetard]

is there any proof or argument behind your statment other than ppl in acient times using them as muses

people in ancient times were better so it's the proof

 

[snow]

Dnr

 

[idkwhatodo]

people in ancient times were better so it's the proof

well than thats biacy towards unexperienced times you cant say its better unless you yourself experienced it wich will never happen

 

[theRetard]

well than thats biacy towards unexperienced times you cant say its better unless you yourself experienced it wich will never happen

you don't need to experience it for knowledge

 

[idkwhatodo]

you don't need to experience it for knowledge

yes you do its like ppl saying communism is the best since everyone is equal until they experienced it and saw that everyone was shit unless you have proof experience and and multiple ppl backing you up also with experience you cant say so for sure a thing might look good on paper but not good practicaly sidenote as a race we evolve mourning on the past is sensles you ether evolve or die and with that our standards evolve my guess is the reason u made this thread is because you have resemblence towards these guys who were considered peak beauty and you think that if the beuty standards were like then you would be considered attractive ether way im done exposing my view cause istg i feel like a keyboard worrior

 

[kafka]

Everyone let’s take a break

Time to congratulate me for my high iq

View attachment 261804

no way

 

[theRetard]

yes you do its like ppl saying communism is the best since everyone is equal until they experienced it and saw that everyone was shit unless you have proof experience and and multiple ppl backing you up also with experience you cant say so for sure a thing might look good on paper but not good practicaly sidenote as a race we evolve mourning on the past is sensles you ether evolve or die and with that our standards evolve my guess is the reason u made this thread is because you have resemblence towards these guys who were considered peak beauty and you think that if the beuty standards were like then you would be considered attractive ether way im done exposing my view cause istg i feel like a keyboard worrior

1. you don't know what communism is and hence you don't know that there was no communism
2. you can know social system and thus you can know what life felt like
3. our standards don't evolve, they degrade since like 19th century
4. even if i looked differently it wouldn't change anything, i'd still consider it the ideal

 

[idkwhatodo]

1. you don't know what communism is and hence you don't know that there was no communism
2. you can know social system and thus you can know what life felt like
3. our standards don't evolve, they degrade since like 19th century
4. even if i looked differently it wouldn't change anything, i'd still consider it the ideal

1i do know what comunism is i live in a country that was part of the comunist block wtf are u on abt my parents experienced it
2 the information you have is not valid easily changeble and not veritical
3 they evolve/adapt thats how life works doesnt matter if you consider it worse or not thats just your opinion u cant say that one is worse than the other u can only say that is worse for you
4 when you used aristocrats as an exemple mind you being high status pearson doesnt make you attractive
5 istg your jewish and i have to study so im not wasting my time anymore

 

[theRetard]

1i do know what comunism is i live in a country that was part of the comunist block wtf are u on abt
2 the information you have is not valid easily changeble and no veritical
3 they evolve/adapt doesnt matter if you consider it worse or not thats just your opinion u cant say that one is worse that the other u can only say that is worse for you
4 when you used aristocrats as an exemple mind you being high status pearson doesnt make you attractive
5 istg your jewish and i have to study so im not wasting my time anymore

1. no you don't, if you were knowledgeble then you wont say that, because communism is classless and stateless society. in soviet union there were classes and there was a state
2. go read some history, it's not even some esoteric knowledge
3. they degrade and it's an objective fact because beauty is objective, if you say otherwise then you just have shitty taste like all masses have
4. it's just peasant cope
5. your jewish saaar your jewish i'm plebian goy so i'm offended

 

[Almighty Sigma Wolf]

Everyone let’s take a break

Time to congratulate me for my high iq

View attachment 261804

Congrats on condemning yourself to the path of modern slavery

 

[Enrique ꗞ]

Congrats on condemning yourself to the path of modern slavery

I agree

My first choice was bricklaying and banter at slough college but I didn’t get a high enough ucas

 

[theRetard]

I agree

My first choice was bricklaying and banter at slough college but I didn’t get a high enough ucas

what will you study there?

 

[Enrique ꗞ]

what will you study there?

It says on xhe og image lol

 

[theRetard]

It says on xhe og image lol

i can't read

 

[Enrique ꗞ]

i can't read

History

 

[theRetard]

History

it's good but tbh i'd study philosophy rather than history

 

[Enrique ꗞ]

it's good but tbh i'd study philosophy rather than history

I would study physics if I could