Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

If you saw how women talked about

If you’ve ever seen my ratings you would know they are good, your reality are insults while mine are reality.

It’s hard to take you serious when you throw temper tantrums
Ok ask penalizer69 shes as educated as me or more and she’s more mature
 
NO ONE SHOULD GAF ABT THEIR RATINGS CUZ NO ONE HERE IN AT THEIR PEAK YET
Nga you get your rating to find your lesser obvious flaws
I never knew my esr was unideal nb told me
And my ipd is regular
Ratings arent js a number, theyre your strengths and weaknesses
 
Nga you get your rating to find your lesser obvious flaws
I never knew my esr was unideal nb told me
And my ipd is regular
Ratings arent js a number, theyre your strengths and weaknesses
i agree fully that's what the most important part is
 
see what i replied with
But u said something “see where im at” blah blah which implies you still think its js how attractive you are
Ratings include strengths and weaknesses
Thats why i said that
 
Nga you get your rating to find your lesser obvious flaws
I never knew my esr was unideal nb told me
And my ipd is regular
Ratings arent js a number, theyre your strengths and weaknesses
Not all flaws are the same, unlaced facial thirds and having protruding ears are completely different, some flaws really are just to insignificant to matter at the ranking your at
 
But u said something “see where im at” blah blah which implies you still think its js how attractive you are
Ratings include strengths and weaknesses
Thats why i said that
agreed i meant "see where i'm at" in the sense in how much i've personally improved from sub 3, and what else needs to be done
 
Not all flaws are the same, unlaced facial thirds and having protruding ears are completely different, some flaws really are just to insignificant to matter at the ranking your at
What? Thats not even what i was saying? I never implied that all flaws are the same
Some flaws can be insignificant but there are certain significant flaws you cant pick up on without measuring you just know “something’s off”
 
BRO @Penalizer69 PLEASE TELL ME IM NOT TWEAKING BUT FAKECEL IS LITERALLY JS GREY 😭😭😭
Idk what you guys are arguing over but
What? Thats not even what i was saying? I never implied that all flaws are the same
Some flaws can be insignificant but there are certain significant flaws you cant pick up on without measuring you just know “something’s off”
This is true obviously, which is why normies make fun of people for having big noses, thin lips, large chins, botched surgery, etc.
 
Yeah I see chads all the time when I go out
View attachment 340204
Average guy in the grocery store
didnt know there were that many chads in mumbai :eek:
NO ONE SHOULD GAF ABT THEIR RATINGS CUZ NO ONE HERE IN AT THEIR PEAK YET
ig
its nice to know where you are
especially if your anit social and dont interact w women
i disagree w fat ppl getting ratings tho
BRO @Penalizer69 PLEASE TELL ME IM NOT TWEAKING BUT FAKECEL IS LITERALLY JS GREY 😭😭😭
he has 2000 posts so obv not:rolleyes:
 
didnt know there were that many chads in mumbai :eek:

ig
its nice to know where you are
especially if your anit social and dont interact w women
i disagree w fat ppl getting ratings tho

he has 2000 posts so obv not:rolleyes:
Grey is a state of mind 🥺🥺
 
What? Thats not even what i was saying? I never implied that all flaws are the same
Some flaws can be insignificant but there are certain significant flaws you cant pick up on without measuring you just know “something’s off”
Lesser obvious are lesser obvious for a reason, and it’s because they don’t really matter. Some time people don’t know there nose is too big for there IPD but most of the time it’s just harmony problems. Saying umtn is not lhtn is wrong and you’re doing it for attention. If you stop acting like a child I can have a reasonable conversation with you… this is probably why no one wants to discuss anything with you.
 
Idk what you guys are arguing over but

This is true obviously, which is why normies make fun of people for having big noses, thin lips, large chins, botched surgery, etc.
Brah he pmo he kinda dumb as rocks
 
Lesser obvious are lesser obvious for a reason, and it’s because they don’t really matter. Some time people don’t know there nose is too big for there IPD but most of the time it’s just harmony problems. Saying umtn is not lhtn is wrong and you’re doing it for attention. If you stop acting like a child I can have a reasonable conversation with you… this is probably why no one wants to discuss anything with you.
Dude i deadass am nkt even on the topic of umtn’s rating right now. I was simply explaining how ratings can show you less obvious flaws that normies could never point out. ANY flaw matters if you really want to go 100% which is what i think umtn is doing and also my personal ideology. “Most of the time its just harmony problems” ratios are harmony, harmony problems are flaws? If someone doesnt know their ipd is too big for their nose (which can be an important, significant flaw), i can measure it with ratios and figure out the exact flaw. Honestly, i dont even jnow what you’re trying to say. You’re clearly not educated. Harmony problems = something measured with ratios which ratings provide.
 
Is it
I js get annoyed big peen
969feba0096d93b86481361de0f8ca27.webp.webp
 
Dude i deadass am nkt even on the topic of umtn’s rating right now. I was simply explaining how ratings can show you less obvious flaws that normies could never point out. ANY flaw matters if you really want to go 100% which is what i think umtn is doing and also my personal ideology. “Most of the time its just harmony problems” ratios are harmony, harmony problems are flaws? If someone doesnt know their ipd is too big for their nose (which can be an important, significant flaw), i can measure it with ratios and figure out the exact flaw. Honestly, i dont even jnow what you’re trying to say. You’re clearly not educated. Harmony problems = something measured with ratios which ratings provide.
+ you can measure things like dimorphism and health markers which are harder to quantify
 
Dude i deadass am nkt even on the topic of umtn’s rating right now. I was simply explaining how ratings can show you less obvious flaws that normies could never point out. ANY flaw matters if you really want to go 100% which is what i think umtn is doing and also my personal ideology. “Most of the time its just harmony problems” ratios are harmony, harmony problems are flaws? If someone doesnt know their ipd is too big for their nose (which can be an important, significant flaw), i can measure it with ratios and figure out the exact flaw. Honestly, i dont even jnow what you’re trying to say. You’re clearly not educated. Harmony problems = something measured with ratios which ratings provide.
Monlid eyes do not suit strong brow ridge definition, a button nose and big eyes look good together. Normally strong brow ridge is good, normally overly large eyes are bad, however harmony changed that in these examples. Knowing that the corners of your mouth aren’t at the pupils is not going to make you ascend and it’s so insignificantly small that it doesn’t factor into my ratings until you hit CL. Harmony is measurable but it’s also personal, and can fluctuate, refusing to believe that is how you fall into uncanny valley
 
Monlid eyes do not suit strong brow ridge definition, a button nose and big eyes look good together. Normally strong brow ridge is good, normally overly large eyes are bad, however harmony changed that in these examples. Knowing that the corners of your mouth aren’t at the pupils is not going to make you ascend and it’s so insignificantly small that it doesn’t factor into my ratings until you hit CL. Harmony is measurable but it’s also personal, and can fluctuate, refusing to believe that is how you fall into uncanny valley
“Flaws do not harmonize with strengths” “strengths harmonize with strengths”
Also knowing many of these minor flaws could definitely help you ascend a sub tier which could get a hhtn to lcl. ANY FLAW IS STILL A FLAW. If you want to go 100% then you should know EVERY. MINOR. FLAW.
Harmony is not personal, its simply mathematics.
You say a button nose goes with big eyes. This is because the math between each feature is ideal. Monolid eyes do not go with either a strong nor a weak browridge. They are simply a flaw.

This not an argument im debating because im typing in lowercase guys
 
“Flaws do not harmonize with strengths” “strengths harmonize with strengths”
Also knowing many of these minor flaws could definitely help you ascend a sub tier which could get a hhtn to lcl. ANY FLAW IS STILL A FLAW. If you want to go 100% then you should know EVERY. MINOR. FLAW.
Harmony is not personal, its simply mathematics.
You say a button nose goes with big eyes. This is because the math between each feature is ideal. Monolid eyes do not go with either a strong nor a weak browridge. They are simply a flaw.

This not an argument im debating because im typing in lowercase guys
the golden ratio is what the human eye likes, however leading lines, rule of 3, 50 40 10 rules are all film concepts that can manipulate the eye into likeing something that’s unideal. Yes everything can be explained with science and math, such is the universe, however being aware and attempting to fix EVERY small flaw is not worth. Best case scenario you maybe go up one sub ranking and that’s only if you’re on the verge of it. This is the point when looksmaxxing goes to far, fixing 30 small things will not get you the girl, will not get you the job, will not make the world accept you, and spending hundreds of dollars and hours upon hours of fixing these small flaws will make you feel worse thus deranking you. I understand that you think every flaw matters, because every flaw sets you further from ideal. But I would argue some flaws don’t matter on some faces, (not because of the perfect ratio) but because of its insignificance
 
the golden ratio is what the human eye likes, however leading lines, rule of 3, 50 40 10 rules are all film concepts that can manipulate the eye into likeing something that’s unideal. Yes everything can be explained with science and math, such is the universe, however being aware and attempting to fix EVERY small flaw is not worth. Best case scenario you maybe go up one sub ranking and that’s only if you’re on the verge of it. This is the point when looksmaxxing goes to far, fixing 30 small things will not get you the girl, will not get you the job, will not make the world accept you, and spending hundreds of dollars and hours upon hours of fixing these small flaws will make you feel worse thus deranking you. I understand that you think every flaw matters, because every flaw sets you further from ideal. But I would argue some flaws don’t matter on some faces, (not because of the perfect ratio) but because of its insignificance
Well this is nuanced. I dont want to get the girl, the job, i dont care i could fix my large flaws and easily get it. I simply want to look my mathematical best. Everything you say is true to the general people. But it is also nuanced. Umtn is already at the start of diminishing returns, yet he decided to fix more more more flaws. He’s told me he just wants to see how far he can go. And its the same for me. If you were making this point to another person you’d be correct. In both mine and umtn’s cases, you miss our nuanced goal.
 
Well this is nuanced. I dont want to get the girl, the job, i dont care i could fix my large flaws and easily get it. I simply want to look my mathematical best. Everything you say is true to the general people. But it is also nuanced. Umtn is already at the start of diminishing returns, yet he decided to fix more more more flaws. He’s told me he just wants to see how far he can go. And it’s the same for me. If you were making this point to another person you’d be correct. In both mine and umtn’s cases, you miss our nuanced goal.
Ok then we agree here, let me bring it back to rankings. You judge these people on your goal of perfection, not the objective standards. I think you are not able to separate small flaws from big ones and that is why you rate harshly.
 
Ok then we agree here, let me bring it back to rankings. You judge these people on your goal of perfection, not the objective standards. I think you are not able to separate small flaws from big ones and that is why you rate harshly.
Objective standards are based on perfection. That is all i have to say. Sure, in a normal person’s perception of “objectivity,” chads like matt bomer or hernan drago have no flaws, but they obviously do when you do the math. That is why i rate off of perfection.
 
Ok then we agree here, let me bring it back to rankings. You judge these people on your goal of perfection, not the objective standards. I think you are not able to separate small flaws from big ones and that is why you rate harshly.
And i am very capable of separating large and small flaws. I just see so many small flaws that it builds up. Umtn has large flaws in his eyes and his nose for example yet maybe i rate harshly because of how important those areas are.
 
Objective standards are based on perfection. That is all i have to say. Sure, in a normal person’s perception of “objectivity,” chads like matt bomer or hernan drago have no flaws, but they obviously do when you do the math. That is why i rate off of perfection.
I will rate off of what’s avrage (if you are missing something or have something different from the average person)

And you will rate off of what they don’t have (how far away are they from Chad)

Nothing inherently wrong with either but I think it’s much harder to separate people into rankings when all you see are flaws and not the ideals.
 
I will rate off of what’s avrage (if you are missing something or have something different from the average person)

And you will rate off of what they don’t have (how far away are they from Chad)

Nothing inherently wrong with either but I think it’s much harder to separate people into rankings when all you see are flaws and not the ideals.
Because all humans have a lot of ideals. Not many are as flawed as they are ideal. Thats why i subtract with flaws instead of adding from ideals
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • D
Back
Top