i'm black AMA

[Transposon]

@97baHater​

I read the actual thread and I was completely wrong​

You said what I was saying actually. Even that day I simply read the title and misjudged. I would like to apolagize for my earlier statements

 

[Transposon]

Good

Brutal, chill n***a no need to race cuck me

So Jewish sponsored “science”

That’s simply not true LMAOOO, you clearly haven’t read much, in reality there’s an IQ gap in between blacks and whites even if they were raised in the same household (Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study, 1992, found by the time they’re adult there was a 12-15 IQ point gap)


Just out of these sentences I know you’re not white

Although there are still things you get wrong, by and large you are correct about your understanding of the nuanced issue about race and IQ. You're almost there and in my eyes that is good enough. Again, I misread that thread you made in February.. (Bio major here)

 

[97baHater]

Although there are still things you get wrong, by and large you are correct about your understanding of the nuanced issue about race and IQ. You're almost there and in my eyes that is good enough. Again, I misread that thread you made a month ago..

Dude, I am pretty educated about this ngl. Used to debate sfcels on X all da time. Tell me what I got wrong? Also, about that thread months ago, I’ve learned so much since then, what I wrote doesn’t apply anymore

 

[Transposon]

Dude, I am pretty educated about this ngl. Used to debate sfcels on X all da time. Tell me what I got wrong? Also, about that thread months ago, I’ve learned so much since then, what I wrote doesn’t apply anymore

do you have any academic qualifications?

 

[97baHater]

do you have any academic qualifications?

That’s an incredible deflection tactic mirin imma use it to piss off ngs all the time

 

[Transposon]

That’s an incredible deflection tactic mirin imma use it to piss off ngs all the time

I would structure my arguments accordingly(if you had academic knowledge even to some degree I would not have to make my arguments as detailed). Well you not answering is an answer in itself. I will still talk to you about the things you get wrong

 

[Transposon]

That’s simply not true LMAOOO, you clearly haven’t read much, in reality there’s an IQ gap in between blacks and whites even if they were raised in the same household (Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study, 1992, found by the time they’re adult there was a 12-15 IQ point gap)

First I will begin with a simple argument (will work my way upto why the statement is in itself wrong eventually). Say I am to believe the conclusions to this study are indeed accurate. You say yourself, correctly of that too - "And I can quote many more cognitive psychologists and psychometricians, who explain how IQ is first culturally biased and don't measure the "objective intelligence" that many people believe. Intelligence is a lot more complicated than". Very well said. You lead with the claim - 'IQ tests are in themself false'. Well of course, they are perhaps, the most overrated pop sci garbage tools ever made. Originally made for the purposes of rooting out children who needed special care, and many other issues that make them inadequate to communicate the common sensical notion of intelligence (the more accurate word would be aptitude) that we assume when we talk about intelligence. Why then do you lead with the assertion that a 12 point range is satisfactory to conclude anything. Quite contradictory don't you think? One claim of yours is the invalidity of IQ tests and in another occasion you assume there is this understood trust of IQ tests between us? Sorry, but IQ tests are not trusted in modern day psychology.

 

[97baHater]

First I will begin with a simple argument (will work my way upto why the statement is in itself wrong eventually).

We shall see

You lead with the claim - 'IQ tests are in themself false'

I said IQ is imperfect, yes it is culturally influenced, and not the sole definition of intelligence. That’s a very different claim. A speedometer may be imperfect in strong wind, but it still measures speed. Likewise, IQ tests are not flawless, but they have shown multiple times that they correlate strongly with measurable outcomes, and this part is factual and studied, in the west that is. But I'll get to that in detail later.

Well of course they are, perhaps, the most overrated pop sci garbage tools ever made. Originally made for the purposes of rooting out children who needed special care, and many other issues that make them inadequate to communicate the common sensical notion of intelligence (the more accurate word would be aptitude) that we assume when we talk about intelligence.

That's just outright false. Even critics of IQ, from famous evolutionary biologists such as Stephen Jay Gould to modern sociologists, ALL admit one uncomfortable (for you) fact: IQ tests consistently predict real-world outcomes. Academic success, job performance, even health and longevity all correlate with IQ scores. If IQ were ‘garbage,’ it would have no predictive validity. Yet it has very high predictive validity across thousands of studies. That’s why militaries, universities, and companies still use cognitive testing. In fact, modern psychology still treats general intelligence (g) as one of the most robust constructs ever studied, why lie and claim otherwise?

Why then do you lead with the assertion that a 12 point range is satisfactory to conclude anything. Quite contradictory don't you think? One claim of yours is the invalidity of IQ tests and in another occasion you assume there is this understood trust of IQ tests between us? Sorry, but IQ tests are not trusted in modern day psychology.

‘not trusted in modern psychology.’ Again, that’s simply false. Look at APA reports, textbooks on psychometrics, or military research: IQ remains central why do you cope so hard? Please explain to me? Psychologists debate interpretation, not whether IQ measures something real. It’s like debating BMI, it’s not a perfect measure of health (far from it), but nobody claims it measures nothing.

Now to your final point: "why take a 12-point average difference seriously, if IQ is imperfect?" The answer is quite simple really: imperfection does not erase recurring patterns. Weather forecasts aren’t perfect, yet we can still predict winter will be colder than summer. The 12-point gap is statistically significant, cross-validated, and persists across generations and multiple testing instruments. To dismiss it is frankly denial and cope from your end.

 

[Deleted Member 62079]

can I touch your hair?

Fuck meeee this question bro

Or “let me guess where you’re from” then guess the opposite side of the continent

 

[DonJuanDeMarco]

Fuck meeee this question bro

Or “let me guess where you’re from” then guess the opposite side of the continent

Yh fr. First hr of meeting most ppl if its mostly abt the fact I’m black.. then I instantly know what kind of friendship its gonna be.

 

[RottingCarrie]

Did u abandon ur son

 

[bigdickcel1]

What country are you from? Or are you one of those american blacks who don't know their ancestry?

 

[BlendedBulge]

How it’s like to be inferi….