Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Inceldom looksmaxing is entire a ecanomic problem let me explain closely

reptiles

Well-known member
Banned
Established
Joined
Sep 21, 2019
Messages
539
Online time
1d 6h
Reputation
662
Economics isn’t some outdated, bald-cell cope. It’s why you can post on these forums at dirt-cheap prices and don’t have to slave away for years at a minimum-wage job to earn what you could make in a month. To highlight the disparity: Bangladesh, my home country, has a per capita GDP of $2,000, while the United Kingdom, where I was born, has a per capita GDP of $31,000. But GDP alone isn’t a great metric—you need to consider purchasing power. The pound’s purchasing power is higher than the Bangladeshi taka, which affects living standards.


Don’t call economics a cope. Economics is about people—how they interact, trade, and live. The freer the market and the fewer barriers you place on business, the better the standard of living. This follows the law of nature: if you can’t compete, your business fails, and the strongest survive. That’s what capitalism truly is—natural Darwinism, not tied to figures like Biden or Trump.

This is why you can afford to “rot” and still enjoy a higher standard of living than those in the third world. Economics isn’t a cope—it’s reality. Now, let’s break down how inceldom ties into economics, point by point.

Inceldom and Its Causes
Inceldom is often tied to physical traits—penis size, height, facial features—or a lack of wealth. How can a free market with fewer barriers solve this? Simple: removing red tape eliminates disincentives to innovate, letting natural Darwinism take over.

Genetic Innovations and Market Freedom
Traits like height or facial features are largely genetic. In a free market, innovations like CRISPR or large-scale GWAS (genome-wide association studies) could face fewer ethical restrictions. People could voluntarily participate in these advancements. Businesses offering subpar treatments would fail as customers avoid them, while the best rise to the top. This is how innovations like bimax, titanium plates, or double jaw surgery came about. A freer market opens doors to decentralized, customer-driven projects, turning “cope fantasies” into reality.

Embryo Selection
If you’re wary of genetic editing but want to maximize your genetic potential, embryo selection is an option. This process involves choosing embryos with the best traits—like height or facial features—based on genetic predispositions. For example, if you’re short but have tall ancestors, or if you’re concerned about other traits, you could select embryos to increase the likelihood of desirable outcomes. A free market would make this more accessible and competitive, driving quality up and costs down

Improving Looks as an Adult
If you’re an adult uninterested in reproduction but want to improve your appearance, a free market fosters competition. Procedures like maxillofacial surgery would face market pressures to deliver results at competitive prices. One bad outcome could ruin a business’s reputation, as public shaming and customer choice drive accountability. Chad-like features become a competitive market goal, not just a fantasy.

Sex and Market Dynamics
If you’re uninterested in relationships but want sexual access, deregulating markets like OnlyFans or prostitution would flood the market with providers. Only the best would earn significant profits, while average providers wouldn’t make six or seven figures. This saturation drives competition, improves quality, and lowers costs for consumers

Economics and Social DarwinismBlackpillers rarely mention this, but capitalism isn’t evil—it’s social Darwinism. In a truly free market, only the best survive, and every micro-level problem boils down to the value of your dollar. By removing barriers, you unleash innovation, competition, and natural selection, solving issues like inceldom through decentralized, market-driven solutions.


TLDR didn't read a single molecule summary.
To call caiptailism cope is essentially calling surgeries cope cause you would have surgical innovations unless there was competition caiptailism is just competiton without barriers the fittest quite literally survive
 
Register to hide this ad
Women get more social approval if they’re anticapitalist


It's not that they can't compete on a free market they have lower IQ on average don't trust those bollocks studies on there supposed average iqs most of that is not raven matrixes that test for pattern recognition a lot of it is bullshit they already learned.

Raw genetic potential is done using a battery of tests no I think every political pov is genetically predisposed it's why my people on average are poorer they are predisposed to being anti caiptailist because that's how south Asian societies are it's weird and I hope it's not fully genetic but I do see trends but when ever this system is forced on people they always go to the top why wouldn't they ? The best always win if chad wins in dating why isn't the smartest guy gonna win in selling a product
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top