Incorporated 43 ratios

[negativ]

its missing ethnicity based ratios and gender based

I don't think it should include coloring/ethnicity

 

[genio]

Honestly i understand wanting to have high harmony but this is just obviously biased

 

[genio]

I don't think it should include coloring/ethnicity

Maybe
I think it should tbh bc different races get away with different features
For example: asians = higher eyes apart ratio = acceptable

 

[TFC]

its locally hosted (not out for the public yet)

if you want any help with the project I would be down, seems cutting edge and can defiantly be the standard that all looksmaxxers can use

 

[negativ]

Maybe
I think it should tbh bc different races get away with different features
For example: asians = higher eyes apart ratio = acceptable

IT should be js ratio's imo

 

[genio]

if you want any help with the project I would be down, seems cutting edge and can defiantly be the standard that all looksmaxxers can use

Bhai can u code
I wanna make my own lowk cuz ts one is super biased so far and ion think foidslayer will listen to me

 

[genio]

IT should be js ratio's imo

Exactly
Different ratios fit on different races

 

[foidslayer]

Even from the forehead i can tell its very lens distorted
Also why is the fwhr so fucking harsh this is just inconsistent
Tier 4 mfr gets 9.7/10 and a tier 2 fwhr gets 2/10?
This is hopeless im ngl its clearly biased and inconsistent as fuck
Fix the curve it should be half off every tier and go into negatives once its tier 6+
Adjust the spots between the tiers to make sense
Fix the ideal range of the ratios
For now, this harmony analyzer is useless

fwhr is harsh cause of lens distortion

where are you seeing tier 4 getting 9.7 and tier 2 getting 2/10

 

[foidslayer]

I don't think it should include coloring/ethnicity

rn its purely off of ratios

 

[genio]

fwhr is harsh cause of lens distortion

where are you seeing tier 4 getting 9.7 and tier 2 getting 2/10

0.86 mfr is tier 4
2.11 fwhr is tier 2
Also why is this adjusted for lens distortion? There is many different types of lens distortion. Make them take an undistorted image in the mirror and use undistorted ratios. You cannot reliably adjust for lens distortion

 

[foidslayer]

0.86 mfr is tier 4
2.11 fwhr is tier 2
Also why is this adjusted for lens distortion? There is many different types of lens distortion. Make them take an undistorted image in the mirror and use undistorted ratios. You cannot reliably adjust for lens distortion

its not adjusted for lens distortion son

different ratios have different weights on the face, you can try this on any face it brings an accurate result it has been tested on more faces than you see daily

 

[genio]

its not adjusted for lens distortion son

different ratios have different weights on the face, you can try this on any face it brings an accurate result it has been tested on more faces than you see daily

n***a YOURE FUCKING PISSING ME OFF YOU JUST SAID FWHR IS HARSH BECAUSE OF LENS DISTORTION
EVEN IF THAT SHIT IS LENS DISTORTED 2.11 IS STILL FUCKING TIER 2 AND SHOULDNT BE THAT LOWLY SCORED
YES NO SHIT DIFFERENT RATIOS HAVE DIFFERENT WEIGHTS ON THE FACE I NEVER SAID IT DIDNT n***a

 

[foidslayer]

its not adjusted for lens distortion son

different ratios have different weights on the face, you can try this on any face it brings an accurate result it has been tested on more faces than you see daily

calling it biased and inconsistent when it brings consistent accurate results is you being biased about it, just cause you don't like it doesn't mean it's wrong

 

[TFC]

Bhai can u code
I wanna make my own lowk cuz ts one is super biased so far and ion think foidslayer will listen to me

yes, I code with java, but I can do almost everything C++ to assembly (no I cant code in rust fuck rust

 

[foidslayer]

n***a YOURE FUCKING PISSING ME OFF YOU JUST SAID FWHR IS HARSH BECAUSE OF LENS DISTORTION
EVEN IF THAT SHIT IS LENS DISTORTED 2.11 IS STILL FUCKING TIER 2 AND SHOULDNT BE THAT LOWLY SCORED
YES NO SHIT DIFFERENT RATIOS HAVE DIFFERENT WEIGHTS ON THE FACE I NEVER SAID IT DIDNT n***a

n***a FWHR IS ARGUABLY ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT RATIOS ON THE FACE THE CURVE FOR IT IS GONNA BE HARSHER THAN OTHER RATIOS

I SAID LENS DISTORTION FUCKS YOUR FWHR n***a

 

[TFC]

n***a YOURE FUCKING PISSING ME OFF YOU JUST SAID FWHR IS HARSH BECAUSE OF LENS DISTORTION
EVEN IF THAT SHIT IS LENS DISTORTED 2.11 IS STILL FUCKING TIER 2 AND SHOULDNT BE THAT LOWLY SCORED
YES NO SHIT DIFFERENT RATIOS HAVE DIFFERENT WEIGHTS ON THE FACE I NEVER SAID IT DIDNT n***a

its not lens distortion its perspective distortion... and there are ways to detect if there the photo is bad (I recomend do a rateing on how good the picture quality is from clarity to perspective)

 

[foidslayer]

n***a YOURE FUCKING PISSING ME OFF YOU JUST SAID FWHR IS HARSH BECAUSE OF LENS DISTORTION
EVEN IF THAT SHIT IS LENS DISTORTED 2.11 IS STILL FUCKING TIER 2 AND SHOULDNT BE THAT LOWLY SCORED
YES NO SHIT DIFFERENT RATIOS HAVE DIFFERENT WEIGHTS ON THE FACE I NEVER SAID IT DIDNT n***a

you do realize wider than ideal is worse than narrower than ideal right?

 

[genio]

n***a FWHR IS ARGUABLY ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT RATIOS ON THE FACE THE CURVE FOR IT IS GONNA BE HARSHER THAN OTHER RATIOS

I SAID LENS DISTORTION FUCKS YOUR FWHR n***a

n***a SO WHAT IF IT FUCKS YOUR FWHR IF IT FUCKED IT TO A 2.11 IT WOULD STILL BE A TIER 2 DUMB ASS n***a
ALSO NO SHIT IT WAS NUMBER 2 ON MY IMPORTANT RATIOS LIST BUT THE CURVE SHOULD BE THE SAME FOR EVERY FUCKING RATIO BUT THE WEIGHT OF EACH SHOULD BE DIFFERENT DUMB ASS n***a

EXAMPLE
MFR: TIER 4 0.86 - 3/10 (10% weight)
FWHR: TIER 2 2.11 -7/10 (50% weight)
DUMB ASS n***a STUPID ASS n***a BITCH ASS n***a

 

[TFC]

n***a FWHR IS ARGUABLY ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT RATIOS ON THE FACE THE CURVE FOR IT IS GONNA BE HARSHER THAN OTHER RATIOS

I SAID LENS DISTORTION FUCKS YOUR FWHR n***a

practically the only way of is that and nose proportion to your ears... both of which (if they actually have these falios and its not just distortion) would be HUGE falios and need to be deranked HARD

 

[foidslayer]

n***a SO WHAT IF IT FUCKS YOUR FWHR IF IT FUCKED IT TO A 2.11 IT WOULD STILL BE A TIER 2 DUMB ASS n***a
ALSO NO SHIT IT WAS NUMBER 2 ON MY IMPORTANT RATIOS LIST BUT THE CURVE SHOULD BE THE SAME FOR EVERY FUCKING RATIO BUT THE WEIGHT OF EACH SHOULD BE DIFFERENT DUMB ASS n***a

EXAMPLE
MFR: TIER 4 0.86 - 3/10 (10% weight)
FWHR: TIER 2 2.11 -7/10 (50% weight)
DUMB ASS n***a STUPID ASS n***a BITCH ASS n***a

n***a IM GONNA ACC FUCK YOU IN THE ASS

THE ONLY THING PEOPLE MAKE FUN OF TOM WELLING FOR IS HAVING A BLOCKHEAD SKULL

WIDER THAN IDEAL IS WORSE

 

[foidslayer]

n***a IM GONNA ACC FUCK YOU IN THE ASS

THE ONLY THING PEOPLE MAKE FUN OF TOM WELLING FOR IS HAVING A BLOCKHEAD SKULL

WIDER THAN IDEAL IS WORSE

PUTTING MY FACE SPECIFICALLY IN THAT FRAUDED PHOTO IN FACEIQ LABS GIVES ME A FRONTAL RATIO HIGHER THAN MATT BOMER THE SAME PHOTO HERE BEING THAT HIGH OF A HARMONY ISNT A SURPRISE

 

[genio]

you do realize wider than ideal is worse than narrower than ideal right?

n***a n***a n***a THE CURVE SHOULD BE FUCKING SYMMETRICAL FOR A RATIO LIKE FWHR

 

[genio]

PUTTING MY FACE SPECIFICALLY IN THAT FRAUDED PHOTO IN FACEIQ LABS GIVES ME A FRONTAL RATIO HIGHER THAN MATT BOMER THE SAME PHOTO HERE BEING THAT HIGH OF A HARMONY ISNT A SURPRISE

n***a YOU NEVER PAID FOR FACEIQLABS YOU DUMB FUCK YOU JS LOOKED AT THE NUMBERS AND ASSUMED THAT

 

[foidslayer]

n***a n***a n***a THE CURVE SHOULD BE FUCKING SYMMETRICAL FOR A RATIO LIKE FWHR

yea would you rather be a blockhead or have a narrow fwhr son

 

[foidslayer]

n***a YOU NEVER PAID FOR FACEIQLABS YOU DUMB FUCK YOU JS LOOKED AT THE NUMBERS AND ASSUMED THAT

n***a YOU LEGIT CAN SEE THE SCORE AND THE SCORE COLOR OML

 

[genio]

its not lens distortion its perspective distortion... and there are ways to detect if there the photo is bad (I recomend do a rateing on how good the picture quality is from clarity to perspective)

n***a thats not even the point bro the fucking ideal ranges are js wrong and the grading curve is incredibly inconsistent

 

[genio]

yea would you rather be a blockhead or have a narrow fwhr son

ARE YOU FUCKING DUMB HES CALLED BLOCKHEAD FOR HIS JFA NOT HIS FUCKING FWHR

 

[genio]

n***a YOU LEGIT CAN SEE THE SCORE AND THE SCORE COLOR OML

n***a YOU CANT SEE A PERCENTAGE YOU CANNOT CLAIM MATT BOMER HARMONY n****r

 

[foidslayer]

n***a thats not even the point bro the fucking ideal ranges are js wrong and the grading curve is incredibly inconsistent

"inaccurate and inconsistent"

 

[foidslayer]

n***a YOU CANT SEE A PERCENTAGE YOU CANNOT CLAIM MATT BOMER HARMONY n****r

YES YOU LEGIT CAN SEE IT.

 

[foidslayer]

ARE YOU FUCKING DUMB HES CALLED BLOCKHEAD FOR HIS JFA NOT HIS FUCKING FWHR

no hes called a blockhead cause of his fwhr f****t

 

[genio]

View attachment 345852



"inaccurate and inconsistent"

n***a you know what
Sure n***a believe what youd like
Ill make my own

 

[foidslayer]

n***a you know what
Sure n***a believe what youd like
Ill make my own

you're saying matt bomer isnt a 9.3?

his harmony legit is a 91%

 

[genio]

you're saying matt bomer isnt a 9.3?

his harmony legit is a 91%

Hes an overrated chad

 

[TFC]

n***a n***a n***a THE CURVE SHOULD BE FUCKING SYMMETRICAL FOR A RATIO LIKE FWHR

View attachment 345852



"inaccurate and inconsistent"

when you entire High PSL there is subjectivity involved ie the diffrent trypes of attractive

maybe when there is a face higher the HTN you give them a option to rate there face on a few different scales

• Masculine ↔ Feminine — jaw width, brow ridge, neck thickness, fat distribution
• Soft ↔ Hard — round/smooth features vs angular/sharp ones (this is separate from masc/fem; you can have a soft masculine face or a hard feminine one)
• Youthful ↔ Mature — neoteny vs maturity markers (large eyes, small nose vs developed jaw, prominent cheekbones)
• Familiar ↔ Striking — symmetrical pleasant "average" vs unusual proportions that read as alien/editorial
• Approachable ↔ Intimidating — what your resting face signals before you do anything
  

this only matters when you are attractive

 

[TFC]

when you entire High PSL there is subjectivity involved ie the diffrent trypes of attractive

maybe when there is a face higher the HTN you give them a option to rate there face on a few different scales

• Masculine ↔ Feminine — jaw width, brow ridge, neck thickness, fat distribution
• Soft ↔ Hard — round/smooth features vs angular/sharp ones (this is separate from masc/fem; you can have a soft masculine face or a hard feminine one)
• Youthful ↔ Mature — neoteny vs maturity markers (large eyes, small nose vs developed jaw, prominent cheekbones)
• Familiar ↔ Striking — symmetrical pleasant "average" vs unusual proportions that read as alien/editorial
• Approachable ↔ Intimidating — what your resting face signals before you do anything

this only matters when you are attractive

if you are setting the scales you shouldn't be afraid to stick inside of the usual scale framing we have of 1 line that connects subhuman to adam
I think once you pass Low HTN you hit a point where your look becomes subjective on different scales

 

[genio]

when you entire High PSL there is subjectivity involved ie the diffrent trypes of attractive

maybe when there is a face higher the HTN you give them a option to rate there face on a few different scales

• Masculine ↔ Feminine — jaw width, brow ridge, neck thickness, fat distribution
• Soft ↔ Hard — round/smooth features vs angular/sharp ones (this is separate from masc/fem; you can have a soft masculine face or a hard feminine one)
• Youthful ↔ Mature — neoteny vs maturity markers (large eyes, small nose vs developed jaw, prominent cheekbones)
• Familiar ↔ Striking — symmetrical pleasant "average" vs unusual proportions that read as alien/editorial
• Approachable ↔ Intimidating — what your resting face signals before you do anything

this only matters when you are attractive

bhai? i dont think you understand what the point is?
ratios are ratios this is different from archetypes and dimorphism althought it does affect those that's not what we're measuring
to put it simply, if your certain ratio is in an ideal range it should get 10/10 points, every deviation (tier) that isnt in that range should be penalized
we are not discussing psl in general we are discussing PURELY HARMONY AND RATIOS

 

[genio]

if you are setting the scales you shouldn't be afraid to stick inside of the usual scale framing we have of 1 line that connects subhuman to adam
I think once you pass Low HTN you hit a point where your look becomes subjective on different scales

dude thats not even what we're talking about
if you dont understand could you ask instead of trying to step into a conversation you're wholly uneducated about

 

[TFC]

bhai? i dont think you understand what the point is?
ratios are ratios this is different from archetypes and dimorphism althought it does affect those that's not what we're measuring
to put it simply, if your certain ratio is in an ideal range it should get 10/10 points, every deviation (tier) that isnt in that range should be penalized
we are not discussing psl in general we are discussing PURELY HARMONY AND RATIOS

if your neck to head ratio is bigger average or smaller these can have different levels of attractiveness and depending on the scale the harmony will change. im proposing we use different harmony scales when things get subjective like wide or skinny skulls

 

[genio]

if your neck to head ratio is bigger average or smaller these can have different levels of attractiveness and depending on the scale the harmony will change. im proposing we use different harmony scales when things get subjective like wide or skinny skulls

Dude you clearly have no understanding of harmony
The whole point is that it’s objective

 

[foidslayer]

Hes an overrated chad

n***a deadass said this im crine

 

[Syniq]

Massive thanks to @genio for the help!​

World's most accurate current automatic ratio measurer atm! but pins need adjusting, although you can adjust the pins yourself.​

View attachment 345632

Unfortunately I can't show the rest of the ratios

Spoiler: Tags please dont get mad at me x2

@Blackpillirony @kifykify @aryaw @giga.mia @Beatrice. @2ANA @kimothy @misclick@Vampi @Molotongo @trueceljester @BigDihDiddy @Grilldaddy @Atra @Ghoultune@AbusedDog333 @Glamour @Garce @sociopath @moonlight1 @Starlet @muscipla@P1et @bleeder @vespertine @lizzy Grant @ltbscorp @emeraldpill @ecoli @Shkypot@Krusty @Galvatron @doll @Auggy @Penalizer69 @sweetpotato @unknownturk1c@Mafia bob @RottingCarrie @Newday @Razul @zombiebeatz2006 @nomi @Adam2.0@loox @Pento @kelksub @hazyfuture @Foid @97baHater @</3@rickydickydoodahgrimes @Monsieur Meow @SASALELE @Almighty Sigma Wolf@Rias @Cortisol @selank @LaWi @beautyiseverything @matiasheanolikeswomen@Fidelis @huxifier_p7s @snow @SkinnyDennis @Nenestar @RRM @perculez @Fidelis@Anna @Lo Hey @ItzyaboyJJ @Mafia bob @Notnotover0 @Notnotnotover0 @Notnotnotnotover0 @Notnotnotnotnotnotover0 @glitter @jony🖤bp @Dysmorphia@aran @Mandy? @cop @avzrael @nomi @TonyDr @kafka ☭ @PingPong @Molotongo@appeal_splanky @SammyElMafioso @Luxe @pompompurino @rose @Voyalbritani @Spongebob CirclePants @Evilemofoid @foidslayer @Nocturne @TonyDr

@paulyune

MFR is already assessed by EME and it is done better than MFR.
Midface ratio is flawed tbh