- Joined
- Nov 8, 2023
- Messages
- 2,588
- Solutions
- 1
- Time Online
- 4d 5h
- Reputation
- 4,145
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why the fuck would i need your ipslap me, get my ip dox me cut my internet off
it doesn't match my in person iq test, so probI feel like these are bull but I'll do it anyway cause I'm bored
based matching test, did you get the last one?
highest IQfound one thats totally free, do it https://www.idrlabs.com/matrices-iq/test.php
mine:
View attachment 112409
chatgptKinda pmo bc im p sure i got the last one right, idk what i got wrong
View attachment 112481
its not that rare to have 135 bro, its like 1 in 100chatgpt
You have an abnormal distribution, these tests are of no use to you
How boring you arechatgpt
Also, far be it from me to defend a girlchatgpt
being smart is hitting a target accurately, while genius is hitting a target no one can see (fourier, mozart, ramanujan), with this in mind 135 is nothing, shit even amongst 150-170 it takes a really rare kind of person to be a genius, for example for all the potential 170s in the world right now theres 1 person who's well regarded being the best mathematician of our generation (terry tao), and maybe a handful of others who have contributed greatly to science/art, but still those geniuses are a small minority compared to the 7000 people with an iq of 170 (based on standard distribution)How boring you are
Everything above 130 is fake and blah blah
Genius range is 150+ and that’s just entry level genius
jfl i forgot i said thisAlso, far be it from me to defend a girl
But this:
View attachment 112496
“Human equivalent of if autocorrect had a baby with a defibrillator”
This is something a very intelligent person would say, no tests are needed
@sjnny404
True, but don't consider distribution when you talk about extremely high iqs, it doesn't really work that waybeing smart is hitting a target accurately, while genius is hitting a target no one can see (fourier, mozart, ramanujan), with this in mind 135 is nothing, shit even amongst 150-170 it takes a really rare kind of person to be a genius, for example for all the potential 170s in the world right now theres 1 person who's well regarded being the best mathematician of our generation (terry tao), and maybe a handful of others who have contributed greatly to science/art, but still those geniuses are a small minority compared to the 7000 people with an iq of 170 (based on standard distribution)
A good example of pattern recognition, having an iq around 150 allows you to add an extra piecejfl i forgot i said this
yeah i know that a. theres lower accuracy the higher the score is and b. theres actually a fat tail at the higher end meaning theres more people who are high iq than someone with a low iq of an equal variance away from the mean, idk what else would be a reason it wouldnt work thoTrue, but don't consider distribution when you talk about extremely high iqs, it doesn't really work that way
Considering we got the highest score it would be a disservice to the gene pool for us NOT to reproduceKinda pmo bc im p sure i got the last one right, idk what i got wrong
View attachment 112481
Dnr tbh I just want an e girl pm methe odds are stacked against us brudda
View attachment 112520
Satoshi Kanazawa, Social Science Research – National Child Development Study (U.K.), 2014
That’s a shame, having lots of kids is the most important thing by farthis gives me a 42-50% less chance of reproducing compared to the average woman, i am also an only child, aka burnt to a sizzle in the lowest depths of jahanam
I fogorbased matching test, did you get the last one?
holy low iqView attachment 112422
I'm too sleep deprived for ts
oh yeah because my brain faculties are all either genius or retardedYou have an abnormal distribution, these tests are of no use to you
Just say you got under 120 gangiq is fake and gay
So youre telling me that doing well at a contrived test predicts that I will perform better at... contrived tests
Jfl at this abomination of a "science"
found one thats totally free, do it https://www.idrlabs.com/matrices-iq/test.php
mine:
View attachment 112409
so smart
i dont need to waste 10 minutes of my life autistically squinting at shapes to validate my intelligence because i have irl resultsJust say you got under 120 gang![]()
bro got 95i dont need to waste 10 minutes of my life autistically squinting at shapes to validate my intelligence because i have irl results
iq tests are for retarded neets desperately looking for some sense of self-worth to cling to
At least use a 1980s SAT problem. Calculus just requires practice
Everything just requires practice bro...At least use a 1980s SAT problem. Calculus just requires practice
Lol no. 1980s SAT problems can't be practiced for, unless you've already seen the same problem before (which is just memorization). A study showed a 20 point increase after 100 hours of tutoring. It's meant to measure more of raw cognitive ability than mere practice effecta and education.Everything just requires practice bro...
Jfl at iqtards thinking that experience with previous iq tests doesnt help you with future ones
Is this supposed to be hard
practice and memorisation are both prior experience, midwit. stop pretending they are distinct concepts.Lol no. 1980s SAT problems can't be practiced for, unless you've already seen the same problem before (which is just memorization). A study showed a 20 point increase after 100 hours of tutoring. It's meant to measure more of raw cognitive ability than mere practice effecta and education.