Join 60,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Is my assymetry fixable?

true mtn

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 28, 2025
Messages
238
Time Online
13h 45m
Reputation
383
3774.webp

My left zygo and masseters are bigger then the ones on my right
Will it be fixed just by chewing on the right side or is there anything else I can do to help even out my face
 
Register to hide this ad
View attachment 255544
My left zygo and masseters are bigger then the ones on my right
Will it be fixed just by chewing on the right side or is there anything else I can do to help even out my face
Asymmetry seems to be a fixation for many, but its importance in regards to a persons facial rating is much lower than it is made it out to be. Personally, I don't notice people's facial asymmetry unless I am actively looking for imperfections or the asymmetry is very severe. Yours seems pretty mild from what I can see. Maybe it could be fixed, but it would hardly be worth it.
 
View attachment 255544
My left zygo and masseters are bigger then the ones on my right
Will it be fixed just by chewing on the right side or is there anything else I can do to help even out my face
The loss of volume on the side where the masseter muscle is underdeveloped may create the illusion that the bone is larger because it makes the area under the cheekbone appear hollow. In other words, the problem isn't with the bone itself, but with the shadow cast by the muscle. This phenomenon is entirely possible scientifically and is, in fact, a "volume illusion" frequently encountered in aesthetic terminology.
I know this well because I've experienced it myself. However, developing a one-sided chewing habit is like 'making things worse while trying to make them better' you can damage your teeth and jaw joint. Instead, working with a facial physiotherapist to strengthen the right side with controlled exercises or to even out that depression with a very mild dermal filler will give a much safer and more definitive result."
 
Cant sleep on my back
same, my left sides zygos n mandible r wider then the right, so i sleep very easily on the left side, harder on the right side n impossible on my back. ive spent hours laying n got nowhere near falling asleep
 
Im still a minor so Idk what to do, but my left zygo is definitely bigger then my right one, might get fikler
The loss of volume on the side where the masseter muscle is underdeveloped may create the illusion that the bone is larger because it makes the area under the cheekbone appear hollow. In other words, the problem isn't with the bone itself, but with the shadow cast by the muscle. This phenomenon is entirely possible scientifically and is, in fact, a "volume illusion" frequently encountered in aesthetic terminology.
I know this well because I've experienced it myself. However, developing a one-sided chewing habit is like 'making things worse while trying to make them better' you can damage your teeth and jaw joint. Instead, working with a facial physiotherapist to strengthen the right side with controlled exercises or to even out that depression with a very mild dermal filler will give a much safer and more definitive result."
 
Im still a minor so Idk what to do, but my left zygo is definitely bigger then my right one, might get fikler
You probably didn't understand what I said. As we just discussed, the weakness in the masseter muscle on the right side and the resulting sunken cheek might be creating a contrast that makes the bone structure of the left side feel "giant." So the problem might not be that the left side is larger, but rather that the right side is less prominent.
Right now, your body is in a state of constant construction, and it wouldn't be right to decide the building is crooked and demolish the walls before it's finished. Your bone structure will settle in your early 20s. Until then, the best thing you can do is to balance your chewing habits and see an orthodontist to find out if your tooth structure is causing this problem. But the cause of this is most likely, as I said, "volume illusion," I think you should research that. However, it would be best to see an orthodontist.
 
You probably didn't understand what I said. As we just discussed, the weakness in the masseter muscle on the right side and the resulting sunken cheek might be creating a contrast that makes the bone structure of the left side feel "giant." So the problem might not be that the left side is larger, but rather that the right side is less prominent.
Right now, your body is in a state of constant construction, and it wouldn't be right to decide the building is crooked and demolish the walls before it's finished. Your bone structure will settle in your early 20s. Until then, the best thing you can do is to balance your chewing habits and see an orthodontist to find out if your tooth structure is causing this problem. But the cause of this is most likely, as I said, "volume illusion," I think you should research that. However, it would be best to see an orthodontist.
My parents don't want to take me to an orthodontist, or at least are avoiding it, also would you recommend an mse?
Me and my Hb have been discussing getting a slow expander and face mask for some little extra forward growth and cheekbone prominence
 
My parents don't want to take me to an orthodontist, or at least are avoiding it, also would you recommend an mse?
Me and my Hb have been discussing getting a slow expander and face mask for some little extra forward growth and cheekbone prominence
Methods like MSE and face masks are essentially 'operations'. Taking these externally and using them on your own can cause permanent damage to your bone structure and lead to irreversible pain.
To convince your family, I suggest approaching the subject from a health-focused perspective, such as "I can't breathe properly and I have difficulty closing my mouth," rather than focusing on "looking more handsome/beautiful." Trying to fix it yourself could lead to much more expensive and complicated surgeries in the future. For now, focusing on proper posture and tongue exercises (harmless methods like Mewing) and pushing for a consultation with a specialist is the safest option.
 
Methods like MSE and face masks are essentially 'operations'. Taking these externally and using them on your own can cause permanent damage to your bone structure and lead to irreversible pain.
To convince your family, I suggest approaching the subject from a health-focused perspective, such as "I can't breathe properly and I have difficulty closing my mouth," rather than focusing on "looking more handsome/beautiful." Trying to fix it yourself could lead to much more expensive and complicated surgeries in the future. For now, focusing on proper posture and tongue exercises (harmless methods like Mewing) and pushing for a consultation with a specialist is the safest option.
I shall, sorry if I'm a bit dumb and annoying Ur acc one of the few ppl who had the patience to acc tell me stuff thank you fe
 
I shall, sorry if I'm a bit dumb and annoying Ur acc one of the few ppl who had the patience to acc tell me stuff thank you fe
It's perfectly natural to see a millimeter-sized asymmetry in your face as the center of the world right now, because it's your world. But remember there is no perfect symmetry in nature. The branches of a tree, the flow of a river, or the summit of a mountain are asymmetrical, and their beauty comes precisely from this 'unique' imbalance. If you have any other questions, I'm here.
 
Botox

Or you could try injecting igf 1 des into the master and chew chewing
Prescribing anabolic peptides and high-risk invasive procedures that disrupt hormonal balance to a minor is an example of medical malpractice. These methods do not restore symmetry on the contrary, they disrupt the body's natural homeostasis, leaving permanent aesthetic and functional damage.
 
It's perfectly natural to see a millimeter-sized asymmetry in your face as the center of the world right now, because it's your world. But remember there is no perfect symmetry in nature. The branches of a tree, the flow of a river, or the summit of a mountain are asymmetrical, and their beauty comes precisely from this 'unique' imbalance. If you have any other questions, I'm here.
Bro just dropped a generational quote❤️‍🩹
 
Prescribing anabolic peptides and high-risk invasive procedures that disrupt hormonal balance to a minor is an example of medical malpractice. These methods do not restore symmetry on the contrary, they disrupt the body's natural homeostasis, leaving permanent aesthetic and functional damage.
Ok doesn't understand anything "anabolic peptide" peptides are short strings of amino acids anabolic are derivative of testosterone

Go back to tiktok
 
Ok doesn't understand anything "anabolic peptide" peptides are short strings of amino acids anabolic are derivative of testosterone

Go back to tiktok
 Saying "anabolic peptides are derivatives of testosterone" is as fundamentally flawed a generalization as saying "apples are a type of tree." First, some basic biochemistry peptides are not derivatives of testosterone. Testosterone is a steroid hormone derived from a cholesterol ring. Peptides, as you said, are chains of amino acids, but their mechanisms are entirely different. One binds to receptors and alters gene transcription (steroid), the other triggers cellular signaling pathways (like PI3K/Akt). It's truly tragicomic that you recommend injections without understanding this enormous difference. Furthermore, IGF-1 DES is not a testosterone derivative, but a modified version of insulin-like growth factor. For someone who equates the word 'anabolic' solely with testosterone to give advice on a critical topic like facial anatomy is a more superficial approach than anything you'd find on TikTok. Don't try to market your cliches which have no basis in scientific literature and are full of pharmacological contradictions (like using Botox and IGF-1 in the same sentence) as 'expertise.' Human health is not an area to be gambled with your half-baked knowledge of steroids/peptides. Now, you should put aside those incorrectly learned terms and consult a basic biology textbook.
 
This isn't him talking it's a automatic ai bot responding I just realised 😅
It's ironic that you resorted to a bot when your own words ran out. But the problem is, the bot's biochemistry algorithm is quite flawed. It's simply ridiculous that you're trying to be an 'expert' with copy-paste answers from an AI that can't even distinguish between peptides and steroid (testosterone) derivatives.
 
It's perfectly natural to see a millimeter-sized asymmetry in your face as the center of the world right now, because it's your world. But remember there is no perfect symmetry in nature. The branches of a tree, the flow of a river, or the summit of a mountain are asymmetrical, and their beauty comes precisely from this 'unique' imbalance. If you have any other questions, I'm here.

Ok doesn't understand anything "anabolic peptide" peptides are short strings of amino acids anabolic are derivative of testosterone

Go back to tiktok
Did you skip 11th grade biology
 Saying "anabolic peptides are derivatives of testosterone" is as fundamentally flawed a generalization as saying "apples are a type of tree." First, some basic biochemistry peptides are not derivatives of testosterone. Testosterone is a steroid hormone derived from a cholesterol ring. Peptides, as you said, are chains of amino acids, but their mechanisms are entirely different. One binds to receptors and alters gene transcription (steroid), the other triggers cellular signaling pathways (like PI3K/Akt). It's truly tragicomic that you recommend injections without understanding this enormous difference. Furthermore, IGF-1 DES is not a testosterone derivative, but a modified version of insulin-like growth factor. For someone who equates the word 'anabolic' solely with testosterone to give advice on a critical topic like facial anatomy is a more superficial approach than anything you'd find on TikTok. Don't try to market your cliches which have no basis in scientific literature and are full of pharmacological contradictions (like using Botox and IGF-1 in the same sentence) as 'expertise.' Human health is not an area to be gambled with your half-baked knowledge of steroids/peptides. Now, you should put aside those incorrectly learned terms and consult a basic biology textbook.
I'm acc writing a presentation and exploration work on anabolic steroid's use for this semester's big project, thought I'd just back up your claims by saying that everything you said is absolutely true
 
Did you skip 11th grade biology

I'm acc writing a presentation and exploration work on anabolic steroid's use for this semester's big project, thought I'd just back up your claims by saying that everything you said is absolutely true
For some people, the issue isn't about 'finding the truth' but simply 'being right' Ignoring scientific evidence and resorting to aggression or excuses like 'using AI' when cornered actually reveals their own desperation. No matter how much evidence you present, you can't explain anything to someone who doesn't want to understand. I will continue to defend the accuracy of the information, because informed people like you can already see the difference. Thank you again for your support and these insightful observations.
 
 Saying "anabolic peptides are derivatives of testosterone" is as fundamentally flawed a generalization as saying "apples are a type of tree." First, some basic biochemistry peptides are not derivatives of testosterone. Testosterone is a steroid hormone derived from a cholesterol ring. Peptides, as you said, are chains of amino acids, but their mechanisms are entirely different. One binds to receptors and alters gene transcription (steroid), the other triggers cellular signaling pathways (like PI3K/Akt). It's truly tragicomic that you recommend injections without understanding this enormous difference. Furthermore, IGF-1 DES is not a testosterone derivative, but a modified version of insulin-like growth factor. For someone who equates the word 'anabolic' solely with testosterone to give advice on a critical topic like facial anatomy is a more superficial approach than anything you'd find on TikTok. Don't try to market your cliches which have no basis in scientific literature and are full of pharmacological contradictions (like using Botox and IGF-1 in the same sentence) as 'expertise.' Human health is not an area to be gambled with your half-baked knowledge of steroids/peptides. Now, you should put aside those incorrectly learned terms and consult a basic biology textbook.
Your absolutely right but I was just making a basic statement mainly because I thought you were a "blue pill normie"So I didn't want to write an in depth analysis or answer the reason i vaguely said "anabolic peptide" peptides are short strings of amino acids anabolic are derivative of testosterone was simply due to the fact that I thought you were a "blue pill normie" Also this is a lm forum in general when uneducated people use the term anabolic it usually refers to AAS.Ually on forums like this I believed at first you thought of igf 1 des as a AAS" my mistake
 Saying "anabolic peptides are derivatives of testosterone" is as fundamentally flawed a generalization as saying "apples are a type of tree." First, some basic biochemistry peptides are not derivatives of testosterone. Testosterone is a steroid hormone derived from a cholesterol ring. Peptides, as you said, are chains of amino acids, but their mechanisms are entirely different. One binds to receptors and alters gene transcription (steroid), the other triggers cellular signaling pathways (like PI3K/Akt). It's truly tragicomic that you recommend injections without understanding this enormous difference. Furthermore, IGF-1 DES is not a testosterone derivative, but a modified version of insulin-like growth factor. For someone who equates the word 'anabolic' solely with testosterone to give advice on a critical topic like facial anatomy is a more superficial approach than anything you'd find on TikTok. Don't try to market your cliches which have no basis in scientific literature and are full of pharmacological contradictions (like using Botox and IGF-1 in the same sentence) as 'expertise.' Human health is not an area to be gambled with your half-baked knowledge of steroids/peptides. Now, you should put aside those incorrectly learned terms and consult a basic biology textbook.
Everything you said here was correct but (Botox done by a perfesional is what is medically recommended by orthodontist for treatment of masseters assymetry)

I said igf 1 des as a possibility he could look into tho I think it's not a viable option as it has limited to know research only anecdotal evidence

"Now, you should put aside those incorrectly learned terms and consult a basic biology textbook." Your right to assume this statement but my answer original was due to a lack of effort mainly cause by the educational level of the other forum members "I auto assume you thought igf DES was an AAS"
It's ironic that you resorted to a bot when your own words ran out. But the problem is, the bot's biochemistry algorithm is quite flawed. It's simply ridiculous that you're trying to be an 'expert' with copy-paste answers from an AI that can't even distinguish between peptides and steroid (testosterone) derivatives.

Your text I very well written it's so I assumed it was AI no one spends effort on answering questions to get dnr
 
Did you skip 11th grade biology

I'm acc writing a presentation and exploration work on anabolic steroid's use for this semester's big project, thought I'd just back up your claims by saying that everything you said is absolutely true
Every thing he said there was excellent I thought it was AI because how well it was written

And did I skip 11th grade biology no I'm not in in 11th grade as yet

I gave a vague answer because I generalized him with the other people in the forum I thought he meant igf DES is an AAS

"I'm acc writing a presentation and exploration work on anabolic steroid's use for this semester's big project, thought I'd just back up your claims by saying that everything you said is absolutely"

Nice I do believe you can used anabolic andrewgenic steroids to help with masseter asymmetry but I don't think igf 1 des would be a good option as there is little research on it

I'm a believer in AAS for masseter aystemety tho for example most people say when there on gear they noticed "bone growth" well there is no such thing as facial bone growth when on anabolic it's due to the growth of soft tissue due to the up regulations on igf 1 and MyoD which stimulates protein synthesis in these muscles combined with the chewing this could be a viable method but yes there a lot of side effects. For example you could develop tmj

There alot of side effects on AAS but that going to take days to explain how to prevent and stay safe when on and alot of money


So the only viable option in my opinion is getting masseter Botox from a perfesional
 
Every thing he said there was excellent I thought it was AI because how well it was written

And did I skip 11th grade biology no I'm not in in 11th grade as yet

I gave a vague answer because I generalized him with the other people in the forum I thought he meant igf DES is an AAS

"I'm acc writing a presentation and exploration work on anabolic steroid's use for this semester's big project, thought I'd just back up your claims by saying that everything you said is absolutely"

Nice I do believe you can used anabolic andrewgenic steroids to help with masseter asymmetry but I don't think igf 1 des would be a good option as there is little research on it

I'm a believer in AAS for masseter aystemety tho for example most people say when there on gear they noticed "bone growth" well there is no such thing as facial bone growth when on anabolic it's due to the growth of soft tissue due to the up regulations on igf 1 and MyoD which stimulates protein synthesis in these muscles combined with the chewing this could be a viable method but yes there a lot of side effects. For example you could develop tmj

There alot of side effects on AAS but that going to take days to explain how to prevent and stay safe when on and alot of money


So the only viable option in my opinion is getting masseter Botox from a perfesional
Im not that dumb I swear
 
Your absolutely right but I was just making a basic statement mainly because I thought you were a "blue pill normie"So I didn't want to write an in depth analysis or answer the reason i vaguely said "anabolic peptide" peptides are short strings of amino acids anabolic are derivative of testosterone was simply due to the fact that I thought you were a "blue pill normie" Also this is a lm forum in general when uneducated people use the term anabolic it usually refers to AAS.Ually on forums like this I believed at first you thought of igf 1 des as a AAS" my mistake
I'm glad we were able to meet directly on a scientific basis, without hiding behind labels or jargon (blue pill, normie, etc.) labeling people as 'uneducated' or 'superficial' can sometimes cause us to miss the extent of their knowledge, as in this example. For me, the issue isn't who knows what, but the accuracy of the information shared. It's a technical error to categorize IGF-1 DES, or any group of peptides, as anabolic steroids (AAS) through a flawed generalization. Now that we've clarified that distinction, I think we agree on the crucial point recommending such powerful biological agents randomly to someone in their developmental years without expert supervision carries a significant risk.Recognizing your mistake and honestly admitting it is a virtue. The way to reduce noise in forums is not by labeling each other, but by sharing information in its purest and most accurate form.

Everything you said here was correct but (Botox done by a perfesional is what is medically recommended by orthodontist for treatment of masseters assymetry)

I said igf 1 des as a possibility he could look into tho I think it's not a viable option as it has limited to know research only anecdotal evidence

"Now, you should put aside those incorrectly learned terms and consult a basic biology textbook." Your right to assume this statement but my answer original was due to a lack of effort mainly cause by the educational level of the other forum members "I auto assume you thought igf DES was an AAS"
I'm glad we agree on this point the use of substances like IGF-1 DES, as you mentioned, is a risky area with limited and anecdotal data and unproven clinical safety. Presenting such an 'uncertain' and 'unfeasible' option, even as a possibility, to a young person in their developmental stage could open a dangerous door to their health. We are responsible not only for the accuracy of information, but also for to whom and how we present that information. Instead of making incomplete or erroneous generalizations by assuming the other person is 'uneducated' speaking with technically accurate information from the outset will prevent such misunderstandings. Acknowledging a mistake and clarifying the situation is a sign of maturity.

Your text I very well written it's so I assumed it was AI no one spends effort on answering questions to get dnr
I take your comparison of my thoughtful response to "artificial intelligence" as a compliment indeed, discussing a topic in depth, rationally, and respectfully has become a rare endeavor these days. I believe in the difference that accurate information can make in a person's life. Therefore, it's worth making an effort to defend the truth, no matter who I'm speaking to. I wish you a good day.
 
I'm glad we were able to meet directly on a scientific basis, without hiding behind labels or jargon (blue pill, normie, etc.) labeling people as 'uneducated' or 'superficial' can sometimes cause us to miss the extent of their knowledge, as in this example. For me, the issue isn't who knows what, but the accuracy of the information shared. It's a technical error to categorize IGF-1 DES, or any group of peptides, as anabolic steroids (AAS) through a flawed generalization. Now that we've clarified that distinction, I think we agree on the crucial point recommending such powerful biological agents randomly to someone in their developmental years without expert supervision carries a significant risk.Recognizing your mistake and honestly admitting it is a virtue. The way to reduce noise in forums is not by labeling each other, but by sharing information in its purest and most accurate form.
I never meant uneducated as a superficial way as Im uneducated in many subjects my self
I'm glad we agree on this point the use of substances like IGF-1 DES, as you mentioned, is a risky area with limited and anecdotal data and unproven clinical safety. Presenting such an 'uncertain' and 'unfeasible' option, even as a possibility, to a young person in their developmental stage could open a dangerous door to their health. We are responsible not only for the accuracy of information, but also for to whom and how we present that information. Instead of making incomplete or erroneous generalizations by assuming the other person is 'uneducated' speaking with technically accurate information from the outset will prevent such misunderstandings. Acknowledging a mistake and clarifying the situation is a sign of maturity.
I fully agree
I take your comparison of my thoughtful response to "artificial intelligence" as a compliment indeed, discussing a topic in depth, rationally, and respectfully has become a rare endeavor these days. I believe in the difference that accurate information can make in a person's life. Therefore, it's worth making an effort to defend the truth, no matter who I'm speaking to. I wish you a good day.
Thank you I wish you a good day too
 
Every thing he said there was excellent I thought it was AI because how well it was written

And did I skip 11th grade biology no I'm not in in 11th grade as yet

I gave a vague answer because I generalized him with the other people in the forum I thought he meant igf DES is an AAS

"I'm acc writing a presentation and exploration work on anabolic steroid's use for this semester's big project, thought I'd just back up your claims by saying that everything you said is absolutely"

Nice I do believe you can used anabolic andrewgenic steroids to help with masseter asymmetry but I don't think igf 1 des would be a good option as there is little research on it

I'm a believer in AAS for masseter aystemety tho for example most people say when there on gear they noticed "bone growth" well there is no such thing as facial bone growth when on anabolic it's due to the growth of soft tissue due to the up regulations on igf 1 and MyoD which stimulates protein synthesis in these muscles combined with the chewing this could be a viable method but yes there a lot of side effects. For example you could develop tmj

There alot of side effects on AAS but that going to take days to explain how to prevent and stay safe when on and alot of money


So the only viable option in my opinion is getting masseter Botox from a perfesional
Bone growth is acc possible whilst using anabolic steroid's but only for a very short period of time and without visible changes
 
I'm glad we were able to meet directly on a scientific basis, without hiding behind labels or jargon (blue pill, normie, etc.) labeling people as 'uneducated' or 'superficial' can sometimes cause us to miss the extent of their knowledge, as in this example. For me, the issue isn't who knows what, but the accuracy of the information shared. It's a technical error to categorize IGF-1 DES, or any group of peptides, as anabolic steroids (AAS) through a flawed generalization. Now that we've clarified that distinction, I think we agree on the crucial point recommending such powerful biological agents randomly to someone in their developmental years without expert supervision carries a significant risk.Recognizing your mistake and honestly admitting it is a virtue. The way to reduce noise in forums is not by labeling each other, but by sharing information in its purest and most accurate form.


I'm glad we agree on this point the use of substances like IGF-1 DES, as you mentioned, is a risky area with limited and anecdotal data and unproven clinical safety. Presenting such an 'uncertain' and 'unfeasible' option, even as a possibility, to a young person in their developmental stage could open a dangerous door to their health. We are responsible not only for the accuracy of information, but also for to whom and how we present that information. Instead of making incomplete or erroneous generalizations by assuming the other person is 'uneducated' speaking with technically accurate information from the outset will prevent such misunderstandings. Acknowledging a mistake and clarifying the situation is a sign of maturity.


I take your comparison of my thoughtful response to "artificial intelligence" as a compliment indeed, discussing a topic in depth, rationally, and respectfully has become a rare endeavor these days. I believe in the difference that accurate information can make in a person's life. Therefore, it's worth making an effort to defend the truth, no matter who I'm speaking to. I wish you a good day.
hi sorry I have a question that has nothing to do with this conversation, do people irl SE me as I see myself in the mirror or as on the back camera?
 
hi sorry I have a question that has nothing to do with this conversation, do people irl SE me as I see myself in the mirror or as on the back camera?
People see you as you are in the rear camera view that is as if the mirror hasn't been reversed.
 
The mirror reverses the image along the horizontal axis. When you raise your right hand your reflection in the mirror is raising its left hand. When someone looks directly at you, or when a rear camera is filming you, your image isn't inverted. So your right side remains to their left (like a seesaw).
 
Bone growth is acc possible whilst using anabolic steroid's but only for a very short period of time and without visible changes
Anabolic is tissue building in the context of aas

But androgen refers to masculinizing properties. Androgenic signaling is actually what triggers the widening of the bones (periosteal growth) during puberty.


But bone growth is often minimal for what I have read so far I'm a bit unknowledgeable about bone growth due to AAS in the context of facial bones

There a thread on looksmax.org that explains this

Thread 'The truth about steroids and peptides affecting bones/height' https://looksmax.org/threads/the-truth-about-steroids-and-peptides-affecting-bones-height.1550764/
 
That was why I was so worried about fixing my assymetry
The asymmetry we see in rear cameras is often not even real. Wide-angle lenses on smartphones distort objects towards the edges.
By the way have you talked to your family about going to the orthodontist, and what did they say?
 
The asymmetry we see in rear cameras is often not even real. Wide-angle lenses on smartphones distort objects towards the edges.
By the way have you talked to your family about going to the orthodontist, and what did they say?
I acc haven't had time to speak to my family, I have three different tests on the same day and more each day next week so I kinda dont have time to socialise outside of school, also thank you u just saved my self confidence 😛
 
I acc haven't had time to speak to my family, I have three different tests on the same day and more each day next week so I kinda dont have time to socialise outside of school, also thank you u just saved my self confidence 😛
It's okay, you can talk to your family calmly when you have time. I'm really glad you've regained your self confidence. Believe me, when you're moving, talking, or laughing, that asymmetry isn't noticeable at all. The human brain doesn't scan for millimeter sized imperfections when looking at a moving face like it does when looking at a static photograph instead, it focuses on the sincerity in the expression, the eye contact, and your energy. Live your life and good luck with your exam
 
It's okay, you can talk to your family calmly when you have time. I'm really glad you've regained your self confidence. Believe me, when you're moving, talking, or laughing, that asymmetry isn't noticeable at all. The human brain doesn't scan for millimeter sized imperfections when looking at a moving face like it does when looking at a static photograph instead, it focuses on the sincerity in the expression, the eye contact, and your energy. Live your life and good luck with your exam
Ur probably such a great guy irl, ty 🙏🙏
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • B
Back
Top