Join 68,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

is my shoulder overdeveloped?

Register to hide this ad
make sure to tag gt yo
 
There's no such thing as an overdeveloped muscle, shoulder looks fine
If a muscle is out of proportion with other muscles that’s not in your subjective liking/favour then you can consciously classify it as “overdeveloped” in a practical sense.

In a medical sense, you can definitely classify a muscle as relatively overdeveloped if it is causing postural issues (e.g strong rectus abdominis yet relatively weak erector spinae, causing a misbalance in posture)

So overall, you are incorrect, I do not like disinformation at all.
 
If a muscle is out of proportion with other muscles that’s not in your subjective liking/favour then you can consciously classify it as “overdeveloped” in a practical sense.

In a medical sense, you can definitely classify a muscle as relatively overdeveloped if it is causing postural issues (e.g strong rectus abdominis yet relatively weak erector spinae, causing a misbalance in posture)

So overall, you are incorrect, I do not like disinformation at all.
Thats true, I was more saying that in most cases an "overdeveloped" muscle is just a muscle surrounded with not as well developed muscles creating an unaesthethic contrast.
 
It's all about perspective, big traps look unaesthethic because they look "overdeveloped" compared to other muscles that aren't developed enough.
 
For point 2, shouldn't the weak spine be blamed for the postoral issues rather than the abs ?
It still means the abdomen is overdeveloped compared to the erectors, since it is relative to each other
 
It still means the abdomen is overdeveloped compared to the erectors, since it is relative to each other
I see, should've clarified in terms of looks.
 
Even in terms of looks it still a thing since aesthetically it’s subjective and proportions exist
That's what I am saying, it's not much the muscle being overdeveloped than others not being as well developed. I guess it's a question of perspective.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top