JFL Is Roadto1% the worst face rating channel ?

[ToptierGooner]

Was scrolling through shorts on youtube and then this guy showed up with yet another bad rating

So let's breakdown the things that he got wrong about Cavill's face

Minor flaw

Henry's canthal tilt is positive (+2.99°), but it falls outside the ideal range for men(4° to 6°)

Major flaw 1

Cavill's chin to philtrum ratio is 2.322, which lies outside the ideal range(2.4 to 2.8) due to his long philtrum

This warrants at least a half point deduction, but Fraud to 1% doesn't mention it

Somehow,Fraud to 1% didn't notice this

Major flaw 2
He failed to notice Henry's recessed infraorbitals,which makes it appear as if he has permanent eyebags

He's supposed to be an objective face rater

Henry Cavill has a highly attractive face, but you can't rate him anything above 8.5 (Top 0.03%)

And you certainly can't rate him higher than Chico and Dellisola like Fraud to 1% did

 

[ToptierGooner]

@genio

 

[foidslayer]

Was scrolling through shorts on youtube and then this guy showed up with yet another bad rating

So let's breakdown the things that he got wrong about Cavill's face

Minor flaw
View attachment 357127
Henry's canthal tilt is positive (+2.99°), but it falls outside the ideal range for men(4° to 6°)

Major flaw 1

Cavill's chin to philtrum ratio is 2.322, which lies outside the ideal range(2.4 to 2.8) due to his long philtrum

This warrants at least a half point deduction, but Fraud to 1% doesn't mention it

View attachment 357129
Somehow,Fraud to 1% didn't notice this
View attachment 357130

Major flaw 2
He failed to notice Henry's recessed infraorbitals,which makes it appear as if he has permanent eyebags
View attachment 357131
He's supposed to be an objective face rater

Henry Cavill has a highly attractive face, but you can't rate him anything above 8.5 (Top 0.03%)
View attachment 357133
And you certainly can't rate him higher than Chico and Dellisola like Fraud to 1% did

you're using a picture of henry smiling to measure philtrum? jfl

 

[genio]

2.4-2.8 ideal?
2.05-2.55 is ideal

 

[genio]

you're using a picture of henry smiling to measure philtrum? jfl


View attachment 357140

Yeah n***a quit talking you use omega distorted images

 

[genio]

Tbh, at least in his youth or prime, i think Cavill is definitely in the 8.75 range

 

[foidslayer]

Was scrolling through shorts on youtube and then this guy showed up with yet another bad rating

So let's breakdown the things that he got wrong about Cavill's face

Minor flaw
View attachment 357127
Henry's canthal tilt is positive (+2.99°), but it falls outside the ideal range for men(4° to 6°)

Major flaw 1

Cavill's chin to philtrum ratio is 2.322, which lies outside the ideal range(2.4 to 2.8) due to his long philtrum

This warrants at least a half point deduction, but Fraud to 1% doesn't mention it

View attachment 357129
Somehow,Fraud to 1% didn't notice this
View attachment 357130

Major flaw 2
He failed to notice Henry's recessed infraorbitals,which makes it appear as if he has permanent eyebags
View attachment 357131
He's supposed to be an objective face rater

Henry Cavill has a highly attractive face, but you can't rate him anything above 8.5 (Top 0.03%)
View attachment 357133
And you certainly can't rate him higher than Chico and Dellisola like Fraud to 1% did

Using your logic:

Henry mogs sean cause sean in this picture has unideal ratios!​

 

[genio]

Using your logic:
View attachment 357141
View attachment 357142

Henry mogs sean cause sean in this picture has unideal ratios!​

Unequal comparison
That slight smirk will not hinder his chin to philtrum ratio to the point of it deviating enough to change a rating
It may affect commissure measurements, but not the philtrum

 

[genio]

Was scrolling through shorts on youtube and then this guy showed up with yet another bad rating

So let's breakdown the things that he got wrong about Cavill's face

Minor flaw
View attachment 357127
Henry's canthal tilt is positive (+2.99°), but it falls outside the ideal range for men(4° to 6°)

Major flaw 1

Cavill's chin to philtrum ratio is 2.322, which lies outside the ideal range(2.4 to 2.8) due to his long philtrum

This warrants at least a half point deduction, but Fraud to 1% doesn't mention it

View attachment 357129
Somehow,Fraud to 1% didn't notice this
View attachment 357130

Major flaw 2
He failed to notice Henry's recessed infraorbitals,which makes it appear as if he has permanent eyebags
View attachment 357131
He's supposed to be an objective face rater

Henry Cavill has a highly attractive face, but you can't rate him anything above 8.5 (Top 0.03%)
View attachment 357133
And you certainly can't rate him higher than Chico and Dellisola like Fraud to 1% did

Btw 8.5 is much higher than top 0.03%
This would mean Cavill is merely a 1/3333 face
8.5 could easily be a 0.001% face or even 0.0001%

 

[genio]

I do agree that with age hes succumbed to the norwood reaper and descended to mid chad as opposed to his high chad prime

 

[ToptierGooner]

2.4-2.8 ideal?
2.05-2.55 is ideal

I was wrong
Anything between 2:1 to 3:1 is ideal for men

 

[ToptierGooner]

you're using a picture of henry smiling to measure philtrum? jfl


View attachment 357140

I don't think it makes that big of a difference
Anyways my previous claim that 2.4-2.8 is the ideal range is wrong

His chin to philtrum ratio is ideal because it's between 2-3

 

[ToptierGooner]

I do agree that with age hes succumbed to the norwood reaper and descended to mid chad as opposed to his high chad prime

Yea, the Norwood Reaper is called the killer of chads for a reason

 

[_x11]

Yea, the Norwood Reaper is called the killer of chads for a reason

I'm already bald so it can't kill me and I'm chad. Suck it bud

 

[matiasheanolikeswomen]

holy yappuchino
ppl care more about chads looks, who doesn't give a fuck about them
instead of looksmaxxing themselves

 

[ToptierGooner]

holy yappuchino
ppl care more about chads looks, who doesn't give a fuck about them
instead of looksmaxxing themselves

It's science and I enjoy doing it
Also,the channel in OP rates like trash so I had to point it out

 

[genio]

I was wrong
Anything between 2:1 to 3:1 is ideal for men

Fuck no
Too broad
2.05-2.55

 

[lowkeydeadoutside]

how old is this video

 

[Penalizer69]

Chico would look like a lost and confused orphan next to henry btw

 

[_x11]

Chico would look like a lost and confused orphan next to henry btw

they need to nerf me and henry

 

[Nenestar]

holy autism

 

[Syniq]

Was scrolling through shorts on youtube and then this guy showed up with yet another bad rating

So let's breakdown the things that he got wrong about Cavill's face

Minor flaw
View attachment 357127
Henry's canthal tilt is positive (+2.99°), but it falls outside the ideal range for men(4° to 6°)

Major flaw 1

Cavill's chin to philtrum ratio is 2.322, which lies outside the ideal range(2.4 to 2.8) due to his long philtrum

This warrants at least a half point deduction, but Fraud to 1% doesn't mention it

View attachment 357129
Somehow,Fraud to 1% didn't notice this
View attachment 357130

Major flaw 2
He failed to notice Henry's recessed infraorbitals,which makes it appear as if he has permanent eyebags
View attachment 357131
He's supposed to be an objective face rater

Henry Cavill has a highly attractive face, but you can't rate him anything above 8.5 (Top 0.03%)
View attachment 357133
And you certainly can't rate him higher than Chico and Dellisola like Fraud to 1% did

You can rate him a lot higher than Chico. Chico is a 7.3+, not even an 8.