Join 48,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

it's that time of the year again (not for everyone: naked 18 yo girls ITT)

Idk this guy is a dummie. Why jfl me when I was correct the whole time :mad:

Dummie:mad:
 
Obv someone would eventually get it right, but wasn't the whole thing here actually explaining the logic behind it?
I could've picked that spot out (actually did) but still have no way to explain how I came to that conclusion lol
 
he hasn't explained it though
could have just happen to pick that one spot lmao
its an obvious pattern - see it as pairs of two.
everytime a combination of two dots gets combined - the next one inverts and starts the combination at the bottom/top - proof and point of that is the difference between beginning of dots in the first column and second one - then it moves right a slight amount thats the pattern
 
its an obvious pattern - see it as pairs of two.
everytime a combination of two dots gets combined - the next one inverts and starts the combination at the bottom/top - proof and point of that is the difference between beginning of dots in the first column and second one - then it moves right a slight amount thats the pattern
Yeah, this exactly
 
its an obvious pattern - see it as pairs of two.
everytime a combination of two dots gets combined - the next one inverts and starts the combination at the bottom/top - proof and point of that is the difference between beginning of dots in the first column and second one - then it moves right a slight amount thats the pattern
Hmm, why did u hide this explanation from your initial answer? :monkahmm:
 
he hasn't explained it though
could have just happen to pick that one spot lmao

true, but i gave him the benefit of the doubt because at least he didn't mention "center" of anything. plus i didnt put align the dots perfectly, plus none of the 8 visible dots are in the same position as the one in field 9
 
its an obvious pattern - see it as pairs of two.
everytime a combination of two dots gets combined - the next one inverts and starts the combination at the bottom/top - proof and point of that is the difference between beginning of dots in the first column and second one - then it moves right a slight amount thats the pattern

what? just check my explanation again (i edited the post responding to you)
 
i gave actual logic, my pattern works

it's too convoluted and basically faux reverse engineering. if you can't explain the solution to matrices of this level of complexity in 7-8 words, you are just doing faux reverse engineering.

but as i said earlier, your response was obviously the best on the sole account of you not rambling about "centers" of any kind, so i can accept that you just described the same pattern differently, as far as language goes
 
the solution he typed out is simpler and would be applied more easily tbh hes right

yeah. confirmed high iq for 1. realizing this and 2. being able to admit it.

again, you are still the winner because i've set this up so that you can't guess the correct dot placement completely out of the blue; even if you see a different pattern, if the end solution is right, that qualifies as you being correct. if i d framed it like there were 2 or 3 possible placements that were the right answer and you came up with the correct one while offering some overcomplicated "explanation" as the solution, it wouldn't mean much, but it was much more open-ended
 
yeah. confirmed high iq for 1. realizing this and 2. being able to admit it. again, you are still the winner because i've set this up so that you can't guess the correct dot placement completely out of the blue; even if you see a different pattern, if the end solution is right, that qualifies as you being correct
Even i told the pattern and the answer too wtf
 
@Altruist your 1 forward 2 back doesnt even hold in row 2, jfl the pattern is more complex, jfl at u
 
@Altruist your 1 forward 2 back doesnt even hold in row 2, jfl the pattern is more complex, jfl at u

bro. the convention is 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9. (1-2-3 - first row; 4-5-6 - second row; 7-8-9 - third row). there are versions where the "pattern" is applicable both vertically and horizontally, but realizing it wasn't the case here is a part of the task
 
bro. the convention is 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9. (1-2-3 - first row; 4-5-6 - second row; 7-8-9 - third row). there are versions where the "pattern" is applicable both vertically and horizontally, but realizing it wasn't the case here is a part of the task
Yes but how i explained it, explains the whole pattern as well. Are u kidding me? And my "middle left" clearly shows there can be 2 lefts, implying 4x4 grid. Idk are u geniunely retarded on this, but u cant even see the whole pattern urself
 
Last edited:
speaking from a unbiased perspective because i didnt see this thread until now: this puzzle sucks and/or you have explained the solution terribly
 
speaking from a unbiased perspective because i didnt see this thread until now: this puzzle sucks and/or you have explained the solution terribly
nvm i see it now

1 to the right followed by 2 to the left repeated with top left of the 4x4 grid connecting to bottom right
 
speaking from a unbiased perspective because i didnt see this thread until now: this puzzle sucks and/or you have explained the solution terribly
nvm i see it now

1 to the right followed by 2 to the left repeated with top right of the 4x4 grid connecting to bottom left

i rest my case. p.s. stop drinking
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top