Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

James vee is just the natural conclusion of alot of u n*****s

Darkeningstar said:
A classic:
I understand that intentions directly expressed but with ulterior motives are misinterpreted and I understand that people judge based on binary considerations without seeing what is behind it or what one wants to do





Question: there must be a reason why I never asked for pictures of you, or not?
Click to expand...
Female reaction to truth: thumb down
 
Darkeningstar said:
take a step back tony, I don't know if you're referring to me but I didn't manipulate anyone


You can accuse me of exploiting her weaknesses but I guarantee you that I didn't manipulate to get things, I would never allow myself to request hot photos or anything like that, for example
Click to expand...
After what i've read, no i will not take a step back my g
 
Darkeningstar said:
this is because you have surely read things wrongly or decontextualised things
You can’t understand my intentions from my messages, tony
Don’t be a cuck
Click to expand...
can you accuse me of exploiting certain female “cravings”? Yes, but I had no intentions beyond the online


I never asked for photos
 
Darkeningstar said:
Don’t be a cuck
Click to expand...
You know what, this drama will be solved with proof
Find a neutral third party y'all can trust and show him/her
Someone who isn't involved in that drama

Excuse me to trust Pompom before you bud, because ik how guys can "exploit" vulnerable girls

Darkeningstar said:
can you accuse me of exploiting certain female “cravings”? Yes
Click to expand...
Then explain why you've exploited their "cravings" ? What was the end goal ?
 
TonyDr said:
You know what, this drama will be solved with proof
Find a neutral third party y'all can trust and show him/her
Someone who isn't involved in that drama

Excuse me to trust Pompom before you bud, because ik how guys can "exploit" vulnerable girls


Then explain why you've exploited their "cravings" ? What was the end goal ?
Click to expand...
I don’t care
I tell you the truth:
I opened that thread because I wanted to get a bad reputation and be banned or something like that

You know what? I’m guilty

See pms btw
 
Darkeningstar said:
this is because you have surely read things wrongly or decontextualised things
You can’t understand my intentions from my messages, tony
Don’t be a cuck
Click to expand...
you actually said nothing. genuinely, what does this even mean besides you don’t know how to use a dictionary? regardless, if an outsider reading your messages cannot understand your intentions, why would you be surprised people assume things? isn’t that the whole point of writing in such a way your intent is unclear? plausible deniability only works if you don’t follow it up with this though:

Darkeningstar said:
can you accuse me of exploiting certain female “cravings”? Yes, but I had no intentions beyond the online


I never asked for photos
Click to expand...
so mission immediately failed
 
sup said:
you actually said nothing. genuinely, what does this even mean besides you don’t know how to use a dictionary? regardless, if an outsider reading your messages cannot understand your intentions, why would you be surprised people assume things? isn’t that the whole point of writing in such a way your intent is unclear? plausible deniability only works if you don’t follow it up with this though:


so mission immediately failed
Click to expand...
I don't take a person who mentions dictionaries seriously, sorry
Binary obtuse
You wouldn't understand
If you want I'll explain in private
 
sup said:
you actually said nothing. genuinely, what does this even mean besides you don’t know how to use a dictionary? regardless, if an outsider reading your messages cannot understand your intentions, why would you be surprised people assume things? isn’t that the whole point of writing in such a way your intent is unclear? plausible deniability only works if you don’t follow it up with this though:


so mission immediately failed
Click to expand...
I’m not surprised, in fact jfl
 
Darkeningstar said:
I don't take a person seriously who mentions dictionaries, sorry
Binary obtuse
You wouldn't understand
If you want I'll explain in private
Click to expand...
obviously you don’t or else you would actually say something of value and not a bunch of nonsense stringed together. i don’t understand and i don’t care or know you enough to privately talk to you about shit i don’t care about. publicly? sure. but if you can’t even defend your own actions publicly but need to privately address it with everyone individually, you’ve already lost
 
sup said:
obviously you don’t or else you would actually say something of value and not a bunch of nonsense stringed together. i don’t understand and i don’t care or know you enough to privately talk to you about shit i don’t care about. publicly? sure. but if you can’t even defend your own actions publicly but need to privately address it with everyone individually, you’ve already lost
Click to expand...
Blah blah blah
Binary ramblings
 
Darkeningstar said:
Blah blah blah
Binary ramblings
Click to expand...
so true bestie, hope you get every single person individually messaging you and they all share those messages together. i’m sure it’ll be consistent across the board and if that’s the case, you’re stupid as a bag of bricks for wasting everyone’s time instead of stating it here
 
sup said:
so true bestie, hope you get every single person individually messaging you and they all share those messages together. i’m sure it’ll be consistent across the board and if that’s the case, you’re stupid as a bag of bricks for wasting everyone’s time instead of stating it here
Click to expand...


I’m arrogant because you are annoying
I ask you a question: what happens if you take two different patterns and put them together?
Spoiler: misunderstanding


I don't want to defend myself, I couldn't.
 
Darkeningstar said:
I’m arrogant because you are annoying
I ask you a question: what happens if you take two different patterns and put them together?
Spoiler: misunderstanding


I don't want to defend myself, I couldn't.
Click to expand...
an annoying lady online? crazy concept.

if you don’t want and actively choose to avoid defending yourself, there is no misunderstanding you just choose to write gibberish. decontextualize deez nuts bro when you can’t provide context
 
sup said:
an annoying lady online? crazy concept.

if you don’t want and actively choose to avoid defending yourself, there is no misunderstanding you just choose to write gibberish. decontextualize deez nuts bro when you can’t provide context
Click to expand...

I don't think you are capable of understanding contexts
Contexts are not for everyone



I’m guilty, miss
Happy?
 
Darkeningstar said:
I don't think you are capable of understanding contexts
Contesta are not for everyone



I’m guilty, miss
Happy?
Click to expand...
totally can’t understand why retards act like retards, i’m sure. i’m not happy or unhappy, i hate the fact ya’ll do stupid shit publicly and expect people to privately message you and then they all start fighting because you switch up so much. ALL of you.

i wanna enjoy the forum but you’re all too busy gossiping about esex for anybody else to put up with this insufferable site for longer than a few posts. unfortunately, i’m not a bot so i actually respond and question what you’re attempting to convey. i’ve done more to understand you than half the people in this thread even considered giving you but when it’s the same shit every single day i’m gonna be snappy.

i’m actually ok with publicly admitting to something for the sake of transparency, which makes me as retarded as you all for even trying. man
 
sup said:
obviously you don’t or else you would actually say something of value and not a bunch of nonsense stringed together. i don’t understand and i don’t care or know you enough to privately talk to you about shit i don’t care about. publicly? sure. but if you can’t even defend your own actions publicly but need to privately address it with everyone individually, you’ve already lost
Click to expand...
^ it’s easy to twist things in private
 
Darkeningstar said:
ping-pong if I had been nicer to you you would have asked me for a ticket to Italy
Cut it out
Click to expand...
i literally tried to just be friends with you, you got mad and threatened to share things, i appeased you so that you wouldn’t, now this happened because you once again got mad

anything i said to make you happy was to stop this from happening, yet it happened anyway
 
pompompurino said:
i literally tried to just be friends with you, you got mad and threatened to share things, i appeased you so that you wouldn’t, now this happened because you once again got mad

anything i said to make you happy was to stop this from happening, yet it happened anyway
Click to expand...
You are lying again
Not surprising
 
pompompurino said:
^ it’s easy to twist things in private
Click to expand...
plausible deniability is so much easier when nobody checks n it’s different enough to convey different tones or change seemingly small but important context or details. every issue on this forum would be solved within minutes if people put in any effort to ask questions or verify any information being told to them 🥀 im fighting demons in my head rn
 
ey88 said:
He wouldn’t join, he’s too good for it
Click to expand...
Oh yh we're just a bunch of degen incels to him how could I forget

hehe.gif
 
sup said:
plausible deniability is so much easier when nobody checks n it’s different enough to convey different tones or change seemingly small but important context or details. every issue on this forum would be solved within minutes if people put in any effort to ask questions or verify any information being told to them 🥀 im fighting demons in my head rn
Click to expand...
pompompurino deleted my message twice

I'll show what I had written, if you want
 
Darkeningstar said:
you said this and worse, who knows what you said to others jfl
“Just a friend”
Click to expand...
a 25yo jobless autistic guy who willingly sexts girls online then pulls a full 180 to shame them for doing exactly what he begged for
what a clown you are
 
huntergirl said:
a 25yo jobless autistic guy who willingly sexts girls online then pulls a full 180 to shame them for doing exactly what he begged for
what a clown you are
Click to expand...
the first “sexual” interactions I had with them

Allure telling me she would like to have the honour of taking my e-virginity
Pingpong telling me if I would like a blowjob

Nice try

Of course they will deny it


Bonus:
Unfortunately for me, unlike you, I can afford to have other hobbies since I have enough money to no longer work

E-sexting is not a hobby, of course
 
pompompurino said:
just pm people from now on, nobody cares in the forum💀
Click to expand...
Yh that's crazy Pompom but isn't it crazier that the universe is made up of atoms and different fundamental particles: Hadrons and Leptons
Hadrons make up what's inside the proton and neutron are split into two groups, ones that include 3 quarks called Baryons and the other group containing 2 quarks: its quark and its antiparticle variant- Mesons. There are 2 types of mesons, ones including a particle and antiparticle pair: pions and the other containing at least one strange quark- kaons. Baryons make up what's inside of protons and neutrons. There are 3 different flavours of quarks, the up,down and strange quark. The up quark has has a charge of +2/3, and both the down and strange quark have a charge of -1/3. Its antiparticle variant will have the negated charges of these values. In baryons you can't have antiparticle and particle mixes. The quark structure inside a proton for example would be UUD (2/3+2/3-1/3=1) since a proton has a charge of 1. The charge of a neutron is 0 so it's quark structure would be UDD (2/3-1/3-1/3=0). As for leptons, they make up electrons, the muon and the neutrino. These dont have quarks and have a lepton number of 1. When a neutron turns into a proton, it releases an electron and electron antineutrino. The reason for is is because baryon, lepton, and charge number are always conserved. Strangeness may not conserved during particle interactions involving the weak interaction force which is a fundamental force alongside the EM force, strong force and gravitational force.
 
AuggyDauggy said:
Yh that's crazy Pompom but isn't it crazier that the universe is made up of atoms and different fundamental particles: Hadrons and Leptons
Hadrons make up what's inside the proton and neutron are split into two groups, ones that include 3 quarks called Baryons and the other group containing 2 quarks: its quark and its antiparticle variant- Mesons. There are 2 types of mesons, ones including a particle and antiparticle pair: pions and the other containing at least one strange quark- kaons. Baryons make up what's inside of protons and neutrons. There are 3 different flavours of quarks, the up,down and strange quark. The up quark has has a charge of +2/3, and both the down and strange quark have a charge of -1/3. Its antiparticle variant will have the negated charges of these values. In baryons you can't have antiparticle and particle mixes. The quark structure inside a proton for example would be UUD (2/3+2/3-1/3=1) since a proton has a charge of 1. The charge of a neutron is 0 so it's quark structure would be UDD (2/3-1/3-1/3=0). As for leptons, the make up electrons, the muon and the neutrino. These dont have quarks and have a lepton number of 1. When a neutron turns into a proton, it releases an electron and electron antineutrino. The reason for is is because baryon, lepton, and charge number are always conserved. Strangeness may not conserved during particle interactions involving the weak interaction force which is a fundamental force alongside the EM force, strong force and gravitational force.
Click to expand...
Good read tbh, I am gonna go to college to do an undergraduate on physics btw
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top