The Dark Passenger
I Only Fuck With Knowledge
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2026
- Messages
- 213
- Online time
- 1d 6h
- Reputation
- 355
An argument that I see being heavily used by the normies who are against the black pill and the looksmaxxing community,is that you might not be attractive to x but you can be attractive to y,or beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Arguments wich I will debunk in this thread
As my first argument,normies don't really seem to understand that we have social media and dating app now days,and here's the problem,as I explained In a previous thread women,in the older times really didn't have control of anything,wich made them heavily relying to men financially,Wich trapped them In a wedding that only existed because of the financially estable life the man could provide,but as the time passed most women don't need men anymore,near as they needed before,either it is socially or economically,and when this shift happens they gain the power to choose a way better (attractive) partner than before.
And with the creation of dating apps they can choose whoever they want without even needing to get out of home, putting their standards in the sky and just waiting for the jackpot,and that's when we face the wall:
Hypergamy,When we create a market where women are the buyers and men are the products,you would expect that the average man would be chosen by the average woman but if you already know how things work you know this game is not played this way,as stated before with now the power to choose completely In their hands,the tendency is for them to only seek 6-10 guys,in these platforms or a man with status(in this case is not love,but u got the idea)And when you understand that most relationships now days are formed by dating apps thing start to seem even more dystopic.
And as my second argument,I would like to show you this study:
When we think about beauty,being subjective we are completely ignoring history and time,as it may be obvious to some,the Eurocentric looks were always considered the most attractive,the traditional white man, with straight hair,handsome face etc.and the traditional white woman with a nice body,and pretty face,so taking all that in mind,that most relationships are formed in these dating apps now days,how do you think the outcome will be to the average man? A complete humiliation,if you are not white or at least Latino,I think you have more chances to win the lottery,than finding a Mtb,or Htb,who will want so settle with you in these apps (without even considering the gold diggers).
And if you really want to use the argument of:"what do you mean your incel now women can't have preferences?",I just have one answer for you;when was the last time you saw a woman,saying she'd like to date an short, bald, with recessed jawline man? Probably never,And when was the last you saw a woman saying she would like to date an tall,muscular,and handsome "nerd"? Reality is that the "preferences" and the "icks" only exist for those who are unattractive In their view,but if you can do 1+1=2,you already know this by now.if you are a man of color you will always be less likely to be chosen by women, either in reality or
dating apps.
And that is reality.
Be Aware Not In Despair.
As my first argument,normies don't really seem to understand that we have social media and dating app now days,and here's the problem,as I explained In a previous thread women,in the older times really didn't have control of anything,wich made them heavily relying to men financially,Wich trapped them In a wedding that only existed because of the financially estable life the man could provide,but as the time passed most women don't need men anymore,near as they needed before,either it is socially or economically,and when this shift happens they gain the power to choose a way better (attractive) partner than before.
And with the creation of dating apps they can choose whoever they want without even needing to get out of home, putting their standards in the sky and just waiting for the jackpot,and that's when we face the wall:
Hypergamy,When we create a market where women are the buyers and men are the products,you would expect that the average man would be chosen by the average woman but if you already know how things work you know this game is not played this way,as stated before with now the power to choose completely In their hands,the tendency is for them to only seek 6-10 guys,in these platforms or a man with status(in this case is not love,but u got the idea)And when you understand that most relationships now days are formed by dating apps thing start to seem even more dystopic.
And as my second argument,I would like to show you this study:
When we think about beauty,being subjective we are completely ignoring history and time,as it may be obvious to some,the Eurocentric looks were always considered the most attractive,the traditional white man, with straight hair,handsome face etc.and the traditional white woman with a nice body,and pretty face,so taking all that in mind,that most relationships are formed in these dating apps now days,how do you think the outcome will be to the average man? A complete humiliation,if you are not white or at least Latino,I think you have more chances to win the lottery,than finding a Mtb,or Htb,who will want so settle with you in these apps (without even considering the gold diggers).
And if you really want to use the argument of:"what do you mean your incel now women can't have preferences?",I just have one answer for you;when was the last time you saw a woman,saying she'd like to date an short, bald, with recessed jawline man? Probably never,And when was the last you saw a woman saying she would like to date an tall,muscular,and handsome "nerd"? Reality is that the "preferences" and the "icks" only exist for those who are unattractive In their view,but if you can do 1+1=2,you already know this by now.if you are a man of color you will always be less likely to be chosen by women, either in reality or
dating apps.
And that is reality.
Be Aware Not In Despair.