Hypothesis Looksmaximum experiment

[Penalizer69]

 hypothesis
People rate mainly off of reputation, so no matter how good looking you are, you'll always get rates lower than your actual rate. Foids and greys are more prone to this bias.

 conditions
I avoided stating names to avoid potential recollection.

my own rates:
Chad vanderloo - mid chad
Andreas - mid chad
Stepanov - mid chad
Welling - hhtn
Leon Kennedy - low chadlite
Cavil - mid chad

 results
Experiment 1: chad vanderloo

Aligns with my hypothesis pretty well since he's pretty unknown. Most people who underrated where indeed greys or foids.

Experiment 2: andreas eriksen

I kinda was expecting a few htn rates since muhhh appeal copers, but he actually did the best out of all the results.

Experiment 3: vasily stepanov

I was suprised he got less chad rates on average than vanderloo tbh

Experiment 4: welling

Most diverse rating profile I'd say.

Experiment 5: Leon Kennedy

most consistent so far except andreas. I was kind of suprised there was no htn rates as he's more average than all the other faces shown other than maybe welling

Experiment 6: cavil

Gets slander alot on tiktok. Pleasantly suprised by this outcome

conclusion:
the rating they got most tended to be the most accurate one. I think poor rates are usually just down to the audience, certain times posted leading to more greys and foids seeing and rating. Status certainly has a slight role into rates though, and some faces are more prone to underrates (likely due to a higher averageness.)

Leon did get slightly overrated tho

most autistic thing I've ever done

 

[Deleted Member 106124]

lmao i cant believe people downrate other people just because they're jealous or because they sexualize a norm that is not objectively a pro

 

[Deleted Member 102155]

@imsubhumanlmfao used to give fair rates

 

[Shkypot]

 hypothesis
People rate mainly off of reputation, so no matter how good looking you are, you'll always get rates lower than your actual rate. Foids and greys are more prone to this bias.

 conditions
I avoided stating names to avoid potential recollection.

my own rates:
Chad vanderloo - mid chad
Andreas - mid chad
Stepanov - mid chad
Welling - hhtn
Leon Kennedy - low chadlite
Cavil - mid chad

 results
Experiment 1: chad vanderloo
View attachment 283702
Aligns with my hypothesis pretty well since he's pretty unknown. Most people who underrated where indeed greys or foids.

Experiment 2: andreas eriksen
View attachment 283703
I kinda was expecting a few htn rates since muhhh appeal copers, but he actually did the best out of all the results.

Experiment 3: vasily stepanov
View attachment 283714
I was suprised he got less chad rates on average than vanderloo tbh

Experiment 4: welling
View attachment 283705
Most diverse rating profile I'd say.

Experiment 5: Leon Kennedy
View attachment 283720most consistent so far except andreas. I was kind of suprised there was no htn rates as he's more average than all the other faces shown other than maybe welling

Experiment 6: cavil
View attachment 283701
Gets slander alot on tiktok. Pleasantly suprised by this outcome

conclusion:
the rating they got most tended to be the most accurate one. I think poor rates are usually just down to the audience, certain times posted leading to more greys and foids seeing and rating. Status certainly has a slight role into rates though, and some faces are more prone to underrates (likely due to a higher averageness.)

Leon did get slightly overrated tho

most autistic thing I've ever done

She tricked the internet.

 

[Superior]

She tricked the internet.

she?

 

[Penalizer69]

@imsubhumanlmfao used to give fair rates

Yeah cause he could actually analyse I think most people now just give it an eye test

 

[Deleted Member 102155]

Yeah cause he could actually analyse I think most people now just give it an eye test

I’m most people

 

[Penalizer69]

@Vampi

 

[HerculesJr.]

 hypothesis
People rate mainly off of reputation, so no matter how good looking you are, you'll always get rates lower than your actual rate. Foids and greys are more prone to this bias.

 conditions
I avoided stating names to avoid potential recollection.

my own rates:
Chad vanderloo - mid chad
Andreas - mid chad
Stepanov - mid chad
Welling - hhtn
Leon Kennedy - low chadlite
Cavil - mid chad

 results
Experiment 1: chad vanderloo
View attachment 283702
Aligns with my hypothesis pretty well since he's pretty unknown. Most people who underrated where indeed greys or foids.

Experiment 2: andreas eriksen
View attachment 283703
I kinda was expecting a few htn rates since muhhh appeal copers, but he actually did the best out of all the results.

Experiment 3: vasily stepanov
View attachment 283714
I was suprised he got less chad rates on average than vanderloo tbh

Experiment 4: welling
View attachment 283705
Most diverse rating profile I'd say.

Experiment 5: Leon Kennedy
View attachment 283720most consistent so far except andreas. I was kind of suprised there was no htn rates as he's more average than all the other faces shown other than maybe welling

Experiment 6: cavil
View attachment 283701
Gets slander alot on tiktok. Pleasantly suprised by this outcome

conclusion:
the rating they got most tended to be the most accurate one. I think poor rates are usually just down to the audience, certain times posted leading to more greys and foids seeing and rating. Status certainly has a slight role into rates though, and some faces are more prone to underrates (likely due to a higher averageness.)

Leon did get slightly overrated tho

most autistic thing I've ever done

What the fuck is any of this

 

[doll]

indeed, If a unknown Chad/Stacy posted themselves here they would probably get rated HTN/HTB at best

 

[Deleted Member 106124]

indeed, If a unknown Chad/Stacy posted themselves here they would probably get rated HTN/HTB at best

yeah thats why i dont post myself yep exactly that