HIGH IQ THREAD n*****s THIS TOOK ME FOREVER AND I POPPED LIKE FOUR ADDERALL AND ENOUGH KRATOM TO MAKE JOE BIDEN FORM A SENTIENT THOUGHT
DNRD ME AND BE ANALLY MOLESTED BY THE GHOST OF ER
(thread soundtrack LISTEN TO IT)
AND WE BEGIN
MANDIBULAR ANGLE IMPLANTS
DONT LISTEN TO RETARDS TELLING YOU TO FLY YO TURKEY AND GET SOME RANDOM ASS OFF THE SHELF IMPLANT TO CUT CORNERS. The gonial angle formed by the junction of the RAMUS and mandibular body is one of the STRONGESTT visual sex markers in the human skull. Men usually sit around 110 to 120 degrees, women closer to 125 to 135, and the smaller that angle gets the more the face reads androgen exposure detected.
Mandibular angle implants work by changing lateral flare, posterior projection, and sometimes vertical drop, and how those vectors are applied matters more than size. In men, the eye prefers width over height, with a sharp but not drooping angle that lines up roughly with the corner of the mouth or slightly behind it. Drop the angle too far down and the face starts looking dragged or heavy like when gravity finally hits a kardashian every five years before they get that shit nipped and tucked by a jewish doctor again. In women on the other hand angle implants need RESTRAINT okay or you make urself look like a t****y.
Subtle lateral definition and minimal vertical extension give sharpness without turning the lower face into a block. Models complicate this because fashion modeling tolerates exaggeration. Male models often have more acute angles (some n*****s are low iq and don’t even know what an acute angle is anymore if you forgot just look that shit up) than the general population sometimes bordering on unnatural, but it works because their MIDFACE is lean and their neck to jaw transition is clean. Female models with angular jaws almost always have narrow lower thirds and high cheekbones to counterbalance the sharpness. BALANCE n*****s ITS ALL ABOUT BALANCE!!! On a non model skull with thicker soft tissue copying those angles makes the face read harsh instead of editorial. The masseter muscle wraps this area, so implants that fight the natural muscle vector get clocked instantly even if people cannot explain why. It just looks off and you’ll wind up botched as shit. Humans analyze faces to a microscopic level to anticipate danger and friendliness we can tell when something’s off.
JAW (MANDIBULAR BODY) IMPLANTS
NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH MANDIBULAR ANGLE IMPLANTS THATS A PSYOP FROM THE SOMALIS TO KEEP YOU SUB5. Jaw BODY implants are about manipulating facial width to height ratio which the human brain uses as a proxy for maturity strength and in men especially dominance (johnny sins is a great example @Johnny hmu papa). The mistake people make is thinking these implants go straight sideways, when in REALITY the most aesthetic vectors move slightly n***a SLIGHTLY outeard and forward tapering as they approach the chin. Men look best when the jaw widens gradually with the widest point sitting just behind the mouth corners and never i mean NEVER exceeding the cheekbone width UNLESS the rest of the skull can support it. Once the jaw becomes wider than the zygomas, the face starts reading bottom heavy and primitive rather than powerful and you’ll STILL be sub 5 whilst looking like you SWALLOWED a ps5
JFL LOOK AT THIS JEWISH n***a
In fashion models however cus every tom dick and mtn wanna be a model, the rules bend slightly. Many male models have jaws that approach cheekbone width or even match it, but they get away with it because of extreme leanness, long necks, and low facial fat. Their ratios are not just bone based, they are soft tissue optimized (thread on soft tissue and its importance coming soon) Women benefit far more from anterior emphasis than lateral bulk. The goal is continuity, not mass, letting the jaw guide the eye smoothly toward the chin. Female models often have minimal jaw width but extremely clean mandibular lines, which creates sharpness without size. Skull base width sets the hard limit here. If the neurocranium (i fucking love this word babis) is narrow, you cannot brute force width into the mandible without creating that uncanny Minecraft character effect.
One of my favorite results of female jaw implants (done very rarely btw)
CHIN IMPLANTS
The chin is ABSURDLYYYY sensitive to millimeters and MIGHT be the most misunderstood structure in facial aesthetics as it’s always shadowed by the jaw in common conversation. It controls lower facial thirds lip posture jawline flow, and even how large the nose appears in profile. Horizontal projection is KEY. In men, the chin can align with or sit slightly ahead of the lower lip. In women, it almost always looks better slightly behind. Overshoot this and the face does not read dominant. It reads jutting, like the chin is trying to escape the skull or even WORSE you look like a random somali with an overbite (I really don’t like somalians
)
Models often have chins that are TECHNICALLY under projected but visually strong because of sharp mental folds and low submental fat.
(notice how the chin is slightly under projected)
That is why copying a model chin projection number without considering tissue thickness fails. (I mention this because on reddit someone just got botched because they tried to paste angelina jolies ratios onto themselves JFLLLL BRUTAL IQPILL) Chin WIDTH also carries gender coding. Wider and squarer works for men, while women usually look better with a tapered or softly rounded chin. Vertical lengthening is where a lot of people RUINNNNN things noggas. Too much length pulls down the lower lip, ages the face, and makes expressions look strained. Many runway models actually have shorter lower thirds than average which gives that youthful androgynous edge. Implants do not move with muscle the way bone does which is why some people look fine still but uncanny when talking.
GENIOPLASTY
SLIDING GENIOPLASTY IS ONE OF MY FAVORITE AFFORDABLE SURGERIES TO FIX MULTIPLE ISSUES IN ONE SWOOP. PRECISE control over horizontal projection vertical height asymmetry correction and midline alignment in a way implants simply CANNOT. Men usually benefit from forward movement combined with mild vertical lengthening and some widening, which reinforces skeletal maturity and jaw continuity.
Women almost always look best with forward movement only, minimal vertical change, and careful tapering, because vertical length in the lower third can quickly make the face look gaunt or prematurely aged.
Many high fashion faces (anyone hhtn and above in my book) rely on genioplasty type proportions naturally. Shorter chins with strong forward projection create a compact lower third that photographs extremely well. This is why copying a male model with a long face and applying vertical chin length to a shorter face breaks and RAPES harmony. Genioplasty also changes soft tissue tension including the genioglossus (heh glossus
) muscle, which is why some people notice improved airway or jaw resting posture afterward. The tradeoff is recovery. Bone surgery does not care about your plans or your tolerance for swelling. Shit is painful and can take up to two years for swelling to fully go down.
WHY SOME ETHNIC SKULLS NEED DIFFERENT VECTORS
A NIGGGA CANT GET THE SAME IMPLANTS AS A CHIGGA WHO CANT GET THR SAME IMPLANTS AS A WIGGA. Different populations have DIFFERENT baseline craniofacial architecture. Skull base width mandibular plane angle dental protrusion (sounds like something anal related) and soft tissue thickness all vary, and applying the same implant vectors universally is how people end up looking uncanny. Many African and Afro diasporic skulls already have strong anterior projection and thicker soft tissue coverage, so pure lateral expansion often looks wrong. These faces respond better to forward biased vectors that respect natural depth rather than forcing width.
East Asian skulls tend to have wider midfaces and shorter mandibular bodies, meaning excessive lateral jaw implants overpower the face. Forward and slightly downward chin movement with subtle jaw contouring usually looks far more natural. South Asian and Middle Eastern skulls often have strong nasal projection and softer jaw transitions, so sharpening angles without over widening preserves harmony.
European skulls generally tolerate width better due to longer mandibles, but even then unchecked lateral expansion creates blocky artificial faces.
@
@Nbernical @Born Superior @vampi @TonyDr@RAD@Newday @vespertine @2Beau @97baHater@acketar@apatheia @BigDihDiddy @Cat.
@homiespidy [USER=74605]@snow @Kaari @kifykify @Koji @Love @Molotongo @mus.@Orka @PingPong @pxe @Spuffy@rickydickydoodahgrimes@rovea @sigmagoy @trueceljester@Schizotypalcel @Starlet@Trilltown @spreading love@wavyheadrei @ZyzzReincarnate@Ghoultune @ibelieveinunicorns @Enrique ꗞ
@hazyfuture @Thebird @giga.mia @2based
Sincerely, AClonedTyrone
DNRD ME AND BE ANALLY MOLESTED BY THE GHOST OF ER
(thread soundtrack LISTEN TO IT)
AND WE BEGIN
MANDIBULAR ANGLE IMPLANTS
DONT LISTEN TO RETARDS TELLING YOU TO FLY YO TURKEY AND GET SOME RANDOM ASS OFF THE SHELF IMPLANT TO CUT CORNERS. The gonial angle formed by the junction of the RAMUS and mandibular body is one of the STRONGESTT visual sex markers in the human skull. Men usually sit around 110 to 120 degrees, women closer to 125 to 135, and the smaller that angle gets the more the face reads androgen exposure detected.
Mandibular angle implants work by changing lateral flare, posterior projection, and sometimes vertical drop, and how those vectors are applied matters more than size. In men, the eye prefers width over height, with a sharp but not drooping angle that lines up roughly with the corner of the mouth or slightly behind it. Drop the angle too far down and the face starts looking dragged or heavy like when gravity finally hits a kardashian every five years before they get that shit nipped and tucked by a jewish doctor again. In women on the other hand angle implants need RESTRAINT okay or you make urself look like a t****y.
Subtle lateral definition and minimal vertical extension give sharpness without turning the lower face into a block. Models complicate this because fashion modeling tolerates exaggeration. Male models often have more acute angles (some n*****s are low iq and don’t even know what an acute angle is anymore if you forgot just look that shit up) than the general population sometimes bordering on unnatural, but it works because their MIDFACE is lean and their neck to jaw transition is clean. Female models with angular jaws almost always have narrow lower thirds and high cheekbones to counterbalance the sharpness. BALANCE n*****s ITS ALL ABOUT BALANCE!!! On a non model skull with thicker soft tissue copying those angles makes the face read harsh instead of editorial. The masseter muscle wraps this area, so implants that fight the natural muscle vector get clocked instantly even if people cannot explain why. It just looks off and you’ll wind up botched as shit. Humans analyze faces to a microscopic level to anticipate danger and friendliness we can tell when something’s off.
JAW (MANDIBULAR BODY) IMPLANTS
NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH MANDIBULAR ANGLE IMPLANTS THATS A PSYOP FROM THE SOMALIS TO KEEP YOU SUB5. Jaw BODY implants are about manipulating facial width to height ratio which the human brain uses as a proxy for maturity strength and in men especially dominance (johnny sins is a great example @Johnny hmu papa). The mistake people make is thinking these implants go straight sideways, when in REALITY the most aesthetic vectors move slightly n***a SLIGHTLY outeard and forward tapering as they approach the chin. Men look best when the jaw widens gradually with the widest point sitting just behind the mouth corners and never i mean NEVER exceeding the cheekbone width UNLESS the rest of the skull can support it. Once the jaw becomes wider than the zygomas, the face starts reading bottom heavy and primitive rather than powerful and you’ll STILL be sub 5 whilst looking like you SWALLOWED a ps5
JFL LOOK AT THIS JEWISH n***a
In fashion models however cus every tom dick and mtn wanna be a model, the rules bend slightly. Many male models have jaws that approach cheekbone width or even match it, but they get away with it because of extreme leanness, long necks, and low facial fat. Their ratios are not just bone based, they are soft tissue optimized (thread on soft tissue and its importance coming soon) Women benefit far more from anterior emphasis than lateral bulk. The goal is continuity, not mass, letting the jaw guide the eye smoothly toward the chin. Female models often have minimal jaw width but extremely clean mandibular lines, which creates sharpness without size. Skull base width sets the hard limit here. If the neurocranium (i fucking love this word babis) is narrow, you cannot brute force width into the mandible without creating that uncanny Minecraft character effect.
One of my favorite results of female jaw implants (done very rarely btw)
CHIN IMPLANTS
The chin is ABSURDLYYYY sensitive to millimeters and MIGHT be the most misunderstood structure in facial aesthetics as it’s always shadowed by the jaw in common conversation. It controls lower facial thirds lip posture jawline flow, and even how large the nose appears in profile. Horizontal projection is KEY. In men, the chin can align with or sit slightly ahead of the lower lip. In women, it almost always looks better slightly behind. Overshoot this and the face does not read dominant. It reads jutting, like the chin is trying to escape the skull or even WORSE you look like a random somali with an overbite (I really don’t like somalians
)Models often have chins that are TECHNICALLY under projected but visually strong because of sharp mental folds and low submental fat.
(notice how the chin is slightly under projected)
That is why copying a model chin projection number without considering tissue thickness fails. (I mention this because on reddit someone just got botched because they tried to paste angelina jolies ratios onto themselves JFLLLL BRUTAL IQPILL) Chin WIDTH also carries gender coding. Wider and squarer works for men, while women usually look better with a tapered or softly rounded chin. Vertical lengthening is where a lot of people RUINNNNN things noggas. Too much length pulls down the lower lip, ages the face, and makes expressions look strained. Many runway models actually have shorter lower thirds than average which gives that youthful androgynous edge. Implants do not move with muscle the way bone does which is why some people look fine still but uncanny when talking.
GENIOPLASTY
SLIDING GENIOPLASTY IS ONE OF MY FAVORITE AFFORDABLE SURGERIES TO FIX MULTIPLE ISSUES IN ONE SWOOP. PRECISE control over horizontal projection vertical height asymmetry correction and midline alignment in a way implants simply CANNOT. Men usually benefit from forward movement combined with mild vertical lengthening and some widening, which reinforces skeletal maturity and jaw continuity.
Women almost always look best with forward movement only, minimal vertical change, and careful tapering, because vertical length in the lower third can quickly make the face look gaunt or prematurely aged.
Many high fashion faces (anyone hhtn and above in my book) rely on genioplasty type proportions naturally. Shorter chins with strong forward projection create a compact lower third that photographs extremely well. This is why copying a male model with a long face and applying vertical chin length to a shorter face breaks and RAPES harmony. Genioplasty also changes soft tissue tension including the genioglossus (heh glossus
) muscle, which is why some people notice improved airway or jaw resting posture afterward. The tradeoff is recovery. Bone surgery does not care about your plans or your tolerance for swelling. Shit is painful and can take up to two years for swelling to fully go down.WHY SOME ETHNIC SKULLS NEED DIFFERENT VECTORS
A NIGGGA CANT GET THE SAME IMPLANTS AS A CHIGGA WHO CANT GET THR SAME IMPLANTS AS A WIGGA. Different populations have DIFFERENT baseline craniofacial architecture. Skull base width mandibular plane angle dental protrusion (sounds like something anal related) and soft tissue thickness all vary, and applying the same implant vectors universally is how people end up looking uncanny. Many African and Afro diasporic skulls already have strong anterior projection and thicker soft tissue coverage, so pure lateral expansion often looks wrong. These faces respond better to forward biased vectors that respect natural depth rather than forcing width.
East Asian skulls tend to have wider midfaces and shorter mandibular bodies, meaning excessive lateral jaw implants overpower the face. Forward and slightly downward chin movement with subtle jaw contouring usually looks far more natural. South Asian and Middle Eastern skulls often have strong nasal projection and softer jaw transitions, so sharpening angles without over widening preserves harmony.
European skulls generally tolerate width better due to longer mandibles, but even then unchecked lateral expansion creates blocky artificial faces.
@
@Nbernical @Born Superior @vampi @TonyDr@RAD@Newday @vespertine @2Beau @97baHater@acketar@apatheia @BigDihDiddy @Cat.
@homiespidy [USER=74605]@snow @Kaari @kifykify @Koji @Love @Molotongo @mus.@Orka @PingPong @pxe @Spuffy@rickydickydoodahgrimes@rovea @sigmagoy @trueceljester@Schizotypalcel @Starlet@Trilltown @spreading love@wavyheadrei @ZyzzReincarnate@Ghoultune @ibelieveinunicorns @Enrique ꗞ
@hazyfuture @Thebird @giga.mia @2based
Sincerely, AClonedTyrone
Last edited:
