Join 45,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

ltb/ltn is average

isn't mtn average because its in the middle? If people get uglier they'll still be mtn's compared to other ugly people the average doesn't just become ltn
I believe this too, but many say high LTN/B through low MTN/B is average. I’d rather just say MTN/B is exactly average.
 
isn't mtn average because its in the middle? If people get uglier they'll still be mtn's compared to other ugly people the average doesn't just become ltn
i don't think this rating scale is based on averages, it's just a general scale. but the PSL scale is, for example 4 PSL will always be average
 
it does, if mtn stayed the average then the chad in 2025 would just be a 6/10 white boy
that's not true if everyone got uglier than beauty standards will change too you cant have people looking for 8/10 partners living in a 5/10 world
 
that's not true if everyone got uglier than beauty standards will change too you cant have people looking for 8/10 partners living in a 5/10 world
8/10 partners basically don't exist, it's too rare
 
Wasn't the average created to be a median of all people? How is the "average" person below average?
 
i explained, keep up spuffy
I mean standards change. Mtn will always be average. In 2025, I think a 6/10 white guy is probably mtn or high mtn? It doesn't automatically make him a chad if he is objectively 6/10. The "standards" should reflect its pool of data.
 
I mean standards change. Mtn will always be average. In 2025, I think a 6/10 white guy is probably mtn or high mtn? It doesn't automatically make him a chad if he is objectively 6/10. The "standards" should reflect its pool of data.
6 is htn
 
Average woman is a 5, the average man is like a 2.
IMG_1811.jpeg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top